Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:51:57.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The SATISPSY-22: Development and validation of a French hospitalized patients’ satisfaction questionnaire in psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

X.Y. Zendjidjian ,
P. Auquier ,
C. Lançon ,
A. Loundou ,
N. Parola ,
M. Faugère  and
L. Boyer
X.Y. Zendjidjian*
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille University, EA 3279–Public Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life – Research Unit13005Marseille, France Department of Psychiatry, La Conception University Hospital13005Marseille, France
P. Auquier
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille University, EA 3279–Public Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life – Research Unit13005Marseille, France
C. Lançon
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille University, EA 3279–Public Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life – Research Unit13005Marseille, France Department of Psychiatry, Sainte-Marguerite University Hospital13009Marseille, France
A. Loundou
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille University, EA 3279–Public Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life – Research Unit13005Marseille, France
N. Parola
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Sainte-Marguerite University Hospital13009Marseille, France
M. Faugère
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Sainte-Marguerite University Hospital13009Marseille, France
L. Boyer
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille University, EA 3279–Public Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life – Research Unit13005Marseille, France
*
*Corresponding author. EA 3279 – Self-Perceived Health Assessment Research Unit, School of Medicine, La Timone University, 13005 Marseille, France. Tel.: +33 6 76 78 13 83; fax: +33 4 91 43 51 15. E-mail address: [email protected] (X. Zendjidjian).
Get access

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of our study was to develop a specific French self-administered instrument for measuring hospitalized patients’ satisfaction in psychiatry based on exclusive patient point of view: the SATISPSY-22.

Methods:

The development of the SATISPSY was undertaken in three steps: item generation, item reduction, and validation. The content of the SATISPSY was derived from 80 interviews with patients hospitalized in psychiatry. Using item response and classical test theories, item reduction was performed in 2 hospitals on 270 responders. The validation was based on construct validity, reliability, and some aspects of external validity.

Results:

The SATISPSY contains 22 items describing 6 dimensions (staff, quality of care, personal experience, information, activity, and food). The six-factor structure accounted for 78.0% of the total variance. Each item achieved the 0.40 standard for item-internal consistency, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficients were > 0.70. Scores of dimensions were strongly positively correlated with Visual Analogue Scale scores. Significant associations with socioeconomic and clinical indicators showed good discriminant and external validity. INFIT statistics were ranged from 0.71 to 1.25.

Conclusions:

The SATISPSY-22 presents satisfactory psychometric properties, enabling patient feedback to be incorporated in a continuous quality health care improvement strategy.

