Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:30:21.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Promotion of mindfulness in psychotherapists in training: Preliminary study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Ludwig Grepmair ,
Ferdinand Mitterlehner ,
Thomas Loew  and
Marius Nickel
Ludwig Grepmair
Affiliation:
Psychotherapeutic Teaching Institute, Regensburg, Germany
Ferdinand Mitterlehner
Affiliation:
Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine, Inntalklinik, Simbach am Inn, Germany
Thomas Loew
Affiliation:
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Clinic, Regensburg, Germany
Marius Nickel*
Affiliation:
Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Graz, Bad Aussee, Austria University Clinic for Psychiatry 1, PMU, Salzburg, Austria
*
*Corresponding author. Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Graz, Sommersbergseestr. 395, 8990 Bad Aussee, Austria. Tel.: +43 3622 521003203. E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Nickel).
Get access

Abstract

This study examined whether the promotion of mindfulness in psychotherapists in training can influence the treatment results of their patients. The therapeutic course and treatment results of 196 inpatients, who were treated during a nine week period by nine psychotherapists in training, were compared: in the first phase of the study, the treatment group without (CG, historical control group, n = 55), and in the second phase the treatment group with, (MFG, n = 58) therapists who were currently practicing Zen meditation. The results of treatment were examined (according to the intent-to-treat principle) with the Session Questionnaire for General and Differential Individual Psychotherapy (STEP), the Questionnaire of Changes in Experience and Behaviour (VEV) and the Symptom Checklist (SCL-90-R), and showed significantly better results in the MFG.

Keywords

MindfulnessZEN meditationPsychotherapists in training
Type
Short communication
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 22 , Issue 8 , November 2007 , pp. 485 - 489
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier Masson SAS 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, H., Prescott, R.Applied mixed models in medicine. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.Google Scholar
Craig, P.E.Sanctuary and presence: an existential view on the therapist's contribution. Human Psychologist 1986;14:22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R.M.Mindful practice. Journal of the American Medical Association 1999;282:833–839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heidenreich, T., Michalak, J.Achtsamkeit (“mindfulness”) als therapieprinzip in verhaltenstherapie und verhaltensmedizin [mindfulness as a therapeutic principle in behavioral therapy and behavioral medicine]. Verhaltenstherapie 2003;13:264–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabat-Zinn, J.Full catastrophe living. New York: Delta: New York; 1990.Google Scholar
Kabat-Zinn, J.Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 2003;10:144–156.Google Scholar
Krampen, G., Petry, J.Kurzinstrumente für die prozessevaluation und adaptative indikation in der psychotherapie [short instruments for process evaluation and adaptive indication in psychotherapy]. Goettingen: Hogrefe 2002.Google Scholar
Levis, J.M.Thirty years of teaching psychotherapy skills. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 1991;41:419–432.Google Scholar
Lesh, T.V.Zen meditation and the development of empathy in counselors. Journal of Human Psychology 1970;10:39–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, S.H., Teasdale, J.D.Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: replication and exploration of differential relapse prevention effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2004;72:31–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakagawa, F.S.Zen – weil wir menschen sind [Zen – because we are humans]. Berlin: Theseus; 1997.Google Scholar
Peveler, R.C., Fairburn, C.G.Measurement of neurotic symptoms by self-report questionnaire: validity of SCL-90-R. Psychological Medicine 1990;20:873–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro, J.C., Bates, D.M.Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer; 2001.Google Scholar
Reibel, D.K., Greeson, J.M., Brainard, G.C., Rosenzweig, S.Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health-related quality of life in a heterogenous patient population. General Hospital Psychiatry 2001;23:183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, S.L., Schwartz, G.E., Bonner, G.Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on medical and premedical students. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 1998;21:581–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, R.J.Images of mindfulness. Journal of Social Issues 2000;56:112–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, J.Applied multivariate statistics for the social science. New Jersey: Erlbaum; 1992.Google Scholar
Williams, K.A., Kolar, M.M., Reger, B.E., Pearson, J.C.Evaluation of a wellness-based. Mindfulness stress reduction intervention: a controlled trial. American Journal of Health Promotion 2001;15:422–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zielke, M., Kopf-Mehnert, C.Der Veränderungsfragebogen des erlebens und verhaltens (VEV) [the questionnaire on change in experience and behavior (VEV)]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 1980;1:43–55.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.