Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:22:33.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘A few practical things’: The Redress of Law and the irritation of (critical) constitutional theory – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2023

Angelo Golia Jr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Erratum
Information
European Law Open , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 2023 , pp. 881
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Max-Planck-Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law was not listed as the author’s primary institution in the original article. The research for this paper was carried out while the author was still affiliated to the MPIL Heidelberg. The publisher apologises for the error.

References

Golia, A. (2023). ‘A few practical things’: The Redress of Law and the irritation of (critical) constitutional theory. European Law Open, 2(1), 184–200. doi: 10.1017/elo.2023.19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar