Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T02:39:50.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1544 – The Portuguese Traumatic Experiences Checklist (tec): Psychometrics And Prevalence Of Traumatic Experiences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

H. Espirito-Santo
Affiliation:
Psychology, Instituto Superior Miguel Torga, Coimbra, Portugal
P. Rocha
Affiliation:
Psychology, Instituto Superior Miguel Torga, Coimbra, Portugal
L. Gonçalves
Affiliation:
Psychology, Instituto Superior Miguel Torga, Coimbra, Portugal
S. Cassimo
Affiliation:
Psychology, Instituto Superior Miguel Torga, Coimbra, Portugal
L. Martins
Affiliation:
Psychology, Instituto Superior Miguel Torga, Coimbra, Portugal
M. Xavier
Affiliation:
Psychology, Instituto Superior Miguel Torga, Coimbra, Portugal

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The TEC is a validated measure that should integrate mental health assessment. We want to assess the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version, and examine the prevalence of traumatic experiences. Of the 248 participants (77.8% women, mean age = 31.12 ± 13.70), 36 had mood disorders (MD), 38 had eating disorders (ED), 29 had pain disorder (PD), 54 were substance and alcohol dependent (SAD), 20 were violence victims (VV), and 71 were non-patients. All completed the TEC, 55.2% completed the Dissociation Experiences Scale (DES), and 23.8% the Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire (SDQ-20).

Twelve per cent reported at least one traumatic experience to a maximum of 29 traumatic experiences (19.8%). The mean score of TEC was 9.37 ± 10.48, with the higher scores in SAD (27.22 ± 6.31), followed by VV (8.65 ± 3.82), MD (6.69 ± 3.12), ED (5.37 ± 4.83), PD (3.07 ± 1.46), and non-patients (2.06 ± 2.57). Reliability was high (Cronbach α = 0.93) in total sample, ranging from 0.94 (ED) to 0.44 (PD). In ED group, TEC significantly correlated with DES and SDQ-20. On the other groups (MD, SAD, VV), the correlations were not significant. An optimal cutoff point of 5.5 traumatic presences distinguished between clinical and non-clinical patients (AUC = 0.87, p < 0.001).

Portuguese TEC is a promising reliable and valid screen and allows for measurement of traumatic experiences in clinical and non-clinical samples. However, the criterion validity should be established with other measures and involve larger clinical samples.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2013
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.