Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:52:27.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Presidents in business. Career and destiny of democratic leaders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Fortunato Musella
Fortunato Musella*
Affiliation:
Social Sciences Vico Monte di Pietà 1, University of Naples Federico II, Naples 80141, Italy
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Deep changes regard the political careers of democratic leaders. Until recently, becoming president or prime minister was the last step before retirement or withdrawal to an undemanding seat on the back benches. On the contrary recent heads of government are enthusiastically seeking alternative ways to capitalize on their prestige and contacts portfolio, often ending up in the world of business or international finance. There are many examples of such a trend, from Blair to Mulroney, from Schröder to Barak. This article provides an empirical analysis of the phenomenon, by examining a dataset of 441 leaders in 78 different democratic countries over a period dating from 1989 to 2012. Attention will be focused on the political background of the prime ministers and presidents, how long they stay in power, the average age of heads of government, what professional pursuits they are involved in after their term in office and what career model they follow. The article concludes by proposing a post-presidential model which indicates some of the current trends and illustrates how former leaders are gaining decision-making power and visibility.

Keywords

leaderspolitical careerdemocracy
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , May 2015 , pp. 293 - 313
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, L. (2010), ‘The ex-presidents’, Journal of Democracy 21: 64–78.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F.R., Berry, J.M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D.C. and Leach, B.L. (2009), Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Belenky, I. (1999), ‘The making of the ex-presidents 1797–1993: six recurrent models’, Presidential Studies Quarterly 29: 150–165.Google Scholar
Bennett, A.J. (1992), ‘Selecting prime ministers and presidents: a trans-Atlantic comparison in 1992’, Presidential Studies Quarterly 22: 279–294.Google Scholar
Bennister, M. (2012), Prime Ministers in Power. Political Leadership in Britain and Australia, London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernado, L. and Weiss, J. (2009), Citizen-in-Chief: The Second Lives of the American Presidents , New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Besley, T. and Reynal-Querol, M. (2011), ‘Do democracies select more educated leaders?’, American Political Science Review 105: 552–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondel, J. (1980), World Leaders: Heads of Government in the Postwar Period, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Blondel, J. (1985), Government Ministers in the Contemporary World, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Blondel, J. and Thiébault, J.-L. (eds) (1991), The Profession of Government Minister in Western Europe, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blondel, J. and Thiébault, J.-L. (2010), Political Leadership, Parties and Citizens, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boehm, F. (2007), Regulatory capture revisited–lessons from economics of corruption, Internet Centre for Corruption Research (ICGG) Working Paper, p. 22.Google Scholar
Borchert, J. (2001), Movement and linkage in political careers: individual ambition and institutional repercussions in a multi-level setting, ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, 6–11 April, Grenoble.Google Scholar
Borchert, J. and Zeiss, J. (2004), The Political Class in Advanced Democracies. A Comparative Handbook, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bryman, A., Collinson, D., Grint, K., Jackson, B. and Uhl-Bien, M. (2011), The Sage Handbook of Leadership, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Calise, M. and Lowi, J.T. (2010), ‘Bureaucracy’, in Hyperpolitics: An Interactive Dictionary of Political Science Concepts, Chicago: Chicago University of Chicago Press, pp. 56–61.Google Scholar
Calise, M. and Mannheimer, R. (1982), Governanti in Italia: un trentennio repubblicano, 1946-1976, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Campus, D. (2006), L'antipolitica al governo. De Gaulle, Reagan, Berlusconi, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Cotta, M. (1979), Classe politica e parlamento in Italia: 1946-1976, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Couto, R.A. (2010), Political and Civic Leadership: A Reference Handbook, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. (ed.) (2004), Post Democracy, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Daniel, J. (2006), ‘Soldiering on: the post-presidential years of Nelson Mandela 1999–2005’, in R. Southall and H. Melber (eds), Legacies of Power: Leadership, Change, and Former Presidents in African Politics, Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council and Uppsala, Nordiska Institute, pp. 26–50.Google Scholar
Davis, J.W. (1998), Leadership Selection in Six Western Democracies, Westport: Greenwood.Google Scholar
De Vries, M.K. (2003), ‘The Retirement Syndrome: The Psychology of Letting Go’, European Management Journal 21: 707–716.Google Scholar
Diermeier, D., Keane, M. and Merlo, A. (2005), ‘A Political Economy Model of Congressional Careers’, American Economic Review 95: 347–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Leo, R. (2012), Il ritorno delle élites, Roma: Manifestolibri.Google Scholar
Dogan, M. (1979), ‘How to become a cabinet minister in France: Career Pathways, 1870–1978’, Comparative Politics 12: 1–25.Google Scholar
Dowding, K. and Dumont, P. (2009), The Selection of Ministers in Europe: Hiring and Firing, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dunphy, H. (2007), Lanton raps former European leaders, Associated Press, 13 June. http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-06-13-2870151492_x.htm Google Scholar
Elgie, R. (2000), ‘Review: Leadership Selection in Six Western Democracies by James W. Davis’, American Political Science Review 94: 963.Google Scholar
Foley, M. (1993), The Rise of the British Presidency, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, M. (2000), The British Presidency, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Goethals, G.S., Sorensen, G.J. and MacBurns, J. (eds) (2004), The Encyclopedia of Leadership, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Government of Canada (2006), Canadian Federal Accountability Act, 11 April, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Helms, L. (2005), Presidents, Prime Ministers, and Chancellors, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Helms, L. (ed.) (2012), Comparative Political Leadership, London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. (1998), Out of Retirement. Former President Jimmy Carter has tried to mediate some of the world’s most stubborn conflicts, The New York Times, 7 June.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, B. (2005), Presidential Temples: How Memorials and Libraries Shape Public Memory, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Keane, J. (2009), ‘Life after political death: the fate of leaders after leaving high office’, in J. Keane, H. Patapan, P. t’ Hart (eds), Dispersed Democratic Leadership: Origins, Dynamics and Implications, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. (1981), ‘The rise of the career politician in Britain – and its consequences’, British Journal of Political Science 11: 249–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. (2002a), Leaders' Personalities and the Outcome of Democratic Elections, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
King, A. (2002b), The outsider as political leader: the case of Margaret Thatcher’, British Journal of Political Science 32: 435–454.Google Scholar
Masciulli, J., Molchanov, M.A. and Knight, W.A. (eds) (2009), The Ashgate Research Companion to Political Leadership, London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mattozzi, A. and Merlo, A. (2008), ‘Political careers or career politicians’, Journal of Public Economics 92: 597–608.Google Scholar
Morgan, I. (2012), ‘After the White House: The Modern U.S. Post-Presidency’, in K. Theakston and J. de Vries (eds), Former Leaders in Modern democracies: Political Sunsets, London: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 12–32.Google Scholar
Mughan, A. (2000), Media and the Presidentialization of Parliamentary Elections, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musella, F. (2012), Il Premier diviso. Italia tra presidenzialismo e parlamentarismo, Milano: Bocconi.Google Scholar
Musella, F. (2014), ‘A premier without parliament. The legislative process in the Italian Second Republic’, Journal of Comparative Politics 7: 4–17.Google Scholar
O’Malley, E. (2007), ‘The power of prime ministers: results of an expert survey’, International Political Science Review 28: 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poguntke, T. and Webb, P. (eds) (2005), The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poli, E. (2001), Forza Italia. Strutture, leadership e radicamento territoriale, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R.A.W. and 't Hart, P. (eds) (2014), The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, A.J. and Shugart, M.S. (2010), Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers. How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, D.J. (1999), Political ambition in Brazil, 1945–95: theory and evidence, Working Paper, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Schaller, T.F. and Williams, T.W. (2003), ‘The contemporary presidency: postpresidential influence in the postmodern era Presidential Studies Quarterly 33: 188–200.Google Scholar
Schenker, A.E. (1982), ‘Former presidents: suggestions for the study of an often neglected resource’, Presidential Studies Quarterly 12: 545–551.Google Scholar
Schenker, A.E. (1985), ‘Former prime ministers and presidents: suggestions for study and comparison’, Presidential Studies Quarterly 15: 498–511.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, J.A. (1966), Ambition and Politics. Political Careers in the United States, Chicago: RandMcNally.Google Scholar
Schneider, B.R. (1991), Politics within the State: Elite Bureaucrats and Industrial Policy in Authoritarian Brazil, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Skidmore, M.J. (2004), After the White House: Former Presidents as Private Citizens, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Smith, S. (2008), ‘Former presidents: federal pension and retirement benefits’, Congressional Research Service, Washington, US Senate Retrieved 6 June 2013 from www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/98-249.pdf Google Scholar
‘t Hart, P. and Uhr, J. (2008), ‘Understanding public leadership: an introduction’, in P. ‘t Hart, J. Uhr (eds), Public Leadership: Perspectives and Practices, Camberra: ANU ePress, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Theakston, K. (2010), After Number 10. Former Prime Ministers in British Politics, London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Theakston, K. and de Vries, J. (eds) (2012), Former Leaders in Modern Democracies: Political Sunsets, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Updegrove, M.K. (2006), Second Acts: Presidential Lives and Legacies After the White House, Guilford: The Lyons Press.Google Scholar
Useem, M. (1984), The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the US and UK, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verzichelli, L. (2010), Vivere di politica. Come (non) cambiano le carriere politiche in Italia, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1946), ‘Politics as a vocation’, in C. Wright Mills and H.H. Gerth (eds), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 77–128.Google Scholar
Wice, P.W. (2009), Presidents in Retirement: Alone and Out of Office, Latham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar