Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:31:25.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Showing the path to path dependence: the habitual path

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2014

Zeki Sarigil
Zeki Sarigil*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article investigates the conceptual and theoretical implications of the logic of habit for the path-dependence approach. In the existing literature, we see two different logics of action associated with two distinct models of path dependence: the logic of consequences (instrumental rationality) is linked with utilitarian paths (i.e. increasing returns) and the logic of appropriateness (normative rationality) constitutes normative paths (normative lock-in). However, this study suggests that despite its popularity, the path-dependence approach remains underspecified owing to its exclusion or neglect of the logic of habit, which constitutes a distinct mechanism of reproduction or self-reinforcement in the institutional world. This article, therefore, introduces the notion of the ‘habitual path’ as a different model of path dependence. Although the idea of the habitual path is complementary with the existing models, owing to its distinctive notions of agency and mechanisms of path reproduction, it offers a different interpretation of continuity or regularity. Thus, by enriching the path-dependence approach, the notion of the habitual path would contribute to our comprehension of continuities and discontinuities in the political world.

Keywords

path dependencelogic of habithabitual pathshabitual path dependence
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , May 2015 , pp. 221 - 242
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akram, S. (2012), ‘Fully unconscious and prone to habit: the characteristics of agency in the structure and agency dialectic’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43(1): 45–65.Google Scholar
Alexander, G. (2001), ‘Institutions, path dependence, and democratic consolidation’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 13(3): 249–270.Google Scholar
Arrow, K.J. (1986), ‘Rationality of self and others in an economic system’, Journal of Business 59(4): 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, W.B. (1990), ‘Positive feedbacks in the economy’, Scientific American 262(2): 92–99.Google Scholar
Arthur, W.B. (1994), Increrasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, W., Gartland, M. and Stack, M. (2004), ‘Old habits die hard: path dependency and behavioral lock-in’, Journal of Economic Issues 38(2): 371–377.Google Scholar
Bates, R.H. (1988), ‘Contra contractarianism: some reflections on the new institutionalism’, Politics & Society 16(2–3): 387–401.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. (1993), Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Becker, G.S. (1962), ‘Irrational behavior and economic theory’, The Journal of Political Economy 70(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G.S. (1992), ‘Habits, addictions, and traditions’, Kyklos 45(3): 327–345.Google Scholar
Bennett, A. and Elman, C. (2006), ‘Complex causal relations and case study methods: the example of path dependence’, Political Analysis 14(3): 250–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkman, M.B. and Reenock, C. (2004), ‘Incremental consolidation and comprehensive reorganization of American state executive branches’, American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 796–812.Google Scholar
Berman, S. (1998), ‘Path dependency and political action: reexamining responses to the depression’, Comparative Politics 30(4): 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, J. (2010), ‘The same or not the same-on the variety of mechanisms of path dependence’, International Journal of Social Sciences 5(1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Blyth, M. (2001), ‘The transformation of the Swedish model: economic ideas, distributional conflict, and institutional change’, World Politics 54(1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Blyth, M. (2002), Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Tewntieth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boas, T.C. (2007), ‘Conceptualizing continuity and change: the composite-standard model of path dependence’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 19(1): 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudon, R. (2003), ‘Beyond rational choice theory’, Annual Review of Sociology 29(1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice, (translated by R. Nice) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, M. (2007), ‘Formal versus informal institutions in Africa’, Journal of Democracy 18(3): 96–110.Google Scholar
Camic, C. (1986), ‘The matter of habit’, American Journal of Sociology 91(5): 1039–1087.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.L. (2002), ‘Ideas, politics, and public policy’, Annual Review of Sociology 28: 21–38.Google Scholar
Capoccia, G. and Kelemen, R.D. (2007), ‘The study of critical junctures: theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism’, World Politics 59(3): 341–369.Google Scholar
Clemens, E.S. and Cook, J.M. (1999), ‘Politics and institutionalism: explaining durability and change’, Annual Review of Sociology 25: 441–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, R.B. and Collier, D. (1991), Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement and Regime Dynamics in Latin America, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, R. (2004), ‘The path‐dependency of an idea: why Scandinavian welfare states remain distinct’, Social Policy & Administration 38(2): 204–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, N. (2013), ‘Habit and habitus’, Body & Society 19(2–3): 136–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, P.A. (1985), ‘Clio and the economics of QWERTY’, The American Economic Review 75(2): 332–337.Google Scholar
David, P.A. (2007), ‘Path dependence: a foundational concept for historical social science’, Cliometrica 1(2): 91–114.Google Scholar
