Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:55:08.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anxiety and bruxist behaviour in the patients with temporomandibular joint disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

T. Badel
Affiliation:
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
S. Kocijan Lovko
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Outpatient Department, Zabok General Hospital, Zabok, Croatia
J. Panduric
Affiliation:
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
M. Marotti
Affiliation:
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinical Hospital "Sestre Milosrdnice", Zagreb, Croatia
J. Keros
Affiliation:
Department of Dental Anthropology, School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
J. Kern
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Statistics, Epidemiology and Medical Informatics, Andrija Stampar School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background and aims:

The level of anxiety depending on existing bruxist behaviour between temporomandibular joint disorder (TMJD) patients and asymptomatic volunteers was compared.

Methods:

TMJD in 40 patients (mean age 35.5, 76% women) was diagnosed using RDC/TMD Axis I and was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. The control group consisted of 25 asymptomatic volunteers (mean age 23.4, 72% women). Bruxism was diagnosed based on case history and clinical findings. The anxiety was confirmed by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).

Results:

A higher level of anxiety was determined for all examined patients (the mean score in STAI 1=38.43, STAI 2=46.10). There was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) with respect to the control group (STAI 1=34.25, STAI 2=39.00). Including only patients with determined anxiety depending on age and gender resulted in 62.5% of patients with anxiety according to the STAI 1=42.84, and 72.5% of patients with anxiety according to the STAI 2=44.20. Only 16% subjects from the control group and 40% patients had bruxism. There was a statistically significant difference in scores of both STAI tests in patients with bruxist behaviour (p<0.001). Statistically significant differences between patients with lower (1-4) and higher (5-10) degree of pain were rated on a visual-analogue scale for State-Trait Anxiety Inventory 2 (p=0.012).

Conclusions:

This study has confirmed the connection between anxiety and bruxism as one of the central etiological factors. However, patients with TMJD experience a higher level of anxiety. Patients with estimated VAS pain score ≥5 show significantly more anxiety on STAI 2 subscale.

Type
Poster Session 2: Anxiety, Stress Related, Impulse and Somatoform Disorders
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2007
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.