No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Du paradoxe professional: médecins et ingénieurs des années 1800
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
Extract
Nous comparerons deux occupations, la médcine et le génie, que I'on désigne habituellement sous le même titre de professions libérates. L'époque qui va de 1750 à 1850 environ est, pour chacune d'elles, celle de la cristallisation de leur statut, de leur fonction et des bases cognitives modernes sur lesquelles elles poursuivent leur développement jusqu'à nos jours.
- Type
- Professions avec ou sans compétence
- Information
- European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , November 1976 , pp. 306 - 330
- Copyright
- Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1976
References
Bibliographie
Artz, F.B., The Development of Technical Education in France 1500–1800 (Cambridge, M.I.T. Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Barber, B., Some Problems in the Sociology of the Professions, Daedalus, LXXXXII (1963), 669–688.Google Scholar
Carr-Saunders, A.M., Wilson, P.A., The Professions (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1933).Google Scholar
Caplow, T., The Sequence of Professionalization, in Vollmers, H.M. and Mills, D.L., Professionalization (Engledans wood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1969), pp. 19–20.Google Scholar
Coury, C., L'enseignement de la médecineen France, des origines à not jours (Paris, Expansion scientifique française, 1968).Google Scholar
Dunham, A.L., The Industrial Revolution in France 1815–1488 (New York, Exposition Press, 1955).Google Scholar
Gilbert, R.R., Machine-Tools, in Singer, C., A History of Technology (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1954–1958), vol. III.Google Scholar
Goode, W.J., Enchroachment, Charlatanism and the Emergins Professions, American Sociological Review, XXV (1960), 902–913.Google Scholar
Greaves, W.F., Carpentier, J.H., A Short History of Mechanical Engineering (London, Longman, 1969).Google Scholar
DrHunt, T., Lettsom and the Foundation of the Foundation of the Society, in Hunt, T. (ed.), The Medical Society of London (London, Heinemann, 1972).Google Scholar
Maurice, M., Professionnalisation et syndicalisme, Sociologie du travail (1968), n° 3. 243–256.Google Scholar
Moore, W.E., The Professions: Roles and Rules (New York, Russsell Sage Foundation, 1920).Google Scholar
Musgrave, P.W., The Development of Technical Education, 1800–1910, in Musgrave, P.W. (éd), Sociology, History and Education (London, Methuen, 1970).Google Scholar
Musson, A.E., Robinson, E., Science and Technology in the Industrial Revolution (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Newman, C., The Evolution of Medical Education in the Nineteenth Century (London, Oxford University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Parsons, R.H., A History of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers 1847–1947 (London 1947).Google Scholar
Rashdall, W., Powicke, R.M., Enden, A.B., The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages, vol. I (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1951).Google Scholar
Reader, W.J., Professional Man: The rise of the professional classes in nineteenth century England (New York, Basic Book, 1966).Google Scholar
Russo, F., Histoire des sciences et des techniques: bibliographic (Paris, Hermann, 1954).Google Scholar
Sanderson, M., The Universities and British Industry, 1850–1970 (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1972).Google Scholar
Schofield, R.E., The Industrial Orientation of Science in the Lunar Society of Birmingham, in Musson, A.E. (ed.), Science, Technology and Economic Growth in the Eighteenth Century (London, Methuen, 1972).Google Scholar
Scott, W.L., The Conflict between Atomism and Conservation Theory 1644 to 1860 (London, Macdonald, 1970).Google Scholar
Scott, W.R., Professionals in Bureaucracies, in Vollmer, H.M. and Mills, D.L., Professionalization (Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1966), pp. 265–274.Google Scholar
Shryock, R.H., The Development of Modern Medecine, an Interpretation of the Social and Scientific Factors involved (London, Gollancz, 1948).Google Scholar
Smith, J.W.A., The Birth of Modern Education: The contribution of the dissenting academies, 1660–1800 (London, Independent Press, 1954).Google Scholar
Tudsbery, J.H.T., Record of the Origin and Progress of the Institution, Proceedings of the Institutions of Civil Engineers, CCV (1918), 216–225.Google Scholar