Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T20:39:19.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political awareness and support for redistribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2017

Jason Jordan
Jason Jordan*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Political Science & International Relations, Department of Political Science & International Relations, Drew University, New Jersey, USA
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Traditional research on preferences for redistributive social policy suggest increasingly complex models of public opinion formation that envision individuals balancing normative concerns against sophisticated calculations of economic self-interest. This research largely ignores the large body of evidence demonstrating significant differences in levels of political awareness across the population that strongly influence the quality, structure, and determinants of political preferences. Analyzing public opinion data for 14 European countries reveals that large sections of the population do not appear to hold or express social policy preferences that are internally consistent or well-grounded in either their self-interests or ideological predispositions. At low levels of political awareness, little discernible connection exists between seemingly related preferences for redistribution, levels of social spending, left–right positioning, tolerance for inequality, or overall support for the welfare state. Moreover, income, a theoretically central causal variable, has no effect on attitudes toward redistribution when political awareness is low. These results pose a significant challenge to existing models of social policy preferences.

Keywords

public opinionwelfare statepolitical awareness
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 119 - 137
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, A. (2010), The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Alesina, A. and Glaeser, E.L. (2004), Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althaus, S.L. (2003), Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R., Tilley, J. and Heath, A.F. (2005), ‘Political knowledge and enlightened preferences: party choice through the electoral cycle’, British Journal of Political Science 35: 285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, J.R. (2012), ‘The electoral consequences of voter ignorance’, Electoral Studies 31(4): 796–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldassarri, D. and Gelman, A. (2008), ‘Partisans without constraint: political polarization and trends in American public opinion’, American Journal of Sociology 114(2): 408–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bean, C. and Papadakis, E. (1998), ‘A comparison of mass attitudes towards the welfare state in different institutional regimes, 1985-1990’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 10(3): 211–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, G.F. (2005), The Illusion of Public Opinion: Fact and Artifact in American Public Opinion Polls, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Blekesaune, M. and Quadagno, J. (2003), ‘Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: a comparative analysis of 24 nations’, European Sociological Review 19(5): 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, P.E. (1964), ‘The nature of belief systems in mass publics’, in D. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Converse, P.E. (2000), ‘Assessing the capacity of mass electorates’, Annual Review of Political Science 3: 331–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, M.X. and Keeter, S. (1993), ‘Measuring political knowledge: putting first things first’, American Journal of Political Science 37(4): 1179–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, M.X. and Keeter, S. (1996), What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Edlund, J. (1999), ‘Trust in government and welfare regimes: attitudes to redistribution and financial cheating in the USA and Norway’, European Journal of Political Research 35(3): 341–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, R. and Goldthorpe, J.H. (1992), The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, S. (1989), ‘Measuring issue preferences: the problem of response instability’, Political Analysis 1(1): 25–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finseraas, H. (2008), ‘Immigration and preferences for redistribution: an empirical analysis of European survey data’, Comparative European Politics 6(4): 407–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraile, M. (2013), ‘Do information-rich contexts reduce knowledge inequalities? The contextual determinants of political knowledge in Europe’, Acta Politica 48(2): 119–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzese, R.J. Jr. (2005), ‘Empirical strategies for various manifestations of multilevel data’, Political Analysis 13(4): 430–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederico, C.M. and Hunt, C.V. (2013), ‘Political information, political involvement, and reliance on ideology in political evaluation’, Political Behavior 35: 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronlund, K. and Milner, H. (2006), ‘The determinants of political knowledge in comparative perspective’, Scandinavian Political Studies 29(4): 386–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2001), ‘An asset theory of social policy preferences’, American Political Science Review 95(4): 875–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2006), ‘Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: why some democracies redistribute more than others’, American Political Science Review 100(2): 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2015), ‘Information, inequality, and mass polarization: ideology in advanced democracies’, Comparative Political Studies 48(13): 1781–1813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jæger, M.M. (2006), ‘Welfare regimes and attitudes towards redistribution: the regime hypothesis revisited’, European Sociological Review 22(2): 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, J. (2014), ‘Religious belief, religious denomination, and preferences for redistribution: a comparison across 13 countries.’ West European Politics 37(1): 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, C.M., Krosnick, J.A. and Milburn, M.A. (1981), ‘Political involvement and attitude structure in the general public’, American Sociological Review 46(5): 660–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, G., Tomz, M. and Wittenberg, J. (2000), ‘Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation’, American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (1998), ‘The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in western countries’, American Sociological Review 63(5): 661–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklinski, J.H., Quirk, P.J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D. and Rich, R.F. (2000), ‘Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship’, Journal of Politics 62(3): 790–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M.S., Jacoby, W.G., Norpoth, H. and Weisberg, H.F. (2008), The American Voter Revisited, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, A. and McCubbins, M.D. (1998), The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luskin, R.C. (1987), ‘Measuring political sophistication’, American Journal of Political Science 31(4): 856–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luskin, R.C. (1990), ‘Explaining political sophistication’, Political Behavior 12(4): 331–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, A.H. and Richard, S.F. (1981), ‘A rational theory of the size of government’, Journal of Political Economy 89(5): 914–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moene, K.O. and Wallerstein, M. (2001), ‘Inequality, social insurance, and redistribution’, American Political Science Review 95(4): 859–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1994), Psychometric Theory, 3rd edn., New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pasek, J. and Krosnick, J.A. (2010), ‘Optimizing survey questionnaire design in political science: insights from psychology’, in J.E. Leighley (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Popkin, S.L. (1994), The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns, 2nd edn., Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rehm, P. (2011), ‘Social policy by popular demand’, World Politics 63(2): 271–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. and Harrison, E. (2007), ‘The European socio-economic classification: a new social class schema for comparative European research’, European Studies 9(3): 459–490.Google Scholar
Scheve, K. and Stasavage, D. (2006), ‘Religion and preferences for social insurance’, Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1(3): 255–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuman, H. and Presser, S. (1981), Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Steenbergen, M.R. and Jones, B.S. (2002), ‘Modeling multilevel data structures’, American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 218–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svallfors, S. (1997), ‘Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: a comparison of eight Western nations’, European Sociological Review 13(3): 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, J. (1990), ‘Political awareness, elite opinion leadership, and the mass survey response’, Social Cognition 8(1): 125–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, J. (1992), The Nature and Origin of Mass Opinion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, J. (2012), ‘What nature and origins leaves out’, Critical Review 24(4): 569–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Jordan supplementary material

Jordan supplementary material 1

Download Jordan supplementary material(File)
File 31.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Jordan supplementary material

Appendix A

Download Jordan supplementary material(File)
File 19.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Jordan supplementary material

Appendix B

Download Jordan supplementary material(File)
File 57.2 KB