Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:44:53.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Depression Scale (DEPS) as a case finder for depression in various subgroups of primary care patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Outi Poutanen ,
Anna-Maija Koivisto  and
Raimo K.R. Salokangas
Outi Poutanen*
Affiliation:
University of Tampere, Medical School/Tampere University Hospital, Psychiatric Clinic, P.O. Box 607, Teiskontie 35, Tampere33014, Finland
Anna-Maija Koivisto
Affiliation:
University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Finland
Raimo K.R. Salokangas
Affiliation:
University of Turku, Department of Psychiatry/University Central Hospital in Turku, Psychiatric Clinic, Finland
*
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +358 50 3068159. E-mail address: [email protected] (O. Poutanen).
Get access

Abstract

Purpose

The quick and simple Depression Scale (DEPS) has been a popular self-rating depression scale in Finland for nearly 15 years. The purpose was to assess the validity of the DEPS in various subgroups of patients.

Materials and methods

Primary care patients, aged 18–64, completed a postal questionnaire including the DEPS. Of the 1643 patients all screen-positive subjects and every 10th screen-negative subject were invited for interview (the Present State Examination, PSE). Complete DEPS scores were available for 410 patients. They were grouped by gender, age, marital status, perceived physical health, basic education and the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST) score. Separately for each subgroup, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were done, sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), predictive values and likelihood ratios were calculated, and Cronbach's α was estimated.

Results

The DEPS was valid in general, but best for patients with basic education longer than 9 years.

Discussion

The key statistical figures for the DEPS were comparable to the figures for other short self-rating scales.

Conclusion

The DEPS is a valid case finder for primary care patients in the age group 18–64 years, and especially suitable for more highly educated patients. Future studies comparing the DEPS with other simple depression rating scales are needed.

Keywords

DepressionPrimary health careQuestionnaireSubgroup analyses
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 23 , Issue 8 , December 2008 , pp. 580 - 586
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier Masson SAS 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, D.Bland, J.Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values BMJ. 1994 July 9; 309 6947102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altman, D.Bland, J.Diagnostic tests. 1: sensitivity and specificity BMJ. 1994 June 11; 308 69431552CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnau, R.Meagher, M.Norris, M.Bramson, .Psychometric evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory-II with primary care medical patients Health Psychol. 2001 March; 20 2112–119CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, .Oxman, .Gerber, .Prevalence of depression and its correlates in general medical practice J Affect Disord. 12 1987 167–174CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becht, M.Van Erp, C.Teeuwisse, T.Van Heck, G.Van Son, M.Pop, V.Measuring depression in women around menopausal age: towards a validation of the Edinburgh Depression Scale J Affect Disord. 63 1–3 2001 March 209–213CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, .Steer, .Beck depression inventory manual San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1993.Google Scholar
Beck, A.Steer, R.Ball, .Ranieri, .Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients J Pers Assess. 1996 December; 67 3588–597CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, A.Ward, C.Mendelson, .Mock, .Erbaugh, .An inventory for measuring depression Arch Gen Psychiatry. 4 1961 June 561–571CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjelland, .Dahl, A.Haug, T.Neckelmann, .The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review J Psychosom Res. 2002 February; 52 269–77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, K.Toft, .Frostholm, .Ornbol, .Fink, .Olesen, .The FIP study: a randomised, controlled trial of screening and recognition of psychiatric disorders Br J Gen Pract. 2003 October; 53 495758–763Google ScholarPubMed
Christensen, K.Toft, .Frostholm, .Ornbol, .Fink, .Olesen, .Screening for common mental disorders: who will benefit? Results from a randomised clinical trial Fam Pract. 2005 August; 22 4428–434CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, J.Holden, J.Sagovsky, .Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale Br J Psychiatry. 150 1987 June 782–786CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deeks, J.Altman, D.Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios BMJ. 2004 July 17; 329 7458168–169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eaton, W.Neufeld, .Chen, L.Cai, .A comparison of self-report and clinical diagnostic interviews for depression: diagnostic interview schedule and schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry in the Baltimore epidemiologic catchment area follow-up Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000 March; 57 3217–222CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
el-Rufaie, O.Absood, G.Retesting the validity of the Arabic version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale in primary health care Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1995 January; 30 126–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furlanetto, L.Mendlowicz, M.Romildo Bueno, .The validity of the Beck Depression Inventory-Short Form as a screening and diagnostic instrument for moderate and severe depression in medical inpatients J Affect Disord. 2005 May; 86 187–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbody, .House, A.Sheldon, T.Screening and case finding instruments for depression Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 4 2005 CD002792Google Scholar
Gilbody, S.House, A.Sheldon, T.Routinely administered questionnaires for depression and anxiety: systematic review BMJ. 2001 February 17; 322 7283406–409CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henkel, .Mergl, .Kohnen, .Allgaier, A.Moller, H.Hegerl, .Use of brief depression screening tools in primary care: consideration of heterogeneity in performance in different patient groups Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004 May–June; 26 3190–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkel, .Mergl, .Kohnen, .Maier, .Moller, H.Hegerl, .Identifying depression in primary care: a comparison of different methods in a prospective cohort study BMJ. 2003 January 25; 326 7382200–201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huttunen, .Taiminen, .Kahkonen, .Tuominen, .Salokangas, R.Depression Scale (DEPS) in schizophrenia Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1999 March; 99 3220–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristenson, .Trell, .Indicators of alcohol consumption: comparisons between a questionnaire (Mm-MAST), interviews and serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) in a health survey of middle-aged males Br J Addict. 1982 September; 77 3297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, C.Pan, P.Chan, A.Chan, S.Munro, .Can the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale be used on Chinese elderly in general practice? Fam Pract. 1995 Jun; 12 2149–154CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthey, .Barnett, .Kavanagh, D.Howie, .Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for men, and comparison of item endorsement with their partners J Affect Disord. 64 2–3 2001 May 175–184CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, J.Monson, R.Laird, N.Sobol, A.Leighton, A.A comparison of diagnostic interviews for depression in the Stirling County study: challenges for psychiatric epidemiology Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000 March; 57 3230–236CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, C.Lopez, A.Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: global burden of disease study Lancet. 1997 May 24; 349 90641498–1504CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papassotiropoulos, .Heun, .Maier, .Age and cognitive impairment influence the performance of the General Health Questionnaire Compr Psychiatry. 1997 November–December; 38 6335–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poutanen, .Koivisto, A.Joukamaa, .Mattila, .Salokangas, R.The Depression Scale as a screening instrument for a subsequent depressive episode in primary healthcare patients Br J Psychiatry. 191 2007 July 50–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poutanen, .Mattila, .Seppala, N.Groth, .Koivisto, A.Salokangas, R.Seven-year outcome of depression in primary and psychiatric outpatient care: results of the TADEP (Tampere Depression) II Study Nord J Psychiatry. 2007; 61 162–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poutanen, . Depressio terveyskeskuspotilaalla. Ph.D. thesis, Tampere: University of Tampere; 1996 [in Finnish].Google Scholar
Revah-Levy, .Birmaher, .Gasquet, .Falissard, .The Adolescent Depression Rating Scale (ADRS): a validation study BMC Psychiatry. 7 2007 2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salokangas, R.Poutanen, .Stengard, .Jahi, .Palo-oja, .Prevalence of depression among patients seen in community health centres and community mental health centres Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996 June; 93 6427–433CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salokangas, R.Poutanen, .Stengard, .Screening for depression in primary care. Development and validation of the Depression Scale, a screening instrument for depression Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1995 July; 92 110–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salokangas, R.Poutanen, .Risk factors for depression in primary care. Findings of the TADEP project J Affect Disord. 48 2–3 1998 March 171–180CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salokangas, R.Vaahtera, .Pacriev, .Sohlman, .Lehtinen, .Gender differences in depressive symptoms. An artefact caused by measurement instruments? J Affect Disord. 68 2–3 2002 April 215–220CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saylor, C.Finch, A.J. Jr.Spirito, .Bennett, .The children's depression inventory: a systematic evaluation of psychometric properties J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984 December; 52 6955–967CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selzer, M.The Michigan alcoholism screening test: the quest for a new diagnostic instrument Am J Psychiatry. 1971 June; 127 121653–1658CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seppa, .Koivula, .Sillanaukee, .Drinking habits and detection of heavy drinking among middle-aged women Br J Addict. 1992 December; 87 121703–1709CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seppa, .Sillanaukee, .Koivula, .The efficiency of a questionnaire in detecting heavy drinkers Br J Addict. 1990 December; 85 121639–1645CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spinhoven, .Ormel, .Sloekers, P.Kempen, G.Speckens, A.Van Hemert, A.A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects Psychol Med. 1997 March; 27 2363–370CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R.Kroenke, .Williams, J.Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire JAMA. 1999 November 10; 282 181737–1744CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SPSS, Statistical package for social sciences 13.0 ed.Chicago, USA: SPSS; 2004.Google Scholar
Suomen Psykiatriyhdistys, Suomalainen Lääkäriseura Duodecim, Depressio. Käypä hoito Duodecim. 120 2004 742–764 [in Finnish]Google Scholar
Taiminen, T.Saarijarvi, .Helenius, .Keskinen, .Korpilahti, .Salokangas, R.Depression Scale (DEPS) among suicide attempters Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996 September; 94 3185–186CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willenbring, M.Measurement of depression in alcoholics J Stud Alcohol. 1986 September; 47 5367–372CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, J.Cooper, J.Sartorius, .The measurement and classification of psychiatric symptoms. The description and manual for the PSE and CATEGO system London: Cambridge University Press; 1974.Google Scholar
www.stata.com.Google Scholar
Yesavage, J.Brink, T.Rose, T.Lum, .Huang, .Adey, .et al.Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report J Psychiatr Res. 1982; 17 137–49CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zierau, .Bille, .Rutz, .Bech, .The Gotland Male Depression Scale: a validity study in patients with alcohol use disorder Nord J Psychiatry. 2002; 56 4265–271CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zigmond, A.Snaith, R.The hospital anxiety and depression scale Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 June; 67 6361–370CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.