Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:56:39.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constraints, competition, and competitiveness: explaining the non-linear effect of democratization on political budget cycles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2016

Ferdinand Eibl  and
Halfdan Lynge
Ferdinand Eibl*
Affiliation:
Department of Middle Eastern Studies, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
Halfdan Lynge
Affiliation:
Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The literature on political budget cycles (PBCs) does not offer a full-fledged theory about the effect of democratization. However, it does imply a non-linear effect along the regime spectrum: positive at the autocratic end, negative at the democratic end. We theoretically develop and empirically test this implication by pointing to two countervailing effects of democratization: executive constraints and political competition. While the former contains PBCs, the latter stimulates them. Because of their empirical covariation, PBCs occur primarily in hybrid regimes where the decision-making powers of the executive are relatively unrestricted and politics is relatively competitive. We also show that while executive constraints and political competition condition PBCs, what triggers the fluctuations is electoral competitiveness. Only when incumbents fear electoral defeat, do they create PBCs. The study is based on novel data on public spending in 112 countries, covering the entire regime spectrum over the period from 1960 to 2006.

Keywords

political economypolitical budget cyclesdemocratization
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , November 2017 , pp. 629 - 656
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, A., Alexander, B. and Gunning, M. (2008), ‘Incumbency, redistricting, and the decline of competition in U.S. house elections’, Journal of Politics 68(1): 75–88.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J.A., Naidu, S. and Restrepo, P. (2014), ‘Democracy does cause growth’. NBER Working Papers No. 20004, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Aidt, T. and Eterovic, D.S. (2011), ‘Political competition, electoral participation, and public finance in 20th century Latin America’, European Journal of Political Research 27(1): 181–200.Google Scholar
Aidt, T. and Mooney, G. (2014), ‘Voting suffrage and the political budget cycle: evidence from the London Metropolitan Boroughs’. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics CWPE No. 1401, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Akhmedov, A. and Zhuravskaya, E. (2004), ‘Opportunistic political cycles: test in a young democracy setting’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(4): 1301–1338.Google Scholar
Alesina, A., Cohen, G. and Roubini, N. (1993), ‘Electoral business cycle in industrial democracies’, European Journal of Political Economy 9(1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Alt, J. and Rose, S. (2009), ‘Context-conditional political budget cycles’, in S.C., Stokes and C., Boix (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 845–867.Google Scholar
Alt, J.E. and Lassen, D.D. (2006), ‘Transparency, political polarization, and political budget cycles in OECD countries’, American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 530–550.Google Scholar
Armony, A. and Schamis, H. (2005), ‘Babel in democratization studies’, Journal of Democracy 16(4): 115–128.Google Scholar
Banks, A. (2011), ‘Cross-national time series data archive’. Retrieved 13 June 2016 from www. databanksinternational. com.Google Scholar
Beck, N. and Katz, J.N. (2011), ‘Modeling dynamics in time-series-cross-section political economy data’, Annual Review of Political Science 14: 331–352.Google Scholar
Berry, W., Golder, M. and Milton, D. (2012), ‘Improving tests of theories positing interaction’, Journal of Politics 74(3): 653–671.Google Scholar
Blais, A. and Dobrzynska, A. (1998), ‘Turnout in electoral democracies’, European Journal of Political Research 33(2): 239–261.Google Scholar
Blaydes, L. and Kayser, M. (2011), ‘Counting calories: democracy and distribution in the developing world’, International Studies Quarterly 55(4): 887–908.Google Scholar
Block, S., Ferree, K. and Singh, S. (2003), ‘Multiparty competition, founding elections and political business cycles in Africa’, Journal of African Economies 12(3): 444–468.Google Scholar
Boix, C. (2003), Democracy and Redistribution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bratton, M. and Van de Walle, N. (1997), ‘Deciphering Africa’s divergent transitions’, Political Science Quarterly 112(1): 67–93.Google Scholar
Brender, A. and Drazen, A. (2005), ‘Political budget cycles in new versus established democracies’, Journal of Monetary Economics 52(7): 1271–1295.Google Scholar
Brender, A. and Drazen, A. (2007), ‘Electoral fiscal policy in new, old, and fragile democracies’, Comparative Economic Studies 49: 446–466.Google Scholar
Brownlee, J. (2009), ‘Portents of pluralism: how hybrid regimes affect democratic transitions’, American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 515–532.Google Scholar
Capoccia, C. and Ziblatt, D. (2010), ‘The historical turn in democratization studies: a new research agenda for Europe and beyond’, Comparative Political Studies 43(8–9): 931–968.Google Scholar
Carr, A. (2013), ‘Psephos’. Retrieved 14 February 2016 from http://psephos. adam-carr.net/.Google Scholar
Cassani, A. (2014), ‘Hybrid what? Partial consensus and persistent divergences in the analysis of hybrid regimes’, International Political Science Review 35(5): 542–558.Google Scholar
Center for Democratic Performance (2012), ‘Election results archive’. Retrieved 12 August 2015 from http: //cdp. binghamton. edu/era/index. html.Google Scholar
Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Lindberg, S.I., Skaaning, S.-E., Teorell, J., Altman, D., Bernhard, M., Fish, M.S., Glynn, A., Hicken, A., Knutsen, C.H., Marquardt, K., McMann, K., Mhi., F., Paxton, P., Pemstein, D., Staton, J., Tzelgov, E., Wang, Y.-t. and Zimmerman, B. (2015), V-Dem Country-Year Dataset v5. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Retrieved 12 September 2015 from https://www.v-dem.net/en/data/data-version-5/Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1971), Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. (2002), ‘Thinking about hybrid regimes’, Journal of Democracy 13(2): 21–35.Google Scholar
Dreher, A. (2006), ‘IMF and economic growth: the effects of programs, loans, and compliance with conditionality’, World Development 34(5): 769–788.Google Scholar
Efthyvoulou, G. (2011), ‘Political budget cycles in the European Union and the impact of political pressures’, Public Choice 153(3–4): 295–327.Google Scholar
Endersby, J., Galatas, S. and Rackaway, C. (2008), ‘Closeness counts in Canada: voter participation in the 1993 and 1997 federal elections’, Journal of Politics 64(2): 610–631.Google Scholar
Eterovic, D.S. and Eterovic, N.A. (2012), ‘Political competition versus electoral participation: effects on government’s size’, Economics and Governance 13(4): 333–363.Google Scholar
Franzese, R. (2002), ‘Electoral and partisan cycles in economic policies and outcomes’, Annual Review of Political Science 4: 369–422.Google Scholar
Frey, B. and Schneider, F. (1978), ‘An empirical study of politico-economic interaction in the United States’, Review of Economics and Statistics 60(2): 174–183.Google Scholar
Gao, G. (2009), ‘China’s local political budget China’, American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 621–632.Google Scholar
Gerring, J., Thaeker, S.C. and Alfaro, R. (2012), ‘Democracy and human development’, The Journal of Politics 74(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Gerring, J., Bond, P., Barndt, W.T., Moreno, C. and Barndt, T. (2005), ‘Democracy and economic growth: a historical perspective’, World Politics 57(3): 323–364.Google Scholar
Goemans, H., Gleditsch, K. and Chiozza, G. (2009), ‘Introducing Archigos: a dataset of political leaders’, Journal of Peace Research 46(2): 183–269.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, M. (2002), ‘Do changes in democracy affect the political budget cycle? Evidence from Mexico’, Review of Development Economics 6(2): 204–224.Google Scholar
Haber, S. and Menaldo, V. (2011), ‘Do natural resources fuel authoritarianism? A reappraisal of the resource curse’, American Political Science Review 105(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Hanusch, M. and Magleby, D. (2014), ‘Popularity, polarization, and political budget cycles’, Public Choice 159(3): 457–467.Google Scholar
Heston, A., Summers, R. and Aten, B. (2006), ‘Penn World Table version 7.0’. Retrieved 14 October 2011 from http://pwt.econ.upenn.edu/php$/backslash$/_site/pwt62/pwt62$/backslash$/_form.php.Google Scholar
Holbrook, T.M. and Tidmarch, C.M. (1993), ‘The effects of leadership positions on votes for incumbents in state legislative elections’, Political Research Quarterly 46(4): 897–909.Google Scholar
Howard, M. and Roessler, P. (2006), ‘Liberalizing electoral outcomes in competitive authoritarian regimes’, American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 365–381.Google Scholar
Hyde, S.D. (2011), The Pseudo-Democrat’s Dilemma: Why Election Monitoring Became an International Norm, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hyde, S.D. and O’Mahony, A. (2010), ‘International scrutiny and pre-electoral fiscal manipulation in developing countries’, The Journal of Politics 72(3): 690–704.Google Scholar
Hyde, S.D. and Marinov, N. (2012), ‘Which elections can be lost?’, Political Analysis 20(2): 191–210.Google Scholar
Kayser, M.A. (2005), ‘Who surfs, who manipulates? The determinants of opportunistic election timing and electorally motivated economic intervention’, American Political Science Review 99(1): 17–27.Google Scholar
Koetzle, W. (1998), ‘The impact of constituency diversity upon the competitiveness of U. S. House elections, 1962-96’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 23(4): 561–573.Google Scholar
Lake, D.A. and Baum, M.A. (2001), ‘The invisible hand of democracy: political control and the provision of public services’, Comparative Political Studies 34(6): 587–621.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S. and Way, L. (2002), ‘The rise of competitive authoritarianism’, Journal of Democracy 13(2): 51–65.Google Scholar
Linde, J. (2009), ‘Into the gray zone: the recent trend of hybridization of political regimes’. Quality of Government Working Paper, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Linz, J. (2000), Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Linz, J. and Stepan, A. (1996), Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe, Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, V. and Richter, T. (2016), ‘State hydrocarbon rents, authoritarian survival and the onset of democracy: evidence from a new dataset’, Research & Politics 3(3).Google Scholar
Marshall, M.C., Jaggers, K. and Gurr, T.R. (2011), ‘Polity project: dataset user manual’. www.systemicpeace. org/polity/polity4. htm.Google Scholar
Milner, H.V. and Kubota, K. (2005), ‘Why the move to free trade? Democracy and trade policy in the developing countries’, International Organisation 59(1): 107–143.Google Scholar
Milner, H. and Mukherjee, B. (2009), ‘Democratization and economic globalization’, Annual Review of Political Science 12: 163–181.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, B., Yadav, V. and Bejar, S. (2014), ‘Electoral particularism, bank concentration, and capital account liberalization in developing democracies’, Comparative Political Studies 46(6): 851–877.Google Scholar
Nickell, S. (1981), ‘Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects’, Econometrica 49(6): 1417–1426.Google Scholar
OECD (2015), ‘OECD.Stat’. Retrieved 18 March 2015 from https: //stats. oecd. org/.Google Scholar
Persson, T. and Tabellini, C. (1994), ‘Is inequality harmful for growth?’, The American Economic Review 84(3): 600–621.Google Scholar
Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2003a), ‘Electoral rules and corruption’, Journal of the European Economic Association 1(4): 958–989.Google Scholar
Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2003b), The Economic Effects of Constitutions, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pettersson-Lidbom, P. (2001), ‘An empirical investigation of the strategic use of debt’, Journal of Political Economy 109(3): 570–583.Google Scholar
Price, S. (1998), ‘Comment on “the politics of the political business cycle”’, British Journal of Political Science 28(1): 201–210.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J.A. and Limongi, F. (2000), Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reuveny, R. and Li, Q. (2003), ‘Economic openness, democracy, and income inequality’, Comparative Political Studies 38(5): 575–601.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2000), ‘Participatory politics, social cooperation, and economic stability’, The American Economic Review 90(2): 140–144.Google Scholar
Rogoff, K. (1990), ‘Equilibrium political budget cycles’, American Economic Review 80(1): 21–36.Google Scholar
Rose, S. (2006), ‘Do fiscal rules dampen the political business cycle?’, Public Choice 128(3–4): 407–431.Google Scholar
Ross, M. (2006), ‘Is democracy good for the poor?’, American Journal of Political Science 50(4): 860–874.Google Scholar
Rudra, N. and Haggard, S. (2005), ‘Globalization, democracy, and effective welfare spending in the developing world’, Comparative Political Studies 38(9): 1015–1049.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1976), Parties and Party Systems, a Framework for Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schedler, A. (2002), Electoral Governance and Democratization, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Schneider, C. (2010), ‘Fighting with one hand tied behind the back: political budget cycles in the West German States’, Public Choice 142(1–2): 125–150.Google Scholar
Schuknecht, L. (1996), ‘Political business cycles and fiscal policies in developing countries’, Kyklos 49(2): 155–170.Google Scholar
Schultz, K.A. (1995), ‘The politics of the political business cycle’, British Journal of Political Science 25(1): 79–99.Google Scholar
Shelton, C. (2014), ‘Legislative budget cycles’, Public Choice 159(1): 251–275.Google Scholar
Shi, M. and Svensson, J. (2006), ‘Political budget cycles: do they differ across countries and why?’, Journal of Public Economics 90(8–9): 1367–1389.Google Scholar
Son, B. (2016), ‘Policy choices in tough times: the case of democratization and currency defense’, International Political Science Review 37(4): 453–469.Google Scholar
Southwell, P. and Burchett, J. (2000), ‘The effect of all-mail elections on voter turnout’, American Politics Research 28(1): 72–79.Google Scholar
Streb, J.M. and Torrens, C. (2013), ‘Making rules credible: divided government and political budget cycles’, Public Choice 156(3–4): 703–722.Google Scholar
Streb, J.M., Lema, D. and Torrens, C. (2009), ‘Checks and balances on political budget cycles: cross-country evidence’, Kyklos 62(3): 426–447.Google Scholar
Tavares, J. and Wacziarg, R. (2001), ‘How democracy affects growth’, European Economic Review 45(8): 1341–1378.Google Scholar
Trounstine, J. (2006), ‘Dominant regimes and the demise of urban democracy’, Journal of Politics 68(4): 879–893.Google Scholar
Vergne, C. (2009), ‘Democracy, elections and allocation of public expenditures in developing countries’, European Journal of Political Economy 25(1): 63–77.Google Scholar
Vreeland, J.R. (2008), ‘The effect of political regime on civil war: unpacking anocracy’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 52(3): 401–425.Google Scholar
Wahman, M., Teorell, J. and Hadenius, A. (2013), ‘Authoritarian regime types revisited: updated data in comparative perspective’, Contemporary Politics 19(1): 19–34.Google Scholar
World Bank (2010), ‘World development indicators’. Retrieved 3 February 2011 from http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators.Google Scholar
World Bank (2013), ‘Database of political institutions 2012’. Retrieved 5 July 2014 from http://econ.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTDEC/EXTRESEARCH/O,,contentMDK:20649465~pagePK:64214825~piPK: 64214943~theSitePK:46938, 200.html.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Eibl and Lynge-Mangueira supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Eibl and Lynge-Mangueira supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 225.8 KB