Dimitrakopoulos, D.G. (2001), ‘Incrementalism and path dependence: European integration and institutional change in national parliaments’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 39(3): 405–422.Google Scholar
Dobusch, L. and Schüßler, E. (2013), ‘Theorizing path dependence: a review of positive feedback mechanisms in technology markets, regional clusters, and organizations’, Industrial and Corporate Change 22(3): 617–647.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A. (1998), ‘What is agency?’, American Journal of Sociology 103(4): 962–1023.Google Scholar
Fleetwood, S. (2008a), Institutions and social structures’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 38(3): 241–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleetwood, S. (2008b), Structure, institution, agency, habit, and reflexive deliberation’, Journal of Institutional Economics 4(2): 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gersick, C.J. (1991), ‘Revolutionary change theories: a multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm’, Academy of Management Review 16(1): 10–36.Google Scholar
Goertz, G. and Diehl, P.F. (1992), ‘Toward a theory of international norms some conceptual and measurement issues’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 36(4): 634–664.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, R.S. and Griffith, W.B. (1991), ‘Amending the economist’s ‘rational egoist’model to include moral values and norms, part 2: alternative solutions’, in K.J. Koford and J.B. Miller (eds), Social Norms and Economic Institutions, (Vol. 2) Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 59–84.Google Scholar
Goldmann, K. (2005), ‘Appropriateness and consequences: the logic of neo-institutionalism’, Governance 18(1): 35–52.Google Scholar
Goldstone, J.A. (1998), ‘Initial conditions, general laws, path dependence, and explanation in historical sociology 1’, American Journal of Sociology 104(3): 829–845.Google Scholar
Greener, I. (2005), ‘The potential of path dependence in political studies’, Politics 25(1): 62–72.Google Scholar
Greener, I. (2007), ‘Two cheers for path dependence – why it is still worth trying to work with historical institutionalism: a reply to Ross’, British Politics 2(1): 100–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J.A. (1993), ‘Ideas and the social sciences’, in J. Goldstein and R.O. Keohane (eds), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, pp. 31–57.Google Scholar
Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R.C. (1996), ‘Political science and the three new institutionalisms’, Political Studies 44(5): 936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, G. and Levitsky, S. (2004), ‘Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research agenda’, Perspectives on Politics 2(4): 725–740.Google Scholar
Helmke, G. and Levitsky, S. (2006), Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America, Baltimore, MA: JHU Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G.M. (2003), ‘The hidden persuaders: institutions and individuals in economic theory’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 27(2): 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G.M. (2004), ‘Reclaiming habit for institutional economics’, Journal of Economic Psychology 25(5): 651–660.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G.M. (2006), ‘What are institutions?’, Journal of Economic Issues 40(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G.M. (2007), ‘Institutions and individuals: interaction and evolution’, Organization Studies 28(1): 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopf, T. (2002), Social Construction of International Politics: Identities & Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hopf, T. (2010), ‘The logic of habit in international relations’, European Journal of International Relations 16(4): 539–561.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G.J. (1988), ‘Conclusion: an institutional approach to American foreign economic policy’, International Organization 42(1): 219–243.Google Scholar
Ingraham, P.W., Moynihan, D.P. and Andrews, M. (2008), ‘Formal and informal institutions in public administration’, in J. Pierre, B.G. Peters and G. Stoker (eds), Debating Institutionalism, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 66–85.Google Scholar
Kay, A. (2005), ‘A critique of the use of path dependency in policy studies’, Public Administration 83(3): 553–571.Google Scholar
Krasner, S.D. (1984), ‘Approaches to the state: alternative conceptions and historical dynamics’, Comparative Politics 16(2): 223–246.Google Scholar
Krasner, S.D. (1988), ‘Sovereignty an institutional perspective’, Comparative Political Studies 21(1): 66–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. (1991), ‘History and industry location: the case of the manufacturing belt’, The American Economic Review 81(2): 80–83.Google Scholar
Lauth, H.J. (2000), ‘Informal institutions and democracy’, Democratization 7(4): 21–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, M. (1990), ‘A logic of institutional change’, in K.S. Cook and M. Levi (eds), The Limits of Rationality, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 402–418.Google Scholar
Levi, M. (1997), ‘A model, a method, and a map: rational choice in comparative and historical analysis’, in M.I. Lichbach and A.S. Zuckerman (eds), Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–41.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. (2000), ‘Path dependence in historical sociology’, Theory and Society 29(4): 507–548.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. (2001), ‘Path-dependent explanations of regime change: Central America in comparative perspective’, Studies in Comparative International Development 36(1): 111–141.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. and Schensul, D. (2006), ‘Historical context and path dependence’, in R.E. Goodin and C. Tilly (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 454–471.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (2010), ‘A theory of gradual institutional change’, in J. Mahoney and K. Thelen (eds), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1984), ‘The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life’, The American Political Science Review 78(3): 734–749.Google Scholar
