Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:27:56.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notwendige Öffnung und legitime Schließung liberaler Demokratien*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Rainer Bauböck
Rainer Bauböck
Affiliation:
Institut für Höhere Studien(Wien).
Get access

Abstract

Up until what point should liberal democracies allow free entry and free settlement for foreigners? Aside from the case of refugees and family reunion, there are two possible arguments for free access: the extension of individual liberty, and as a means of ensuring global redistribution. These arguments are insufficient and, in a counter-utopian reasoning, the author invokes the need for stability and the defence of national interests, which justify the use of 'differentiated' filters for immigrants.

Jusqu'a quel point les démocracies liberates doivent-elles accorder libre entrée et libre installation aux étrangers ? En dchors du cas des réfugiés et du regroupement familial, il peut yavoir deux arguments en faveur de l'ouverture: extension de la liberte individuelle ou moyen d'assurer une redistribution globale. lls sont insuffisants et, contre l'utopie, l'auteur rappelle les condidons de la stabilité et de la defense des intercts nationaux qui justifient l'établissement de filtres « differencies » pour les immigrants.

Wie offen müissen liberale Demokratien für den Zutritt und die Niederlassung von Fremden sein? Der Beitrag argumentiert, daϐ die weitgehend anerkannten Rechte auf freie Auswanderung und auf sicheren Aufenthalt bereits Einwanderungsansprüche für bestimmte Gruppen wie Flüchtlinge oder Famiiienangehorige von niedergelassenen Immigranten fundieren. Ein weitergehendes allgemeines Recht auf Migration zwischen Staaten kann entweder als Erweiterung von individueller Freiheit oder als Mittel zur Herstellung globaler Verteilungsgerechtigkeit begründet werden. Beide Argumente scheinen jedoch nicht stark genug, urn die Aufnahmepflichten von Staaten gegenuber Einwanderungswilligen hinreichend zu konkretisieren. Um die attraktive Utopie offener Grenzen gegen die internen Stabilisierungsbedingungen liberaler Demokratien abzuwagen wird abschliefiend ein Verfahren des stufenweisen Filterns von Einwanderungsrechten und staatlichen Abwehrinteressen skizziert

Type
Gehen, Bleiben, Kommen
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , May 1997 , pp. 71 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURVERZEICHIS

