Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T07:23:57.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Norwegian version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview: Feasibility, acceptability and test-retest reliability in an acute psychiatric ward

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

J. Mordal ,
Ø. Gundersen  and
J.G. Bramness
J. Mordal*
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Department, Lovisenberg Deaconal Hospital, N-0440Oslo, Norway
Ø. Gundersen
Affiliation:
University Hospital of North Norway, Pb 84, N-9038Tromsø, Norway
J.G. Bramness
Affiliation:
Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Kirkeveien 166, N-0407Oslo, Norway Division of Epidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, N-0403Oslo, Norway
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (J. Mordal).
Get access

Abstract

Objective

To assess the feasibility, patient and clinician acceptability and test-retest reliability of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) used by non-psychiatrists in an acute psychiatric ward.

Method

Of 268 consecutive patients included in a cross-sectional study, 176 (66%) completed MINI, and were compared to patients not interviewed. Patients and clinicians were questioned about the interview, using Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). For 38 patients, test-retest reliability was assessed with Cohen's kappa and observed agreement.

Results

MINI was not feasible for all patients. Among factors associated with not being interviewed were early discharge, psychosis, substance use and involuntary admissions. Although evaluations by patients and clinicians completing the postinterview questionnaire varied, MINI was generally perceived as being useful and feasible. Psychotic symptoms were associated with a less positive experience with MINI for both patients and clinicians. In the test-retest analyses, kappa values indicated excellent agreement for six diagnoses, fair to good for six and poor for seven, whereas observed agreement was 75% or above for all disorders.

Conclusion

Among patients admitted to an acute psychiatric ward willing and able to complete the interview, MINI was well accepted by patients and clinicians, and has moderately good test-retest reliability.

Keywords

MINIStructured diagnosisPsychiatric inpatientsFeasibilityAcceptabilityReliability
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , April 2010 , pp. 172 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier Masson SAS 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basco, MR, Bostic, JQ, Davies, D, Rush, AJ, Witte, B, Hendrickse, Wet al.Methods to improve diagnostic accuracy in a community mental health setting. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157:1599–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endicott, JGood diagnoses require good diagnosticians: collecting and integrating the data. Am J Med Genet A 2001;105:48–49.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endicott, J, Spitzer, RL, Fleiss, JL, Cohen, JThe global assessment scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976;33:766–771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gift, AGVisual analogue scales: measurement of subjective phenomena. Nurs Res 1989;38:286–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hripcsak, G, Heitjan, DFMeasuring agreement in medical informatics reliability studies. J Biomed Inform 2002;35:99–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kadri, N, Agoub, M, El Gnaoui, S, Alami, KM, Hergueta, T, Moussaoui, DMoroccan colloquial Arabic version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): qualitative and quantitative validation. Eur Psychiatry 2005;20:193–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, SR, Fiszbein, A, Opler, LAThe Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1987;13:261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecrubier, Y, Sheehan, DV, Weiller, E, Amorim, P, Bonora, I, Sheehan, KHet al.The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. Eur Psychiatry 1997;12:224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, PB, Baker, FMThe reliability of psychiatric diagnosis in the emergency room. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1985;36:291–293.Google ScholarPubMed
Miller, PRInpatient diagnostic assessments: 3. Causes and effects of diagnostic imprecision. Psychiatry Res 2002;111:191–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, PR, Dasher, R, Collins, R, Griffiths, P, Brown, FInpatient diagnostic assessments: 1. Accuracy of structured vs. unstructured interviews. Psychiatry Res 2001;105:255–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Available at https://www.medical-outcomes.com/HTMLFiles/MINI/MINI.htm. [cited 6 February 2009].Google Scholar
Norwegian version of Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Available at http://www.helsebiblioteket.no/Psykisk+helse [cited 6 February 2009].Google Scholar
Otsubo, T, Tanaka, K, Koda, R, Shinoda, J, Sano, N, Tanaka, Set al.Reliability and validity of Japanese version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2005;59:517–526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinninti, NR, Madison, H, Musser, E, Rissmiller, DMINI-International Neuropsychiatric Schedule: clinical utility and patient acceptance. Eur Psychiatry 2003;18:361–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, A, Alberio, R, Porta, A, Sandri, M, Tansella, M, Amaddeo, FThe reliability of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview–Italian version. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2004;24:561–563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruud, T, Gråwe, R, Hatling, T Akuttpsykiatrisk behandling i Norge - resultater fra en multisenterstudie. SINTEF Health, Oslo, Norway, October 2006. Available at http://www.sintef.no/upload/Helse/Psykisk%20helse/Pdf-filer/MAPWeb.pdf [cited 6 February 2009].Google Scholar
Sheehan, DV, Lecrubier, Y, Sheehan, KH, Amorim, P, Janavs, J, Weiller, Eet al.The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59:22–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Sheehan, DV, Lecrubier, Y, Sheehan, KH, Janavs, J, Weiller, E, Keskiner, Aet al.The validity of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) according to the SCID-P and its reliability. Eur Psychiatry 1997;12:232–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrout, PE, Spitzer, RL, Fleiss, JLQuantification of agreement in psychiatric diagnosis revisited. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987;44:172–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tucker, GJPutting DSM-IV in perspective. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:159–161.Google Scholar
Way, BB, Allen, MH, Mumpower, JL, Stewart, TR, Banks, SMInterrater agreement among psychiatrist in psychiatric emergency assessments. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:1423–1428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, M, Mattia, JIPsychiatric diagnosis in clinical practice: is comorbidity being missed?. Compr Psychiatry 1999;40:182–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, M, Mattia, JIPrincipal and additional DSM-IV disorders for which outpatients seek treatment. Psychiatr Serv 2000;51:1299–1304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.