Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
* Guerlac, H., “Some historical assumptions of the history of science” et A. Koyré, “Commentary”, tous deux dans Crombie, A. C. (ed.), Scientific Change (Londres, Heinemann, 1963)Google Scholar; Merton, Robert K., Science, Technology and Society in 17th Century England (Bruges, Imprimerie Sainte-Catherine, 1938)Google Scholar. Hall, A. R., «Merton revisited, or Science and Society in the Seventeenth Century », et J. Agassi, « Towards an historiography of science », History and Theory, II (1963), 1–117Google Scholar; Rossi, Paolo, I filosofi e le macchine 1400–1700 (Milano, Feltrinelli, 1962)Google Scholar, et « Les arts mécaniques et la science nouvelle », Arch, europ. de sociol., IV (1963), 221–236Google Scholar; Feuer, L. S., The Scientific Intellectual (New York, Basic Books, 1962)Google Scholar; Gillispie, C. C., The Edge of Objectivity: An Essay in the History of Scientific Ideas (Princeton, Princeton U.P., 1960)Google Scholar; Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Foundations of the unity of science, vol. II, no. 2 (Chicago, Chicago U.P., 1962).Google Scholar
(1) Guerlac, H., op. cit. pp. 797–812.Google Scholar
(2) Ibid. p. 801.
(3) Ibid. p. 810.
(4) Ibidem.
(5) Koyré, A., op. cit. pp. 847–857.Google Scholar
(6) op. cit.
(7) Loc. cit. p. 13.
(8) Loc. cit. p. 11.
(9) Agassi, J., op. cit.Google Scholar
(10) Rossi, P., I filosofi e le macchineGoogle Scholar; Id., «Les arts mécaniques et la science nouvelle », op. cit.
(11) Feuer, L. S., op. cit.Google Scholar
(12) Gillispie, C. C., Op. cit.Google Scholar
(13) Feuer, L. S., op. cit. p. 394.Google Scholar
(14) Kuhn, T. S., op. cit.Google Scholar
(15) Ibid. p. 109.
(16) Ibid. p. 110.
(17) Ibid. p. 170.