Ackerman, Bruce A., 1980, Social Justice in the Liberal State (New Haven, Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Bader, Veit, 1995, Citizenship and Exclusion; Radical Democracy, Community and Justice. What is wrong with communitarianism?, Political Theory, vol. 23, no. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, Brian, 1992, The Quest for Consistency: A Sceptical View, in Barry, Brian and Goodin, Robert E. (eds), op. cit.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian and Goodin, Robert E. (eds), 1992, Free Movement. Ethical Issues in the transnational migration of people and of money (Pennsylvania State University Press).Google Scholar
Bauböck, Rainer, 1992a, Immigration and the Boundaries of Citizenship. Monograph in Ethnic Relations, No.4 (Coventry University of Warwick, Centre for Research in Ethnic Relations).Google Scholar
Bauböck, Rainer, 1992b, Zur Legitimation von Einwanderungskontrolle, in Althaler, Karl und Hohenwarter, Andrea (Hg.), 1992, Torschluß. Wanderungsbewegungen und Politik in Europa (Wien, Verlag für Gesellschaftskritik).Google Scholar
Bauböck, Rainer, 1994a, Transnational Citizenship. Membership and Rights in International Migration (Aldershot, Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
Bauböck, Rainer, (ed.), 1994b, From Aliens to Citizens. Redefining the Legal Status of Immigrants in Europe (Aldershot, Avebury).Google Scholar
Bauböck, Rainer, 1994c, Changing the Boundaries of Citizenship. The Inclusion of Immigrants in Democratic Polities, in Bauböck, R. (ed.), op. cit.Google Scholar
Carens, Joseph, 1987, ‘Aliens and Citizens’ : The Case for Open Borders, The Review of Politics, vol. 49, no. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carens, Joseph, 1988, Nationalism and the Exclusion of Immigrants: Lessons from Australian Immigration Policy, in Gibney, Marc (ed.), op. cit.Google Scholar
Carens, Joseph, 1989, Membership and Morality, in Brubaker, Rogers W. (ed.), op. cit.Google Scholar
Carens, Joseph, 1992, Migration and Morality. A liberal egalitarian perspective, in Barry, and Goodin, (eds) op. cit.Google Scholar
Castles, Stephen and Miller, Mark J., 1993, The Age of Migration. International Population Movements in the Modern World (London, Macmillan).Google Scholar
Cohen, Robin, 1987, The New Helots. Migrants in the International Division of Labour (Aldershot, Avebury).Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin, 1819/1988, The Liberty of the Ancients Compared With that of the Moderns, Political Writings (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf, 1994, The Changing Quality of Citizenship, in Van Steenbergen, Bart (ed.), The Condition of Citizenship (London, Sage).Google Scholar
Dowty, Alan, 1987, Closed Borders. The Contemporary Assault on Freedom of Movement (New Haven, Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Dummett, Ann, 1992, The transnational migration of people seen from within a natural last tradition, in Barry, and Goodin, (eds), op. cit.Google Scholar
Dummett, Ann, 1994, The Acquisition of British Citizenship. From Imperial Traditions to National Definitions, in Bauböck, Rainer (ed.), op. cit.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, 1977, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, 1981, What is Equality? part 1: Equality of Welfare, Philosophy and Public Affairs, no. 3.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, 1984, Rights as Trumps, in Waldron, Jeremy (ed.), Theories of Rights (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest, 1983, Nations and Nationalism (Oxford, Blackwell).Google Scholar
Gibney, Mark, 1986, Strangers or Friends. Principles for a New Alien Admission Policy (New York, Greenwood Press).Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert (1992), If people were money…, in Barry, Brian and Goodin, Robert (eds), op. cit.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, 1992, Faktizität und Geltung (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Hailbronner, Kay, 1992, Rechtsfragen der doppelten Staatsangehörigkeit bei der erleichterten Einbürgerung von Wanderarbeitern und ihren Familienangehörigen. Rechtsgutachten im Auftrag des Ausländerbeauftragten des Senats der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg.Google Scholar
Hammar, Tomas, 1990, Democracy and the Nation State. Aliens, Denizens and Citizens in a World of International Migration (Aldershot, Avebury).Google Scholar
Hammar, Tomas, 1994, Legal Time of Residence and the Status of Immigrants in Bauböck, Rainer (ed.), op. cit.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O., 1970, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Lutz, 1994, Einwanderungspolitik und Volksverständnis, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, vol. 23, No.3.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, 1984, Zum Ewigen Frieden (Stuttgart, Reclam Universal-Bibliothek).Google Scholar
Layton-Henry, Zig (ed.), 1990, The political rights of migrant workers in Western Europe (London, Sage).Google Scholar
Marshall, T.H., 1949/1965, Citizenship and Social Class, Class, Citizenship, and Social Development. Essays by T.H. Marshall (New York, Anchor Books).Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas, 1991, Equality and Partiality (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert, 1974, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Oxford, Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Plato, , 1961, Crito, The Collected Dialogues of Plato (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas, 1994, An Egalitarian Law of Peoples, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 23, No. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John, 1971, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John, 1993, Political Liberalism (New York, Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A., 1950, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, third edition (New York, Harper Torchbooks).Google Scholar
Shue, Henry, 1988, Mediating Duties, Ethics, No. 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teitelbaum, Michael S., 1980, Right versus Right: Immigration and Refugee Policy in the United States, Foreign Affairs, vol. 59, No. 1, Fall, S. 21–59.Google Scholar
Titmuss, Richard, 1963, Essays on the Welfare State (London, Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
Ueda, Reed, 1982, Naturalization and Citizenship, in Easterlin, Richard A., Ward, David, Bernard, William S., Ueda, Reed, Immigration. Dimensions of Ethnicity. A series of Selections from the Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups (Cambridge, Harvard University Press), 106–154.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe, 1992, Commentary: Citizenship exploitation, unequal exchange and the breakdown of popular sovereignty, in Barry, Brian and Goodin, Robert E. (eds), op. cit.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel, 1983, Historical Capitalism (London, Verso).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, 1983, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York, Basic Books).Google Scholar
Withol de Wenden, Catherine, 1990, The Absence of Rights: The Position of Illegal Immigrants, in Layton-Henry, (ed.), op. cit.Google Scholar
Zolberg, Aristide, 1987, Keeping Them Out: Ethical Dilemmas of Immigration Policy, in Myers, Robert J. (ed.), International Ethics in the Nuclear Age (Boston, University Press of America).Google Scholar
Zolberg, Aristide, Suhrke, Astri, Aguayo, Sergej, 1989, Escape From Violence. Conflict and the Refugee Crises in the Developing World (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar