Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:37:43.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Change and continuity: an institutional approach to institutions of democratic government

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

Johan P. Olsen
Johan P. Olsen*
Affiliation:
Arena Center for European Studies, University of Oslo, Norway
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While it is commonplace to argue that political institutions are a source of inertia and resistance to change and the New Institutionalism is unable to explain change, this paper takes the opposite view. First, the problem of change is reformulated and it is observed that institutions have a role in generating both order and change and in balancing the two. Second, the concepts of institution and institutionalization are elaborated. Third, institutional sources of change and continuity are explored. Fourth, some implications for how democratic change and order can be conceived are spelled out, and, finally, some future challenges are suggested.

Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 3 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ágh, A. (2003), ‘Public administration in Central and Eastern Europe’, in B.G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds), Handbook of Public Administration, London: Sage, pp. 526–548.Google Scholar
Allison, G.T. (1971), Essence of Decision. Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Arthur, W.B. (1989), ‘Competing technologies and lock-in by historical events’, The Economic Journal 99: 116–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R.Cohen, M.D. (1999), Harnessing Complexity. Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bartolini, S. (2005), Re-Structuring Europe. Centre Formation, System Building and Political Structuring Between the Nation State and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bátora, J. (2005), ‘Does the European Union transform the institution of diplomacy?’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, P.L.Luckmann, T. (1967), The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Doubleday, Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Broderick, A. (ed.) (1970), The French Institutionalists. Maurice Hauriou, Georges Renard, Joseph T. Delos, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunsson, N.Olsen, J.P. (1998), ‘Organization theory: thirty years of dismantling, and then…?’, in N. Brunsson and J.P. Olsen (eds), Organizing Organizations, Oslo: Fagbokforlaget, pp. 13–43.Google Scholar
Calvert, R. (1995), ‘Rational actors, equilibrium, and social institutions’, in J. Knight and I. Sened (eds), Explaining Social Institutions, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 57–95.Google Scholar
Caporaso, J. (2007), ‘The promises and pitfalls of an endogenous theory of institutional change: a comment’, West European Politics 30(2): 392–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, E.S.Cook, J.M. (1999), ‘Politics and institutionalism: explaining durability and change’, Annual Review of Sociology 25: 441–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T.Lægreid, P. (eds) (2007), Transcending New Public Management. The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Cohen, M.D., March, J.G.Olsen, J.P. (1972), ‘A garbage can model of organizational choice’, Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M.D., March, J.G.Olsen, J.P. (2007), ‘The garbage can model’, in S. Clegg and J.R. Bailey (eds), International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies, London: Sage, pp. 534–537.Google Scholar
Cyert, R.M.March, J.G. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall (2nd ed. 1992. Oxford, Basil: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A. (1998), On Democracy, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P.J.Powell, W.W. (1991), ‘Introduction’, in W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Di Palma, G. (1990), To Craft Democracies, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Egeberg, M. (ed.) (2006), Multilevel Union Administration. The Transformation of Executive Politics in Europe, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstadt, S.N. (1965), ‘Bureaucracy, bureaucratization, markets, and power structure’, in S.N. Eisenstadt (ed.), Essays in Comparative Institutions, New York: Wiley, pp. 175–215.Google Scholar
Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C.Nelson, R.R. (eds) (2005), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, H.Héritier, A. (2007), ‘Conclusion: evaluating the forces of interstitial institutional change’, West European Politics 30(2): 405–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R.E. (1996), ‘Institutions and their design’, in R.E. Goodin (ed.), The Theory of Institutional Design, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R.E., Rein, M.Moran, M. (2006), ‘The public and its policies’, in M. Moran, M. Rein and R.E. Goodin (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–35.Google Scholar
Gorges, M.J. (2001), ‘Blind alley. New institutionalist explanations for institutional change. A note of caution’, Politics 21: 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, A.Laitin, D.D. (2004), ‘Theories of endogenous institutional change’, American Political Science Review 98(4): 633–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996), Between Facts and Norms, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A., Jay, J.Madison, J. (eds) (1964) [1787–88], The Federalist Papers, New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
Hanson, R.L. (1987), ‘Democracy’, in T. Ball, J. Farr and R.L. Hanson (eds), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 68–89.Google Scholar
Heper, M., Kazancigil, A.Rockman, B.A. (eds) (1997), Institutions and Democratic Statecraft, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Héritier, A. (2007), Explaining Institutional Change in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, J.H. (1995), Hidden Order. How Adaptation Builds Complexity, Reading, MA: Helix Books, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Holland, J.H. (1998), Emergence: From Chaos to Order, Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, S.P. (1968), Political Order in Changing Societies, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hurrelmann, A., Leibfried, S., Martens, K.Mayer, P. (2007), Transforming the Golden-Age Nation State, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immergut, E.M. (2006), ‘Historical institutionalism in political science and the problem of change’, in A. Wimmer and R. Kossler (eds), Understanding Change. Models, Methodologies and Metaphors, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 237–259.Google Scholar
Kaufman, H. (1976), Are Government Organizations Immortal?, Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Knight, F. (1992), Institutions and Social Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, S. (1988), ‘Sovereignty: an institutional perspective’, Comparative Political Studies 21: 66–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lægreid, P.Olsen, J.P. (1978), Byråkrati og beslutninger, Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Laffan, B. (1999), ‘Becoming a “Living Institution”: the evolution of the European court of auditors’, Journal of Common Market Studies 37(2): 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lathrop Gilb, C. (1981), ‘Public or private governments?’, in P.C. Nystrom and W.H. Starbuck (eds), Handbook of Organizational Design, Vol. 2, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 464–491.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C.E. (1965), The Intelligence of Democracy. Decision Making Through Mutual Adjustment, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M.Rokkan, S. (eds) (1967), Party Systems and Voter Alignment, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Long, N.E. (1962a), ‘Public policy and administration’, in N.E. Long (ed.), The Polity, Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 77–93. (Reprinted from: Public policy and administration. The goals of rationality and responsibility, Public Administration Review 1954, 14(1): 22–41.)Google Scholar
Long, N.E. (1962b), ‘Power and administration’, in N.E. Long (ed.), The Polity, Chicago: Rand McNally. (Reprinted from: Power and administration, Public Administration Review 1949, 9(4): 257–264.)Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2007), ‘Party systems and alternation in government, 1950–2000: Innovation and institutionalization’, in S. Gloppen and L. Rakner (eds), Globalization and Democratization: Challenges for Political Parties, Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, pp. 135–153.Google Scholar
Majone, G. (1996), Regulating Europe, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
March, J.G. (1981), ‘Footnotes to organizational change’, Administrative Science Quarterly 26: 563–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J.G. (1991), ‘Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning’, Organization Science 2: 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J.G. (1999), ‘A learning perspective on the network dynamics of institutional integration’, in M. Egeberg and P. Lægreid (eds), Organizing Political Institutions, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, pp. 129–155.Google Scholar
March, J.G. (2004), ‘Parochialism in the evolution of a research community: the case of organization studies’, Management and Organization Review 1(1): 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J.G.Olsen, J.P. (1983), ‘Organizing political life: what administrative reorganization tells us about government’, American Political Science Review 77: 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J.G.Olsen, J.P. (1984), ‘The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life’, American Political Science Review 78: 734–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J.G.Olsen, J.P. (1986), ‘Popular sovereignty and the search for appropriate institutions’, Journal of Public Policy 6: 341–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J.G.Olsen, J.P. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
March, J.G.Olsen, J.P. (1995), Democratic Governance, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
March, J.G.Olsen, J.P. (1998), ‘The institutional dynamics of international political orders’, International Organizations 52(4): 943–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J.G.Olsen, J.P. (2006a), ‘The logic of appropriateness’, in M. Rein, M. Moran and R.E. Goodin (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 689–708.Google Scholar
March, J.G.Olsen, J.P. (2006b), ‘Elaborating the “New Institutionalism”’, in R.A.W. Rhodes, S. Binder and B. Rockman (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
March, J.G.Simon, H.A. (1958), Organizations, New York: Wiley (2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1993).Google Scholar
March, J.G., Schultz, M.Zhou, X. (2000), The Dynamics of Rules. Change in Written Organizational Codes, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maassen, P.Olsen, J.P. (eds) (2007), University Dynamics and European Integration, Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R.K. (1942), ‘Science and technology in a democratic order’, Journal of Legal and Political Sociology 1: 115–126.Google Scholar
Meyer, J.W.Rowan, B. (1977), ‘Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology 83: 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J.S. (1962) [1861], Considerations on Representative Government, South Bend, IN: Gateway Editions.Google Scholar
Moore, B. Jr. (1966), Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Moran, M. (2006), ‘Economic institutions’, in R.A.W. Rhodes, S. Binder and B. Rockman (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 144–162.Google Scholar
Nef, J. (2003), ‘Public administration and public sector reform in Latin America’, in B.G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds), Handbook of Public Administration, London: Sage, pp. 523–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nystrom, P.C.Starbuck, W.H. (1981), ‘Designing and understanding organizations’, in P.C. Nystrom and W.H. Starbuck (eds), Handbook of Organizational Design, Vol. 1, Adapting Organizations to their Environments, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. ix–xxii.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, M. (1991) (new and expanded edition) [1962], Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
Offe, C. (2001), ‘Institutional design’, in P.B. Clarke and J. Foweraker (eds), Encyclopedia of Democratic Thought, London: Routledge, pp. 363–369.Google Scholar
Olsen, J.P. (1983), Organized Democracy, Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.Google ScholarPubMed
Olsen, J.P. (1997), ‘Institutional design in democratic contexts’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 5: 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J.P. (2001), ‘Garbage cans, New Institutionalism, and the study of politics’, American Political Science Review 95: 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J.P. (2003), ‘Coping with conflict at constitutional moments’, Industrial and Corporate Change 12(4): 815–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J.P. (2004), ‘Survey article: unity, diversity and democratic institutions. Lessons from the European Union’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 12(4): 461–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J.P. (2007), Europe in Search for Political Order. An Institutional Perspective on Unity/Diversity, Citizens/their Helpers, Democratic Design/Historical Drift, and the Co-existence of Orders, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J.P. (2008a), ‘Understanding institutions and logics of appropriateness: introductory essay’, in J.G. March (ed.), Understanding Organizations, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 189–199.Google Scholar
