Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:18:25.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The bond that binds or drives us apart? An empirical test of the national identity argument in three countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2022

Carolin Hjort Rapp Open the ORCID record for Carolin Hjort Rapp [Opens in a new window]
Carolin Hjort Rapp*
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen, Department of Political Science, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Solidarity is a key ingredient to making society work. Yet, recent developments such as the refugee crisis and the declining support for social democratic parties question the degree of solidarity in Western societies. So what could increase solidarity? The national identity argument (NIA) claims that a stronger national identity can foster solidarity. While this claim was proven in some cases, several others challenged it. This paper sets out to put the NIA to a severe empirical test by distinguishing five different forms of national identity: national belonging, national pride, patriotism, national chauvinism, and the normative perception of national boundaries. The data stems from national surveys in Germany, the UK, and the USA linked to the ISSP. The results reveal no clear support for the NIA. Whether national identity fosters solidarity depends on what type of national identity and what country one is looking at.

Keywords

national identity argumentsolidaritynationalismredistribution
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , August 2022 , pp. 296 - 314
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Consortium for Political Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abou-Chadi, T. and Wagner, M. (2020), ‘Electoral fortunes of social democratic parties: do second dimension positions matter?’, Journal of European Public Policy 27(2): 246–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banting, K. and Kymlicka, W. (2017), ‘Introduction’, in Banting, K. and Kymlicka, W. (eds), The Strains of Commitment. The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–58.Google Scholar
Blank, T. and Schmidt, P. (2003), ‘National identity in a united Germany: nationalism or patriotism? An empirical test with representative data’, Political Psychology 24(2): 289–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobo, L.D. and Hutchings, V.L. (1996), ‘Perceptions of racial group competition: extending Blumer’s theory of group position to a multiracial social context’, American Sociological Review 61(6): 951–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M.B. (1993), ‘Social identity, distinctiveness, and in-group homogeneity’, Social Cognition 11(1): 150–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M.B. and Kramer, R.M. (1985), ‘The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior’, Annual Review of Psychology 36(1): 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, C. and Peters, Y. (2017), ‘The impact of intra-EU migration on welfare chauvinism’, Journal of Public Policy 26: 1–29.Google Scholar
Careja, R. and Harris, E. (2021), ‘Thirty years of welfare chauvinism research: findings and challenges’, Journal of Social Policy 32(2): 212–224.Google Scholar
Cavaillé, C. and Trump, K.-S. (2015), ‘The two facets of social policy preferences’, The Journal of Politics 77(1): 146–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnysh, V., Lucas, C. and Singh, P. (2015), ‘The ties that bind’, Comparative Political Studies 48(3): 267–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coenders, M. and Scheepers, P. (2003), ‘The effect of education on nationalism and ethnic exclusionism: an international comparison’, Political Psychology 24(2): 313–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidov, E., Dulmer, H., Cieciuch, J., Kuntz, A., Seddig, D. and Schmidt, P. (2016), ‘Explaining measurement nonequivalence using multilevel structural equation modeling: the case of attitudes toward citizenship rights’, Sociological Methods & Research 47: 729–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, T.H. and Jenkins, R. (2007), Flag, Nation and Symbolism in Europe and America, London, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fenger, M. (2018), ‘The social policy agendas of populist radical right parties in comparative perspective’, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy 34(3): 188–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, M. (1998), ‘The four ‘social Europes’: between universalism and selectivity’, in Rhodes, M. and Mény, Y. (eds), The Future of European Welfare: A New Social Contract? London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. (2018), ‘German General Social Survey – ALLBUS 2014: GESIS Data Archive’. Retrieved 19 May 2021 from https://dbk.gesis.org/dbksearch/SDesc2.asp?DB=E&no=5242 Google Scholar
GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. (2008), ‘German General Social Survey – ALLBUS 2004: GESIS Data Archive’. Retrieved 19 May 2021 from https://search.gesis.org/research_data/ZA3764 Google Scholar
González, R. and Brown, R. (2003), ‘Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identifications in intergroup contact’, European Journal of Social Psychology 33(2): 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, E.G.T., Sarrasin, O., Fasel, N. and Staerklé, C. (2011), ‘Nationalism and patriotism as predictors of immigration attitudes in Switzerland: a municipality-level analysis’, Swiss Political Science Review 17(4): 369–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gugushvili, D., Ravazzini, L., Ochsner, M., Lukac, M., Lelkes, O., Fink, M., Grand, P. and van Oorschot, W. (2021), ‘Welfare solidarities in the age of mass migration: evidence from European Social Survey 2016’, Acta Politica 56: 351–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustavsson, G. (2020), ‘National attachment—cohesive, divisive, or both?’, in Gustavsson, G. and Miller, D. (eds), Liberal Nationalism and its Critics. Normative and Empirical Questions, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 59–77.Google Scholar
Gustavsson, G. and Stendahl, L. (2020), ‘National identity, a blessing or a curse? The divergent links from national attachment, pride, and chauvinism to social and political trust’, European Political Science Review 12(4): 449–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamidou-Schmidt, H. and Mayer, S.J. (2021), ‘The relation between social identities and outgroup hostility among German immigrant-origin citizens’, Political Psychology 42(2): 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helbling, M., Bjerre, L., Römer, F. and Zobel, M. (2016), ‘Measuring immigration policies: the IMPIC database’, European Political Science 16(1): 79–98.Google Scholar
Hjerm, M. (1998), ‘National identity: a comparison of Sweden, Germany and Australia’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 24(3): 451–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtug, N. (2020), ‘Does nationhood promote egalitarian justice?’, in Gustavsson, G. and Miller, D. (eds), Liberal Nationalism and its Critics. Normative and Empirical Questions, Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 78–95.Google Scholar
Huddy, L. and Khatib, N. (2007), ‘American patriotism, national identity, and political involvement’, American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, L. and Ponte, A.D. (2020), ‘National identity, pride, and chauvinism—their origins and consequences for globalization attitudes’, in Gustavsson, G. and Miller, D. (eds), Liberal Nationalism and its Critics. Normative and Empirical Questions, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 38–56.Google Scholar
Huo, Y.J., Smith, H.J., Tyler, T.R. and Lind, E.A. (1996), ‘Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: is separatism the problem; is assimilation the answer?’, Psychological Science 7(1): 40–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISSP Research Group. (2012), ‘International Social Survey Programme: National Identity II – ISSP 2003: GESIS Data Archive’. Retrieved 12 December 2018 from https://www.gesis.org/en/issp/modules/issp-modules-by-topic/national-identity/2003 Google Scholar
ISSP Research Group. (2015), ‘International Social Survey Programme: National Identity III – ISSP 2013: GESIS Data Archive’. Retrieved 12 December 2018 from https://www.gesis.org/en/issp/modules/issp-modules-by-topic/national-identity/2013 Google Scholar
Johnston, R., Banting, K., Kymlicka, W. and Soroka, S. (2010), ‘National identity and support for the welfare state’, Canadian Journal of Political Science 43(2): 349–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, R., Wright, M., Soroka, S. and Citrin, J. (2017), ‘Diversity and solidarity’, in Banting, K. and Kymlicka, W. (eds), The Strains of Commitment. The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 152–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keskinen, S. (2016), ‘From welfare nationalism to welfare chauvinism: economic rhetoric, the welfare state and changing asylum policies in Finland’, Critical Social Policy 36(3): 352–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunovich, R.M. (2009), ‘The sources and consequences of national identification’, American Sociological Review 74(4): 573–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (2015), ‘Solidarity in diverse societies: beyond neoliberal multiculturalism and welfare chauvinism’, Comparative Migration Studies 3(1): 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, C.A., Frederiksen, M. and Nielsen, M.H. (2018), ‘European welfare nationalism: a study of deliberative forums in five countries’, in Taylor-Gooby, P. and Leruth, B. (eds), Attitudes, Aspirations and Welfare. Social Policy Directions in Uncertain Times, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, M.S. (2018), ‘Americans, not partisans: can priming American national identity reduce affective polarization?’, The Journal of Politics 80(1): 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lægaard, S. (2016), ‘Liberal nationalism on immigration’, in Holtug, N. (ed.), Nationalism and Multiculturalism in a World of Immigration, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Marcus, G.E., Sullivan, J.L., Theiss-Morse, E. and Wood, S.L. (1995), With Malice toward Some, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McLaren, L.M. (2003), ‘Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants’, Social Forces 81(3): 909–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (2017), ‘Solidarity and its sources’, in Banting, K. and Kymlicka, W. (eds), The Strains of Commitment. The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. and Ali, S. (2014), ‘Testing the national identity argument’, European Political Science Review 6(02): 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (2002), Citizenship and National Identity, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mummendey, A., Klink, A. and Brown, R. (2001), ‘Nationalism and patriotism: national identification and out-group rejection’, British Journal of Social Psychology 40(Pt 2): 159–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NatCen Social Research. (2014), ‘British Social Attitudes Survey, 2013: UK Data Service’. Retrieved 5 April 2021 from https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/ Google Scholar
National Centre for Social Research. (2005), ‘British Social Attitudes Survey, 2003: UK Data Service’. Retrieved 5 April 2021 from https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/ Google Scholar
Osborne, D., Milojev, P. and Sibley, C.G. (2017), ‘Authoritarianism and national identity: examining the longitudinal effects of SDO and RWA on nationalism and patriotism’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31(7): 014616721770419.Google Scholar
Pehrson, S., Brown, R. and Zagefka, H. (2009), ‘When does national identification lead to the rejection of immigrants? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence for the role of essentialist in-group definitions’, British Journal of Social Psychology 48(1): 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, C. (2020), ‘National attachments and the immigrant participation gap’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46(13): 2818–2840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (2009), Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reeskens, T. and Hooghe, M. (2010), ‘Beyond the civic-ethnic dichotomy: investigating the structure of citizenship concepts across thirty-three countries’, Nations and Nationalism 16(4): 579–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichl, S. (2004), ‘Flying the Flag: the Intricate Semiotics of National Identity’, European Journal of English Studies 8(2): 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schildkraut, D.J. (2011), Americanism in the Twenty-First Century. Public Opinion in the Age of Immigration, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shayo, M. (2009), ‘A model of social identity with an application to political economy: nation, class, and redistribution’, American Political Science Review 103(2): 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulman, S. (2002), ‘Challenging the civic/ethnic and west/east dichotomies in the study of nationalism’, Comparative Political Studies 35(5): 554–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A.D. (1991), National Identity, Reno: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
Sniderman, P.M. and Carmines, E.G. (1997), Reaching Beyond Race, Cambridge, Mass, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Soroka, S., Wright, M., Johnston, R., Citrin, J., Banting, K. and Kymlicka, W. (2017), ‘Ethnoreligious identity, immigration, and redistribution’, Journal of Experimental Political Science 4(3): 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1982), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., Billig, M.G., Bundy, R.P. and Flament, C. (1971), ‘Social categorization and intergroup behaviour’, European Journal of Social Psychology 1(2): 149–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, D.J. and Hogg, M.A. (1996), ‘Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: a role for group identification’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22(8): 776–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theiss-Morse, E., Gonzalez, F.J. and O’Toole, A. (2020), ‘Hierarchy, American identity, and support for anti-poverty efforts’, in Gustavsson, G. and Miller, D. (eds), Liberal Nationalism and its Critics. Normative and Empirical Questions, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 96–114.Google Scholar
Theiss-Morse, E. (2009), Who Counts as an American? The Boundaries of National Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J.C. (1985), ‘Social categorization and the self-concept: a social cognitive theory of group behavior’, Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research 2: 77–122.Google Scholar
Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D. and Wetherell, M.S. (1987), Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
van der Waal, J., de Koster, W. and van Oorschot, W. (2013), ‘Three worlds of welfare chauvinism? How welfare regimes affect support for distributing welfare to immigrants in Europe’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 15(2): 164–181.Google Scholar
Wenzel, M., Mummendey, A. and Waldzus, S. (2007), ‘Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: the ingroup projection model’, European Review of Social Psychology 18(1): 331–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L. and Smith, T.W. (2019), ‘General Social Survey 2014 Cross Section and Panel Combined: Open Science Framework’. Retrieved 20 May 2021 from https://www.thearda.com/Archive/Files/Descriptions/GSS14ED.asp Google Scholar
Wright, M. (2011), ‘Policy regimes and normative conceptions of nationalism in mass public opinion’, Comparative Political Studies 44(5): 598–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, M. and Reeskens, T. (2013), ‘Of what cloth are the ties that bind? National identity and support for the welfare state across 29 European countries’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(10): 1443–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Rapp supplementary material

Appendix

Download Rapp supplementary material(File)
File 451.1 KB