Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:27:09.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coercion and restrictions in psychiatric inpatient treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

R. Kaltiala-Heino
Affiliation:
University of Tampere, Tampere School of Public Health and Tampere University Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Tampere, Finland
J. Korkeila
Affiliation:
Kupittaa Hospital, Turku, Finland
C. Tuohimäki
Affiliation:
Oulu University Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Oulu, Finland
T. Tuori
Affiliation:
National Development and Research Centre for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
V. Lehtinen*
Affiliation:
National Development and Research Centre for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
*
*Correspondence and reprints: Riittakerttu Kaltiala-Heino, Senior Assistant Professor, University of Tampere, Tampere School of Public Health, Box 607, 33101 Tampere, Finland
Get access

Summary

To find out to what extent coercion and restrictions are used in psychiatric inpatient treatment and with which patient characteristics the use of coercion is associated. To this end, the hospital records of 1,543 admissions (six-month admission samples) to the psychiatric clinics in three Finnish university towns were evaluated by retrospective chart review. The study clinics provide all psychiatric inpatient treatment for the working-age population in their catchment areas. Use of coercion and restrictions was recorded in a structured form. Coercion and restrictions were applied to 32% of the patients. Mechanical restraints were used on 10% of the patients, and forced medication on 8%. Compared to international statistics the figures in the current study are high.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Éditions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier SAS 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, M.The criminalization of mentally disordered behaviour Hosp Comm Psychiatry 23 1982 101–105Google Scholar
Amarasingham, L.Social and cultural perspectives on medication refusal Am J Psychiatry 137 1980 353–357Google ScholarPubMed
Andersen, B.Hansen, E.Patientrådgivere og tvang i psykiatrien Ugeskr Laeger 152 1990 2292–2294Google Scholar
Angold, A.Seclusion Br J Psychiatry 154 1989 437–444CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Appelbaum, P.Gutheil, T.Drug refusal: a study of psychiatric inpatients Am J Psychiatry 37 1980 340–346Google Scholar
Aviram, U.Care or convenience? On the medical-bureaucratic model of commitment of the mentally ill Int J Law Psychiatry 13 1991 163–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betemps, E.Somoza, E.Buncher, C.Hospital characteristics, diagnoses and staff reactions associated With use of seclusion and restraint Hosp Comm Psychiatry 44 1993 367–371Google Scholar
Binder, RMcNiel, D.Involuntary patients'right to refuse medication: impact of the Riese decision on a California inpatient unit Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 19 1991 351–357Google Scholar
Brown, J.Tooke, S.On the seclusion of psychiatric patients Soc Sci M 35 1992 711–721CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cahn, C.The ethics of involuntary treatment Can J Psychiatry 27 1982 67–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cangas, J.Nursing staff and unit characteristics: do they affect the use of seclusion? Perspect Psychiatr Care 29 1993 15–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chamberlin, J.An ex-patient's response to Soliday J Nerv Ment Dis 173 1985 288–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiles, J.Davidson, P.Mc Bride, D.Effects of Clozapine on use of seclusion and restraint at a state hospital Hosp Comm Psychiatry 45 1994 269–271Google ScholarPubMed
Chodoff, P.Paternalism versus autonomy in medicine and psychiatry Psychiatr Ann 13 1983 318–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chodoff, P.Involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill as a moral issue Am J Psychiatry 141 1984 384–389Google ScholarPubMed
Draper, RDawson, D.Competence to consent to treatment: a guide for the psychiatrist Can J Psychiatry 35 1990 285–289CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, W.Restraint and seclusion: a review of literature Am J Psychiatry 151 1994 1584–1591Google Scholar
Ford, M.The psychiatrist's double bind: the right to refuse medication Am J Psychiatry 137 1980 332–339Google ScholarPubMed
Hammill, K.Mc Evoy, J.Koral, H.Schneider, N.Hospitalized schizophrenic patients'views about seclusion J Commun Psychiatr Nurs 50 1989 174–177Google Scholar
Hermann, D.Autonomy, self-determination, her right of involuntarily committed persons to refuse treatment, and the use of substituted judgement in medication decisions involving incompetent persons Int J Law Psychiatry 13 1990 361–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoaken, P.Psychiatry, civil liberty, and involuntary treatment Can J Psychiatry 31 1986 222–226CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Höyer, G.Drange, H.Bruk av tvangsmidler i norske psykiatriske institusjoner Tisskr Nor Laegeforen 111 1991 1709–1713Google Scholar
Höyer, G.Drange, H.Utviklingen av tvangsmidlerbruk i norske psykiatriske institusjoner Tisskr Nor Laegeforen 114 1994 585–588Google Scholar
Isohanni, M.Mäkikyrö, T.Moring, J.Räsänen, P.Hakko, H.Partanen, U. et al. A comparison of clinical and research DSM-III-R diagnoses of schizophrenia in a Finnish national birth cohort Soc Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol 32 1997 803–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaltiala-Heino, R.Involuntary psychiatric hospitalizationActa Universitas Tamperensis. Ser A 466 VammalaVammalan kirjapaino 1995Google Scholar
Kaltiala-Heino, R.Laippala, P.Salokangas, R.K.R.Impact of coercion on treatment outcome Int J Law Psychiatry 20 1997 311–322CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingdon, D.Bakewell, E.Aggressive behaviour: evaluation of a non-seclusion policy of a district psychiatric service Br J Psychiatry 153 1988 631–634CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kjellin, L.Andersson, K.Candefjord, I.L.Palmistierna, T.Wallsten, T.Ethical benefits and costs of coercion in short-term psychiatric care Psychiatr Serv 48 1997 1567–1570Google Scholar
Levin, S.Brekke, J.Thomas, P.A controlled comparison of involuntarily hospitalized medication refusers and acceptors Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 19 1991 161–171Google ScholarPubMed
Mill, S.J.On Liberty LeipzigBernhard Tauchnitz 1917Google Scholar
Miller, R.D.Law, psychiatry and rights Med Law 10 1991 327–333Google ScholarPubMed
Okin, R.Variation among state hospitals in use of seclusion and restraint Hosp Community Psychiatry 36 1985 648–651Google ScholarPubMed
Reisby, N.Registrering af tvangsanvendelse Ugeskri Laeger 145 1983 1801–1805Google Scholar
Schepelern, E.Aggernaes, KStender, ARaben, H.Tvang udfört på psykiatrisk afdelning, Fredriksberg Hospital, för og efter indförelse af den nye psykiatrilov Ugeskr Laeger 155 1993 553–557Google Scholar
Schröder, P.Christensen, N.Tvang i psykiatrien Ugeskr Laeger 154 1992 1826–1830Google Scholar
Silver, F.Medication refusal by involuntary patients: legal and clinical considerations Clin Psychol Rev 6 1986 115–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soliday, S.A comparison of patient and staff attitudes toward seclusion J Nerv Ment Dis 173 1985 282–286CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soloff, P.Gutheil, T.Wexler, D.Seclusion and restraint in 1985: a review and update Hosp Community Psychiatry 36 1985 652–657Google ScholarPubMed
Soloff, P.Turner, S.Patterns of seclusion. A prospective study J Nerv Ment Dis 269 1981 37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swett, C.Inpatient seclusion: desription and causes Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 22 1994 421–430Google Scholar
Szasz, T.Ideology and insanity Garden City (NY)Doubleday 1970Google Scholar
Szasz, T.Manufacture of madness LondonPaladin Books 1971Google Scholar
Thompson, P.The use of seclusion in psychiatric hospitals in the Newcastle area Br J Psychiatry 149 1986 471–474CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walsh, E.Randell, B.Seclusion and restraint: What do we need to know? J Community Psychiatr Nurs 8 1995 28–40Google ScholarPubMed
Way, B.Banks, S.Use of seclusion and restraint in public psychiatric hospitals: patient characteristics and facility effects Hosp Community Psychiatry 41 1990 75–81Google ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.