Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:58:42.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modélisation analytique de l'action: Pareto versus Weber – Corrigendum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2009

Boris Gurov
Boris Gurov*
Affiliation:
Université de Provence, Aix-Marseille-I, École Doctorale « Espaces, Cultures, Sociétés » [[email protected]].

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Corrigendum
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , August 2009 , E1
Copyright
Copyright © A.E.S. 2009

doi:10.1017/S0003975607000392, Published by Cambridge University Press August 2007

In the English abstract on page 375, ‘Parsonian’ should be replaced with ‘Paretian’.

The full English abstract should read as follows:

Today confronting Pareto versus Weber is commonplace. For the majority of contemporary researchers, validating one of the two theoretical constructs means ipso facto rejecting the other. The present paper attempts to prove the lack of scientific ground. The Weberian and Paretian approaches operate at two different levels. They should be put to work jointly in a sequential manner, Pareto first, Weber thereafter.

References

REFERENCE

Gurov, Boris, Modélisation analytique de l'action Archives Européennes de Sociologie (2007), XLVIII (2):317–344, 375. Published by Cambridge University Press August 2007 doi:10.1017/S0003975607000392CrossRefGoogle Scholar