Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:57:06.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

El Inventario de Ansiedad como Rasgo de Spielberger mide más que la ansiedad

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2020

Hervé Caci ,
Franck J. Baylé ,
Christelle Dossios ,
Philippe Robert  and
Patrice Boyer
Hervé Caci
Affiliation:
“Servicio de Pediatría, CHU de Niza, Hospital Archet, Niza, Francia
Franck J. Baylé
Affiliation:
E O117 Inserm, Universidad París V y Servicio Universitario Hospitalario de Salud Mental y de Terapéutica, Centro Hospitalario Santa Ana 1, París, Francia
Christelle Dossios
Affiliation:
“Servicio de Pediatría, CHU de Niza, Hospital Archet, Niza, Francia
Philippe Robert
Affiliation:
Centro Memoria, Clínica de Psiquiatría y de Psicología Médica, Hospital Pasteur, Pabellón J, CHU de Niza, Niza, Francia
Patrice Boyer
Affiliation:
CNRS UMR 7593, Hospital de la Salpétriére, Pabellón de Clérambault, París, Francia
Get access

Resumen

Objetivo.

Los investigadores intentaron explicar el solapamiento entre la ansiedad y la depresión proponiendo que algunos elementos de los cuestionarios autoadministrados estaban mal seleccionados y que ambos constructos se deben considerar más bien como muldimensionales. Así, planteamos la hipótesis de que el Inventario de Ansiedad como Rasgo (TAI) de Spielberger incluye elementos relacionados con la depresión.

Método.

Una muestra no clínica de 193 sujetos rellenó el TAI y la Escala Hospitalaria de Ansiedad y Depresión. Se postularon factores a partir del contenido de los elementos y se sometieron a análisis factorial confirmatorio (AFC).

Resultados.

Encontramos cinco factores: un factor de ansiedad de 10 elementos que contenía tres factores; un factor de falta de éxi-to que contenía cuatro elementos correlacionado con el factor de anhedonia de la HADS, y un factor de felicidad de seis elementos.

Conclusión.

El TAI incluye medidas de ansiedad, depresión y bienestar. Por consiguiente, el solapamiento con otras medidas de depresión puede derivar de la selección de los elementos. Este trabajo aguarda replicación en muestras normales y patológicas independientes.

Keywords

PersonalidadAnsiedadDepresiónCuestionarioModelado de ecuaciones estructuralesAnálisis factorial confirmatorio
Type
Artículo original
Information
European Psychiatry (Ed. Española) , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , March 2004 , pp. 94 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliografía

Barlow, DH.Anxiety and its disorders: the nature and treatment ofanxiety and panic. New York: Guilford; 1998.Google Scholar
Bentler, PM, Wu, EJC.EQS 5: user’s guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc; 1995.Google Scholar
Bieling, PJ, Antony, MM, Swinson, RP.The state-trait anxiety inventory, trait version: structure and content re-examined. Behav Res Ther 1998;36:777–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, MW.Asymptotic distribution free methods in analysis of covariance structures. Br J Math Statistical Psychol 1984;37:62–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, MW, Cudeck, R.Alternative ways in assessing model fit. In: Bollen, KA, Long, JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993. p. 136–62.Google Scholar
Caci, H, Baylé, FJ, Mattél, V, Dossios, C, Robert, P, Boyer, P.How does the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) measure anxiety and depression in healthy subjects? Psychiatry Res 2003;118:89–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattell, RB, Scheier, IH.The meaning and measurement of neuroti-cism and anxiety. New York: Ronald; 1961.Google Scholar
Cheng, H, Fumham, A.Personality, self-esteem, and demographic predictions of happiness and depression. Person Individ Diff 2003;34:921–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, LA, Watson, D.Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and toxonomic implications. J Abnorm Psychol 1991;100:316–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, PT, Mccrae, RR.Influence of extraversión and neuroticism on subjective well-being: happy and unhappy people. J Pers Soc Psychol 1980;38:668–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deneve, K, Cooper, H.The happy personality: a meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychol Bull 1998;124:197–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobson, KS.An analysis of anxiety and depression scales. J Pers Assess 1985;49:523–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobson, KS.The relationship between anxiety and depression. Clin Psychol Rev 1985;5:307–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embretson, S.Construct validity: construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychol Bull 1983;93:179–97.Google Scholar
Endler, NS.Stress, anxiety and coping: the multidimensional interaction model. Can Psychol 1997;38:136–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endler, NS, Cox, BJ, Parker, JDA, Bagby, RM.Self-reports of depression and state-trait anxiety: evidence for differential assessment. J Pers Soc Psychol 1992;63:832–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endler, NS, Magnusson, D, Ekehammer, B, Okada, M.The multidimen-sionality of State and trait anxiety. Scand J Psychol 1976;17:81–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gotlib, IH.Depression and general psychopathology in university students. J Abnorm Psychol 1984;93:19–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gotlib, IH, Cane, DB.Self-report assessment of depression and anxiety. In: Kendall, PC, Watson, D, editors. Anxiety and depression: distinctive and overlapping features. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1989. p. 131–69.Google Scholar
Hills, P, Argyle, M.Happiness, introversion extraversion and happy-introverts. Person Individ Diff 2001;30:595–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, P, Argyle, M.Emotional stability as a major dimension of happiness. Person Individ Diff 2001;31:1357–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, L-T, Bentler, PM.Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model 1999;6:1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, L-T, Bentler, PM, Kano, Y.Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? Psychol Bull 1992;112:351–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keedwell, P, Snaith, RP.What do anxiety scales measure? Acta Psy-chiatr Scand 1996;93(3):177–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maydeu-Olivares, A.Limited information estimation and testing of Thurstonian models for paired comparison data under multiple judgment sampling. Psychometrika 2001;66:209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, W.Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika 1993;58:525–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, BO.A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered polytomous, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika 1984;49:115–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, LK, Muthén, BO.15th. Mplus 20 user's guide, vol. 22. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 1998.Google Scholar
Parker, G, Hadzi-Pavlovic, D.Is any female preponderance in depression secondary to a primary female preponderance in anxiety disorders? Acta Psychiatr Scand 2001;103:252–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, G, Roy, K.Examining the utility of a temperament model for modelling non-melancholic depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2002;106:54–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preisig, M, Merikangas, KR, Angst, J.Clinical significance and comorbidity of subthreshold depression and anxiety in the community. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2001;104:96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satorra, A, Bentler, PM.Scaling corrections for chi-squared statistics in covariance structures analysis. In: Proceedings of the Business and Economics Sections. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association; 1988. p. 308–13.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, MB, Paulhan, I.15th ed. Manuel de l'lnventaire d'Anxie-té Trait-État (Forme Y), vol. 22. Laboratoire de Psychologie de la Sante, Universite de Bordeaux II (France); 1990.Google Scholar
Snaith, P.What do depression rating scales measure? Br J Psychiatry 1993;163:293–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spielberger, CD.Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory (Form Y) (“Self-evaluation questionnaire”). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.Google Scholar
Spielberger, CD.State-trait anxiety inventory: a comprehensive bibliography. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1989.Google Scholar
Statacorp. Stata statistical software: release 7.0. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2000.Google Scholar
Steyer, R, Schmitt, MJ, Eid, M.Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. Eur J Person 1999;13:389–408.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka-Matsumi, J, Kameoka, VA.Reliabilities and concurrent validities of popular self-report measures of depression, anxiety and social desirability. J Consult Clin Psychol 1986;54:328–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vagg, PR, Spielberger, CD, O’Hearn, TPJR.Is the state-trait anxiety inventory multidimensional? Person Individ Diff 1980;1:207–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Knippenberg, FCE, Duivenvoorden, HI, Bonke, B, Passchier, J.Shortening the state-trait anxiety inventory. Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:995–1000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Schuur, WH, Kiers, HAL.Why factor analysis often is the incorrect model for analyzing bipolar concepts, and what model to use instead. Appl Psychol Meas 1994;18:97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zigmond, AS, Snaith, RP.The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed