Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:52:41.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Policy feedback, generational replacement, and attitudes to state intervention: Eastern and Western Germany, 1990–2006

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Stefan Svallfors
Stefan Svallfors*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
*
* E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper tests contested arguments within the institutionalist literature about the relation between institutional and attitudinal changes, using the reunified Germany as a case. Eastern Germany constitutes a case approaching a ‘natural experiment’ for the social sciences, being twice the receiver of externally imposed institutions. It, therefore, provides a unique opportunity to closely analyse institutional effects on attitudes, as in this particular case, the time order of institutional and attitudinal changes can actually be decided. Using data from the International Social Survey Program modules on ‘The Role of Government’ (1990, 1996, and 2006), attitudes towards government responsibilities are compared in Eastern and Western Germany, and to other countries. Results show a considerable convergence in attitudes between Eastern and Western Germany – attitudes in Western Germany are completely stable while attitudes in Eastern Germany become, overtime, more similar to those found in the West. Furthermore, comparisons of different birth cohorts show that while considerable attitude differences between Eastern and Western Germany are still found in 2006 among those who had their forming experiences before the fall of the wall, differences are virtually nil among those who were still children in 1989. In summary, the analysis provides strong support for the attitude-forming effects of institutions, and a clear vindication of institutional theories. It also points to generational replacement as a key mechanism in translating institutional change into attitudinal change.

Keywords

Germanyattitudesredistributioncohortsinstitutions
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 119 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, A. Fuchs-Schündeln, N. (2007), ‘Good-bye Lenin (or not?): the effect of communism on people’s preferences’, American Economic Review 97: 1507–1528.Google Scholar
Braun, M. Kolosi, T. (1994), ‘Wandel der Einstellungen zu sozialer Ungleichheit in Deutschland und Ungarn’, in M. Braun and P.P. Mohler (eds), Blickpunkt Gesellschaft 3. Einstellungen und Verhalten der Bundesbürger, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 41–69.Google Scholar
Buhlmann, T. (1998), Taking Stock: German Unification as Reflected in the Social Sciences, Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum.Google Scholar
Campbell, A.L. (2008), Policy Feedbacks and the Political Mobilization of Mass Publics. Working Paper, Department of Political Science, MIT.Google Scholar
Clasen, J. (2005), Reforming European Welfare States: Germany and the United Kingdom Compared, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gabriel, O.W. (2007), ‘Bürger und Demokratie im vereinigten Deutschland’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 48: 540–552.Google Scholar
Goedecke, A. (2006), ‘A “ready-made state”: the mode of institutional transition in East Germany after 1989’, in M. Diewald, A. Goedicke and K.U. Mayer (eds), After the Fall of the Wall: Life Courses in the Transformation of East Germany, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 44–64.Google Scholar
Hancock, M.D. (1989), West Germany: The Politics of Democratic Corporatism, Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Jacoby, W. (2000), Imitation and Politics: Redesigning Modern Germany, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kastellec, J.P. Leoni, E.L. (2007), ‘Using graphs instead of tables in political science’, Perspectives on Politics 5: 755–771.Google Scholar
Kohli, M. (1987), ‘Retirement and the moral economy: an historical interpretation of the German Case’, Journal of Aging Studies 1: 125–144.Google Scholar
Lippl, B. Wegener, B. (2004), ‘Soziale Gerechtigkeit in West-und Ostdeutschland’, Gesellschaft-Wirtschaft-Politik 53: 261–280.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. (1996), ‘Was communism good for social justice? A comparative analysis of the two Germanies’, British Journal of Sociology 47: 397–420.Google Scholar
Mau, S. (2003), The Moral Economy of Welfare States: Britain and Germany Compared, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mayer, K.U. (2006), ‘Society of departure: the German democratic republic’, in M. Diewald, A. Goedicke and K.U. Mayer (eds), After the Fall of the Wall: Life Courses in the Transformation of East Germany, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 29–43.Google Scholar
Mettler, S. Soss, J. (2004), ‘The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: bridging policy studies and mass politics’, Perspectives on Politics 2: 55–73.Google Scholar
Meulemann, H. (1997), ‘Value changes in germany after unification: 1990–95’, German Politics 6: 122–139.Google Scholar
Meulemann, H. (2003), ‘Transformation and polarization: attitudes towards equality and achievement and the search for losers and winners of the east german transformation 1990–95’, in D. Pollack, J. Jacobs, O. Müller and G. Pickel (eds), Political Culture in Post-Communist Europe, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 135–150.Google Scholar
Offe, C. (1992), ‘German reunification as a “natural experiment” ’, German Politics 1: 1–12.Google Scholar
Pfaff, S. (2001), ‘The politics of peace in the GDR: the independent peace movement, the church, and the origins of the East German opposition’, Peace & Change 26: 280–300.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1993), ‘When effect becomes cause: policy feedback and political change’, World Politics 45: 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roller, E. (1994), ‘Ideological basis of the market-economy – attitudes toward distribution principles and the role of government in Western and Eastern Germany’, European Sociological Review 10: 105–117.Google Scholar
Roller, E. (1997), ‘Sozialpolitische orientierungen nach der deutschen Vereinigung’, in O. W. Gabriel (ed.), Politische Orientierungen und Verhaltensweisen im vereinigten Deutschland, Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, R.A., Trappe, H. Gornick, J.C. (2004), ‘Gender and work in Germany: before and after reunification’, Annual Review of Sociology 30: 103–124.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. (1989), ‘Learning from catastrophes: West Germany’s public policy’, in F. G. Castles (ed.), The Comparative History of Public Policy, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1992), Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Soss, J., Hacker, J. Mettler, S. (eds) (2007), Remaking America: Democracy and Public Policy in an Age of Inequality, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S. (1993), Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British, and American Approaches to Financing the Modern State, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S., Thelen, K.A. Longstreth, F. (eds) (1992), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stjernø, S. (1995), Mellom kirke og kapital : tysk velferdspolitikk – med sideblikk til britisk, svensk og norsk [Between Church and Capital: German Welfare Policies – in Comparison with Britain, Sweden and Norway], Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Straughn, J.B. (2005), ‘ “Taking the state at its word”: the arts of consentful contention in the German democratic republic’, American Journal of Sociology 110: 1598–1650.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. Thelen, K. (2005), ‘Introduction’, in W. Streeck and K. Thelen (eds), Beyond Continuity. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
Svallfors, S. (1996), Välfärdsstatens moraliska ekonomi: välfärdsopinionen i 90-talets Sverige [The Moral Economy of the Welfare State: Welfare Opinions in 1990s Sweden], Umeå: Boréa.Google Scholar
Svallfors, S. (ed.) (2007), The Political Sociology of the Welfare State: Institutions, Social Cleavages, and Orientations, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Thumfart, A. (2007), ‘Bilanz der einigungsbilanzen – forschungs-und meinungskonjunkturen der letzten 15 Jahre’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 48: 564–584.Google Scholar
Weakliem, D.L. (2005), ‘Public opinion, political attitudes, and ideology’, in T. Janoski, R. Alford, A. Hicks and M.A. Schwartz (eds), The Handbook of Political Sociology: States, Civil Societies, and Globalization, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 227–247.Google Scholar
Wegener, B. (2003), ‘Solidarity, justice, and social change: Germany’s ten years of unification’, in D. Pollack, J. Jacobs, O. Müller and G. Pickel (eds), Political Culture in Post-Communist Europe, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 207–233.Google Scholar
Wegener, B. Liebig, S. (2000), ‘Is the “Inner Wall” here to stay? Justice ideologies in unified Germany’, Social Justice Research 13: 177–197.Google Scholar
Wegener, B., Lippl, B. Christoph, B. (2000), ‘Justice ideologies, perceptions of reward justice, and transformation: East and West Germany in comparison’, in D.S. Mason and J.R. Kluegel (eds), Marketing Democracy: Changing Opinions About Inequality and Politics in East Central Europe, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 122–160.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Svallfors supplementary tables

Svallfors supplementary tables

Download Svallfors supplementary tables(PDF)
PDF 83.6 KB