Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:15:16.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An ‘ancient sense of politics’? Weber, Caesarism and the Republican tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Peter Baehr
Peter Baehr
Affiliation:
Memorial University of Newfoundland(St John).
Get access

Abstract

This article critically examines recent claims that Weber's political thought has close associations with classical republicanism. One salient indication of Weber's distance from this tradition is his theory of Ceasarism, and his view that modern polities are most robust when they assume a version of it consistent with civil liberties. By employing the resources of Begriffsgcschichte, I examine the extent of Weber's departure from the ‘ancient sense of politics’ and the originality of his own political theory.

L'article s'inscrit en faux contre les analyses récentes qui veulent que la pensée politique de Weber ait été en affinité avec le républicanisme classique. Pour preuve on convoquera sa theorie du césarisme et sa vision selon laquelle les régimes politiques modernes sont solides quand ils combinent libertés civiles et une certaine forme de césarisme. Des éléments d'histoire du concept aident à préciser l'originalité de sa théorie poiitique.

Zeitgenössische Behauptungen, Weber hätte sich der antiken Republik verbunden gefüllt, werden in diesem Beitrag widerlegt. Als Beweis für Webers Distanz gelten seine Theorie des Cäsarismus und seine Überzeugung, daß die moderne Politik nur solide ist, wenn sie Cäsarismus und zivile Freiheiten kombiniert. Auf die »Begriffsgeschichte« zurückgreifend, untersuche ich Webers Überlegungen zur »Politik im klassischen Sinn« und dessen eigene politische Theorie.

Type
Note Critique
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , November 1999 , pp. 333 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baehr, Peter, The Age of New Words, Times Literary Supplement, 10 3 (1997), 27.Google Scholar
Baehr, Peter, Caesar and the Fading of the Roman World. A Study in Republicanism and Caesarism (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction, 1998).Google Scholar
Baehr, Peter and O'Brien, Mike, Founders, Classics, and the Concept of a Canon, Current Sociology 42:3 (1994), 1–151.Google Scholar
Bagehot, Walter, Caesarianism As It Now Exists, in Johns-Stevas, N. St. (ed.), The Collected Works of Walter Bagehot, Vol. 4 (London: The Economist, 1968a), 111–116.Google Scholar
Bagehot, Walter, The Collapse of Caesarism, in Johns-Stevas, N. St. (ed.), The Collected Works of Walter Bagehot, Vol. 4 (London: The Economist, 1968b), 155–159.Google Scholar
Beetham, David, Weber, Max and the Liberal Political Tradition, European Journal of Sociology XXX (1989), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beetham, David, The Legitimation of Power (Atlantic City, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Richard, Liberalism and Modern Society. A Historical Argument (Philadelphia: Penn State University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Breiner, Peter, Max Weber and Democratic Politics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camic, Charles, The Matter of Habit, American Journal of Sociology 91:5 (1986), 1039–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, , Tusculan Disputations (London: William Heinemann, 1945), transl. King, J.E..Google Scholar
Cicero, , Pro Sestio and In Vatinium (London: William Heinemann, 1958), transl. Gardner, R..Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin, The Spirit of Conquest and Usurpation and Their Relation to European Civilization, in Fontana, Biancamaria (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 45–167.Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, Heinz, The Caesarism of Napoleon III As Seen by Public Opinion in Germany, Economy and Society 16:3 (1987), 357–404, transl. Wells, Gordon C..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groh, Dieter, Cäsarismus, Napoleonismus, Bonapartismus, Führer, Chef, Imperialismus, in Brunner, O., Conze, W., and Koselleck, R. (eds), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland (Stuttgart: Ernst Klett, 1972), Vol. 1, 726–771.Google Scholar
Gundolf, Friedrich, The Mantle of Caesar (New York: Vanguard Press, 1928), transl. Hartmann, J.W..Google Scholar
Hennis, Wilhelm, Max Weber. Essays in Reconstruction (London: Allen and Unwin, 1988), transl. Tribe, Keith.Google Scholar
Hennis, Wilhelm, Max Webers Wissenschaft vom Menschen (Tünbingen: J.C.B. Mohr [Paul Siebeck], 1996).Google Scholar
Hilger, Dietrich (contribution to the entry on Herrschaft), in Brunner, O., Conze, W., and Koselleck, R. (eds), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politischsozialen Sprache in Deutschland (Stuttgart: Ernst Klett, 1982), Vol. 3, 64–102.Google Scholar
Käsler, Dirk, Max Weber. An Introduction to His Life and Work (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988), transl. Hurd, Philippa.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart, The Historical-Political Semantics of Asymmetric Counterconcepts, in Koselleck, R., Futures Past. On the Semantics of Historical Time (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1985a), 159–197, transl. Keith Tribe.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart, Begriffsgeschichte and Social History, in Koselleck, R., Futures Past. On the Semantics of Historical Time (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1985b), 73–91, transl. Keith Tribe.Google Scholar
Kramnick, Isaac, The ‘Great National Discussion’: The Discourse of Politics in 1787, William and Mary Quarterly 45:1 (1988), 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, D.S., The Relative Influence of European Writers on Late Eighteenth-Century American Political Thought, American Political Science Review 78 (1984), 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò, The Discourses, ed. with an introduction by Crick, Bernard (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970), transl. L.J. Walker, S.J. with revisions by Brian Richardson.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert, Political Parties. A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy (New York: Dover, 1915), transl. Eden, and Paul, Cedar.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Theodor, The History of Rome, vol. 4 (London: Dent and Sons, 1911), transl. Dickson, W.P..Google Scholar
Montesquieu, , The Spirit of the Laws, ed. and transl. by Cohler, A., Miller, B., and Stone, H. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, Twilight of the Idols and The Anti-Christ (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968), transl. Hollingdale, R.J..Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, Daybreak: Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality, (ed.) Tannera, Michael (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), transl. R.J. Hollingdale.Google Scholar
Ostrogorski, Moisei, Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties, 2 Vols (New York: Haskell House, 1970), transl. Clarke, Frederick.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip, Freedom with Honor: A Republican Ideal, Social Research 64:1 (1997a), 52–76.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip, Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997b).Google Scholar
Pocock, J.G.A., Concepts and Discourses: A Difference in Culture? Comment on a Paper by Melvin Richter, in Lehmann, Hartmut and Richter, Melvin (eds), The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts. New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte (Washington: German Historical Institute, 1996), 47–58.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael, Personal Knowledge (New York: Harper and Row, 1958).Google Scholar
Proudhon, Pierre Joseph., Césarisme et Christianisme. De l'an 45 avant J.-C. à l'an 476 après, 2 Vols., with a preface by J.A. Langlois (Paris: Marpon and Flammarion, 1883).Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin, Toward a Concept of Political Illegitimacy: Bonapartist Dictatorship and Democratic Legitimacy, Political Theory 10:2 (1982), 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, Melvin, The History of Political and Social Concepts. A Critical Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Caroline, The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthman. Studies in the Transmission, Development and Circumstance of English Liberal Thought from the Restoration of Charles II until the War with the Thirteen Colonies (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romieu, Auguste, L'ère des Césars (Paris: Ledoyen, 1850).Google Scholar
Roscher, Wilhelm, Politik. Geschichtliche Naturlehre der Monarchie, Aristokratie und Demokratie (Stuttgart: J.C. Cotta, 1892).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Political Economy, in Cole, G.D.H. (ed.), The Social Contract and Discourses (London: J.M. Dent, 1993), transl. G.D. Cole.Google Scholar
Rüstow, F.W., Der Cäsarismus. Sein Wesen und sein Schaffen (Zurich: Cäsar Schmidt, 1879).Google Scholar
Scaff, Lawrence A., The ‘Cool Objectivity of Sociation’: Max Weber and Marianne Weber in America, History of the Human Sciences 11:2 (1998), 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäffle, Albert, Bau und Leben des sozialen Körpers, 2 Vols (Tübingen: Lauppschen Buchhandlung, 1896).Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas, History and Theory 8:1 (1969), 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, Conventions and the Understanding of Speech Acts, Philosophy 20 (1970), 118–138.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, Liberty Before Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Treitschke, Heinrich von, Politics, 2 Vols, transl. Dugdale, B. and De Bille, T. with an introduction by A.J. Balfour (New York: Macmillan, 1916).Google Scholar
Trenchard, John and Gordon, Thomas, Cato's Letters: Or, Essays on Liberty, Civil and Religious, and Other Important Subjects, ed. Hamowy, R., four volumes in two (Indianapolis, Ind., 1995).Google Scholar
Turner, F.M., British Politics and the Demise of the Roman Republic: 1700–1939, The Historical Journal 29:3 (1986), 577–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Addison, The Tory View of Roman History, in Camden, C. (ed.), Studies in English Literature 1500–1900, Vol. 4 (New York: Rice University Press, 1964), 413–456.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, The Protestant Ethnic and the Spirit of Capitalism (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1930), transl. Parsons, Talcott.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, Politics as a Vocation, in Gerth, H.H. and Mills, C. Wright (eds), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (London: Routledge, 1970), 77–128.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, Parliament and Government in a Reconstructed Germany, in Weber, M., Economy and Society, eds. Günther Roth and Claus Wittich (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978a, 1978b), 1381–1469, transl. Günther Roth.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, Economy and Society, eds. Roth, Günther and Wittich, Claus (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978b), transl. various.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, The National State and Economic Policy, Economy and Society (the journal) 9:4 (1980), 428–449, transl. Ben Fowkes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max, ‘Churches’ and ‘Sects’ in North America: An Ecclesiastical Socio-Political Sketch, Sociological Theory 3:1 (1985), 7–13, transl. Loader, Colin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max, Bourgeois Democracy in Russia, in The Russian Revolutions (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995a, 1995b), 41–147, eds and transl., Wells, Gordon C. and Baehr, Peter.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, The Russian Revolutions (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995b), eds and transl., Wells, Gordon C. and Baehr, Peter.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon, Weber, Max: Legitimation, Method and the Politics of Theory, Political Theory 9:3 (1981), 401–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar