Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:34:29.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic expectations and support for secession in Catalonia: between causality and rationalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Jordi Muñoz  and
Raül Tormos
Jordi Muñoz*
Affiliation:
Departament de Dret Constitucional i Ciència Política, Universitat de Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Raül Tormos
Affiliation:
Centre d’Estudis d’Opinió, Catalonia, Spain
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Support for independence from Spain has sharply increased in recent years in Catalonia. According to all available evidence, public opinion has shifted from an overwhelmingly pro-autonomy position to an increasingly pro-independence stance. How can we explain such widespread support for secession in a democratic context? Traditionally, national identity has been regarded as the main explanatory factor, but recent accounts tend to underline the effect of political elite’s agency as well as instrumental calculations regarding the economic consequences of secession. However, the identification of this last causal effect is subject to a fundamental challenge: the possibility that economic expectations are mere rationalizations of prior preferences. In order to overcome this identification problem, we combine the analysis of observational survey data with an original survey-embedded experiment that provides a robust test of the causal nature of economic expectations. Our results show how identity, as well as partisanship, are the main drivers of support for secession, but also that economic considerations play an independent role. Results show that economic motivations are more relevant for citizens with ambivalent identity positions and for those that have no party identification, or are partisans of parties with less clear-cut stances on the issue.

Keywords

secessioneconomyCatalonia
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , May 2015 , pp. 315 - 341
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, G.A. and Kranton, R.E. (2000), ‘Economics and Identity’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 715–753.Google Scholar
Alesina, A. and Spolaore, E. (2003), The Size of Nations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amat, F. (2012), ‘Party competition and preferences for inter-regional redistribution in Spain’, South European Society and Politics 17: 449–465.Google Scholar
Barabas, J. and Jerit, J. (2010), ‘Are survey experiments externally valid?’, American Political Science Review 104: 226–242.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. (1996), ‘Uninformed voters: information effects in presidential elections’, American Journal of Political Science 50: 194–230.Google Scholar
Bartkus, V.O. (1999), The Dynamic of Secession, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bélanger, É. and Perrella, A. (2007), ‘Facteurs d’appui à la souveraineté du Québec chez les jeunes: une comparaison entre francophones, anglophones et allophones’. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association Canadienne de Science Politique, 30 May–1 June, Saskatoon.Google Scholar
Blais, A. and Nadeau, R. (1992), ‘To be or not to be sovereignist: Quebeckers’ perennial dilemma’, Canadian Public Policy 18: 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, A., Martin, P. and Nadeau, R. (1995), ‘Attentes économiques et linguistiques et appui à la souveraineté du Québec: une analyse prospective et comparative’, Canadian Journal of Political Science 28: 637–659.Google Scholar
Blais, A., Martin, P. and Nadeau, R. (1998), ‘Can people explain their own vote? Introspective questions as indicators of salience in the 1995 Quebec referendum on sovereignty’, Quality and Quantity 32: 355–366.Google Scholar
Brambor, T., Clark, W. and Golder, M. (2006), ‘Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analysis’, Political Analysis 14: 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, K. (2004), Why Ethnic Parties Succeed. Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chandra, K. ed. (2012), Constructivist Theories of Ethnic Politics, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, H.D. and Kornberg, A. (1996), ‘Choosing Canada? The 1995 Quebec sovereignty referendum’, Political Science and Politics 29: 676–682.Google Scholar
Clarke, H.D., Kornberg, A. and Stewart, M.C. (2004), ‘Referendum voting as political choice: the case of Quebec’, British Journal of Political Science 34: 345–355.Google Scholar
Colino, C. (2009), ‘Constitutional change without constitutional reform: Spanish federalism and the revision of Catalonia’s statue of autonomy’, Publius: The Journal of Federalism 39: 262–268.Google Scholar
Costa-Font, J. and Tremosa, R. (2006), ‘National identity and the preference for state opting-out in the basque country’, Documents de Treball de la Facultat de Ciències Econòmiques i Empresarials, Col·lecció d’Economia.Google Scholar
Cuadras, X. and Guinjoan, M. (2011a), Sense Espanya. Balanç econòmic de la independència, Barcelona: Ed. Pòrtic.Google Scholar
Cuadras, X. and Guinjoan, M. (2011b), ‘Too bleak vision of Catalan secession’, The Financial Times, 23 June.Google Scholar
Druckman, J.N., Peterson, E. and Slothuus, R. (2013), ‘How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation’, American Political Science Review 107: 57–79.Google Scholar
Duch, R.M. and Stevenson, R.T. (2008), The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duch, R.M., Palmer, H.D. and Anderson, C.J. (2000), ‘Heterogeneity in perceptions of national economic conditions’, American Journal of Political Science 44: 635–652.Google Scholar
Duchesne, E., Eagles, M. and Erfle, S. (2003), ‘Constituency homogeneity, economic risk and support for Quebec sovereignty: a research note’, Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 36: 643–656.Google Scholar
Evans, G. and Anderson, R. (2006), ‘The political conditioning of economic perceptions’, Journal of Politics 68: 194–207.Google Scholar
Fernández-i-Marín, X. and López, J. (2010), ‘Marco cultural de referencia y participación electoral en Catalunya’, Revista Española de Ciencia Política 23: 31–37.Google Scholar
Gabel, M. and Scheve, K. (2007), ‘Mixed messages party dissent and mass opinion on European integration’, European Union Politics 8: 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, B.J. and Kuklinski, J.H. (2011), ‘Treatment effects’, in J.N. Druckman, D.P. Green, J.H. Kuklinski and A. Lupia (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 445–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, B.J., Kuklinski, J.H. and Quirk, P.J. (2007), ‘The logic of the survey experiment reexamined’, Political Analysis 15: 1–20.Google Scholar
Ghemawat, P. (2011a), ‘The ties that bind Catalonia’, The Financial Times, 16 June.Google Scholar
Ghemawat, P. (2011b), ‘Cost comercial de la separació’. La Vanguardia, 19 June.Google Scholar
Guinjoan, M. and Cuadras, X. (2011), Sense Espanya. Balanç econòmic de la independència, Barcelona: Editorial Pòrtic.Google Scholar
Hechter, M. (2001), Containing Nationalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hellström, J. (2008), ‘Who leads, who follows? Re-examining the party electorate linkages on European integration’, Journal of European Public Policy 15: 1127–1144.Google Scholar
Hierro, M.J. (2012), Change in national identification. A study of the Catalan case. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Howe, P. (1998), ‘Rationality and sovereignty support in Quebec’, Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 27: 345–359.Google Scholar
Keating, M.J. and Wilson, A.B. (2009), ‘Renegotiating the state of autonomies: statute reform and multi-level politics in Spain’, West European Politics 32: 536–558.Google Scholar
Laitin, D. (1998), Identity in Formation: The Russian-speaking Populations in the Near Abroad, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lluch, J. (2010), ‘How nationalism evolves: explaining the establishment of new varieties of nationalism within the national movements of Quebec and Catalonia (1976–2005)’. Nationalities papers 38(3): 337–359.Google Scholar
Martí, D. (2013), ‘The 2012 Catalan Election: The First Step Towards Independence?’, Regional & Federal Studies 23(4): 507–516.Google Scholar
Martin, P. (1994), ‘Générations politiques, rationalité économique et appui à la souveraineté au Québec’, Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 27: 345–359.Google Scholar
McCrone, D. and Paterson, L. (2002), ‘The conundrum of Scottish independence’, Scottish Affairs 40: 54–75.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, M. (2003), ‘Rational choice and socio-psychological explanation for opinion on Quebec sovereignty’, Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 36: 511–537.Google Scholar
Muñoz, J. and Guinjoan, M. (2013), ‘Accounting for internal variation in nationalist mobilization: unofficial referendums for independence in Catalonia (2009–11)’, Nations and Nationalism 19: 44–67.Google Scholar
Mutz, D. (2011), Population-Based Survey Experiments, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nadeau, R. and Fleury, C.h.J. (1995), ‘Gains linguistiques anticipés et appui à la souveraineté du Québec’, Revue canadienne de science politique 28: 35–50.Google Scholar
Nadeau, R., Martin, P. and Blais, A. (1999), ‘Attitudes towards risk-taking and individual choice in the Quebec referendum on sovereignty’, British Journal of Political Science 23: 523–539.Google Scholar
Pallarés, F. and Font, J. (1998), ‘‘Las elecciones autonómicas en Catalunya (1980–1992)’’, in P. del Castillo (ed.), Comportamiento político y electoral, Madrid: CIS Academia, pp. 221–273.Google Scholar
Pammett, J.H. and LeDuc, L. (2001), ‘Sovereignty, leadership and voting in the Quebec referendums’, Electoral Studies 20: 265–280.Google Scholar
Posner, D.N. (2005), Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, L. (2003), ‘When parties matter: the conditional influence of party positions on voter opinions about European integration’, Journal of Politics 65: 978–994.Google Scholar
Sambanis, N. and Milanovic, B. (2011), ‘Explaining the demand for sovereignty’. World Bank Policy Research working paper no. WPS 5888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrano, I. (2013), ‘Just a matter of identity? Support for independence in Catalonia’, Regional & Federal Studies 23(5): 523–545.Google Scholar
Sniderman, P., Brody, R. and Tetlock, P. (1991), Reasoning and Choice: Explorationism Political Psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spolaore, E. (2008), ‘Civil conflict and secessions’, Economics of Governance 9: 45–63.Google Scholar
Steenbergen, M.R., Edwards, E.E. and De Vries, C.E. (2007), ‘Who’s cueing whom? Mass-elite linkages and the future of European integration’, European Union Politics 8: 13–35.Google Scholar
Torcal, M. and Mota, F. (2013), ‘The role of political parties in shaping citizens’ political preferences for the territorial organization of the state: the Spanish case’, European Political Science Review 4: 1–26.Google Scholar
Wattenberg, M.P. (1990), The Decline of American Political Parties, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Yale, F. and Durand, C. (2011), ‘What did Quebeckers want? Impact of question wording, constitutional proposal and context on support for sovereignty, 1976–2008’, American Review of Canadian Studies 41: 242–258.Google Scholar