Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:30:37.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do politics matter? Women in Swedish local elected assemblies 1970–2010 and gender equality in outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2011

Lena Wängnerud  and
Anders Sundell
Lena Wängnerud*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Anders Sundell
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
*
* E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A substantial number of studies support the notion that having a high number of women in elected office helps strengthen the position of women in society. However, some of the most cited studies rely on questionnaires asking elected representatives about their attitudes and priorities, thus focusing on the input side of the political system. The closer one gets to outcomes in citizens’ everyday lives, the fewer empirical findings there are to report. In this study, we attempt to explain contemporary variations in gender equality at the sub-national level in Sweden. We use six indicators to capture a broad spectrum of everyday life situations. The overall finding is that having a high number of women elected does affect conditions for women citizens, making them more equal to men in terms of factors such as income levels, full-time vs. part-time employment, and distribution of parental leave between mothers and fathers, even when controlling for party ideology and modernization at the municipal level. No effect was found, however, on factors such as unemployment, poor health, and poverty among women. Thus, the politics of presence theory (Phillips, 1995), which emphasizes the importance of having a high number of women elected, does exert an effect, but the effect needs to be specified. For some dimensions of gender equality, the driving forces of change have more to do with general transformations of society than the equal distribution of women and men in elected assemblies. We thoroughly discuss measurement challenges since there is no accepted or straightforward way of testing the politics of presence theory. We challenge the conventional wisdom of using indexes to capture the network of circumstances that determines the relationship between women and men in society; aggregating several factors undermines the possibility of building fine-tuned understandings of the operative mechanisms.

