Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-04T03:41:45.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Applying “Consensus Design” in the Development of Psychiatric Facilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

M. Voss*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité University Medicine & St. Hedwig Hospital, Berlin, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Abstract

I will point out the important role of a thorough planning process in which all stakeholders work together starting in early phases of the design process („phase 0“) and engage in a truly interdisciplinary and iterative process throughout the entire planning phase as well as the building phase (where often ad hoc decisions have to be made in order to adjust to unforeseen circumstances).

I will examine the terms "Consensus Design" and "Evidence-Based Design" and relate them to lived reality by giving a number of examples from own experience. Here I will contrast different approaches in carrying out the planning process and demonstrate how only a truly interdisciplinary and iterative process can result in individualised and optimised therapeutic environments, strengthen identity and reduce stigmatisation.

As a support to future projects which workshop participants may be involved in, I will share some of the basic methods and tools which I have seen or used to help build and maintain this type of collaborative conversations throughout project phases.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.