Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:35:17.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neo-republicanism: Machiavelli’s solutions for Tocqueville’s republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2009

Jessica L. Kimpell
Jessica L. Kimpell*
Affiliation:
Hertford College, University of Oxford, Catte Street, Oxford, UK
*
* E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, I demonstrate that neo-republicanism, as found in the works of Philip Pettit, Quentin Skinner, Maurizio Viroli, Iseult Honohan, and John Maynor, is underpinned by a conception of the well-ordered republic derived from the classical republican tradition. I also argue that an alternative, modern framework of the republic and its political stability emerged in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries and is captured in the work of thinkers like Benjamin Constant and Alexis de Tocqueville. Neo-republicanism, however, collapses these distinct conceptions of political order. It does so in some cases by misinterpreting these nineteenth-century figures as representing the continuation of the classical perspective that calls for virtuous political participation to secure freedom. It does so in others by aligning with a classical framework of political order and yet not seeing its core conundrum as problematic, perhaps because of adopting assumptions associated with an optimistic perspective on social and political change. What is more, even if neither were a problem, neo-republicanism, in its appeal to a classical tradition, overlooks a relevant body of work which dealt with key republican concerns from within the context of increasingly commercial and heterogeneous societies.

Keywords

republicanismcivic virtuepolitical orderAlexis de TocquevillePhilip Pettit
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , November 2009 , pp. 375 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barry, B. (1965), Political Argument, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berry, C. (1994), The Idea of Luxury, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constant, B. (1988), ‘The liberty of the ancients compared with that of the moderns’, in B. Fontana (ed.), Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 307–328.Google Scholar
Dagger, R. (2006), ‘Neo-republicanism and the civic economy’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5(2): 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. (2006), Setting the People Free: The Story of Democracy, London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Fontana, B. (ed.) (1994), The Invention of the Modern Republic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, M. (1987), Reason and Revolution: The Political Thought of the Abbe Sieyès, New York: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. (2003), ‘Folie républicaine’, Annual Review of Political Science 6(1): 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, E. (2008), ‘From republican to liberal liberty’, History of Political Thought 29(1): 132–167.Google Scholar
Hampsher-Monk, I. (2002), ‘From virtue to politeness’, in M. Van Gelderen and Q. Skinner (eds), Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage, Vol II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herreros, F. (2007), ‘Size and virtue’, European Journal of Political Theory 6(4): 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, L. (1994), ‘Adam Ferguson and spontaneous order: the paradox of progress and decline’, Unpublished DPhil thesis. Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. (1977), The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, A. (1982), ‘Rival interpretations of market society: civilizing, destructive, or feeble?’, Journal of Economic Literature 20(4): 1463–1484.Google Scholar
Honohan, I. (2002), Civic Republicanism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Honohan, I.Jennings, J. (eds) (2005), Republicanism in Theory and Practice, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hont, I. (2005), Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hont, I. (2006), ‘The early enlightenment debate on luxury and commerce’, in M. Goldie and R. Wokler (eds), The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 379–418.Google Scholar
Hont, I.Ignatieff, M. (eds) (1983), Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. (1987), ‘Of refinement in the arts’, in E. Miller (ed.), Essays Moral, Political, and Literary, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, Inc., pp. 268–280.Google Scholar
Hunt, L. (2007), Inventing Human Rights: A History, New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, A.Katznelson, I. (2006), ‘The republic of the moderns: Paine’s and Madison’s novel liberalism’, Polity 38(4): 447–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, A.Katznelson, I. (2008), Liberal Beginnings: Making a Republic for the Moderns, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramnick, I. (1988), ‘The “Great National Discussion”: the discourse of politics in 1787’, William and Mary Quarterly 45(1): 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, J., Hamilton, A.Jay, J. (1987), in I. Kramnick (ed.), The Federalist Papers, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Manin, B. (1994), ‘Checks, balances and boundaries: the separation of powers in the constitutional debate of 1787’, in B. Fontana (ed.), The Invention of the Modern Republic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–62.Google Scholar
Maynor, J. (2003), Republicanism in the Modern World, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Maynor, J.Laborde, C. (eds) (2008), Republicanism and Political Theory, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Paine, T. (1998), ‘“Common Sense”, “Rights of Man, Part Two”’, in M. Philp (ed.), Thomas Paine: Rights of Man, Common Sense and Other Political Writings, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–59; 199–331.Google Scholar
Patten, A. (1996), ‘The republican critique of liberalism’, British Journal of Political Science 26: 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (1999), Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2006), ‘Freedom in the market’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5(2): 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, N. (1983), ‘Adam Smith as civic moralist’, in I. Hont and M. Ignatieff (eds), Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philp, M. (2000), ‘Motivating liberal citizenship’, in C. McKinnon and I. Hampsher-Monk (eds), The Demands of Citizenship, London: Continuum, pp. 165–192.Google Scholar
Philp, M. (2007), ‘Failing the republic’, Paper presented at the Virtues, Vices and Politics Research Seminar, May 25, New College, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pocock, J.G.A. (1983), ‘Cambridge paradigms and scotch philosophers’, in I. Hont and M. Ignatieff (eds), Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J.G.A. (1985), Virtue, Commerce and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J.G.A. (1992), ‘The political limits to premodern economics’, in J. Dunn (ed.), The Economic Limits to Modern Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–141.Google Scholar
Rahe, P. (1994), Republics Ancient and Modern. Inventions of Prudence: Constituting the American Regime, Vol. III, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
de Romilly, J. (1991), The Rise and Fall of States According to Greek Authors, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, J. (1993), ‘The social contract’, in G.D.H. Cole (trans.) and P.D. Jimack (ed.), The Social Contract and Discourses, London: Everyman, pp. 179–309.Google Scholar
Say, J.B. (1999), ‘Olbie, or an essay on the means of reforming the morals of a nation’, in E. Forget (ed.), The Social Economics of Jean-Baptiste Say: Markets and Virtue, London: Routledge, pp. 196–241.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1991), ‘The paradoxes of political liberty’, in D. Miller (ed.), Liberty, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 183–205.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1993), ‘The republican ideal of political liberty’, in G. Bock, Q. Skinner and M. Viroli (eds), Machiavelli and Republicanism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 293–309.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1998), Liberty Before Liberalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2008), ‘Freedom as the absence of arbitrary power’, in J. Maynor and C. Laborde (eds), Republicanism and Political Theory, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 83–101.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, M. (ed.) (2003), Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès, Political Writings, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co., Inc.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, M. (2007), Before the Deluge: Public Debt, Inequality, and the Intellectual Origins of the French Revolution, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springborg, P. (2001), ‘Republicanism, freedom from domination, the Cambridge contextual historians’, Political Studies 49(5): 851–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Staël, G. (2000), ‘Considerations on the principal events of the French revolution’ and ‘Of Public Opinion’, in M. Berger (ed. and trans.), Germaine de Staël, Politics, Literature, and National Character, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, pp. 116–124; 125–130.Google Scholar
Stedman Jones, G. (2004), An End to Poverty?, London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, A. (2000), H. Mansfield and D. Winthrop (eds), Democracy in America, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Tocqueville, A. (2002), O. Zunz and A. Kahan (eds), The Tocqueville Reader: A Life in Letters and Politics, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Venturi, F. (1971), Utopia and Reform in the Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viroli, M. (2002), Republicanism, New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Viroli, M.Bobbio, N. (2003), The Idea of the Republic, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Welch, C. (2004), ‘Tocqueville’s resistance to the social’, History of European Ideas 30(1): 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whatmore, R. (2000), Republicanism and the French Revolution: An Intellectual History of Jean-Baptiste Say’s Political Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootton, D. (ed.) (1994), Republicanism, Liberty and Commercial Society, 1649–1776, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar