Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:12:25.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do corruption measures have a perception problem? Assessing the relationship between experiences and perceptions of corruption among citizens and experts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2015

Nicholas Charron
Nicholas Charron*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor Copenhagen Business School, Denmark & The Quality of Government Institute Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How well do corruption perception measures reflect actual levels of public sector corruption? Leading cross-national corruption perception measures have come under much theoretical and empirical scrutiny in recent years, with serious implications for the validity and reliability of the data in this ever growing sub-field. Critics argue that perceptions – in particular those of outside experts – do not reflect actual corruption in that they are far too ‘noisy’ or simply biased by external factors such as economic performance. Moreover, a number of recent empirical studies, focused on developing areas, have put forth evidence that outside expert assessments of corruption correspond little, if at all, with the experiences and views of actual citizens, and that such a lack of correspondence demonstrates pessimism for existing perception measures. This study offers a systematic analysis of the empirical strength of corruption perception measures in a previously unexplored area in this debate – Europe. Using new survey data collected by the author based on 85,000 European respondents in 24 countries, this issue is analyzed directly, addressing several contemporary critiques of the data. First, perceptions of citizens with, and without, personal corruption experience are compared at both the national and sub-national level in Europe. Second, external factors are checked, which might bias the extent to which citizens perceive corruption relative to how much actual corruption exists in countries and regions. Finally, expert perception indicators and citizen perceptions and experiences are compared. In summary, strong counter-evidence is found to the prevailing pessimistic claims in the literature – the consistency between actual reported corruption, as well as citizen and expert perceptions of corruption, is remarkably high and such perceptions are swayed little by ‘outside noise’. I conclude that, although existing corruption measures certainly have their share of problems, concerns regarding the validity and bias of perceptions have, perhaps, been overstated.

Keywords

corruption perceptionmeasurementcorruption experienceEuroperegions
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 8 , Supplement 1 , February 2016 , pp. 147 - 171
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramo, C. (2008), ‘How much do perceptions of corruption really tell us?’, Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 2: 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, S. and Heywood, P.M. (2009), ‘The politics of perception: use and abuse of Transparency International’s approach to measuring corruption’, Political Studies 57(4): 746–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apaza, C.R. (2009), ‘Measuring governance and corruption through the worldwide governance indicators: Critiques, responses, and ongoing scholarly discussion’, PS: Political Science & Politics 42(1): 139–143.Google Scholar
Arndt, C. and Oman, C. (2006), Development Centre Studies Uses and Abuses of Governance Indicators , Paris, France: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P. and Walsh, P. (2001), ‘New tools in comparative political economy: The Database of Political Institutions’, The World Bank Economic Review 15(1): 165–176.Google Scholar
Boylan, Richard and Long, Cheryl (2003), Measuring public corruption in the American states: A survey of state house reporters, State Politics & Policy Quarterly 3(4): 420–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charron, N. and Lapuente, V. (2010), ‘Does democracy produce quality of government?’, European Journal of Political Research 49(4): 443–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charron, N., Dahlström, C. and Lapuente, V. (2012), ‘No law without a state’, Journal of Comparative Economics 40(2): 176–193.Google Scholar
Charron, N., Lapuente, V. and Rothstein, B. (2013), Good Government and Corruption from a European Perspective: A Comparative Study on the Quality of Government in EU Regions, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Charron, N., Dijkstra, L. and Lapuente, V. (2014a), Mapping the Regional Divide in Europe: A Measure for Assessing Quality of Government in 206 European Regions, Social Indicators Research, 1–32.Google Scholar
Charron, N., Dijkstra, L. and Lapuente, V. (2014b), ‘Regional governance matters: quality of government within European Union member states’, Regional Studies 48(1): 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, A. and Calderon, C. (2000), ‘Causality and feedback between institutional measures and economic growth’, Economics & Politics 12(1): 69–81.Google Scholar
Clarke, G.R. (2011), ‘How petty is petty corruption? Evidence from firm surveys in africa’, World Development 39(7): 1122–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donchev, D. and Ujhelyi, G. (2009), What do corruption indices measure? Retrieved from Social Science Research Network website: http://ssrn.com/paper=1124066 Google Scholar
Gingerich, D.W. (2013), ‘Governance indicators and the level of analysis problem: empirical findings from South America’, British Journal of Political Science 43(3): 505–540.Google Scholar
Heidenheimer, A.J., Johnston, M. and LeVine, V.T. (eds) (1989), Political Corruption: A Handbook, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Holmberg, S., Nasiritousi, N. and Rothstein, B. (2009), ‘Quality of government: what you get’, Annual Review of Political Science. 13(12): 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkin, J. and Rodriguez‐Pose, A. (2007), ‘“Grabbing Hand” or “Helping Hand”?: corruption and the economic role of the state’, Governance 20(2): 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M. (2007), ‘Growth and governance: A reply’, Journal of Politics 69(2): 555–562.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M.(2010), The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430.Google Scholar
Knack, S.F. (2006), Measuring corruption in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: a critique of the cross-country indicators. Vol. 3968, World Bank-free PDF.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1995), ‘Institutions and economic performance: cross‐country tests using alternative institutional measures’, Economics & Politics 7(3): 207–227.Google Scholar
Ko, K. and Samajdar, A. (2010), ‘Evaluation of international corruption indexes: should we believe them or not?’, The Social Science Journal 47(3): 508–540.Google Scholar
Kurtz, M.J. and Schrank, A. (2007), ‘Growth and governance: models, measures, and mechanisms’, Journal of politics 69(2): 538–554.Google Scholar
Lambsdorff, J.G. (2007), The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reform: Theo and Policy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauro, P. (1995), ‘Corruption and growth’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(3): 681–712.Google Scholar
Melgar, N., Rossi, M. and Smith, T.W. (2010), ‘The perception of corruption’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 22(1): 120–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, S.D. and Klesner, J.L. (2010), ‘Corruption and trust: theoretical considerations and evidence from Mexico’, Comparative Political Studies 43(10): 1258–1285.Google Scholar
Olken, B.A. (2009), ‘Corruption perceptions vs. corruption reality’, Journal of Public Economics 93(7): 950–964.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. (2011), ‘Moderation in all things: International Comparisons of Governance Quality’, Financial Accountability & Management 27(4): 437–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razafindrakoto, M. and Roubaud, F. (2010), ‘Are international databases on corruption reliable? A comparison of expert opinion surveys and household surveys in sub-Saharan Africa’, World Development 38(8): 1057–1069.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999), Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, R. and Mishler, W. (2010), ‘Experience versus perception of corruption: Russia as a test case’, Global Crime 11(2): 145–163.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1993), ‘Corruption’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3): 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligson, M.A. (2006), ‘The measurement and impact of corruption victimization: survey evidence from Latin America’, World Development 34(2): 381–404.Google Scholar
Snyder, R. (2001), ‘Scaling down: the subnational comparative method’, Studies in Comparative International Development 36(1): 93–110.Google Scholar
Tanzi, V. (1998), ‘Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope, and cures’, Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund 45(4): 559–594.Google Scholar
Teorell, J., Charron, N., Dahlberg, S., Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., Sundin, P. and Svensson, R. (2013), The Quality of Government Dataset, version 20Dec13. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute. Retrieved April 2014 from http://www.qog.pol.gu.se Google Scholar
Thomas, M.A. (2009), ‘What do the worldwide governance indicators measure?’, European Journal of Development Research 22(1): 31–54.Google Scholar
Uslaner, E. (2002), The moral foundations of trust, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Charron supplementary material

Appendix

Download Charron supplementary material(File)
File 68.5 KB