No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Attitude of tunisian psychiatry residents toward internet searches for patient informations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 August 2024
Abstract
In the age of digital information, the volume of personal information available online continues to grow. Examining patients’ online profiles has become common for various reasons especially in psychiatry, despite ethical concerns. Therefore, it is interesting to explore the attitudes of tunisian psychiatric residents in this regard.
This study aimed to identify the purposes that make psychiatry residents consult their patients’ profiles on social media and to evaluate the consequences of being friends with them or following them on the treatment course and on the doctor-patient relationship.
This was a cross-sectional descriptive study from August to September. A questionnaire on Google form was distributed to psychiatry Tunisian residents.The study evaluated the frequency and causes of patient profiles consultation on social networks, its role and impact in the doctor-patient relationship
The study population included 53 psychiatry residents with a mean age of 28 (+-5) years and a sex ratio of 0.127. Among the responders, 53 % were in their first or second year of residency. And the predominant workplace was El Razi Hospital : a university hospital.
For the frenquency of patient profiles consultation on social networks : 87% of treating psychiatrists declared consulting their patients’ profiles on social media at least once. The purposes of consulting patient’s profiles noted in our study were: looking for signs of pre-morbid functioning (n=32), looking for clinical features of the current episode (n=30). They do it also to verify the informations provided by the patient (n= 18) ,have an idea of their private lives (marital status ,employment, hobbies,..)(n=11) ,or locate a family member (n=5). It can be also out of curiosity (n=21). And this made the psychiatry residents empathetic towards the patient (n=10) .
But, in 91% of cases, patient’s permission was not taken .
Moreover, 4 of treating psychiatrists declared being friends with their patients or following their profiles on social media. Two of them regret it. The friend or follow request was an initiative from the patient, in all cases.
The attitudes of psychiatry residents regarding the consultation of patients’ profiles on social networks were not clear. However, as the boundaries of the digital doctor-patient relationship remain undefined, it is imperative to develop clear guidelines and educational resources.
None Declared
- Type
- Abstract
- Information
- European Psychiatry , Volume 67 , Special Issue S1: Abstracts of the 32nd European Congress of Psychiatry , April 2024 , pp. S576
- Creative Commons
- This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.