Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:42:06.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining Political Tunnel Vision: Politics and Economics in Crisis-Ridden Europe, Then and Now

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2015

Stephanie L. Mudge
Stephanie L. Mudge*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis [[email protected]].
Get access

Abstract

The grip of austerity in European politics since 2008 presents a double puzzle: electorally weak center-left parties offering no definite alternative, and the surprisingly efficient pursuit of “fiscal consolidation”. To understand this double puzzle this article investigates the institutional bases of alternative economic thinking during the 1930s versus the post-2008 crisis years. Noting the recent prominence of a new social type, the European economist-technocrat (eet), I highlight the historically specific order to which the eet is indigenous: rarefied, international professional circuits that tend to work over, not through, party politics. This contrasts sharply with the nationally-based, party-connected economists who developed new economic orthodoxies between the 1930s and 1960s, including Keynes himself. Approaching the study of economic culture in the public sphere in a Polanyian moral markets framework, I argue that the linkages between European economics and financial technocracies help to explain Europe’s double puzzle. Theoretically, I argue that a focus on expertise and parties, and not just states, is central to our understanding of economic culture in the public sphere.

Résumé

L'emprise de l'austérité sur les politiques Européennes depuis 2008 présente une double énigme : l'absence d'alternative portée par des partis de centre-gauche affaiblis, et la poursuite surprenante d'efficacité de la “consolidation fiscale”. Pour comprendre cette double énigme, cet article étudie les bases institutionnelles de la pensée économique alternative durant les années 1930 et les années qui suivirent la crise de 2008. A partir du constat de l'affirmation récente d'un nouveau type social, l'Economiste-Technocrate Européen (ETE), je souligne l'ordre historique caractéristique de l'ETE : des circuits professionnels internationaux très fermés qui passent, non pas à travers, mais au dessus des partis politiques. Cette situation contraste fortement avec celle des économistes proches des partis qui, comme Keynes lui-même, ont contribué entre les années 1930 et les années 1960, au développement des nouvelles orthodoxies économiques. En abordant l'étude de la culture économique dans la sphère publique à partir d'un cadre théorique Polanyian, il s'agit de montrer que les liens entre les économistes européens et les technocraties financières rendent compte de notre double énigme Européenne. D'un point de vue théorique, l'article souligne l'importance qu'il y a à prendre en considération l'expertise et les partis, et pas seulement les Etats, pour comprendre la culture économique dans la sphère publique.

Zusammenfassung

Der Einfluss der seit 2008 gängigen Sparmaßnahmen auf die europäische Politik gibt ein Doppelrätsel auf: einerseits keine von den geschwächten links-mitte Parteien getragene Alternative, andererseits ein überraschender, effizienter Ausbau der Steuerkonsolidierung. Um dieses Doppelrätsel verstehen zu können, befasst sich dieser Beitrag mit den institutionellen Grundlagen des alternativen wirtschaftlichen Gedankenguts der 1930er und der auf die 2008er Krise folgenden Jahre. Ausgehend von dem kürzlich entstandenen neuen Sozialtypus, dem europäischen Wirtschaftstechnokraten (European economist-technocrat, EET), wird der historische Rahmen des EET hervorgehoben: sehr geschlossene, wirtschaftliche Berufskreise, die nicht mehr quer durch, sondern über die Parteien hinaus verlaufen. Ganz anders die parteinahen Wirtschaftswissenschaftler, die, wie Keynes, in den 1930er und 1960er Jahren zur Entwicklung neuer Wirtschaftsorthodoxien beigetragen haben. Die Untersuchung der Wirtschaftskultur des öffentlichen Bereichs, eingegrenzt von Polanyians Theorie, verdeutlicht, dass die Beziehungen zwischen europäischen Wirtschafts- und Finanztechnokratien das europäische Doppelrätsel verstehen helfen. Aus theoretischer Perspektive betrachtet, muss ein Fokus nicht nur auf Staaten, sondern auch auf Sachwissen und Parteien gelegt werden, um die Wirtschaftskultur des öffentlichen Bereichs verstehen zu können.

Keywords

AusterityPolitical partiesEconomicsExpertiseEuropean UnionAusteritéPartis politiquesEconomieCompétenceUnion européenneSparmaβnahmenPolitischen ParteienWirtschaftFrachkenntnisseEuropäische Union
Type
Economic Culture in the Public Sphere
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 56 , Issue 1: Economic Culture in the Public Sphere , April 2015 , pp. 63 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © A.E.S. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abdelal, Rawi, 2007. Capital Rules: The Construction of Global Finance (Cambridge/London, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Arrighi, Giovanni, 1994. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times (London, Verso).Google Scholar
Bbc 2011. “Profile: Lucas Papademos”, 10 November, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-15643454, accessed 5 February 2014.Google Scholar
Bbc 2013. “Profile: Mario Monti”, 18 February, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-15695056, accessed 17 October 2013.Google Scholar
Berezin, Mabel, 2009. Illiberal Politics in Neoliberal Times (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri, 1990. The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe (Cambridge/London, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri, 1998. “Path Dependency and Political Action: Reexamining Responses to the Depression”, Comparative Politics, 30 (4): 379-400.Google Scholar
Blyth, Mark, 2013. Austerity: The Origins of a Dangerous Idea (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, 1997 [2000], Pascalian Meditations. (Cambridge, Polity Press).Google Scholar
Callon, Michel, ed., 1998. The Laws of the Markets (Oxford, Blackwell).Google Scholar
Centre For Economic Policy Research (CEPR), 2013a. http://www.cepr.org/about-cepr, accessed 12 October 2013.Google Scholar
Centre For Economic Policy Research (CEPR), 2013b. http://www.cepr.org/content/supporters-cepr, accessed 12 October 2013.Google Scholar
Cohen, Benjamin J., 1998. The Geography of Money (Ithaca, Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Colander, David, 2008. “The Making of a European Economist”, Kyklos 61 (2): 215-236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramme, Olaf, 2013. ‘The German Election: Why Did the SPD Fail?”, Policy Network, 17 October, http://www.policy-network.net/pno_detail.aspx?ID=4492&title, accessed 18 October 2013.Google Scholar
Cross, Colin, 1966. Philip Snowden (Wallingford, Barrie & Rockliff).Google Scholar
Daley, Suzanne, 2011. “Economist Named to Lead Greek Unity Government”, 10 November, New York Times, online edition.Google Scholar
De Haan, Jakob and Eijffinger, Sylvester C. W., 2000. “The Democratic Accountability of the European Central Bank: A Comment on Two Fairy Tales”, Journal of Common Market Studies 38 (3): 393-407.Google Scholar
De Leon, Cedric, 2014. Party and Society (Cambridge, Polity Press).Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant, 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists and the Transformation of Latin-American States (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Donadio, Rachel, 2012. “As a Premier Prepares to Depart, the Talk Is of Lost Opportunities”, 13 November, New York Times, online edition.Google Scholar
Durbin, Elizabeth, 1985. New Jerusalems: the Labour Party and the Economics of Democratic Socialism (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Ecofin, , 2015. See http://www.consilium.europa.eu/policies/council-configurations/economic-and-financial-affairs?lang=en, accessed 5 February 2014.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry, 1998. Globalizing Capital: A History of the International Monetary System (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Erixon, Lennart and Wadensjö, Eskil, 2012. “Gösta Rehn (1913-96)–en otålig samhällsreformator”. Ekonomisk Debatt, 40 (8): 71-82.Google Scholar
Euractiv.Com 2013 “Monti: EU countries need grand coalitions in times of crisis”, 14 October, http://www.euractiv.com/euro-finance/monti-eu-countries-need-grand-co-news-531052, accessed 15 October 2013.Google Scholar
European Council 2014. ““Fiscal compact” entered into force on 1 January 2013”. http://www.european-council.europa.eu/home-page/highlights/fiscal-compact-enters-into-force-on-1-january-2013?lang=en, accessed 8 May 2014.Google Scholar
European Union (EU), 2014a. http://eurozone.europa.eu/Eurogroup/previous-Eurogroup-presidents/, accessed 5 February 2014.Google Scholar
European Union (EU), 2014b. http://europa.eu/efc/about/index_en.htm, accessed 5 February 2014.Google Scholar
European Union (EU), 2014c. http://europa.eu/efc/president/index_en.htm, accessed 5 February 2014.Google Scholar
Forte, Francesco, 1995. “European Economics: A Tiny Creature under Tutorship”, Kyklos 48: 211-217.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, 1979 [2010]. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979 (New York, Picador).Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion, 2006. “The Construction of a Global Profession: The Transnationalization of Economics”, American Journal of Sociology, 112: 145-194.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion, 2009. Economists and Societies (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion and Healy, Kieran, 2007. “Moral Views of Market Society”, Annual Review of Sociology, 33: 285-311.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion, Steiner, Philippe, Streeck, Wolfgang and Woll, Cornelia, 2013. “Discussion Forum: Moral Categories in the Financial Crisis.” Socio-Economic Review, 11: 601-627.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno, Humbert, Silke and Schneider, Friedrich, 2007. “Was denken Deutsche Okonomen? Eine empirische Auswertung einer Internetbefragung unter den Mitgliedern des Vereins für Socialpolitik, im Sommer 2006,” Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 8: 359-377.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffrey, 2006. Global Capitalism: Its Fall and Rise in the Twentieth Century, (New York/London, WW Norton & Co).Google Scholar
Georgakakis, Didier and Lassale, Marine De, 2008. “Where Have All the Lawyers Gone? Structure and Transformations of the Top European Commission Officials’ Legal Training”, EUI Working Paper no. RSCAS 2008/38 (December) (San Domenico di Fiesole, European University Institute, Robert Schuman, Centre for Advanced Studies).Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob, 2013. “How to Reinvigorate the Centre-left? Predistribution”, 12 June, The Guardian, online edition, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/12/reinvigorate-centre-left-predistribution, accessed 21 October 2013.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter, ed., 1989. The Political Power of Economic Ideas (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Haseler, Stephen, 1969. The Gaitskellites: Revisionism in the British Labour Party, 1951-1964 (London, MacMillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawtrey, Ralph G., 1947. The Gold Standard in Theory and Practice (New York, Longmans, Green).Google Scholar
Henricksson, Rolf G. H., 1991. “The Political Economy Club and the Stockholm School”, in Jonung, , ed., The Stockholm School of Economics Revisited (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 41-73).Google Scholar
Holmes, Douglas R., 2000. Integral Europe: Fast-Capitalism, Multiculturalism and Neofascism, (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Howson, Susan and Winch, Donald, 1977. The Economic Advisory Council, 1930-1939: A Study in Economic Advice During Depression and Recovery (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
James, Harold, 1981. “Rudolf Hilferding and the Application of the Political Economy of the Second International”, The Historical Journal 24 (4): 847-869.Google Scholar
Jonung, Lars, ed., 1991. The Stockholm School of Economics Revisited (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard, 1926. The End of Laissez-faire (London, L & Virginia Woolf).Google Scholar
Krippner, Greta, 2005. “The Financialization of the American Economy”, Socio-Economic Review, 3 (17): 173-208.Google Scholar
Krippner, Greta, 2011. Capitalizing on Crisis (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Lebaron, Frédéric, 2001. “Economists and the Economic Order: The Field of Economists and the Field of Power in France”, European Societies 3 (1): 91-110.Google Scholar
Lebaron, Frédéric, 2006. ““Nobel” Economists as Public Intellectuals: The Circulation of Symbolic Capital”, International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 43 (1): 87-101.Google Scholar
Liddle, Roger, 2013. “No Return to ‘Business as Usual’ for European Social Democracy”. 10 April, Policy Network, http://www.policy-network.net/pno_detail.aspx?ID=4363&title=No+return+to+%E2%80%98business+as+usual%E2%80%99+for+European+social+democracy, accessed 8 May 2014.Google Scholar
Major, Aaron, 2014. Architects of Austerity: International Finance and the Politics of Growth (Stanford, Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Marcussen, Martin, 2009. “Scientization of Central Banking: The Politics of A-Politicization”, in Dyson K. and M. Marcussen, eds., The Changing Power and Politics of the ECB (Oxford, Oxford University Press: 373-390).Google Scholar
Markoff, John and Montecinos, Verónica, 1993. “The Ubiquitous Rise of Economists”, Journal of Public Policy, 13 (1): 37-68.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, 1846 [1978]. “The German Ideology, Part I”, pp. 146-202 in Tucker, R., ed., The Marx-Engels Reader (New York/ London, Norton & Company).Google Scholar
Miebach, Michael, 2013. “The SPD Election Campaign: Getting Out Lost Voters”, 19 September, Policy Network http://www.policy-network.net/pno_detail.aspx?ID=4464&title=The-SPD-election-campaign-Getting-out-lost-voters, accessed 10 October 2013.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip and Plehwe, Dieter, 2009. The Road from Mont Pelerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective (Cambridge/London, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy, 1998. “Fixing the Economy”, Cultural Studies, 12 (1): 82-101.Google Scholar
Monti, Mario, 2010. A New Strategy for the Single Market: At the Service of Europe’s Economy and Society, Report to the President of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso (Brussels, European Commission).Google Scholar
Monti, Mario, 2011. “Address by Mario Monti”, Conference in memory of Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa, Banca d’Italia, Rome, Italy, 16 December.Google Scholar
Mudge, Stephanie L. 2008. “What is Neo-Liberalism?”, Socio-Economic Review.Google Scholar
Mudge, Stephanie L., (forthcoming) Neoliberal Politics, Unpublished book manuscript.Google Scholar
Mudge, Stephanie L. and Chen, Anthony, 2014. “Political Parties and the Sociological Imagination: Past, Present, and Future Directions”, 40: 305-330.Google Scholar
Mudge, Stephanie L. and Vauchez, Antoine, 2012. “Building Europe on a Weak Field: Law, Economics, and Scholarly Avatars in European Politics”, American Journal of Sociology, 118 (2): 449-492.Google Scholar
Ohlin, Bertil, 1937. “Some Notes on the Stockholm Theory of Savings and Investment I”, The Economic Journal 47 (185): 53-69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, Jamie, 2010. Constructions of Neoliberal Reason (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas, 2014. Capitalism in the 21st Century. (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl, 1944 [2001]. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Boston, Beacon Press).Google Scholar
Polillo, Simone and Guillén, Mauro F., 2005. “Globalization Pressures and the State: The Worldwide Spread of Central Bank Independence”, American Journal of Sociology, 110 (6): 1764-1802.Google Scholar
Pugh, Patricia, 1984. Educate, Agitate, Organise: 100 Years of Fabian Socialism (London, Methuen).Google Scholar
Quinn, Dennis P., 2003. “Capital Account Liberalization and Financial Globalization, 1890-1999: A Synoptic View”, International Journal of Finance and Economics 8: 189-204.Google Scholar
Reay, Michael J., 2012. “The Flexible Unity of Economics”, American Journal of Sociology, 118, 1: 45-87.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Kurt W., 1995. “In Search of a European Identity”, Kyklos 48: 273-277.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich and Skocpol, Theda, eds., 1996. States, Social Knowledge and the Origins of Modern Social Policies (Princeton/New York, Princeton University Press and Russell Sage Foundation).Google Scholar
Rydgren, Jens, 2007. “The Sociology of the Radical Right”, Annual Review of Sociology, 33: 241-262.Google Scholar
Sandelin, Bo, 2000. “The post-1945 development of economics and economists in Sweden”, in Coats, A. W., ed., The development of economics in Western Europe since 1945 (London, Routledge: 142-164).Google Scholar
Sassoon, Donald, 1996. One Hundred Years of Socialism: The West European Left in the Twentieth Century (London/New York, IB Tauris Publishers).Google Scholar
Scheller, Hanspeter K., 2006. “The European Central Bank: History, Role, and Functions” (Frankfurt, European Central Bank).Google Scholar
Serwotka, Mark, 2013. “Miliband's Offer of Austerity in a Red Rosette is Failing Voters”, 24 June, New Statesman, Online edition.Google Scholar
Skidelsky, Robert, 1992. John Maynard Keynes: The Economist as Savior, 1920-1937 (London, Macmillan).Google Scholar
Smaldone, William, 1998. Rudolf Hilferding: The Tragedy of a German Social Democrat (Dekalb, Northern Illinois University Press).Google Scholar
Stern, Charlotta, 2009. “European Professors as Public Intellectuals”, Society, 46: 110-118.Google Scholar
Swank, Duane and Betz, Hans-Georg, 2003. “Globalization, the Welfare State, and Right-Wing Populism in Europe”, Socio-Economic Review, 1: 215-245.Google Scholar
Sylvers, Eric, 2010. “Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa, 70, a Champion of the Euro, Dies”, NYTimes.com, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/21/business/global/21schiopp, accessed 13 May 2014.Google Scholar
Tanner, Duncan, 2004. “Snowden, Philip, Viscount Snowden (1864-1937)”, in Matthew H. C. G. and B. Harrison, eds., Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Treanor, Jill, 2010. “Tributes paid to Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa, a founding father of the euro”, The Guardian (online edition). http://www.theguardian.com/business/2010/dec/19/tommaso-pa, accessed 13 May 2014.Google Scholar
Thygesen, Niels, 2011. “TPS and European integration”, Conference in memory of Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa, Banca d’Italia, Rome, Italy, 16 December.Google Scholar
Tingsten, Herbert, 1941 [1973]. The Swedish Social Democrats: Their Ideological Development (Totowa, Bedminster Press).Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc, 2006. “Pierre Bourdieu”, in Stones R., ed., Key Contemporary Thinkers.Google Scholar
Weir, Margaret and Skocpol, Theda, 1985. “State structures and the possibilities for ‘Keynesian’ response to the great depression in Sweden, Britain and the United States” in Evans Peter B., Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol, eds., Bringing the State Back in (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 107-168).Google Scholar
Wigforss, Ernst, 1938. “The Financial Policy During Depression and Boom”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 197, Social Problems and Policies in Sweden (May): 25-39.Google Scholar
Woytinsky, Wladimir, 1961. Stormy Passage (New York, Vanguard Press).Google Scholar