No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Revisiting the role of process incentives as a determinant of university students’ protest
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 July 2012
Abstract
Drawing on the original data collected during a period of university student protest in Greece, we explore whether the expected gains from the act of protesting itself influence an individual's decision to participate in collective action. More particularly, we investigate the extent to which the process incentives qualify the weight individuals attach to the primary elements of the original cost–benefit equation of rational choice theory as well as other considerations in their decision-making process. Our findings point out that the magnitude of the effect of the process incentives is very strong and its inclusion in a rational choice model improves our understanding of students’ participation in protest activities. Turning to indirect effects, we show that process incentives behave as a first stage precondition for the students’ decision to participate in collective action. In the absence of perceived benefits associated with the process of protesting, the importance of attaining the public good becomes much less important in their decision-making process.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2012
References
Aguiar, F., Brañas-Garza, P., Espinosa, M.P.Miller, L.M. (2010), ‘Personal identity: a theoretical and experimental analysis’, Journal of Economic Methodology 17(3): 261–275.Google Scholar
Andrews, K.T.Biggs, M. (2006), ‘The dynamics of protest diffusion: movement organizations, social networks, and new media in the 1960 sit-ins’, American Sociological Review 71(5): 752–777.Google Scholar
Angrist, J.D.Pischke, J.-S. (2009), Mostly Harmless Econometrics: an Empiricist's Companion, Princenton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bäck, H., Teorell, J.Westholm, A. (2011), ‘Explaining modes of participation: a dynamic test of alternative rational choice models’, Scandinavian Political Studies 34(1): 74–97.Google Scholar
Bean, C. (1991), ‘Participation and political protest: a causal model with Australian evidence’, Political Behavior 13(3): 253–283.Google Scholar
Carmines, E.G.Zeller, R.A. (1979), Reliability and Validity Assessment. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences no. 17. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Chong, D. (1991), Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chong, D. (1995), ‘Rational choice theory's mysterious rivals’, Critical Review 9(1–2): 37–57.Google Scholar
Clarke, J.W.Egan, J. (1972), ‘Social and political dimensions of campus protest activity’, Journal of Politics 34(2): 500–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Porta, D. (2008), ‘Research on social movements and political violence’, Qualitative Sociology 31(3): 221–230.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1989a), The Cement of Society: a Study of Social Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1989b), ‘Social norms and economic theory’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(4): 99–117.Google Scholar
Erickson, B.H. (1979), ‘Some problems of inference from chain data’, Sociological Methodology 10: 276–302.Google Scholar
Eyerman, R. (2002), ‘Music and movement: cultural politics and old and new social movements’, Qualitative Sociology 25(3): 443–458.Google Scholar
Finkel, S.E. (2008), ‘In defense of the ‘wide’ rational choice model of collective political action’, in A. Diekmann, K. Eichner, P. Schmidt and T. Voss (eds), Rational Choice: theoretische analysen und empirische resultate, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 23–35.Google Scholar
Finkel, S.E.Muller, E.N. (1998), ‘Rational choice and the dynamics of collective political action: evaluating alternative models with panel data’, American Political Science Review 92(1): 37–49.Google Scholar
Finkel, S.E., Muller, E.N.Opp, K.-D. (1989), ‘Personal influence, collective rationality, and mass political action’, American Political Science Review 83(3): 885–903.Google Scholar
Finkel, S.E.Opp, K.-D. (1991), ‘Party identification and participation in collective political action’, Journal of Politics 53(2): 339–371.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, R.S.Sigelman, L. (2010), ‘Does ‘civic duty’ ‘solve’ the rational choice voter turnout puzzle?’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 22(3): 275–300.Google Scholar
Heath, O. (2008), ‘Triggers for protest: modelling responses to the political context in Britain, 2000–2002’, European Journal of Political Research 47(4): 489–509.Google Scholar
Heckathorn, D.D. (1997), ‘Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations’, Social Problems 44(2): 174–199.Google Scholar
Hugh-Jones, D., Katsanidou, A.Riener, G. (2011), ‘Intergroup conflict and the media: an experimental study of Greek students after the 2008 riots’, International Journal of Conflict and Violence 5(2): 325–344.Google Scholar
Jasper, J.M. (1998), ‘The emotions of protest: the affective and reactive emotions in and around social movements’, Sociological Forum 13(3): 397–424.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J.C. (1983), ‘Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements’, Annual Review of Sociology 9: 527–553.Google Scholar
Jennings, M.K. (2002), ‘Generation units and the student protest movement in the United States: an intra- and intergenerational analysis’, Political Psychology 23(2): 303–324.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, S.N.Kocher, M.A. (2007), ‘How free is ‘free riding’ in civil wars? Violence, insurgency and the collective action problem’, World Politics 59(2): 177–216.Google Scholar
Kim, K. (1991), The impact of post-materialism on Korean students activism. PhD thesis, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.Google Scholar
King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A.Scheve, K. (2001), ‘Analyzing incomplete political science data: an alternative algorithm for multiple imputation’, American Political Science Review 95(1): 49–69.Google Scholar
Klandermans, B. (1984), ‘Mobilization and participation: social–psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory’, American Sociological Review 49(5): 583–600.Google Scholar
Klandermans, B.Smith, J. (2002), ‘Survey research: a case for comparative designs’, in B. Klandermans and S. Staggenborg (eds), Methods of Social Movement Research, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–31.Google Scholar
Leeson, P.T. (2010), ‘Rational choice, Round Robin, and rebellion: an institutional solution to the problems of revolution’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 73(3): 297–307.Google Scholar
Levin, M.Spiegel, J. (1977), ‘Point and counterpoint in the literature of student unrest’, in D. Light Jr. and J. Spiegel (eds), The Dynamics of University Protest, Chicago: Helson-Hall, pp. 23–50.Google Scholar
Lichbach, M.I. (1996), The Cooperator's Dilemma, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, R. (2004), Prairie Power: Voices of 1960s Midwestern Student Protest, Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Maas, C.J.M.Hox, J.J. (2005), ‘Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling’, Methodology 1(3): 86–92.Google Scholar
Möller, R., Sander, U., Schäfer, A., Villányi, D.Witte, M.D. (2009), ‘Motive structures and violence among young globalization critics: a statistical typology of the motives for protest at the 2007 G8 Summit’, International Journal of Conflict and Violence 3(1): 124–142.Google Scholar
Muller, E.N., Dietz, H.A.Finkel, S.E. (1991), ‘Discontent and the expected utility of rebellion: the case of Peru’, American Political Science Review 85(4): 1261–1282.Google Scholar
Muller, E.N.Opp, K.-D. (1986), ‘Rational choice and rebellious collective action’, American Political Science Review 80(2): 471–488.Google Scholar
Norris, P. (2007), ‘Political activism: new challenges, new opportunities’, in C. Boix and S. Stokes (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 628–652.Google Scholar
Oberschall, A. (1993), Social Movements: Ideologies, Interests, and Identities, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Oliver, P. (1980), ‘Rewards and punishments as selective incentives for collective action: theoretical investigations’, American Journal of Sociology 85(6): 1356–1375.Google Scholar
Oliver, P. (1984), ‘‘If you don't do it, nobody else will’: active and token contributors to local collective action’, American Sociological Review 49(5): 601–610.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Opp, K.-D. (1988), ‘Grievances and participation in social movements’, American Sociological Review 53(6): 853–864.Google Scholar
Opp, K.-D. (1990), ‘Postmaterialism, collective action, and political protest’, American Journal of Political Science 34(1): 212–235.Google Scholar
Opp, K.-D. (1999), ‘Contending conceptions of the theory of rational action’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 11(2): 171–202.Google Scholar
Opp, K.-D. (2009), Theories of Political Protest and Social Movements: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Critique, and Synthesis, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Polletta, F. (1998), ‘‘It was like a fever…’ narrative and identity in social protest’, Social Problems 45(2): 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polletta, F.Jasper, J.M. (2001), ‘Collective identity and social movements’, Annual Review of Sociology 27: 283–305.Google Scholar
Psacharopoulos, G. (2003), ‘The social cost of an outdated law: Article 16 of the Greek Constitution’, European Journal of Law and Economics 16(2): 123–137.Google Scholar
Psacharopoulos, G.Kazamias, A.M. (1980), ‘Student activism in Greece: a historical and empirical analysis’, Higher Education 9(2): 127–138.Google Scholar
Sherkat, D.A.Blocker, T.J. (1994), ‘The political development of sixties’ activists: identifying the influence of class, gender, and socialization on protest participation’, Social Forces 72(3): 821–842.Google Scholar
Snijders, T.Bosker, R. (1999), Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Applied Multilevel Analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Spreen, M. (1992), ‘Rare populations, hidden populations, and link-tracing designs: what and why?’, Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique 6(1): 34–58.Google Scholar
Steenbergen, M.R.Jones, B.S. (2002), ‘Modeling multilevel data structures’, American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 218–237.Google Scholar
Teune, S. (2007), ‘Humour as a guerrilla tactic: the West German student movement's mockery of the establishment’, International Review of Social History 52(Suppl): 115–132.Google Scholar
van Dyke, N. (1998), ‘Hotbeds of activism: locations of student protest’, Social Problems 45(2): 205–220.Google Scholar
Whiteley, P.F. (1995), ‘Rational choice and political participation: evaluating the debate’, Political Research Quarterly 48(1): 211–233.Google Scholar
Walgrave, S.Verhulst, J. (2011), ‘Selection and response bias in protest surveys’, Mobilization: An International Journal 16(2): 203–222.Google Scholar
Dinas supplementary material
Dinas supplementary material
PDF
71.1 KB