Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:07:56.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Circulation of Interpersonal Credit in Renaissance Florence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2014

Paul D. McLean  and
Neha Gondal
Paul D. McLean
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey [[email protected]]
Neha Gondal
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University [[email protected]].
Get access

Abstract

We analyze a network of 3,590 interpersonal credit ties among Renaissance Florentine elite households to determine how Florentine personal credit was socially structured. We assess the network in light of various social and economic motivations Florentines might have had to exchange credit with each other. We explore the extent of participation by people from different categories, such as neighborhoods, factions, and guilds, and we determine whether loans flowed primarily within or between such groupings. We observe considerable homophily within families and neighborhoods, but also extensive circulation of credit among the most commercially and politically active Florentines. The overall connectivity of this network of interpersonal credit transactions resembles the social structure of other contemporaneous Florentine networks, such as marriage and business, suggesting that interpersonal credit was an important and distinct domain in which elite membership was confirmed and elite social solidarity achieved.

Résumé

L’article étudie un réseau de 3 590 liens interpersonnels de crédit au sein de l’élite des ménages florentins de la Renaissance, pour rendre compte de la manière dont les prêts personnels étaient socialement structurés. Nous analysons le réseau à la lumière des diverses motivations socio-économiques associées à l’échange de crédit. Nous rendons compte du degré d’implication des Florentins en fonction de différentes catégories telles que le voisinage, la faction et la guilde et nous déterminons si les prêts avaient lieu prioritairement à l’intérieur ou entre ces groupes. Nous mettons en évidence une forte homophilie à l’intérieur des familles et des voisinages, mais également une circulation importante de crédit parmi les Florentins les plus actifs commercialement et politiquement. La connectivité globale de ce réseau de transactions interpersonnelles de crédit rappelle la structure sociale d’autres réseaux florentins de la même période, tels que des réseaux de mariages ou d’affaires. Ce qui suggère que le crédit interpersonnel était un domaine distinct et important dans lequel se jouait tant l’appartenance à une élite que la réalisation d’une forme spécifique de solidarité sociale.

Zusammenfassung

Der Aufsatz untersucht ein Netz von 3590 interpersonellen Krediten florentinischer Elitefamilien der Renaissance, um darzulegen, wie florentinische persönliche Kredite sozial strukturiert waren. Es handelt sich um eine Analyse der verschiedenen sozialen und wirtschaftlichen Beweggründe, die dem Kredithandel zugrunde lagen. Der Grad der Involvierung verschiedener Kategorien, wie Nachbarschaft, Faktion und Gilde wird untersucht und die Vergabe von Leihen, ob hauptsächlich innerhalb oder zwischen diesen Gruppen, bestimmt. Es lässt sich eine starke Homophilie innerhalb der Familien und der Nachbarschaften ausmachen, gleichzeitig aber auch ein bedeutender Kredithandel zwischen den wirtschaftlich und politisch aktivsten Florentinern. Die globale Verflechtung dieses Netzwerks interpersoneller Kredittransaktionen erinnert an die soziale Struktur anderer florentinischer Gruppen der gleichen Epoche, z.B. Ehe- und Handelsverbindungen. Dies deutet darauf hin, dass der interpersonelle Kredit ein eigenes und wichtiges Gebiet war, von der Zugehörigkeit zur Elite und der sozialen Solidarität der Eliten geprägt.

Keywords

CreditNetworkFlorenceRenaissanceEliteSolidarityCréditRéseauFlorenceRenaissanceÉliteSolidaritéKreditNetzwerkFlorenzRenaissanceEliteSolidarität
Type
Research Article
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , August 2014 , pp. 135 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © A.E.S. 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alberti, Leon Battista, 1969 [∼1433]. The Family in Renaissance Florence [I Libri della famiglia], trans. Renée Neu Watkins (Columbia, University of South Carolina Press).Google Scholar
Anthony, Denise, 2005. “Cooperation in Microcredit Borrowing Groups: Identity, Sanctions, and Reciprocity in the Production of Collective Goods”, American Sociological Review, 70: 496-515.Google Scholar
Bearman, Peter S., Moody, James and Stovel, Katherine, 2004. “Chains of Affection: The Structure of Adolescent Romantic and Sexual Networks”, American Journal of Sociology, 110: 44-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, Andrew A., 1985. “Local Lending Practice: Borrowers in a Small Northeastern Industrial City, 1832-1915”, The Journal of Economic History, 45: 393-403.Google Scholar
Botticini, Maristella, 2000. “A Tale of ‘Benevolent’ Governments: Private Credit Markets, Public Finance, and the Role of Jewish Lenders in Medieval and Renaissance Italy”, Journal of Economic History, 60: 164-89.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. Richard Nice (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Bowers, Richard H., 1983. “From Rolls to Riches: King’s Clerks and Moneylending in Thirteenth-Century England”, Speculum, 58: 60-71.Google Scholar
Branca, Vittore ed., 1986. Mercanti Scrittori: Ricordi nella Firenze tra Medioevo e Rinascimento (Milano, Rusconi).Google Scholar
Brucker, Gene A., 1977. The Civic World of Early Renaissance Florence (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Brucker, Gene A., 2005. “Fede and fiducia: The Problem of Trust in Italian History, 1300–1500”, in Living on the Edge in Leonardo’s Florence: Selected Essays (Berkeley: University of California Press: 83-103).Google Scholar
Camerer, Colin. 1988. “Gifts as Economic Signals and Social Symbols”, American Journal of Sociology, 94: 180-214.Google Scholar
Christakis, Nicholas A. and Fowler, James H., 2009. Connected: How Your Friends’ Friends’ Friends Affect Everything You Feel, Think, and Do (New York, Little, Brown and Company).Google Scholar
Conti, Elio, 1984. L’imposta diretta a Firenze nel Quattrocento (1427-1494) (Roma, Istituto storico italiano per il medio evo, Palazzo Borromini).Google Scholar
De Roover, Raymond, 1944. “Early Accounting Problems of Foreign Exchange”, Accounting Review, 19: 381-407.Google Scholar
Doosselaere, Quentin van, 2009. Commercial Agreements and Social Dynamics in Medieval Genoa (New York, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary, 1986. How Institutions Think (Syracuse, Syracuse University Press).Google Scholar
Eckstein, Nicholas A., 1995. The District of the Green Dragon: Neighborhood Life and Social Change in Renaissance Florence (Florence, Leo S. Olschki).Google Scholar
Emigh, Rebecca Jean, 2009. The Undevelopment of Capitalism: Sectors and Markets in Fifteenth-century Tuscany (Philadelphia, Temple University Press).Google Scholar
Erikson, Emily and Bearman, Peter S., 2006. “Malfeasance and the Foundations for Global Trade: The Structure of English Trade in the East Indies, 1601-1833”, American Journal of Sociology, 112: 195-230.Google Scholar
Franceschi, Franco, 2004. “The Economy: Work and Wealth”, in Najemy John M., ed., Italy in the Age of the Renaissance, 1300-1550 (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 124-144).Google Scholar
Goldthwaite, Richard A., 1968. Private Wealth in Renaissance Florence: A Study of Four Families (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Goldthwaite, Richard A., 1985. “Local Banking in Renaissance Florence”, Journal of European Economic History, 14: 5-55.Google Scholar
Goldthwaite, Richard, 2009. The Economy of Renaissance Florence (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Gondal, Neha, and McLean, Paul D., 2013a. “Linking Tie-meaning with Network Structure: Variable Connotations of Personal Lending in a Multiple-Network Ecology”, Poetics, 41: 122-150.Google Scholar
Gondal, Neha, and McLean, Paul D., 2013b. “What Makes a Network Go Round? Exploring the Structure of a Strong Component with Exponential Random Graph Models”, Social Networks, 35: 499-513.Google Scholar
Gow, Andrew and Griffiths, Gordon, 1994. “Pope Eugenius IV and Jewish Money-Lending in Florence: The Case of Salomone di Bonaventura during the Chancellorship of Leonardo Bruni”, Renaissance Quarterly, 47: 282-329.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark S., 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties”, American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, Mark S., 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: the Problem of Embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481-510.Google Scholar
Greif, Avner, 1989. “Reputation and Coalitions in Medieval Trade: Evidence on the Maghribi Traders”, Journal of Economic History, 49: 857-882.Google Scholar
Greif, Avner, 2006. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Herlihy, David, 1977. “Family and Property in Renaissance Florence”, in Miskimin Harry A., David Herlihy and A. L. Udovitch, eds., The Medieval City (New Haven/ London, Yale University Press: 3-24).Google Scholar
Herlihy, David and Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane, 1985. Tuscans and their Families: A Study of the Florentine Catasto of 1427 (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Hillmann, Henning. 2008. “Mediation in Multiple Networks: Elite Mobilization before the English Civil War”, American Sociological Review, 73: 426-454.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Philip T., Postel-Vinay, Gilles and Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent, 1999. “Information and Economic History: How the Credit Market in Old Regime Paris Forces Us to Rethink the Transition to Capitalism”, American Historical Review, 104: 69-94.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Philip T., Postel-Vinay, Gilles and Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent, 2000. Priceless Markets: The Political Economy of Credit in Paris, 1660-1870 (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Holderness, B. A., 1976. “Credit in English Rural Society before the Nineteenth Century, with Special Reference to the Period 1650-1720”,The Agricultural History Review 24: 97-109.Google Scholar
Jackson, Matthew O., Rodriguez-Barraquer, Tomas and Tan, Xu, 2012. “Social Capital and Social Quilts: Network Patterns of Favor Exchange”, American Economic Review, 102: 1857-1897.Google Scholar
Kent, Dale V., 1975. “The Florentine Reggimento in the Fifteenth Century.” Renaissance Quarterly 28: 575-638.Google Scholar
Kent, Dale V., 1978. The Rise of the Medici: Faction in Florence, 1426-1434 (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kent, Francis W., 1977. Household and Lineage in Renaissance Florence: The Family Life of the Capponi, Ginori, and Rucellai (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Kent, Francis W. and Kent, Dale V., 1982. Neighbours and Neighbourhood in Renaissance Florence: The District of the Red Lion in the Fifteenth Century (Locust Valley, J. J. Augustin).Google Scholar
Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane, 1985. “Kin, Friends and Neighbors: The Urban Territory of a Merchant Family in 1400”, in Klapisch-Zuber Christiane, Women, Family, and Ritual in Renaissance Italy (Chicago, University of Chicago Press: 68-93).Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi R., 1994. Insider Lending: Banks, Personal Connections, and Economic Development in Industrial New England (New York, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauss, Marcel, 1990. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, trans.W. D. Halls (New York: Norton).Google Scholar
Mazzei, Lapo, 1880. Lettere di un Notaro a un Mercatante del secolo xiv, con altre Lettere e Documenti, edited by Cesare Guasti.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Marjorie K., 1988. “Money Lending on the Periphery of London, 1300-1600”, Albion, 20: 557-571.Google Scholar
McPherson, Miller, Smith-Lovin, Lynn and Cook, James M., 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks”, Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 415-444.Google Scholar
Molho, Anthony, 1971. Florentine Public Finances in the Early Renaissance, 1400-1433 (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Molho, Anthony, 1994. Marriage Alliance in Late Medieval Florence (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Molm, Linda D., Collett, Jessica L. and Schaefer, David R., 2007. “Building Solidarity through Generalized Exchange: A Theory of Reciprocity”, American Journal of Sociology, 113: 205-242.Google Scholar
Moody, James, 2004. “The Structure of a Scientific Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963-1999”, American Sociological Review, 69: 213-238.Google Scholar
Najemy, John M., 1982. Corporatism and Consensus in Florentine Electoral Politics, 1280-1400 (Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press).Google Scholar
Nisbet, Charles T., 1971. “Moneylending in Rural Areas of Latin America: Some Examples from Colombia”, The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 30: 71-84.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F., 2010. “Open Elite? Social Mobility, Marriage and Family in Renaissance Florence, 1282-1494”, Renaissance Quarterly, 63: 357-411.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F. and Ansell, Christopher K., 1993. “Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434”, American Journal of Sociology, 98: 1259-1319.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F. and McLean, Paul D., 2006. “Organizational Invention and Elite Transformation: The Birth of Partnership Systems in Renaissance Florence”, American Journal of Sociology ,111: 1463-1568.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F. and McLean, Paul D., 2011. “Economic Credit in Renaissance Florence”, Journal of Modern History, 83: 1-47.Google Scholar
Phillips, Mark, 1987. The Memoir of Marco Parenti: A Life in Medici Florence (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro and Sensenbrenner, Julia, 1993. “Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action”, American Journal of Sociology, 98: 1320-1350.Google Scholar
Pullan, Brian, 1987. “Jewish Moneylending in Venice: From Private Enterprise to Public Service”, in Cozzi Gaetano, ed., Gli ebrei e Venezia, secoli XIV-XVIII (Milan: Edizioni Comunità: 671-686).Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Nicolai, 1997 [1966]. The Government of Florence Under the Medici (1434 to 1494), second edition (Oxford, Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C., 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior (New York, Norton).Google Scholar
Spicksley, Judith, 2008. “Usury Legislation, Cash, and Credit: The Development of the Female Investor in the Late Tudor and Stuart Periods”, The Economic History Review, New Series, 61: 277-301.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. and Weiss, Andrew, 1981. “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information”, American Economic Review, 71: 393-410.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Nobuyuki, 2000. “The Emergence of Generalized Exchange”, American Journal of Sociology, 105: 1105-1134.Google Scholar
Trexler, Richard C., 1980. Public Life in Renaissance Florence (Ithaca/ London: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Trexler, Richard C., 1994. “Shamed Poor: Charity and Defense of Urban Elites in the Italian Communes”, in Trexler Richard, Dependence in Context in Renaissance Florence (Binghamton, Medieval and Renaissance texts & Studies: 61-111).Google Scholar
Uzzi, Brian, 1996. “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect”, American Sociological Review, 61: 674-698.Google Scholar
Uzzi, Brian, 1999. “Social Relations and Networks in the Making of Financial Capital”, American Sociological Review, 64: 481-505.Google Scholar
Watts, Duncan J., 1999. “Networks, Dynamics, and the Small-World Phenomenon”, American Journal of Sociology, 105: 493-527.Google Scholar
Weissman, Ronald F. E., 1982. Ritual Brotherhood in Renaissance Florence (New York, Academic Press).Google Scholar
Zhou, Li and Takeuchi, Hiroki, 2010. “Informal Lenders and Rural Finance in China: A Report from the Field”, Modern China, 36: 302-28.Google Scholar
Ziegler, R., 2008. “What Makes the Kula Go Round? A Simulation Model of the Spontaneous Emergence of a Ceremonial Exchange System”, Social Networks, 30: 107-126.Google Scholar