Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:01:25.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

For Conscience and Kingdom Martyrs, Monarchs and the Spirit of Modernity in Early Modern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2019

Clayton Fordahl
Clayton Fordahl*
Affiliation:
Sociology Department, University of Memphis [[email protected]]
Get access

Abstract

This article compares the collective commemoration of martyrs to ascertain changes in cultural understandings of the relationship between the ultimate sacrifice offered by an individual and monarchal violence. This historical comparison is used to argue that changes in the nature of Christianity transformed the popular interpretation of sovereign violence from a desecrative to a redemptive force. While cultural individualism and political statism appear in secularized modernity as contradictory impulses, their birth in early modernity was induced by coherent and entirely consistent religious worldview.

Résumé

Cet article compare différentes commémorations collectives de martyrs pour préciser la manière dont se transforme la compréhension culturelle de la relation entre le sacrifice ultime d’un individu et la violence monarchique. Cette comparaison historique permet d’affirmer que des changements dans la nature de la chrétienté ont contribué à transformer l’interprétation populaire de la violence souveraine comme force profanatrice en une force rédemptrice. Alors que l’individualisme culturel et l’étatisme politique apparaissent dans la modernité sécularisée comme des impulsions contradictoires, leur naissance au début de la modernité a été induite par une vision du monde religieuse entièrement cohérente.

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag vergleicht verschiedene, für Märtyrer organisierte, kollektive Gedenkfeiern, um darzustellen, auf welche Art und Weise kulturelle Verständnisse die Beziehung zwischen individueller Opferbereitschaft und monarchischer Gewalt verändern. Dieser historische Vergleich verdeutlicht, wie eine sich verändernde Konzeption des Christentums bei der Öffentlichkeit zu einer Neuinterpretation der Gewaltausübung eines Herrschers führt – von einer ruchlosen zu einer erlösenden Gewalt. Obwohl der kulturelle Individualismus und der politische Etatismus in der säkularisierten Moderne als sich widersprechende Impulse verstanden werden, geht ihre Entstehung zu Beginn der Moderne auf eine ganz kohärente, religiöse Weltvorstellung zurück.

Keywords

SacrificeModernityMonarchyMartyrdomHeresyConscienceSacrificeModernitéMonarchieMartyreHérésieConscienceOpferModerneMonarchieMärtyrerKetzereiGewissen
Type
Varia
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , April 2019 , pp. 1 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © A.E.S. 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Acknowledgement: I am grateful to Bryan S. Turner, Saïd Arjomand, Daniel Levy, and Ian Roxborough for their time and valuable feedback. A debt is owed also to Berglind H. Ragnarsdóttir for reading and commenting on this article’s earlier drafts.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Anderson, Perry, 1974. Lineages of the Absolutist State (New York, Verso).Google Scholar
Armstrong, Karen, 2015. Fields of Blood: Religion and the History of Violence (New York, Anchor Books).Google Scholar
Barlow, Frank, 1990. Thomas Becket (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press).Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard, 1978. Kings or People: Power and the Mandate to Rule (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press).Google Scholar
Black, J. H., ed., 1846. The Life and Martyrdom of Thomas Beket, Archbishop of Canterbury, From the Series of Lives and Legends Now Proved to Have Been Composed By Robert of Gloucester in Early English Poetry and Ballads, and Popular Literature of the Middle Ages, Vol. XIX (London, Printed for the Percy Society by T. Richards).Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean, 1992. On Sovereignty (Cambridge Texts on Political Theory), edited by Franklin, Julian H. (New York, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Cantor, Norman F., 1994. The Civilization of the Middle Ages: A Completely Revised and Expanded Edition of Medieval History (New York, Harper Perennial).Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, William T., 1995. “‘A Fire Strong Enough to Consume the House’: The Wars of Religion and the Rise of the State”, Modern Theology, 11 (4): 397-420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, Mary G., 1941. “The Compromise of Avranches of 1172 and the Spread of Canon Law”, English Historical Review, 56 (222): 177-197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donne, John, 1610. Pseudo-martyr: Wherein, Out of Certaine Propositions and Gradations, This Conclusion Is Evicted, That Those Which Are of the Romane Religion in This Kingdome, may and ought to take The Oath Of Allegiance (London, W. Stansby for Walter Burre).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, Norbert, 1982. Power and Civility: The Civilizing Process, Pt. II (New York, Pantheon).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, 1990. The History of Sexuality, Volume I (New York, Vintage).Google Scholar
Foxe, John, 1576. “The Unabridged Acts and Monuments Online or TAMO (1576 edition)”, HRI Online Publications, Sheffield, 2011. Retrieved September 20, 2017 (www.johnfoxe.org).Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony, 1990. The Consequences of Modernity (Palo Alto, Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Giles, J. A., ed., 1846. The Life and Letters of Thomas à Becket, now first gathered from Contemporary Historians, Volume II (London, Whitacker & Co).Google Scholar
Gorski, Philip, 2003. The Disciplinary Revolution: Calvinism and the Rise of the State in Early Modern Europe (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, John, 2012. Thomas Becket: Warrior, Priest, Rebel (New York, Random House).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, 1982. Leviathan (New York, Penguin Classics).Google Scholar
Internet Medieval Sourcebook. 1998. “Roger of Hovedon: The Chronicle: On the Disputes Between Thomas Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury and King Henry II of England.” The Bronx, NY: Fordham University. Retrieved September 19, 2017 (http://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/source/hoveden-becket.asp)Google Scholar
Jones, Thomas M., ed., 1970. The Becket Controversy (New York, John Wiley and Sons).Google Scholar
Lilla, Mark, 2008. The Stillborn God: Religion, Politics, and the Modern West (New York, Vintage).Google Scholar
Magnusson, Eríkur, ed., 1883. Thómas Saga Erkibyskups: A Life of Archbishop Thomas Becket in Icelandic, Volume II (London, Longman & Co.).Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington Jr., 1987. Authority and Inequality under Capitalism and Socialism (Oxford, Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Murray, Douglas, 2017. The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam (London, Bloomsbury Continuum).Google Scholar
Nederman, Cary J., ed., 1990. Policraticus: On the Frivolities of Courtiers and the Footprints of Philosophers (New York, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Nederman, Cary J., 2015. “John of Salisbury’s Political Theory,” in Grellard, Christophe and Lachaud, Frederique, A Companion to John of Salisbury (Boston, Brill: 258-288).Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven, 2011. The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined (New York, Penguin).Google Scholar
Pollock, Frederick and Maitland, Frederic William., 1889. The History of English Law Before Edward I, Volume I (Cambridge, Little, Brown & Company).Google Scholar
Prudlo, Donald S., 2011. “Martyrs on the Move: the Spread of the Cults of Thomas of Canterbury and Peter of Verona”, Peregrinations: Journal of Medieval Art and Architecture, 3 (2): 32-62.Google Scholar
Reinhard, Wolfgang, 1989. “Reformation, Counter-Reformation, and the Early Modern State A Reassessment”, The Catholic Historical Review, 75 (3): 383-404.Google Scholar
Reynolds, E. E., ed., 1963. The Lives of Saint Thomas More by William Roper and Nicholas Harspfield (London, Everyman’s Library).Google Scholar
Robertston, William Craigie, ed., 1876. Materials for the History of Thomas Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury, Volume II (Benedict of Peterborough, John of Salisbury, Alan of Tewksbury, Edward Grim) (London, Longman & Co).Google Scholar
Schama, Simon, 2002. A History of Britain: At the Edge of the World? 3000 BC–1603 ad (London, BBC Books).Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith, 1989. “The Liberalism of Fear” in Liberalism and the Moral Life, edited by Rosenblum, Nancy L. (Cambridge, Harvard University Press: 21-38).Google Scholar
Smith, Lacey Baldwin, 1999. Fools, Martyrs, Traitors: The Story of Martyrdom in the Western World (Chicago, IL, Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Solt, Leo F., 1990. Church and State in Early Modern England, 1509-1640 (New York, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik, 1996. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems of Change (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Stevenson, Joseph, trans., 1856. William of Newburgh. The Church Historians of England, Vol. IV, Part II (London, Seeley’s).Google Scholar
Strayer, Joseph R., 1970. On the Medieval Origins of the Modern State (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles, 1992. Coercion, Capital, and European States: AD 990-1992 (Cambridge, MA, Blackwell).Google Scholar
Turner, Bryan S., 2013. The Religious and the Political: A Comparative Sociology of Religion (New York, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel, 2011. The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press).Google Scholar
Weiler, Björn, 2009. “Kings and Sons: Princely Rebellions and the Structures of Revolt in Western Europe, c. 1170-1280”, Historical Research, 82 (215): 17-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar