Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:21:47.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The making of four ideologies of globalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2018

Pieter de Wilde
Pieter de Wilde*
Affiliation:
Institute for Historical Studies, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
*
*Correspondence author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent societal conflicts over immigration, free trade and EU membership testify to the controversiality of globalization in Western societies. Brexit, Trump, the refugee crisis, and the debate around transatlantic trade and investment partnership (TTIP) are clear illustrations of the salience of globalization in politics. Many argue that neoliberal ideology supports and drives globalization. This raises the question whether opposition to globalization is also ideological, and how. This contribution investigates the existence of ideologies of globalization. It does so presenting a novel rigorous version of Freeden’s analytical morphological approach to ideologies, with deductive conceptualization drawing on political philosophy combined with inductive correlational analysis at the level of individual arguments. It presents original representative claims analysis data on debates over climate change, human rights, migration, trade, and regional integration in the United States, Germany, Poland, Mexico, Turkey, the European Parliament, and the United Nations General Assembly between 2004 and 2011. It shows that we are witnessing the making of four ideologies of globalization: liberalism, cosmopolitanism, communitarianism, and statism. Each has its own distinctive grouping of concepts. Their emergence may solidify a globalization cleavage in Western societies, shape democratic politics for years to come, and affect the course of globalization itself.

Keywords

claim analysiscommunitarianismcosmopolitanismideologyglobalizationpublic sphere
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , February 2019 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azmanova, A (2011) After the left-right (dis)continuum: globalization and the remaking of Europe’s ideological geography. International Political Sociology 5, 384–407.Google Scholar
Bartolini, S, Mair, P (1990) Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability. The Stabilisation of European Electorates, 1885-1985, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
BBC (2017) France Election: Far-Right’s Le Pen Rails Against Globalisation. BBC. Retrieved 9 June 2017 from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38872335.Google Scholar
Berkhout, J, Sudulich, L (2011) Codebook for political claims analysis. SOM Working Papers, 2011/02, University of Neuchatel, Neuchatel. Retrieved 12 March 2012 from http://www.som-project.eu/Google Scholar
De Wilde, P (2013) Representative claims analysis: theory meets method, Journal of European Public Policy 20(2), 278–294.Google Scholar
De Wilde, P, Koopmans, R, Merkel, W, Strijbis, O, Zürn, M (forthcoming) The Struggle over Borders. A Political Sociology of Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Wilde, P, Koopmans, R, Zürn, M (2014) The political sociology of cosmopolitanism and communitarianism: representative claims analysis. WZB Discussion Papers, SP IV 2014/102, WZB Berlin Social Science Center. Retrieved from http://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2014/iv14-102.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N (1992) Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. in Craig Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 109–142.Google Scholar
Freeden, M (1996) Ideologies and Political Theory. A Conceptual Approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeden, M (1998) Is nationalism a distinct ideology?, Political Studies 46, 748–765.Google Scholar
Freeden, M (2006) Ideology and political theory, Journal of Political Ideologies 11(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
Hantrais, L (1999) Contextualization in cross-national comparative research, International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2(2), 93–108.Google Scholar
Helbling, M, Hoeglinger, D, Wueest, B (2010) How political parties frame European integration, European Journal of Political Research 49(4), 496–521.Google Scholar
Heywood, A (2017) Political Ideologies. An Introduction, 6th edn, London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Hobolt, SB (2016) The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent, Journal of European Public Policy 23(9), 1259–1277.Google Scholar
Hooghe, L, Marks, G (2018) Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy 25(1), 109–135.Google Scholar
Keynes, JM (1951[1936]) The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money, London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Koopmans, R (2002) Codebook for the analysis of political mobilisation and communication in European public spheres. Europub.com Project, Berlin. Retrieved 23 July 2012 from http://europub.wz-berlin.deGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, R, Statham, P (1999) Political claims analysis: integrating protest event and political discourse approaches, Mobilization: An International Quarterly 4(2), 203–221.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H, Grande, E, Lachat, R, Dolezal, M, Bornschier, S, Frey, T (2008) West European Politics in the Age of Globalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H, Grande, E, Dolezal, M, Helbling, M, Höglinger, D, Hutter, S, Wüest, B (2012) Political Conflict in Western Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W (1995) Multicultural Citizenship. A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W (2010) Citizenship in an era of globalization. in GW Brown and D Held (eds), The Cosmopolitanism Reader, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 435–443.Google Scholar
Leader Maynard, J, Mildenberger, M (2016) Convergence and divergence in the study of ideology: a critical review, British Journal of Political Science 48(2), 563–589.Google Scholar
Lipset, SM, Rokkan, S (1967) Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: an introduction. in S.M. Lipset and S. Rokkan (eds), Party Systems and Voter Alignments, New York: Free Press, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
Lombard, M, Snyder-Duch, J, Bracken, CC (2002) Content analysis in mass communication. assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability, Human Communication Research 28(4), 587–604.Google Scholar
Mair, P (2005) Cleavages. in Richard S. Katz (ed.), Handbook of Party Politics, London: Sage, pp. 371–375.Google Scholar
Mittelman, JH (2004) Whither Globalization? The Vortex of Knowledge and Ideology, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nagel, T (2005) The problem of global justice, Philosophy & Public Affairs 33(2), 113–147.Google Scholar
Rawls, J (1971) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rupert, M (2000) Ideologies of Globalization. Contending Visions of a New World Order, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sandel, MJ (1998 [1982]) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saward, M (2010) The Representative Claim, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Statham, P (2005) Forging divergent and “path dependent” ways to Europe?: Political communication over European integration in the British and French public spheres. European Political Communication Working Paper Series, 2005/11, EurPolCom, University of Leeds, Leeds. Retrieved 23 July 2012 from http://www.eurpolcom.eu/exhibits/paper_11.pdfGoogle Scholar
Steger, MB (2007) Globalization and ideology. in George Ritzer (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Globalization, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 367–382.Google Scholar
Steger, MB (2013) Political ideologies in the age of globalization. in M. Freeden, L.T., Sargent and M. Stears (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 214–231.Google Scholar
Steger, MB, Wilson, EK (2012) Anti-globalization or alter-globalization? Mapping the political ideology of the global justice movement, International Studies Quarterly 56, 439–454.Google Scholar
Steger, MB, Goodman, J, Wilson, EK (2013) Justice Globalism. Ideology, Crises, Policy, Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Stewart, H, Mason, R (2016) Nigel Farage’s anti-migrant poster reported to police’. Retrieved 10 June 2017 from https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/16/nigel-farage-defends-ukip-breaking-point-poster-queue-of-migrantsGoogle Scholar
Teney, C, Lacewell, OP, De Wilde, P (2014) Winners and losers of globalization in Europe: attitudes and ideologies, European Political Science Review 6(4), 575–595.Google Scholar
Walzer, M (1983) Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism and Equality, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wirth, W, Kolb, S (2004) Designs and methods of comparative political communication research. in F. Esser and B. Pfetsch (eds), Comparing Political Communication. Theories, Cases, and Challenges, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–111.Google Scholar
Zürn, M, De Wilde, P (2016) Debating globalization: cosmopolitanism and communitarianism as political ideologies, Journal of Political Ideologies 21(3), 280–301.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

de Wilde supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download de Wilde supplementary material(File)
File 152.7 KB