Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:04:42.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public policy-making and risk profiles: Scandinavian centre-right governments after the turn of the millennium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2016

Christoph Arndt
Christoph Arndt*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent theoretical advances in the welfare state literature have outlined the differences between labour market- and life course-related schemes as centre-right parties have difficulties in enacting retrenchment on life course-related schemes because these concern every voter. In contrast, the textbook risk profile of centre-right parties’ electorates allows them to cutback on labour market-related schemes as these parties get negligible support from workers and low-income voters. Conducting a comparative case study of recent Danish and Swedish centre-right governments, this article analyses the stylized assumptions on the party level by comparing two similar centre-right governments, which differed in their voter coalitions’ risk profile. I first argue that centre-right governments are generally constrained by the popular entrenchment of the universal welfare state when it comes to life course-related welfare schemes. Second, I argue that the leeway on labour market-related schemes is contingent on the actual risk profile of the centre-right’s electorate, and thereby move beyond the stylized assumptions from recent literature. In this respect, the Danish centre-right did, in contrast to its Swedish counterpart, gain power with an unusual high support among working-class voters which constrained its latitude on labour market-related schemes. I find that the Danish centre-right governments after 2001 acted with bound hands thanks to its high working-class backing, and refrained from outright cutbacks on both labour market- and life course-related schemes until 2010 except for labour market outsiders. In contrast, the Swedish centre-right had a much lower working-class backing and therefore engaged in some outright cutbacks of labour market-related schemes such as unemployment benefits directly after taking office 2006. The centre-right’s actual voter coalition’s risk profile is thus an important determinant for its public policies and its leeway for policy-seeking.

Keywords

right-wing governmentsrisk profileslife courselabour marketwelfare state retrenchment
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , November 2017 , pp. 495 - 518
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, J.P. and Scruggs, L. (2004), ‘Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies’, American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 496–512.Google Scholar
Andersen, J. and Andersen, J.G. (2003), ‘Klassernes forsvinden’, in J.G. Andersen and O. Borre (eds), Politisk Forandring. Værdipolitik og Nye Skillelinjer ved Folketingsvalget 2001, Aarhus: Systeme, pp. 207–221.Google Scholar
Andersen, J.G. (2003), ‘Partiernes image: De Borgerlige Bedst til at Sikre Velfærden’, in J.G. Andersen and O. Borre (eds), Politisk Forandring. Værdipolitik og Nye Skillelinjer ved Folketingsvalget 2001, Aarhus: Systime, pp. 151–170.Google Scholar
Andersen, J.G. (2007), ‘Restricting access to social protection for immigrants in the Danish welfare state’, Benefits 15(3): 257–269.Google Scholar
Andersen, J.G. (2011), ‘Denmark: ambiguous modernization of an inclusive unemployment protection system’, in J. Clasen and D. Clegg (eds), Regulating the Risk of Unemployment. National Adaptions to Post-Industrial Labour Markets in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 187–207.Google Scholar
Andersen, J.G. (2012), ‘Økonomisk Bæredygtighed – Politisk Usikkerhed. Den Danske Velfærdsstat 1990–2012’, Politica 44(3): 339–361.Google Scholar
Arndt, C. (2013), The Electoral Consequence of Third Way Welfare State Reforms, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, P. (1990), The Politics of Social Solidarity. Class Bases of the European Welfare State 1875–1975, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berglund, T. and Esser, I. (2014), Modell i Förändring. Landrapport om Sverige. Fafo-rapport 2014:10, Oslo.Google Scholar
Beskæftigelsesministeriet (2004), Notat Vedrørende Kontanthjælpsloftet. Retrieved 10 October 2015 from http://bm.dk/da/Aktuelt/Pressemeddelelser/Arkiv/2004/0713%20Notat%20vedroerende%20Kontanthjaelpsloftet.aspx Google Scholar
Beskæftigelsesudvalget (2013), BEU Alm.del endeligt svar på spørgsmål 79. Retrieved 10 October 2015 from http://www.ft.dk/samling/20131/almdel/beu/spm/79/svar/1090490/1302411.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bonde, A. (2005), Velfærdskommissionen Vil Skære Dagpenge Ned Til To et Halvt År. Berlingske Tidende, 8 December, p. 10.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, M.R., Goerres, A. and Weschle, S. (2009), ‘Attitudes towards redistributive spending in an era of demographic ageing: the rival pressures from age and income in 14 OECD countries’, Journal of European Social Policy 19(3): 195–212.Google Scholar
Castles, F.G. (ed.) (1982), The Impact of Parties: Politics and Policies in Democratic Capitalist States, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Christiansen, P.M., Nørgaard, A.S., Rommetvedt, H., Svensson, T., Thesen, G. and Öberg, P. (2010), ‘Varieties of democracy: interest groups and corporatist committees in Scandinavian policy making’, Voluntas 21(1): 22–40.Google Scholar
Cusack, T., Iversen, T. and Rehm, P. (2006), ‘Risks at work: the demand and supply sides of government redistribution’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22(3): 365–389.Google Scholar
Dagens Nyheter (2004), Borgarna Till Val Med Gemensamt Program, Dagens Nyheter, 31 August. Retrieved 3 September 2014 from http://www.dn.se/nyheter/politik/borgarna-till-val-med-gemensamt-program Google Scholar
Danmarks Statistik (2014), Offentligt forbrug fordelt på hovedfunktioner og individuel og kollektiv andel. Retrieved 8 October 2015 from www.statistikbanken.dk/OFF24 Google Scholar
Davidsson, J.B. and Marx, P. (2013), ‘Losing the issue losing the vote: issue competition and the reform of unemployment insurance in Germany and Sweden’, Political Studies 61(3): 505–522.Google Scholar
De Svenska Hälsoräkenskaperna 2001–2013 (2015). Retrieved 8 October 2015 from http://www.scb.se/nr0109/ Google Scholar
Ditlev, N. and Maressa, J.E. (2003), Dagpenge: Fogh Kæmper for Troværdigheden. Jyllands-Posten, 19 November, p. 3.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999), Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Försäkringskassan (2015), Förändringar Inom Socialförsäkrings och Bidragsområdena 1968–2015, Stockholm: Försäkringskassan.Google Scholar
Forsberg, M., Hedberg, P. and Oscarsson, H. (2011), Väljarnas partier 1956–2010. Rapport 2011:1, Valforskningsprogrammet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, Göteborgs Universitet, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Forssblad, M. (2008), Arbetsmarknadsministeren: Höjt Tak i A-kassan Kostar För Mycket. Sverigesradio, 11 November. Retrieved 10 October 2015 from http://sverigesradio.se/sida/ artikel.aspx?programid=83&artikel=2435270 Google Scholar
Hardis, A. (2006), Interview: Claus Hjort Frederiksen. Weekendavisen, 18 August, p. 2.Google Scholar
Häusermann, S. (2010), The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbs, D.A. (1977), ‘Political parties and macroeconomic policy’, American Political Science Review 71(4): 1467–1487.Google Scholar
Houmark Andersen, I. (2007), Dagpengereform: Hjort Afviser Svensk Dagpengemodel. Information, 9 January, pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
IAF (2010), Arbetslöshetsförsäkringen – Ersättningsnivå, Högsta Dagspenning, Genomsnittlig Dagpenning Och Kas/Grundbelopp Från Och Med 1980. Retrieved 10 October 2015 from http://www.iaf.se Google Scholar
Jensen, C. (2010), ‘Issue compensation and right-wing government social spending’, European Journal of Political Research 49(2): 282–299.Google Scholar
Jensen, C. (2011), ‘Marketization via compensation: health care and the politics of the right in advanced industrialized nations’, British Journal of Political Science 41(4): 907–926.Google Scholar
Jensen, C. (2012), ‘Labour market-versus life course-related social policies: understanding cross programme differences’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(2): 275–291.Google Scholar
Kittel, B. and Obinger, H. (2003), ‘Political parties, institutions, and the dynamics of social expenditure in times of austerity’, Journal of European Public Policy 10(1): 20–45.Google Scholar
Kjellberg, A. (2013), Vilka ‘Hoppada Av’ A-Kassan eller Avstod Från Att Gå Med? En Studie Av A-Kassornas Medlemsras. Studies in Social Policy, Industrial Relations, Working Life and Mobility, Lund University. Lund: Department of Sociology, Lund University.Google Scholar
Kjellberg, A. (2014), Växande Avgiftsskillnader i A-Kassan – Ökad Social Polarisering. Studies in Social Policy, Industrial Relations, Working Life and Mobility, Lund University. Lund: Department of Sociology, Lund University.Google Scholar
Klitgaard, M.B. and Nørgaard, A.S. (2014), ‘Structural stress or deliberate decision? Government partisanship and the disempowerment of unions in Denmark’, European Journal of Political Research 53(2): 404–421.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. (1983), The Democratic Class Struggle, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (2003), ‘New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–95’, American Political Science Review 97(3): 425–446.Google Scholar
Lindbom, A. (2008), ‘The Swedish conservative party and the welfare state: institutional change and adapting preferences’, Government and Opposition 43(4): 539–560.Google Scholar
Lönegård, C. (2009), ‘Det Blir Inte Några Ändringar i A-Kassan’, Fokus 2009(36): 31.Google Scholar
Maressa, J.E. (2003), Angsten for Vælgernes Dom. Jyllands-Posten, 12 November, p. 4.Google Scholar
Maressa, J.E. and Svane, A.M. (2003), Dagpenge: Dagpengene Fredes. Jyllands-Posten, 13 November, p. 4.Google Scholar
Moderaterna (2009), Framtidsvalet 2010. Moderaterna, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Mortensen, H. (2008), Tid til Forvandling. Venstres Vej til Magten, Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Öberg, P., Svensson, T., Christiansen, P.M., Nørgaard, A.S., Rommetvedt, H. and Thesen, G. (2011), ‘Disrupted exchange and declining corporatism: government authority and interest group capability in Scandinavia’, Government and Opposition 46(3): 365–391.Google Scholar
OECD (2013a), Economic Outlook 2013, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2013b), Crisis squeezes income and puts pressure on inequality and poverty. http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/OECD2013-Inequality-and-Poverty-8p.pdf Google Scholar
OECD (2014), OECD Employment Outlook 2014, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2015), OECD Health Statistics 2015. Retrieved 1 February 2016 from http://www.oecd.org/health/health-data.htm Google Scholar
Oscarsson, H. and Holmberg, S. (2008), Regeringsskifte. Väljarna och Valet 2006, Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.Google Scholar
Palme, J. (2012), ‘Den Nordiska Velfærdsstat og Globalisering. Sverige som Eksempel’, Økonomi & Politik 85(4): 3–15.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994), Dismantling the Welfare State: Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Re-Trenchment in Britain and the United States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prop (2006/07), 52: Regeringens proposition 2006/07:52 Driftsformer för sjukhus. http://www.riksdagen.se/sv/Dokument-Lagar/Forslag/Propositioner-och-skrivelser/Driftsformer-for-sjukhus_GU0352/?text=true Google Scholar
Prop (2013/14), 1: Regeringens proposition, Budgetpropositionen för 2014. Finansdepartementet, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Regeringskansliet (2007), Viktigare Lager & Förordningar Indför Halvårsskiftet 2007. Västerås, Regeringskansliet.Google Scholar
Regeringskansliet (2008), Viktigare Lager & Förordningar Indför Årsskiftet 2008/09. Västerås, Regeringskansliet.Google Scholar
Regeringskansliet (2014), Viktigare Lager & Förordningar Indför Årsskiftet 2013/14. Västerås, Regeringskansliet.Google Scholar
Ritzau (2004), Venstre Går Efter Jobfradrag. Ritzaus Bureau, Copenhagen, 17 December.Google Scholar
Ritzau (2005), Ingen Starthjælp til Danskere. Ritzaus Bureau, Copenhagen, 28 December.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M.G. (1982), Wohlfahrtsstaatliche Politik unter Bürgerlichen und Sozialdemokratischen Regierungen. Ein Internationaler Vergleich, Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
SFS (2009), 140: Lag om ändring i hälso- och sjukvårdslagen (1982:763).Google Scholar
SFS (2010), 243: Lag om ändring i hälso- och sjukvårdslagen (1982:763).Google Scholar
Sjöberg, O. (2011), ‘Sweden: ambivalent adjustment’, in J. Clasen and D. Clegg (eds), Regulating the Risk of Unemployment. National Adaptions to Post-Industrial Labour Markets in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 208–231.Google Scholar
SO (2012), Lägesbeskrivning av Arbetslöshetsförsäkringen Våren 2012. Arbetslöshetskassornas Samorganisation, Stockholm.Google Scholar
SO (various years) SO-rapport. Arbetslöshetskassornas Samorganisation, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Stubager, R. and Hansen, K.M. (2013), ‘Social Baggrund og Partivalg’, in R. Stubager, K.M. Hansen and J.G. Andersen (eds), Krisevalg. Økonomien og Folketingsvalg 2011, Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, pp. 61–88.Google Scholar
Stubager, R., Hansen, K.M. and Andersen, J.G. (2013), Krisevalg. Økonomien og Folketingsvalg 2011, Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag.Google Scholar
Thobo-Carlsen, J. (2001), Venstre Indleder Offensiv. Berlingske Tidende, 8 August, p. 2.Google Scholar
Van Oorschot, W. (2006), ‘Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states’, Journal of European Social Policy 16(1): 23–42.Google Scholar
Winter, N. (2006), ‘Beyond welfare: framing and the racialization of white opinion on social security’, American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 400–420.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Arndt supplementary material

Table A1

Download Arndt supplementary material(File)
File 15.9 KB