Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:44:08.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

À Frazer ce qui est de Frazer: vers une réinterprétation de l'intellectualisme du Golden Bough

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Frederico Rosa
Frederico Rosa
Affiliation:
Université de Paris X, (Nanterre).
Get access

Abstract

Current interpretations of James Frazer's work overestimate the importance of the three stages theory (Magic-Religion-Science) and of individual reflection in the philosopbes sauvages. The Golden Bough is more about the idea of a universal and spontaneous psychological atmosphere, beyond the distinction between Religion and Magic. Frazer prefers to characterise this atmosphere through the explicit content of rites and beliefs, often neglected by twentieth century religious anthropology.

La vision courante dc l'œuvre de James Frazer exagère l'importance de la théorie des trois stades (Magic-Religion-Science) et de la réflexion individuelle des philosopbes sauvages. The Golden Bough dépend davantage de l'idée déune atmosphére psychologique universelle et spontanée, au-delà de la distinction entre Religion et Magie. Cctte atmosphère est préférentiellement caractérisée par Frazer à travers le contenu explicite des rites et des croyances, souvent négligé par léanthropologie religieuse du xxe siècle.

Bei der Beurteilung des Werkes von James Frazer wird haufig die Bedeutung der Drei-Stadien Theorie (Zauberei-Religion-Wissenschaft) und der Einzelüberlegungen (Gedankensansatz) der ‘wilden Philosophen’ übertrieben. The Golden Bough basiert eher auf der Idee einer universellen und spontanen psychologischen Atmosphäre, über die Trennung von Religion und Zauberei hinausgehend. Für Frazer typisch wird diese Atmosphäre durch den genauen Inhalt der Riten und Glaubensformen nachgezeichnet, der oft von der religiösen Anthropologie des 20. Jahrhunderts vernachlässigt worden ist.

Type
Notes Critiques
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , November 1997 , pp. 301 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

RÉFÉRENCES

Ackerman, Robert, 1987, J.G. Frazer. His Life and Work (Cambridge, University Press), X–348 p.Google Scholar
Crawley, Ernest, 1902, The Mystic Rose. A Study of Primitive Marriage (London, MacMillan and Co.), XVIII–492 p.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary, 1978, Judgements on James Frazer, Daedalus, vol. 107, 151–164.Google Scholar
Frazer, James George, 1890, The Golden Bough. A Study in Comparative Religion (London, MacMillan and Co.), 2 vol.Google Scholar
Frazer, James George, 1900, The Golden Bough. A Study in Magic and Religion (London, MacMillan and Co.), 3 vol.Google Scholar
Frazer, James George, 1922, The Golden Bough. A Study in Magic and Religion (Penguin Books, 1996), XXXIII–907 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, James George, 1923, Le Rameau d'Or (Paris, Paul Geuthner), 722 p.Google Scholar
Leach, Edmund, 1961, Golden Bough or Gilded Twig?, Daedalus, vol. 90, 371–387.Google Scholar
Libnhart, G., 1993, Frazer's Anthropology: Science and Sensibility, Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford, vol. 24, 1–12.Google Scholar
MacCormack, Sabine, 1984, Magic and the Human Mind: a Reconsideration of Frazer's Golden Bough, Arethusa, vol. 17, 151–176.Google Scholar
Stocking, George W. Jr., 1995, After Tylor. British Social Anthropology 1888–1951 (Madison, The University of Wisconsin Press), XX–570 p.Google Scholar
Stocking, George W. Jr., 1996, Outcast from the Islands: Frazer, The Golden Bough and Modern Anthropology, in James Frazer, The Golden Bough. A Study in Magic and Religion (Penguin Books, 1996), XV–XXX.Google Scholar
Weisinger, Herbert, 1961, The Branch that Grew Full Straight, Daedalus, vol. 90, 388–399.Google Scholar
Wood, Geoffrey, 1982, Frazer's Magic Wand of Anthropology: Interpreting The Golden Bough, Archives Européennes de Sociologie, XXIII (1982), 93–122.Google Scholar