Keywords

political representationgender equalityoutcomessub-national variation
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , 08 February 2012 , pp. 97 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrecht, J., Björklund, A.Vroman, S. (2003), ‘Is there a glass ceiling in Sweden?’, Journal of Labor Economics 21(1): 145–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, S.Sen, A. (1995), Gender Inequality in Human Development: Theories and Measurement (Occasional Paper no. 19). New York: United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report Office.Google Scholar
Bergh, J. (2007), ‘Gender attitudes and modernization processes’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 19(1): 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berglund, S. (1988), Svenska valdata 1911–1944. Svensk Nationell Datatjänst, SND 0204.Google Scholar
Bergqvist, C., Borchorst, A.Christensen, A-D.Ramstedt-Silén, V.Raaum, N.C.Styrkársdóttir, A. (eds) (2000), Equal Democracies? Gender and Politics in the Nordic Countries, Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Bratton, K.A.Ray, L.P. (2002), ‘Descriptive representation, policy outcomes, and municipal day-care coverage in Norway’, American Journal of Political Science 46(2): 428–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, K. (2006), ‘Substantive representation of women: the representation of women's interests and the impact of descriptive representation in the Belgian parliament (1900–1979)’, Journal of Women Political Policy 28(2): 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, M.G. (2003), ‘Current controversies in feminist theory’, Annual Review of Political Science 6(1): 399–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz, M.M. (2005), Representing Women? Female Legislators in West European Parliaments, Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Dodson, D.L. (2006), The Impact of Women in Congress, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eduards, M. (1997), ‘The women's shelter movement’, in G. Gustafsson (ed.), Towards a New Democratic Order? Women's Organizing in Sweden in the 1990s, Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik, pp. 120–168.Google Scholar
Eriksson, R. (2005), Parental Leave in Sweden: The Effects of the Second Daddy Month (Working Paper 9/2005). Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Forsberg, G. (1997), ‘Rulltrapperegioner och social infrastruktur’, in E. Sundin (ed.), Om makt och kön – in spåren av offentliga organisationers omvandling, Stockholm: SOU, pp. 31–41.Google Scholar
Gornick, J.Jacobs, J. (1998), ‘Gender, the welfare state, and public employment: a comparative study of seven industrialized countries’, American Sociological Review 63(5): 688–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graubard, S.R. (ed.) (1986), Norden – The Passion for Equality, Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Grey, S. (2002), ‘Does size matter? Critical mass and New Zealand's women MPs’, in K. Ross (ed.), Women, Politics, and Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–129.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, A. (2008), Könsmakt och könsbaserade intressen: Om könspolitisk representation i svensk kommunalpolitik. PhD thesis. Förvaltningshögskolan: Göteborgs Universitet.Google Scholar
Hedlund, G. (1996), Det handlar om prioriteringar: Kvinnors villkor och intressen i lokal politik. PhD thesis. Örebro: Örebro Studies in Politics.Google Scholar
Hernes, H. (1987), Welfare State and Woman Power: Essays in State Feminism, Oslo: Oslo Norwegian Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R.Norris, P. (2003), Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsson, N.Kotsadam, A. (2010), ‘Do attitudes toward gender equality really differ between Norway and Sweden?’, Journal of European Social Policy 20(2): 142–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, L. (1983), ‘Kommunal servicevariation’, in L. Strömberg and J. Westerståhl (eds), De nya kommunerna. En sammanfattning av den kommunaldemokratiska forskningsgruppens undersökningar, Stockholm: LiberFörlag, pp. 209–247.Google Scholar
Karlsson, D., Johansson, V. (2006), ‘Kingdom of Sweden’, in UCGL country profiles (online). Retrieved 30 November 2010 from www.cities-localgovernments.orgGoogle Scholar
Kimmel, M. (2004), The Gendered Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kittilson, M.C. (2006), Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Liebig, B. (2000), ‘Perspectives on gender cultures in elites’, in M. Vianello and G. Moore (eds), Gendering Elites: Economic and Political Leadership in 27 Industrialized Societies, London: MacMillan, pp. 220–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, K.O.Vernby, K. (2007), ‘Om kvinnorepresentation och rätten till heltid’, Kommunal Ekonomi och Politik 11(4): 7–31.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, J. (2005), Feminizing Politics, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, J.Norris, P. (eds) (1993), Gender and Party Politics, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, J.Norris, P. (2003), ‘Westminster women: the politics of presence’, Political Studies 51(1): 84–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyman, H.Pettersson, J. (2002), ‘Spelade Pappamånaden Någon Roll?’, RFV Analyserar 14: 40–44.Google Scholar
Permanyer, I. (2010), ‘The measurement of multidimensional gender inequality: continuing the debate’, Social Indicators Research 95: 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, H. (1967), The Concept of Representation, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, A. (1995), The Politics of Presence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. (2007), Multiculturalism without Culture, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pincus, I. (2002), The politics of gender equality policy: a study of implementation and non-implementation in three Swedish municipalities. PhD thesis. Örebro: Örebro Studies in Political Science.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbluth, F., Salmond, R.Thies, M.F. (2006), ‘Welfare works: explaining female legislative representation’, Politics & Gender 2(02): 165–192.Google Scholar
Ross, K. (ed.) (2002), Women, Politics, and Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, D. (1993), ‘The politics of increased women's representation: the Swedish case’, in J. Lovenduski and P. Norris (eds), Gender and Party Politics, London: Sage, pp. 263–290.Google Scholar
Schüler, D. (2006), ‘The uses and misuses of the gender-related development index and gender empowerment measure: a review of the literature’, Journal of Human Development 7(2): 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, L.A.Mishler, W. (2005), ‘An integrated model of women's representation’, The Journal of Politics 67(2): 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjeie, H. (1992), Den politiske betydningen av kjønn: En studie av norsk topp-politikk (The political importance of gender: a study of Norwegian top politics). PhD thesis. Oslo: Institutt for Samfunnsforskning.Google Scholar
Svaleryd, H. (2009), ‘Women's representation and public spending’, European Journal of Political Economy 25: 186–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, S.Wilcox, C. (2005), Women and Elected Office. Past, Present, and Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, S. (1994), How Women Legislate, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vega, A.Firestone, J.M. (1995), ‘The effects of gender on congressional behavior and the substantive representation of women’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 20(2): 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wängnerud, L. (2000), ‘Testing the politics of presence: women's representation in the Swedish riksdag’, Scandinavian Political Studies 23(1): 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wängnerud, L. (2009), ‘Women in parliaments: descriptive and substantive representation’, Annual Review of Political Science 12: 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar