Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:21:49.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Validation of the WHO Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL-100) in a population of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Erik D. Masthoff ,
Fons J. Trompenaars ,
Guus L. Van Heck ,
Paul P. Hodiamont  and
Jolanda De Vries
Erik D. Masthoff*
Affiliation:
Stichting GGZ Midden Brabant, P.O. Box 770, 5000 AT Tilburg, The Netherlands
Fons J. Trompenaars
Affiliation:
Stichting GGZ Midden Brabant, P.O. Box 770, 5000 AT Tilburg, The Netherlands
Guus L. Van Heck
Affiliation:
Department Psychology and Health, Tilburg University, LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
Paul P. Hodiamont
Affiliation:
Stichting GGZ Midden Brabant, P.O. Box 770, 5000 AT Tilburg, The Netherlands Department Psychology and Health, Tilburg University, LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
Jolanda De Vries
Affiliation:
Department Psychology and Health, Tilburg University, LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +31-135808080. E-mail address: [email protected] (E.D. Masthoff).
Get access

Abstract

Background

Research concerning the psychometric properties of the WHO Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL-100) in general populations of psychiatric outpatients has not been performed systematically.

Aims

To examine the content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the WHOQOL-100 in a general population of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients.

Method

A total of 533 psychiatric outpatients entered the study (438 randomly selected, 85 internally referred). Participants completed self-administered questionnaires for measuring quality of life (WHOQOL-100), psychopathological symptoms (SCL-90), and perceived social support (PSSS). In addition, they underwent two semi-structured interviews in order to obtain Axis-I and Axis-II diagnoses, according to DSM-IV.

Results

The drop-out percentage was low (7.1%). Of the 24 facets of the WHOQOL-100, 22 had a good distribution of scores, leaving out the facets physical environment and transport. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a four-factor structure, which was similar to earlier findings in patients with specific somatic diseases and depressive disorders. Various—a priori expected—positive and negative correlations were found between facets and domains of the WHOQOL-100, and dimensions of the SCL-90 and the PSSS-score, indicating good construct validity of the WHOQOL-100. The internal consistency of all facets and the four domains of the WHOQOL-100 was good (Cronbach’s alpha’s ranging from 0.62 to 0.93 and 0.64 to 0.84, respectively). Sparse and relatively low correlations were found between demographic characteristics (age and sex) and WHOQOL-100 scores.

Conclusions

Content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the WHOQOL-100 in a population of adult Dutch psychiatric outpatients are good. The WHOQOL-100 appears to be a suitable instrument for measuring quality of life in adult psychiatric outpatients.

Keywords

Quality of lifeWHOQOL-100Psychiatric outpatients
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 20 , Issue 7 , November 2005 , pp. 465 - 473