——, (2008b), ‘The ups and downs of bureaucratic organization’, Annual Review of Political Science 11: 13–37.Google Scholar
Olsen, J.P.Peters, B.G. (eds) (1996), Lessons from Experience. Experiential Learning in Administrative Reforms in Eight Countries, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Orren, K.Skowronek, S. (2004), The Search for American Political Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B.G. (1996), ‘Learning from experience about administrative reform’, in J.P. Olsen and B.G. Peters (eds), Lessons from Experience. Experiential Learning in Administrative Reforms in Eight Countries, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, pp. 113–145.Google Scholar
Peters, B.G. (1999a), Institutional Theory in Political Science. The ‘New Institutionalism’, London, New York: Pinter.Google Scholar
Peters, B.G. (1999b), ‘Institutional theory and administrative reform’, in M. Egeberg and P. Lægreid (eds), Organizing Political Institutions, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, pp. 331–355.Google Scholar
Peters, B.G.Pierre, J. (eds) (2003), Handbook of Public Administration, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B.G.Pierre, J. (2005), ‘The politics of path dependency: political conflict in historical institutionalism’, The Journal of Politics 67(4): 1275–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (1996), ‘The path to European integration: a historical institutionalist analysis’, Comparative Political Studies 29(2): 123–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000), ‘The limits of design: explaining institutional origins and change’, Governance 13(4): 475–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2004), Politics in Time. History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P.Skocpol, T. (2002), ‘Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science’, in I. Katznelson and H.V. Miller (eds), Political Science. State of the Discipline, New York: Norton, pp. 693–721.Google Scholar
Pitkin, H.F. (1972) [1967], The Concept of Representation, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Polsby, N.W. (1975), ‘Legislatures’, in F. Greenstein and N.W. Polsby (eds), Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 5: Governmental Institutions and Processes, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 257–319.Google Scholar
Powell, W.W.DiMaggio, P.J. (eds) (1991), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, A. (2006), ‘Self-enforcing democracy’, in B.R Weingast and D.A. Wittman (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 312–328.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. (1966), ‘Norway: numerical democracy and corporate pluralism’, in R.A. Dahl (ed.), Political Oppositions in Western Democracies, New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 70–115.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. (1999), ‘State formation, nation-building and mass politics in Europe’, in P. Flora, S. Kuhnle and D. Urwin (eds), The Theory of Stein Rokkan, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–191.Google Scholar
Rothstein, B. (1996), ‘Political institutions: an overview’, in R.E. Goodin and H-D. Klingemann (eds), A New Handbook of Political Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 133–166.Google Scholar
Sait, E. (1938), Political Institutions – A Preface, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1969), ‘From the sociology of politics to political sociology’, in S.M. Lipset (ed.), Politics and the Social Sciences, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 65–100.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E.E. (1960), The Semi-Sovereign People, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Scott, W.R. (1995), Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Scott, R.R.Meyer, J.W.and Associates (1994), Institutional Environments and Organizations. Structural Complexity and Individualism, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. (1994) paperback ed. [1942], Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Searle, J.R. (1995), The Construction of Social Reality, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Selznick, P. (1957), Leadership in Administration, New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Shepsle, K.A. (2006), ‘Old questions and new answers about institutions. The Riker objection revisited’, in B.R. Weingast and D.A. Wittman (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1031–1049.Google Scholar
Simon, H.A. (1953), ‘Birth of an organization: the economic cooperation administration’, Public Administration Review 13: 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H.A. (1957) (2nd ed.), Administrative Behavior, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S., Thelen, K.Longstreeth, F. (1992), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinchcombe, A.L. (2001), When Formality Works. Authority and Abstraction in Law and Organizations, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, W.Thelen, K. (eds) (2005), Beyond Continuity. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (1999), ‘Historical institutionalism in comparative politics’, Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, K. (2004), How Institutions Evolve, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolbert, P.S.Zucker, L.G. (1983), ‘Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: the diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935’, Administrative Science Quarterly 25: 22–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viroli, M. (1992), From Politics to Reason of State. The Acquisition and Transformation of the Language of Politics 1250–1600, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R.K.Rockman, B.A. (eds) (1993), Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad, Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. (1978), ‘An outline of interpretive Sociology’, in G. Roth and C. Wittich (eds), Economy and Society, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wright Mills, C. (1956), The Power Elite, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrong, D.H. (1961), ‘The oversocialized conception of man in modern sociology’, American Sociological Review 26(2): 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar