Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:53:15.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The adaptive decision-making, risky decision, and decision-making style of Internet gaming disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

C.-H. Ko ,
P.-W. Wang ,
T.-L. Liu ,
C.-S. Chen ,
C.-F. Yen  and
J.-Y. Yen
C.-H. Ko
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan807 Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, 812 Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, 807
P.-W. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan807
T.-L. Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan807
C.-S. Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan807 Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, 807
C.-F. Yen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan807 Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, 807
J.-Y. Yen*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan807 Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 801
*
* Corresponding author at: Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. E-mail address:[email protected] (J.-Y. Yen).
Get access

Abstract

Background:

Persistent gaming, despite acknowledgment of its negative consequences, is a major criterion for individuals with Internet gaming disorder (IGD). This study evaluated the adaptive decision-making, risky decision, and decision-making style of individuals with IGD.

Methods:

We recruited 87 individuals with IGD and 87 without IGD (matched controls). All participants underwent an interview based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th Edition) diagnostic criteria for IGD and completed an adaptive decision-making task; the Preference for Intuition and Deliberation Scale, Chen Internet Addiction Scale, and Barratt Impulsivity Scale were also assessed on the basis of the information from the diagnostic interviews.

Results:

The results demonstrated that the participants in both groups tend to make more risky choices in advantage trials where their expected value (EV) was more favorable than those of the riskless choice. The tendency to make a risky choice in advantage trials was stronger among IGD group than that among controls. Participants of both groups made more risky choices in the loss domain, a risky option to loss more versus sure loss option, than they did in the gain domain, a risky option to gain more versus sure gain. Furthermore, the participants with IGD made more risky choices in the gain domain than did the controls. Participants with IGD showed higher and lower preferences for intuitive and deliberative decision-making styles, respectively, than controls and their preferences for intuition and deliberation were positively and negatively associated with IGD severity, respectively.

Conclusions:

These results suggested that individuals with IGD have elevated EV sensitivity for decision-making. However, they demonstrated risky preferences in the gain domain and preferred an intuitive rather than deliberative decision-making style. This might explain why they continue Internet gaming despite negative consequences. Thus, therapists should focus more on decision-making styles and promote deliberative thinking processes to mitigate the long-term negative consequences of IGD.

Keywords

Internet gaming disorderDecision-makingRisk-takingIntuitive decisionDeliberative decision
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 44 , July 2017 , pp. 189 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed., Arlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petry, NMRehbein, FKo, CHO’Brien, CPInternet gaming disorder in the DSM-5. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2015; 17(9): 72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11920-015-0610-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ko, CHYen, JYChen, SHWang, PWChen, CSYen, CFEvaluation of the diagnostic criteria of Internet gaming disorder in the DSM-5 among young adults in Taiwan. J Psychiatr Res 2014; 53: 103–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.02.008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eichenbaum, AKattner, FBradford, DGentile, DAGreen, CSRole-playing and real-time strategy games associated with greater probability of Internet gaming disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2015; 18: 480–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petry, NMRehbein, FGentile, DALemmens, JSRumpf, HJMößle, T, et al.An international consensus for assessing internet gaming disorder using the new DSM-5 approach. Addiction 2014; 109: 1399–1406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hwang, JYChoi, JSGwak, ARJung, DChoi, SWLee, J, et al.Shared psychological characteristics that are linked to aggression between patients with Internet addiction and those with alcohol dependence. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2014; 13(1): 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-13-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ko, CHYen, JYYen, CFChen, CSWeng, CCChen, CCThe association between Internet addiction and problematic alcohol use in adolescents: the problem behavior model. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008; 11(5): 571–576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ko, CHYen, JYChen, CSChen, CCYen, CFPsychiatric comorbidity of internet addiction in college students: an interview study. CNS Spectr 2008; 13(2): 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yen, JYKo, CHYen, CFChen, CSChen, CCThe association between harmful alcohol use and Internet addiction among college students: comparison of personality. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2009; 63(2): 218–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1819.2009.01943.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, IPWeller, JAPederson, AAHarshman, LAAge-related differences in adaptive decision making: sensitivity to expected value in risky choice. Judgm Decis Mak 2000;72:9.Google Scholar
Ko, CHHsiao, SLiu, GCYen, JYYang, MJYen, CFThe characteristics of decision making, potential to take risks, and personality of college students with Internet addiction. Psychiatry Res 2010; 175: 121–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yao, YWChen, PRLi, SWang, LJZhang, JTYip, SW, et al.Decision-making for risky gains and losses among college students with Internet gaming disorder. PLoS One 2015;10:e0116471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glimcher, PUnderstanding the hows and whys of decision-making: from expected utility to divisive normalization. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2014; 79: 169–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yao, YWChen, PRChen, CWang, LJZhang, JTXue, G, et al.Failure to utilize feedback causes decision-making deficits among excessive Internet gamers. Psychiatry Res 2014; 219: 583–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yao, YWWang, LJYip, SWChen, PRLi, SXu, J, et al.Impaired decision-making under risk is associated with gaming-specific inhibition deficits among college students with Internet gaming disorder. Psychiatry Res 2015; 229: 302–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, DTversky, AProspect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979;47:30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, DA perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol 2003; 58: 697–720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brevers, DBechara, ACleeremans, AKornreich, CVerbanck, PNoel, XImpaired decision-making under risk in individuals with alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2014; 38(7): 1924–1931. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.12447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Appelt, KCMilch, KFHandgraaf, MJJWeber, EUThe decision making individual differences inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research. Judgm Decis Mak 2011;6:11.Google Scholar
Betsch, CPräferenz für Intuition und Deliberation. Inventar zur Erfassung von affekt- und kognitionsbasiertem Entscheiden Preference for intuition and deliberation (PID). An inventory for assessing affect- and cognition-based decision-making Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 2004; 25: 179–197.Google Scholar
Wiers, RWBartholow, BDvan den Wildenberg, EThush, CEngels, RCSher, KJ, et al.Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: a review and a model. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2007; 86: 263–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yen, JYYen, CFChen, CSTang, TCHuang, THKo, CHCue-induced positive motivational implicit response in young adults with Internet gaming addiction. Psychiatry Res 2011; 190: 282–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robbins, TWClark, LBehavioral addictions. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2015; 30: 66–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2014.09.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ding, WNSun, JHSun, YWChen, XZhou, YZhuang, ZG, et al.Trait impulsivity and impaired prefrontal impulse inhibition function in adolescents with internet gaming addiction revealed by a Go/No-Go fMRI study. Behav Brain Funct 2014;10:20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-10-20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ko, CHHsieh, TJWang, PWLin, WCYen, CFChen, CS, et al.Altered gray matter density and disrupted functional connectivity of the amygdala in adults with Internet gaming disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2015; 57: 185–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.11.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petry, NMRehbein, FGentile, DALemmens, JSRumpf, HJMossle, T, et al.An international consensus for assessing internet gaming disorder using the new DSM-5 approach. Addiction 2014; 109(9): 1399–1406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.12457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentile, DAChoo, HLiau, ASim, TLi, DFung, D, et al.Pathological video game use among youths: a two-year longitudinal study. Pediatrics 2011;127(2):e319–e329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayard, SRaffard, SGely-Nargeot, MCDo facets of self-reported impulsivity predict decision-making under ambiguity and risk? Evidence from a community sample. Psychiatry Res 2011;190(2–3):322–326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.06.013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ko, CHHsieh, TJWang, PWLin, WCYen, CFChen, CS, et al.Altered gray matter density and disrupted functional connectivity of the amygdala in adults with Internet gaming disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2015; 57: 185–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheehan, DVLecrubier, YSheehan, KHAmorim, PJanavs, JWeiller, E, et al.The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59(Suppl. 20):22–33 [quiz 34-57].Google ScholarPubMed
Patton, JHStanford, MSBarratt, ESFactor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol 1995; 51: 768–774.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanford, MSMathias, CWDougherty, DMLake, SLAnderson, NEPatton, JHFifty years of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale: an update and review. Pers Individ Dif 2009; 47: 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, CSChen, SHObsessive-compulsiveness and impulsivity in a non-clinical population of adolescent males and females. Psychiatry Res 2007; 149: 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betsch, TThe nature of intuition and its neglect in research on judgment and decision making. In: Plessner, HBetsch, CBetsch, T, editors. Intuition in judgment and decision making. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007. p. 3–22.Google Scholar
Ko, CHYen, JYYen, CFChen, CCYen, CNChen, SHScreening for Internet addiction: an empirical study on cut-off points for the Chen Internet Addiction Scale. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2005; 21: 545–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brevers, DCleeremans, AGoudriaan, AEBechara, AKornreich, CVerbanck, P, et al.Decision making under ambiguity but not under risk is related to problem gambling severity. Psychiatry Res 2012;200(2–3):568–574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2012.03.053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, LAverbeck, BPayer, DSescousse, GWinstanley, CAXue, GPathological choice: the neuroscience of gambling and gambling addiction. J Neurosci 2013; 33(45): 17617–17623. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3231-13.2013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mengarelli, FMoretti, LFaralla, VVindras, PSirigu, AEconomic decisions for others: an exception to loss aversion law. PLoS One 2014;9:e85042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paulsen, DJCarter, RMPlatt, MLHuettel, SABrannon, EMNeurocognitive development of risk aversion from early childhood to adulthood. Front Hum Neurosci 2011;5:178. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00178.Google ScholarPubMed
Depue, BEOlson-Madden, JHSmolker, HRRajamani, MBrenner, LABanich, MTReduced amygdala volume is associated with deficits in inhibitory control: a voxel- and surface-based morphometric analysis of comorbid PTSD/mild TBI. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:691505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ko, CHHsieh, TJChen, CYYen, CFChen, CSYen, JY, et al.Altered brain activation during response inhibition and error processing in subjects with Internet gaming disorder: a functional magnetic imaging study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2014; 264(8): 661–672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00406-013-0483-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruglanski, AWGigerenzer, GIntuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychol Rev 2011; 118: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Hemel-Ruiter, MEde Jong, PJWiers, RWAppetitive and regulatory processes in young adolescent drinkers. Addict Behav 2011; 36: 18–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ko, CHWang, PWLiu, TLYen, CFChen, CSYen, JYThe inhibition of proactive interference among adults with Internet gaming disorder. Asia Pac Psychiatry 2015; 7: 143–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terracciano, ACosta, PT Jr.Smoking and the Five-Factor Model of personality. Addiction 2004; 99: 472–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canale, NVieno, AGriffiths, MDRubaltelli, ESantinello, MTrait urgency and gambling problems in young people by age: the mediating role of decision-making processes. Addict Behav 2015; 46: 39–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.02.020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClure, SMBickel, WKA dual-systems perspective on addiction: contributions from neuroimaging and cognitive training. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2014; 1327: 62–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Til, JADolan, JGStiggelbout, AMGroothuis, KCIjzerman, MJThe use of multi-criteria decision analysis weight elicitation techniques in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a pilot study. Patient 2008; 1(2): 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regier, PSRedish, ADContingency management and deliberative decision-making processes. Front Psychiatry 2015;6:76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.