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, G.Peters, L.Guzman, A.M.Bird, K.A comparison of the two structured diagnostic interviews: CIDI and SCAN. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 1995; 29: 124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angermeyer, M.C.Holzinger, A.Matschinger, H.Stengler-Wenzke, K.Depression and quality of life: results of a follow-up study. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 2002; 48: 189–199CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arrindell, W.A.Ettema, J.H.M.SCL-90 manual for a multidimensional indicator of psycho-pathology. [In Dutch: SCL-90: handleiding bij een multidimensionele psychopathologie-indicator] Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1986.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, J.A.Burg, M.M.Barefoot, J.Williams, R.B.Haney, T.Zimet, G.Social support, type A behavior, and coronary artery disease. Psychosom. Med. 1987; 49: 331–340CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonicatto, S.C.Dew, M.A.Zaratiegui, R.Lorenzo, L.Pecina, P.Adult outpatients with depression: worse quality of life than in other chronic medical diseases in Argentina. Soc. Sci. Med. 2001; 52: 911–919CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonomi, A.E.Patrick, D.L.Bushnell, D.M.Martin, M.Validation of the United States’ version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2000; 53: 1–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breslin, S.Quality of life: how is it measured and defined? Urol. Int. 1991; 46: 246–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullinger, M.Anderson, R.Cella, D.Aaronson, N.K.Developing and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models. Qual. Life Res. 1993; 2: 451–459CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattell, R.B.The Scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav. Res. 1966; 1: 141–161CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derogatis, L.R.Lipman, R.S.Covi, L.SCL-90, an outpatient psychiatric rating scale. Psychopharmacol. Bull. 1973; 9: 13–28Google ScholarPubMed
De Vries, J.Van Heck, G.L.The Dutch version of the WHOQOL-100. [In Dutch: De Nederlandse versie van de WHOQOL-100] Tilburg: Tilburg University; 1995.Google Scholar
De Vries J. Beyond health status. Construction and validation of the Dutch WHO Quality of Life assessment instrument. Doctoral thesis. Tilburg: Tilburg University, 1996.Google Scholar
De Vries, J.Van Heck, G.L.The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL-100): validation study with the Dutch version. Eur J Psychol Assess 1997; 13: 164–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, J.The perceived social support scale, Dutch version Tilburg: Tilburg University; 1998.Google Scholar
De Vries, J.Van Heck, G.L.Drent, M.Gender differences in sarcoidosis: symptoms, quality of life, and medical consumption. Women Health 1999; 30: 99–114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Vries, J.Seebregts, A.Drent, M.Assessing health status and quality of life in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: which measure should be used? Respir. Med. 2000; 94: 273–278CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckermann, L.Gendering indicators of health and well-being: is quality of life gender neutral? Social Indicators Res 2000; 52: 29–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evers, A.Van, VlietMulder, J.C.Groot, C.J.SCL-90, 1981/1986. Documentation of tests and testresearch in the Netherlands [In Dutch: Documentatie van tests en testresearch in Nederland] Assen: Van Gorcum; 2000.Google Scholar
First, M.B.Spitzer, R.L.Gibbon, M.Williams, J.B.W.The structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis-II disorders Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1997.Google Scholar
Giel, R.Nienhuis, F.J.SCAN-2.1: schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry [In Dutch: Vragenschema’s voor klinische beoordeling in neuropsychiatrie]. Division of Mental Health/Groningen; University of Groningen, Division of Social Psychiatry Geneva: WHO; 1996.Google Scholar
Hays, R.D.Stewart, A.L.Sherbourne, C.D.Marshall, G.N.The ‘states of weights’ dilemma in quality of life measurement. Qual. Life Res. 1993; 2: 167–168CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, C.D.Jono, R.T.Stanton, B.A.Stroup-Benham, C.A.The measurement of health-related quality of life: major dimensions identified by factor analysis. Soc. Sci. Med. 1990; 31: 25–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katschnig, H.Krautgartner, M.Quality of life: a new dimension in mental health care. In: Sartorius, N.Gaebel, W.Lopez-Ibor, J.J.Maj, M.eds. Psychiatry in society Chichester: Wiley; 2002.171191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuyken, W.Orley, J.Hudelson, P.Sartorius, N.Quality of life assessment across cultures. Int. J. Ment. Health 1994; 23: 5–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laman, H.Lankhorst, G.J.Subjective weightings of disability: an approach to quality of life assessment in rehabilitation. Disab. Rehab. 1994; 16: 198–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maffei, C.Fossati, A.Agostoni, I.Barraco, A.Bagnato, M.Deborah, D., et al.Interrater reliability and internal consistency of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID-II), version 2.0. J. Personal. Disord. 1997; 11: 279–284CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, C.B.Rehm, J.Üstün, B.Grant, B.Chatterji, S.Factor structures for DSM-IV substance disorder criteria endorsed by alcohol, cannabis, cocaine and opiate users: results from the WHO reliability and validity study. Addiction 1999; 94: 843–855CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Power, M.Bullinger, M.Harper, A.The WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100: tests of the universality of quality of life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide. Health Psychol. 1999; 18: 495–505CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rijnders, C.Van den Berg, J.F.M.Hodiamont, P.P.G.Nienhuis, F.J.Furer, J.W.Mulder, J., et al.Psychometric properties of the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN-2.1). Soc. Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2000; 35: 348–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartorius, N.Kuyken, W.Translation of health status instruments. In: Orley, J.Kuyken, W.eds.Quality of life assessment: international perspectives Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1994.Google Scholar
Skevington, S.M.Bradshaw, J.Saxena, S.Selecting national items for the WHOQOL: conceptual and psychometric considerations. Soc. Sci. Med. 1999; 48: 473–487CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skevington, S.M.Carse, M.S.Williams, A.C.Validation of the WHOQOL-100: pain management improves quality of life for chronic pain patients. Clin. J. Pain. 2001; 17: 264–275CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skevington, S.M.Wright, A.Changes in the quality of life of patients receiving antidepressant medication in primary care: validation of the WHOQOL-100. Br. J. Psychiatry 2001; 178: 261–267CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R.L.Williams, J.B.W.Gibbon, M.First, M.B.Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (SCID-II) Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1990.Google Scholar
Van Nieuwenhuizen GJ. Quality of life of persons with severe mental illness: an instrument. Doctoral thesis. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers, 1998.Google Scholar
Weertman, A.Arntz, A.Kerkhofs, M.L.M.The structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis-II disorders [In Dutch: Gestructureerd Klinisch Interview voor DSM-IV As-II Persoonlijkheidsstoornissen] Maastricht University: Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger; 2000.Google Scholar
WHOQOL Group The development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment instrument (the WHOQOL). In: Orley, J.Kuyken, W.eds. Quality of life assessment: international perspectives Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1994.4160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHOQOL Group The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc. Sci. Med. 1998; 46: 1569–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHOQOL Group Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life assessment. Psychol. Med. 1998; 28: 551–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.I.Ready, set, stop: reflections on assessing quality of life and the WHOQOL-100 (US version). J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2000; 53: 13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wing, J.K.Babor, T.Brugha, T.Burke, J.Cooper, J.Giel, R., et al.Schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1990; 47: 589–593CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, J.K.Sartorius, N.Üstün, T.B.Diagnosis and clinical measurement in psychiatry, a reference manual for SCAN Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.