Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T14:43:12.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The politics of blame avoidance in complex delegation structures: the public transport crisis in Berlin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2019

Tobias Bach Open the ORCID record for Tobias Bach [Opens in a new window]  and
Kai Wegrich
Tobias Bach*
Affiliation:
Professor of Public Policy and Public Administration, Department of Political Science, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1097 Blindern, Oslo, Norway
Kai Wegrich
Affiliation:
Professor of Public Administration and Public Policy, Hertie School, Friedrichstr. 180, Berlin, Germany
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article analyses the public attribution of blame and the use of presentational strategies of blame avoidance in complex delegation structures. We theorize and empirically demonstrate that complex delegation structures result in the diffusion of blame to multiple actors so that a clear allocation of responsibility becomes more difficult. The article shows that public attribution of blame follows a distinct temporal pattern in which politicians only gradually move into the centre of the blame storm. We also find that blame-takers deploy sequential patterns of presentational management and use blame shifting to other actors as a dominant strategy. However, the analysis suggests that complex delegation structures impose limitations on blame-takers’ use of blame avoidance strategies, and that sequential presentational management becomes less useful over time. The article uses media content analysis to study blame games during a major crisis of the public transport system in Berlin, Germany.

Keywords

blame avoidancedelegationinstitutional designcrisis managementregulatory state
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , November 2019 , pp. 415 - 431
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bach, T. and Wegrich, K. (2016), ‘Regulatory reform, accountability and blame in public service delivery: the public transport crisis in Berlin’, in Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook to Accountability and Welfare State Reforms in Europe, London: Routledge, pp. 223–235.Google Scholar
Bache, I., Bartle, I., Flinders, M. and Marsden, G. (2015), ‘Blame games and climate change: accountability, multi-level governance and carbon management’, The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 17(1): 64–88. doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.12040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartling, B. and Fischbacher, U. (2012), ‘Shifting the blame: on delegation and responsibility’, The Review of Economic Studies 79(1): 67–87. doi: 10.1093/restud/rdr023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boin, A., ‘t Hart, P. and McConnell, A. (2009), ‘Crisis exploitation: political and policy impacts of framing contests’, Journal of European Public Policy 16(1): 81–106. doi: 10.1080/13501760802453221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, M. (2007), ‘Analysing and assessing accountability: a conceptual framework’, European Law Journal 13(4): 447–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, M., ‘t Hart, P., Dekker, S. and Verheuvel, G. (1999), ‘The politics of blame avoidance’, in Anheier, H.K. (ed.), When Things Go Wrong, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp. 123–147.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, J.M. and Jones, B.S. (2004), Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brändström, A. and Kuipers, S. (2003), ‘From “Normal incidents’ to political crises: understanding the selective politicization of policy failures”’, Government and Opposition 38(3): 279–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, H.-W. (2010), ‘Berliner S-Bahn am Scheideweg: Eine Denkschrift’, Signal 31(1): 29–35.Google Scholar
Hasler, K., Kübler, D. and Marcinkowksi, F. (2016), ‘Over-responsibilised and over-blamed: elected actors in media reporting on network governance. A comparative analysis in eight European metropolitan areas’, Policy & Politics 44(1): 135–152. doi: 10.1332/030557315X14434668993301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinterleitner, M. (2018a), ‘Policy failures, blame games and changes to policy practice’, Journal of Public Policy 38(2): 221–242. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X16000283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinterleitner, M. (2018b), ‘Salami tactics and the implementation of large-scale public projects’, Journal of European Public Policy: 1–19. Published online: 11 Nov 2018. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2018.1544654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinterleitner, M. and Sager, F. (2015), ‘Avoiding blame-a comprehensive framework and the Australian home insulation program fiasco’, Policy Studies Journal 43(1): 139–161. doi: 10.1111/psj.12088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinterleitner, M. and Sager, F. (2017), ‘Anticipatory and reactive forms of blame avoidance: of foxes and lions’, European Political Science Review 9(4): 587–606. doi: 10.1017/S1755773916000126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C. (2002), ‘The risk game and the blame game’, Government and Opposition 37(1): 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C. (2011), The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government, Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hood, C., Jennings, W. and Copeland, P. (2016), ‘Blame avoidance in comparative perspective: reactivity, staged retreat and efficacy’, Public Administration 94(2): 542–562. doi: 10.1111/padm.12235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C., Jennings, W., Dixon, R., Hogwood, B. and Beeston, C. (2009), ‘Testing times: exploring staged responses and the impact of blame management strategies in two examination fiasco cases’, European Journal of Political Research 48(6): 695–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, M.J. (1995), The Political Economy of Public Administration: Institutional Choice in the Public Sector, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O., Jilke, S., Petersen, C. and Van de Walle, S. (2016), ‘Citizens’ blame of politicians for public service failure: experimental evidence about blame reduction through delegation and contracting’, Public Administration Review 76(1): 83–93. doi: 10.1111/puar.12471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, M. (2002), ‘The wrong type of regulation? Regulatory failure and the railways in Britain and Germany’, Journal of Public Policy 22(03): 271–297. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X02002015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marvel, J.D. and Girth, A.M. (2016), ‘Citizen attributions of blame in third-party governance’, Public Administration Review 76(1): 96–108. doi: 10.1111/puar.12474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, K.M. (1990), ‘Avoiding blame: an experimental investigation of political excuses and justifications’, British Journal of Political Science 20(1): 119–131. doi: 10.1017/s0007123400005731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, P.B. (2012), ‘“It’s the Central Government’s Fault”: elected regional officials’ use of blame-shifting rhetoric’, Governance 25(3): 439–461. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01585.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, P.B. (2013), ‘Public sector reform and blame avoidance effects’, Journal of Public Policy 33(2): 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, P.B. (2016), ‘Agencification and blame shiftung: evaluating a neglected side of public sector reforms’, Public Administration 94(3): 630–646. doi: 10.1111/padm.12243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, D.P. (2012), ‘Extra-network organizational reputation and blame avoidance in networks: the Hurricane Katrina example’, Governance 25(4): 567–588. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01593.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piatak, J., Mohr, Z. and Leland, S. (2017), ‘Bureaucratic accountability in third-party governance: experimental evidence of blame attribution during times of budgetary crisis’, Public Administration 95(4): 976–989. doi: 10.1111/padm.12341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resodihardjo, S.L., Carroll, B.J., Eijk, C.J.A. Van and Maris, S. (2016), ‘Why traditional responses to blame games fail: the importance of context, ritual, and sub-blame games in the face of raves gone wrong’, Public Administration 94(2): 350–363. doi: 10.1111/padm.12202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittberger, B., Schwarzenbeck, H. and Zangl, B. (2017), ‘Where does the buck stop? Explaining public responsibility attributions in complex international institutions’, Journal of Common Market Studies 55(4): 909–924. doi:10.1111/jcms.12524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, C. (2000), ‘Accountability in the regulatory state’, Journal of Law and Society 27: 38–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. (2007), ‘Scything the grass: agenda-setting consequences of appointing public inquiries in the UK. A longitudinal analysis’, Policy & Politics 35(4): 629–650. doi: 10.1332/030557307782452985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VBB (2012), Verbundbericht/Network Report 2012. Berlin: Verkehrsverbund Berlin-Brandenburg GmbH.Google Scholar
Weaver, R.K. (1986), ‘The politics of blame avoidance’, Journal of Public Policy 6(4): 371–398. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X00004219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bach and Wegrich supplementary material

Tables A1-A3

Download Bach and Wegrich supplementary material(File)
File 36 KB