Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:39:55.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Standby citizens: diverse faces of political passivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2013

Erik Amnå  and
Joakim Ekman
Erik Amnå*
Affiliation:
Youth & Society (YeS), Örebro University, Sweden
Joakim Ekman
Affiliation:
Centre for Baltic and East European Studies, Södertörn University, Sweden
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The current debate on political participation is bound to a discussion about whether citizens are active or passive. This dichotomous notion is nurtured by an extensive normative debate concerning whether passivity is an asset or a threat to democracy; and it is especially manifest in studies of young people's political orientations. Drawing on this discussion, the present study goes beyond the dichotomy by keeping political interest conceptually separate from participation in order to improve our understanding of political passivity. Multivariate cluster analysis of empirical data on Swedish youth suggests that we need to consider three distinctive forms of ‘political passivity’. In the paper we present empirical evidence not only of the existence of a particular ‘standby citizen’, but also of two kinds of genuinely passive young people: unengaged and disillusioned citizens. Alongside active citizens, these people are in distinctly different categories with regard to their political behavior. This entails a new analytical framework that may be used to analyze an empirical phenomenon that has received surprisingly little attention in the literature on political participation and civic engagement.

Keywords

political participationpolitical passivitylatent political participationmonitorial citizensstandby citizens
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , May 2014 , pp. 261 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, G.A. Verba, S. (1963), The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Almond, G.A. Verba, S. (eds) (1980), The Civic Culture Revisited: An analytical study, Boston, MA and Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Amnå, E. (2010), ‘Active, passive, or standby citizens? Latent and manifest political participation’, in E. Amnå (ed.), New Forms of Citizen Participation: Normative Implications, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amnå, E. Zetterberg, P. (2010), ‘A political science perspective on socialization research: young Nordic citizens in a comparative light’, in L.R. Sherrod, C.A. Flanagan and J. Torney-Purta (eds), Handbook of Research on Civic Engagement in Youth, New York: Wileys, pp. 43–66.Google Scholar
Axtmann, R. (2001), Balancing Democracy, London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bang, H.P. Sørensen, E. (1999), ‘The everyday maker: a new challenge to democratic governance’, Administrative Theory & Praxis 21: 325–341.Google Scholar
Barber, B. (1984), Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age, Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, S.H., Kaase, M. Allerbeck, K.R. (1979), Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies, Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Bennett, W.L., Wells, C. Freelon, D. (2011), ‘Communicating civic engagement: contrasting models of citizenship in the youth web sphere’, Journal of Communication 61: 835–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, B. (2009), ‘Political theory, political science and the end of civic engagement’, Perspectives on Politics 7: 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, L.R., Magnusson, D. El-Khouri, B.M. (2003), Studying Individual Development in an Interindividual Context: A Person-Oriented Approach, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, N., Lehman Schlozman, K. Verba, S. (2001), The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E. Stokes, D.E. (1960), The American Voter, New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. (1963), ‘Comment on “On the Concept of Influence”’, Public Opinion Quarterly 27: 63–82.Google Scholar
Crozier, M., Huntington, S.P. Watanuki, J. (1975), The Crisis of Democracy, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1971), Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1989), Democracy and Its Critics, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. (1999), ‘Political support in advanced industrial democracies’, in P. Norris (ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R.J. (1988), Citizen Politics in Western Democracies: Public Opinion and Political Parties in the United States, Great Britain, West Germany, and France, Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
Dalton, R.J. (2002), Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, New York: Chatham House Publishers/Seven Bridges Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R.J. (2004), Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R.J. (2008), The Good Citizen: How a Younger Generation is Reshaping American Politics, Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Dostie-Goulet, E. (2009), ‘Social networks and the development of political interest’, Journal of Youth Studies 12: 405–421.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Easton, D. (1965), A Framework for Political Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Ekman, J. Amnå, E. (2012), ‘Political participation and civic engagement: towards a new typology’, Human Affairs 22: 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, M.P. (2002), ‘Parties, participation, and representation in America: old theories face new realities’, in I. Katznelson and H. Milner (eds), Political Science: The State of the Discipline, New York: Norton, pp. 511–541.Google Scholar
Fisher, D.R. (2012), ‘Youth political participation: bridging activism and electoral politics’, Annual Review of Sociology 38: 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, C.A. (2013), Teenage Citizens: The Political Theories of the Young, Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fuchs, D. Klingemann, H.D. (eds) (1995), Citizens and the State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gamson, W.A. (1968), Power and Discontent, Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Geissel, B. (2008), ‘Reflections and findings on the critical citizen. Civic education – what for?’, European Journal of Political Research 74: 34–63.Google Scholar
Harris, A., Wyn, J. Younes, S. (2010), ‘Beyond apathetic or activist youth. ‘Ordinary’ young people and contemporary forms of participation’, Young 18: 9–32.Google Scholar
Held, D. (1995), Models of Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hoff, J.V. Andersen, J.G. (2001), Democracy and Citizenship in Scandinavia, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Holmberg, S. (1999), ‘Down and down we go: political trust in Sweden’, in P. Norris (ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 103–122.Google Scholar
Hooghe, M. Dejaeghere, Y. (2007), ‘Does the “Monitorial Citizen” exist? An empirical investigation into the occurrence of postmodern forms of citizenship in the Nordic countries’, Scandinavian Political Studies 30: 249–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskins, B., Villalba, C., Saisana, M. (2012), The 2011 Civic Competence Composite Indicator (CCCI-2): Measuring Young People's Civic Competence Across Europe Based on the IEA International Citizenship and Civic Education Study. Ispra, Italy: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen: JRC Scientific and Technical Reports.Google Scholar
Huntington, S.P. (1981), American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony, Cambridge, MA: Belknap P.Google Scholar
Hustinx, L., Meijs, L.C., Handy, F. Cnaan, R.A. (2012), Monitorial citizens or civic omnivores? Repertoires of civic participation among university students, Youth & Society 44: 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1997), Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingemann, H. (1999), ‘Mapping political support in the 1990s: a global analysis’, in P. Norris (ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–56.Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M. Schneider, W. (1983), The Confidence Gap: Business, Labor, and Government in the Public Mind, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Loader, B.D. (2007), ‘Introduction: young citizens in the digital age, disaffected or displaced?’, in B.D. Loader (ed.), Young Citizens in the Digital Afe: Political Engagement, Young People and New Media, London: Routledge, pp. 11–19.Google Scholar
Marsh, D., O'Toole, T. Jones, S. (2007), Young People and Politics in the UK. Apathy or Alienation?, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micheletti, M. (2003), Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Consumerism, and Collective Action, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micheletti, M. Stolle, D. (2009), ‘Vegetarianism as life style politics’, in M. Micheletti and A. McFarland (eds), Creative Participation: Responsibility-taking in the Political World, Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, pp. 125–145.Google Scholar
Milner, H. (2010), The Internet Generation: Engaged Citizens or Political Dropouts, Medford, MA: Tufts University Press.Google Scholar
Mycock, A. Tonge, J. (2012), ‘The party politics of youth citizenship and democratic engagement’, Parliamentary Affairs 65: 138–161.Google Scholar
Norris, P. (ed.) (1999), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P. (2002), Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, P. (2011), Democratic Deficits: Critical Citizen Revisited, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nye, J.S. (1997), ‘Introduction: The decline of confidence in government’, in J.S. Nye, P.D. Zelikow and D.C. King (eds), Why People Don't Trust Government, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Offe, C. (1973), Politische Herrschaft und Klassenstrukturen. Zur Analyse spätkapitalistischer Gesellschaftssysteme. Politikwissenschaft. Eine Einführung in ihre Problemen, Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
O'Loughlin, B. Gillespie, M. (2012), ‘Dissenting citizenship? Young people and political participation in the media-security nexus’, Parliamentary Affairs 65: 115–137.Google Scholar
Parry, G., Moyser, G. Day, N. (1992), Political Participation and Democracy in Britain, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, C. (1980), ‘The civic culture: a philosophic critique’, in G.A. Almond and S. Verba (eds), The Civic Culture Revisited: An Analytical Study, Boston, MA and Toronto: Little, Brown and Company, pp. 57–102.Google Scholar
Pattie, C., Seyd, P. Whiteley, P. (2004), Citizenship in Britain: Values, Participation and Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pharr, S.J. Putnam, R.D. (2000), Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries?, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Phelps, E. (2012), ‘Understanding electoral turnout among British young people: a review of the literature’, Parliamentary Affairs 65: 281–299.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus (2010), ‘You've either got it or you don't? The stability of political interest over the life cycle’, The Journal of Politics 72: 747–766.Google Scholar
Putnam, R.D. (1995), ‘Bowling alone: America's declining social capital’, Journal of Democracy 6: 65–78.Google Scholar
Putnam, R.D. (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Quintelier, E. (2007), ‘Differences in Political Participation Between Young and Old People’, Contemporary Politics 13: 165–180.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, P. (2008), Counter-Democracy. Politics in an Age of Distrust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, R. (1980), Challenge to Governance: Studies in Overloaded Polities, Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Sander, T.H. Putnam, R.D. (2010), ‘Still bowling alone? The post-9/11 split’, Journal of Democracy 21: 9–16.Google Scholar
Schudson, M. (1996), ‘What if civic life didn't die?’, American Prospect 25: 17–20.Google Scholar
Schudson, M. (1998), The Good Citizen: A History of American Public Life, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sloam, J. (2012), ‘New voice, less equal: the civic and political engagement of young people in the United States and Europe’, Comparative Political Studies. doi: 10.1177/0010414012453441.Google Scholar
Stoker, G. (2010), ‘The rise of political disenchantment’, in C. Hay (ed.), New Directions in Political Science, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolle, D. Hooghe, M. (2011), ‘Shifting inequalities. Patterns of exclusion and inclusion in emerging forms of political participation’, European Societies 13: 119–142.Google Scholar
Sweden, Statistics. Population statistics. Statistics Sweden 2010. Retrieved 16 January 2012 from http://www.scb.se/Pages/GsaSearch____287280.aspx Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B.G. Fidell, L.S. (2012), Using Multivariate Statistics, 6th edn., New Jersey: Pearson.Google Scholar
Theiss-Morse, E. Hibbing, J.R. (2005), ‘Citizenship and civic engagement’, Annual Review of Political Science 8: 227–249.Google Scholar
Tingsten, H. (1937), Political Behaviour. Studies in Election Statistics, London: P.S. King and Son.Google Scholar
Torcal, M. (2006), ‘Political disaffection and democratisation history in new democracies’, in M. Torcal and J.R. Montero (eds), Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies: Social Capital, Institutions, and Politics, London: Routledge, pp. 157–190.Google Scholar
van Deth, J.W. (2001), ‘Studying political participation: towards a theory of everything?’. Paper presented at the Joint Sessions of Workshops, European Consortium for Political Research, April 6–11, 2001, Grenoble.Google Scholar
van Deth, J.W., Elff, M. (2000), ‘Political involvement and apathy in Europe 1973–1998’. Working Paper No. 33. Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung.Google Scholar
Vromen, A. Collin, P. (2010), ‘Everyday youth participation? Contrasting views from Australian policymakers and young people’, Young 18: 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welzel, C. Inglehart, R. (2005), Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K. Delli Carpini, M.X. (2006), A New Engagement?, New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar