Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:24:25.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparative study of fluoxetine, moclobemide, and tianeptine in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder following an earthquake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

E. Önder ,
Ü. Tural  and
T. Aker
E. Önder
Affiliation:
Center for Psychological Trauma, Medical School of Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
Ü. Tural*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Medical School of Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
T. Aker
Affiliation:
Center for Psychological Trauma, Medical School of Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
*
*Corresponding author. Present address: Kocaeli Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Psikiyatri Bölümü, Derince-İzmit, Kocaeli 41900, Turkey. Tel.: +90 262 233 5981x1708; fax: +90 262 233 5461. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (Ü. Tural).
Get access

Abstract.

Purpose

Although antidepressant drugs have been proven as an effective treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), there are few comparative studies of antidepressants that are acting on different neurotransmitters. The main aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of different class of antidepressant drugs on the PTSD.

Subjects/materials and methods. –

In this open label study, the patients who met DSM-IV criteria for PTSD were randomly assigned to flexible doses of fluoxetine, moclobemide, or tianeptine. After the first assessment, consecutive assessments were performed at the end of weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 using clinician administered PTSD scale (CAPS) and Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). Changes in the total score of CAPS and sub-scale scores of symptom clusters (re-experience, avoidance, and hyperarousal) were the main output of efficacy. All statistics were based on intention-to-treat and last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) principles.

Results.

Thirty-eight patients were assigned to fluoxetine, 35 patients were assigned to moclobemide, and 30 patients were assigned to tianeptine group. Gender distributions and mean ages of the treatment groups were not significantly different. Drop-out rates due to an adverse events or unknown reasons were not significantly different among fluoxetine (18.4%), moclobemide (14.3%), and tianeptine (20.0%) groups. All three treatments has led to a significant improvement in PTSD severity assessed with CAPS total score (ANOVA P < 0.001). Similarly, total scores of re-experiencing, avoidance, and hyperarousal clusters that are subscales of CAPS were significantly reduced by all three treatments (with ANOVA all P values < 0.001). There was not significant difference in terms of treatment effect between three groups.

Discussion. –

Treatment groups showed very similar improvement on all ratings scales. The findings support that fluoxetine, moclobemide, and tianeptine are all effective in the treatment of PTSD. Different mechanisms of action for these antidepressant drugs might result in the same common neurochemical end point. However, further studies using different classes of antidepressant drugs are needed.

Keywords

Posttraumatic stress disorderNatural disastersFluoxetineMoclobemideTianeptineTreatment
Type
Original report
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , April 2006 , pp. 174 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aker, A.T., Özeren, M., Başoğlu, M., Kaptanoğlu, C., Erol, A.Turkish validity and reliability of CAPS. Turk. Psikiyatri. Derg. 1999;10:286–293 [Turkish].Google Scholar
Albucher, R.C., Liberzon, I.Psychopharmacological treatment in PTSD: a critical review. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2002;36:355–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: APA; 1994.Google Scholar
Ansseau, M., Bataille, M., Briole, G., De Nayer, A., Fauchère, P.A., Ferrero, F.et al. Controlled comparison of tianeptine, alprazolam and mianserin in the treatment of adjustment disorders with anxiety and depression. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 1996;11:293–298.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, D.D., Weathers, F.W., Nagy, L.M., Kaloupek, D.G., Klauminzer, G., Charney, D.S.et al. A clinician rating scale for assessing current and lifetime PTSD: the CAPS-1. Behav. Ther. 1990;13:187–188.Google Scholar
Brunello, N., Davidson, J.R.T., Deahl, M., Kessler, R.C., Mendlewicz, J., Racagni, G.et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder: diagnosis and epidemiology, comorbidity and social consequences, biology and treatment. Neuropsychobiology 2001;43:150–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connor, K.M., Sutherland, S.M., Tupler, L.A., Malik, M.L., Davidson, J.R.Fluoxetine in posttraumatic stress disorder. Randomized, double blind study. Br. J. Psychiatry 1999;175:17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, C.D., LeDoux, J.E., Magarinos, A.M., McEwen, B.S.Repeated restraint stress facilitates fear conditioning independently of causing hippocampal CA3 dendritic atrophy. Behav. Neurosci. 1999;113:902–913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Czeh, B., Michaelis, T., Watanabe, T., Frahm, J., De Biurrun, G., Van Kampen, M.et al. Stress-induced changes in cerebral metabolites, hippocampal volume, and cell proliferation are prevented by antidepressant treatment with tianeptine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001;98:12796–12801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, J.R.Pharmacotherapy of posttraumatic stress disorder: treatment options, long-term follow-up, and predictors of outcome. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2000;61(Suppl 5):52–59.Google ScholarPubMed
Davidson, J., Pelton, S.Forms of atypical depression and their response to antidepressant drugs. Psychiatry Res. 1986;17:87–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
First, M.B., Spitzer, R.L., Gibbon, M., Williams, J.B.W.Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID). Clinical Version. Washington, DC: APA; 1996.Google Scholar
Frančišković, T., Moro, L., Lesica, T., Pernar, M.Tianeptine in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. Poster presented at Sixth European Conference on Traumatic Stress, June 5th–8th. Turkey: Istanbul; 1999. p. 151.Google Scholar
Foa, E.B., Davidson, J.R.T., Frances, A.The expert consensus guideline series. Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. J. Clin. Psychiatry 1999;60(Suppl 16):4–69.Google Scholar
Government Planning Organization Undersecretary of Prime Ministry of Turkish Republic. The earthquake report. Ankara: Printing Office of Prime Ministry; 1999. p. 1–127 [Turkish].Google Scholar
Guy, W.ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology, Revised. Rockville: National Institute of Mental Health, Dept of Health, Education, and Welfare publication (ADM); 1976. p. 76–338.Google Scholar
Haefely, W., Burkard, W.P., Cesura, A.M., Kettler, R., Lorez, H.P., Martin, J.R.et al. Biochemistry and pharmacology of moclobemide, a prototype RIMA. Psychopharmacology 1992;196:S6–S14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, M.Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 1967;6:278–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martenyi, F., Brown, E.B., Zhang, H., Prakash, A., Koke, S.C.Fluoxetine versus placebo in posttraumatic stress disorder. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2002;63:199–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martenyi, F., Brown, E.B., Zhang, H., Koke, S.C., Prakash, A.Fluoxetine v. placebo in prevention of relapse in post-traumatic stress disorder. Br. J. Psychiatry 2002;181:315–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martenyi, F., Dossenbach, M., Mraz, K., Metcalfe, S.Gender differences in the efficacy of fluoxetine and maprotiline in depressed patients: a double-blind trial of antidepressants with serotonergic or norepinephrinergic reuptake inhibition profile. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2001;11:227–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neal, L.A., Shapland, W., Fox, C.An open trial of moclobemide in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 1997;12:231–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saporta, J.A., Van der Kolk, B.A.Psychobiological consequences of severe trauma. In: Başoğlu, M. editor. Torture and its consequences. Glasgow: Cambridge University Press; 1992. 151–181.Google Scholar
Stahl, S.M.Classical antidepressants, serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors. In: Stahl, S.M. editor. Essential psychopharmacology. Neuroscientific basis and practical applications. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000. 143–199.Google Scholar
Van der Kolk, B.A., Dreyfuss, D., Michaels, M., Shera, D., Berkowitz, R., Fisler, R.et al. Fluoxetine in posttraumatic stress disorder. J. Clin. Psychiatry 1994;55:517–522.Google ScholarPubMed
Wagstaff, A.J., Ormrod, D., Spencer, C.M.Tianeptine. A review of its use in depressive disorders. CNS Drugs 2001;15:231–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.