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1998), ‘The institutional dynamics of international political orders’, International Organization 52(4): 943–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noll, R.G. and Weingast, B.R. (1991), ‘Rational actor theory, social norms, and policy implementation: applications to administrative processes and bureaucratic culture’, in K.R. Monroe (ed.), The Economic Approach to Politics: A Critical Reassessment of the Theory of Rational Action, New York, NY: Harper Collins, pp. 237–258.Google Scholar
North, D.C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge university press.Google Scholar
Olsen, J.P. (2009), ‘Change and continuity: an institutional approach to institutions of democratic government’, European Political Science Review 1(1): 3–32.Google Scholar
Orren, K. (1991), Belated Feudalism: Labor, the Law, and Liberal Development in the United States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1991), ‘Rational choice theory and institutional analysis: toward complementarity’, The American Political Science Review 85(1): 237–243.Google Scholar
Page, S.E. (2006), ‘Path dependence’, Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1(1): 87–115.Google Scholar
Painter, M. and Peters, B.G. (eds) (2010), Tradition and Public Administration, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Peters, B.G. (2005), Institutional theory in political science, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Peters, B.G., Pierre, J. and King, D.S. (2005), ‘The politics of path dependency: Political conflict in historical institutionalism’, Journal of Politics 67(4): 1275–1300.Google Scholar
Pierre, J., Peters, B.G. and Stoker, G. (eds) (2008), Debating Institutionalism, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1996), ‘The path to European integration: a historical institutionalist analysis’, Comparative Political Studies 29(2): 123–163.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000), ‘Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics’, American Political Science Review 94(2): 251–267.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2003), ‘Big, slow-moving, and… invisible: macro-social processes in the study of comparative politics’, in J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer (eds), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 177–207.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2004), Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pop-Eleches, G. (2007), ‘Historical legacies and post-communist regime change’, Journal of Politics 69(4): 908–926.Google Scholar
Pouliot, V. (2008), ‘The logic of practicality: a theory of practice of security communities’, International Organization 62(2): 257–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, T. (2000), ‘“Let’s Argue!”: communicative action in world politics’, International Organization 54(1): 1–40.Google Scholar
Romer, P.M. (1986), ‘Increasing returns and long-run growth’, The Journal of Political Economy 94(5): 1002–1037.Google Scholar
Rose, R. and Davies, P.L. (1994), Inheritance in Public Policy: Change Without Choice in Britain, New York, NY: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F. (2000), ‘International socialization in the new Europe: rational action in an institutional environment’, European Journal of International Relations 6(1): 109–139.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V.A. (2010), ‘Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth “new institutionalism”’, European Political Science Review 2(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Sewell, W.H. (1996), ‘Three temporalities: toward an eventual sociology’, in T.J. McDonald (ed.), The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 245–281.Google Scholar
Soifer, H.D. (2012), ‘The causal logic of critical junctures’, Comparative Political Studies 45(12): 1572–1597.Google Scholar
Stacey, J. and Rittberger, B. (2003), ‘Dynamics of formal and informal institutional change in the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy 10(6): 858–883.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A.L. (1968), Constructing Social Theories, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. (2005), ‘Introduction: institutional change in advanced political economies’, in W. Streeck and K. Thelen (eds), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
Swartz, D.L. (2002), ‘The sociology of habit: the perspective of Pierre Bourdieu’, Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 22: 61S–69S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G. and Koch, J. (2009), ‘Organizational path dependence: opening the black box’, Academy of Management Review 34(4): 689–709.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2003), ‘How institutions evolve: insights from comparative-historical analysis’, in J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer (eds), Comparative-Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–240.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. and Steinmo, S. (1992), ‘Historical institutionalism in comparative politics’, in S. Steinmo, K. Thelen and F. Longstreth (eds), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Torfing, J. (2001), ‘Path‐dependent Danish welfare reforms: the contribution of the new institutionalisms to understanding evolutionary change’, Scandinavian Political Studies 24(4): 277–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergne, J.-P. and Durand, R. (2010), ‘The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence’, Journal of Management Studies 47(4): 736–759.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1978), Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wegner, D.M. and Bargh, J.A. (1998), ‘Control and automoticity in social life’, in D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th edn., New York, NY: McGraw Hill, pp. 446–496.Google Scholar
Weingast, B.R. (2002), ‘Rational-choice institutionalism’, in I. Katznelson and H.V. Milner (eds), Political Science: The State of the Discipline, New York, NY: W. W. Norton, pp. 660–692.Google Scholar