Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:00:34.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law and strategy in sociological explanation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

James B. Rule
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes Critiques
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , May 1984 , pp. 167 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Mill, J. S., A System of Logic (New York 1893), p. 223Google Scholar.

(2) Homans, G., Contemporary theory in sociology, in Faris, Robert E. L. (ed.), Handbook of Modern Sociology (Chicago 1964)Google Scholar; Id.The Nature of Social Science (New York 1967).

(3) Nagel, E., The Structure of Science (New York 1961)Google Scholar; Hempel, , Aspects of Scientific Explanation (New York 1965)Google Scholar.

(4) Stinchcombe, A., Constructing Social Theories (New York 1968)Google Scholar; Blalock, H., Causal Inference in Nonexperimental Research (Chapel Hill 1964)Google Scholar, and Causal inference, closed populations and measures of association, in Blalock, H. (ed.), Causal Models in the Social Sciences (New York 1971)Google Scholar; Hage, J., Techniques and Problems of Theory Construction (New York 1972)Google Scholar; Boudon, R., The Logic of Sociological Explanation (Hardmondsworth 1974)Google Scholar; Nowak, S., Understanding and Prediction (Boston 1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gibbs, J., Sociological Theory Construction (Hinsdale, Ill. 1972)Google Scholar, and Homans and the methodology of theory construction, in Hamblin, R. and Kunkel, J. (eds), Behavioral Theory in Sociology (New Brunswick, N.J. 1977)Google Scholar.

(5) Homans, , The Nature of Social Science, p. 44Google Scholar.

(6) Hempel, , op. cit., pp. 424, 236–237Google Scholar.

(7) Ibid., pp. 267–268; MacIntyre, A., Is a science of comparative politics possible?, in Ryan, Alan (ed.), The Philosophy of Social Explanation (Oxford 1973), p. 175Google Scholar.

(8) Davidson, D., Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford 1980), p. 224Google Scholar.

(9) Dray, W., Laws and Explanation in History (London 1957)Google Scholar; Scriven, M., A possible distinction between traditional scientific disciplines and the study of human behavior, in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. I edited by Feigl, Herbert and Scriven, Michael (Minneapolis 1956)Google Scholar, and Explanations, predictions and laws, in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. III edited by Feigl, Herbert and Maxwell, Grover (Minneapolis 1962)Google Scholar; Lukes, S., Methodological individualism reconsidered, British Journal of Sociology, XIX (1968), 119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar; MacIntyre, op. cit.; Garfinkel, A., Forms of Explanation (New Haven 1981)Google Scholar.

(10) MacIver, R., Social Causation (New York 1942)Google Scholar.

(11) Ibid. p. 63.

(12) Ibid. p. 251.

(13) Garfinkel, , op. cit. p. 143Google Scholar.

(14) Dretske, F., Contrastive statements, Philosophical Review, LXXXI (1972), 411–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

(15) Ibid. 411–412.

(16) Gorovitz, S., Causal judgment and causal explanation, Journal of Philosophy, LXII (1965), 695–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

(17) Garfinkel, op. cit.

(18) Ibid. p. 30.

(19) Garfinkel, op. cit.

(20) Ibid.

(21) Ibid. p. 56.

(22) Ibid. p. 155.

(23) Boudon, R., The Crisis in Sociology (New York 1980), p. 227CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

(24) Ibid. p. 254.

(25) Ibid. p. 228.

(26) Myrdal, G., Value in Social Theory (London 1958)Google Scholar; Streeten, P., Introduction in Myrdal, , op. cit., p. xivGoogle Scholar; see also Rule, J.Insight and Social Betterment (New York 1978)Google Scholar, Chapter VI.

(27) National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders, Report (Washington, D.C. 1968), p. 5Google Scholar.

(28) Wilson, J. Q., Social science and public policy: a personal note, in Lynn, Jr (ed.), Knowledge and Policy: The Uncertain Connection (Washington, D.C. 1978)Google Scholar.

(29) American Sociological Review, XXXV (1970). 627–649Google Scholar.

(30) Ibid. p. 643.

(31) Ibid. pp. 643–644.

(32) Gurr, T., A causal model of civil strife: a comparative analysis of new indices, in Feierabend, I. and Feierabend, R. (eds), Anger, Violence and Politics (Englewood, N.J. 1972)Google Scholar.

* The author wishes to thank Lewis Coser, Dagfinn Føllesdal, Mark Granovetter, George Homans, Michael Simon, John Sumser, Kurt Wolff and others for commentary useful in the preparation of this study; appreciation is also expressed to sociological audiences at McGill University and the State University of New York at Stony Brook for providing forums for early versions of the work.