Keywords

SatisfactionInpatientQuestionnaireValidityPsychometricsPsychiatry
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 172 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antoniotti, S, Baumstarck-Barrau, K, Simeoni, MC, Sapin, C, Labarere, J, Gerbaud, L, et al.Validation of a French hospitalized patients’ satisfaction questionnaire: the QSH-45. Int J Qual Health Care 2009; 21: 243–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asadi-Lari, M, Tamburini, M, Gray, D. Patients’ needs, satisfaction, and health related quality of life: towards a comprehensive model. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auquier, P, Pernoud, N, Bruder, N, Simeoni, MC, Auffray, JP, Colavolpe, C, et al.Development and validation of a perioperative satisfaction questionnaire. Anesthesiology 2005; 102: 1116–1123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avis, M. Incorporating patients’ voices in the audit process. Qual Health Care 1997; 6: 86–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, DA, Shergill, SS, Higginson, I, Orrell, MW. Patients’ views towards care received from psychiatrists. Br J Psychiatry 1996; 168: 641–646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barlesi, F, Boyer, L, Doddoli, C, Antoniotti, S, Thomas, P, Auquier, P. The place of patient satisfaction in quality assessment of lung cancer thoracic surgery. Chest 2005; 128: 3475–3481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumstarck, K, Boyer, L, Boucekine, M, Michel, P, Pelletier, J, Auquier, P. Measuring the quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis in clinical practice: a necessary challenge. Mult Scler Int 2013; 2013: 524894.Google ScholarPubMed
Bjorngaard, JH, Ruud, T, Friis, S. The impact of mental illness on patient satisfaction with the therapeutic relationship: a multilevel analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2007; 42: 803–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blais, MA, Matthews, J, Lipkis-Orlando, R, O’Keefe, SM, Jacobo, M, Rivas-Vazquez, RA, et al.Development and application of a brief multi-faceted tool for evaluating inpatient psychiatric care. Adm Policy Ment Health 2002; 30: 159–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyer, L, Francois, P, Doutre, E, Weil, G, Labarere, J. Perception and use of the results of patient satisfaction surveys by care providers in a French teaching hospital. Int J Qual Health Care 2006; 18: 359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, L, Baumstarck-Barrau, K, Cano, N, Zendjidjian, X, Belzeaux, R, Limousin, S, et al.Assessment of psychiatric inpatient satisfaction: a systematic review of self-reported instruments. Eur Psychiatry 2009; 24: 540–549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyer, L, Maurel, O, Stingre, D, Samuelian, JC. Hospital reform and public psychiatry. Encephale 2009; 35: 203–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyer, L, Dassa, D, Samuelian, JC, Lancon, C. Questions about the future French mental health finance. Encephale 2011; 37: 1–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyer, L, Baumstarck, K, Boucekine, M, Blanc, J, Lancon, C, Auquier, P. Measuring quality of life in patients with schizophrenia: an overview. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2013; 13: 343–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyer, L, Lancon, C, Baumstarck, K, Parola, N, Berbis, J, Auquier, P. Evaluating the impact of a quality of life assessment with feedback to clinicians in patients with schizophrenia: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2013; 202: 447–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Britten, N. Qualitative interviews in medical research. BMJ 1995; 311: 251–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, DT, Fiske, DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 1959; 56: 81–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cano, N, Boyer, L, Garnier, C, Michel, A, Belzeaux, R, Chabannes, JM, et al.Patients’ perception of seclusion in psychiatry: ethical perspectives. Encephale 2011; 37 Suppl. 1: S4–S10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cano, N, Boyer, L, Wawrzyniak, F.-S., Marciano, V, Vedie, C, Fournier, M, et al.Patients’ perception of hospitalization in psychiatry: ethical perspectives. Ann Med Psychol 2013; 171-8518–523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2012.08.021.Google Scholar
Carey, RG, Seibert, JH. A patient survey system to measure quality improvement: questionnaire reliability and validity. Med Care 1993; 31: 834–845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chue, P. The relationship between patient satisfaction and treatment outcomes in schizophrenia. J Psychopharmacol 2006; 20: 38–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleary, PD, McNeil, BJ. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry 1988; 25: 25–36.Google ScholarPubMed
Crocker, L, Algina, JIntroduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1986.Google Scholar
Crow, R, Gage, H, Hampson, S, Hart, J, Kimber, A, Storey, L, et al.The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 2002; 6: 1–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, KR, Laine, C, Farber, NJ, Nelson, EC, Davidoff, F. Patients’ perceptions of office medical practice: judging quality through the patients’ eyes. Am J Med Qual 1996; 11: 73–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J, Rose, D, Flach, C, Csipke, E, Glossop, H, McCrone, P, et al.VOICE: developing a new measure of service users’ perceptions of inpatient care, using a participatory methodology. J Ment Health 2012; 21: 57–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzpatrick, R. Surveys of patients satisfaction: I – important general considerations. BMJ 1991; 302: 887–889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gigantesco, A, Morosini, R, Bazzoni, A. Quality of psychiatric care: validation of an instrument for measuring inpatient opinion. Int J Qual Health Care 2003; 15: 73–78CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guy, WECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1976.Google Scholar
Hall, JA, Dornan, MC. Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 1990; 30: 811–818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansson, L, Bjorkman, T, Svensson, B. The assessment of needs in psychiatric patients. Interrater reliability of the Swedish version of the Camberwell Assessment of Needs instrument and results from a cross-sectional study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1995; 92: 285–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haute Autorité de santé. http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/r_1439924/fr/manuel-de-certification-des-etablissements-de-sante-v2010-revise-avril-2011. 2011Google Scholar
Holcomb, WR, Adams, NA, Ponder, HM, Reitz, R. The development and construct validation of a consumer satisfaction questionnaire for psychiatric inpatients. Eval Program Plan 1989; 12: 189–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juniper, EF, Guyatt, GH, Mesbah, M, Ravaud, PQuality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996.Google Scholar
Kahn, KL, Liu, H, Adams, JL, Chen, WP, Tisnado, DM, Carlisle, DM, et al.Methodological challenges associated with patient responses to follow-up longitudinal surveys regarding quality of care. Health Serv Res 2003; 38: 1579–1598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaiser, HF, Caffrey, J. Alpha Factor Analysis. Psychometrika 1965; 30: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinnersley, P, Stott, N, Peters, T, Harvey, I, Hackett, P. A comparison of methods for measuring patient satisfaction with consultations in primary care. Fam Pract 1996; 13: 41–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laine, C, Davidoff, F. Patient-centered medicine. A professional evolution. JAMA 1996; 275: 152–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laine, C, Davidoff, F, Lewis, CE, Nelson, EC, Nelson, E, Kessler, RC, et al.Important elements of outpatient care: a comparison of patients’ and physicians’ opinions. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125: 640–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, AS, Plume, SK, Nelson, EC. Transforming patient feedback into strategic action plans. Qual Manag Health Care 1997; 5: 28–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, L, Sibbald, B, Hoare, C. Measuring patient satisfaction with life in a long-stay psychiatric hospital. Int J Soc Psychiatry 1988; 34: 292–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehan, T, Bergen, H, Stedman, T. Monitoring consumer satisfaction with inpatient service delivery: the Inpatient Evaluation of Service Questionnaire. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2002; 36: 807–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nair, K, Dolovich, L, Cassels, A, McCormack, J, Levine, M, Gray, J, et al.What patients want to know about their medications. Focus group study of patient and clinician perspectives. Can Fam Physician. 2002; 48: 104–110.Google ScholarPubMed
Nordon, C, Falissard, B, Gerard, S, Angst, J, Azorin, JM, Luquiens, A, et al.Patient satisfaction with psychotropic drugs: validation of the PAtient SAtisfaction with Psychotropic (PASAP) scale in patients with bipolar disorder. Eur Psychiatry 2013.Google ScholarPubMed
Nunnaly, JC, Bernstein, ICPsychometric theory. New York: Mc Graw-Hill; 1994.Google Scholar
Peytremann-Bridevaux, I, Scherer, F, Peer, L, Cathieni, F, Bonsack, C, Cleopas, A, et al.Satisfaction of patients hospitalised in psychiatric hospitals: a randomised comparison of two psychiatric-specific and one generic satisfaction questionnaires. BMC Health Serv Res 2006; 6: 108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rat, AC, Pouchot, J, Guillemin, F, Baumann, M, Retel-Rude, N, Spitz, E, et al.Content of quality-of-life instruments is affected by item-generation methods. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19: 390–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruggeri, M, Lasalvia, A, Salvi, G, Cristofalo, D, Bonetto, C, Tansella, M. Applications and usefulness of routine measurement of patients’ satisfaction with community-based mental health care. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 2007; 53–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saphora-psy. http://www.ccecqa.asso.fr/projets/saphora-psy. 2010.Google Scholar
Silverman, DDoing Qualitative Research. A Practical Handbook 2nd ed.. London: SAGE Publications; 2005.Google Scholar
Slevin, ML, Plant, H, Lynch, D, Drinkwater, J, Gregory, WM. Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?. Br J Cancer 1988; 57: 109–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ware, JE Jr., Davies, AR. Behavioral consequences of consumer dissatisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plann 1983; 6: 291–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki 6th Revision. Edinburgh: 2008.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.