Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:53:34.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rational action in economic an social theory: some misunderstandings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Mary K. Farmer
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes Critiques
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , May 1982 , pp. 179 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumol, W.J., Business Behaviour, Value and Growth (Los Angeles, Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch, 1967).Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S., The Economic Approach to Human Behavior (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, Mark, The Methodology of Economics (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Boland, L., A critique of Friedman's critics, Journal of Economic Literature, XVII (1979), 503–522.Google Scholar
Deaton, Angus and Muellbaueh, John, Economics and Consumer Behaviour (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Mary and baron, Isherwood, The World of Goods: towards an anthropology of consumption (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1980).Google Scholar
Glaister, Stephen, Mathematical Methods for Economists (London, Gray-Mills, 1972).Google Scholar
Hahn, Frank and Hollis, Martin(eds), Philosophy and Economic Theory (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel M., Are general equilibrium theories explanatory ? in Pitt, Joseph C. (ed.), Philosophy in Economics (Dordrecht, D. Reidel, 1981).Google Scholar
Hollis, Martin, Models of Man (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Katouzian, Homa, Ideology and Method in Economics (London, Macmillan, 1980).Google Scholar
Kirzner, Israel, The Economic Point of View2 (Kansas City, Sheed and Ward, 1976).Google Scholar
Latsis, Spiro J., Situational determinism in economics, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, XXIII (1972), 207–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latsis, Spiro J., A research programme in economics, in Latsis, S.J. (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven, Individualism (Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1973), pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
Mises, Ludwig von, The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science2 (Kansas City, Sheed Andrews and McKeel, 1978).Google Scholar
Routh, Guy, The Origin of Economic Ideas (London, Macmillan, 1975).Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall, Stone Age Economics (London, Tavistock, 1974).Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya, Rational fools: a critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory, in Hahn, F. and Hollis, M. (1979), op. cit.Google Scholar
Simon, H.A., Models of Man (New York, Wiley and Sons, 1957).Google Scholar
Stigler, George, Notes on the theory of the Giffen paradox, Journal of Political Economy, LV (1947), 152–156; reprinted in hisEssays in the History of Economics (Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George and Becker, Gary, De gustibus non est disputandum, American Economics Review, LXVII (1977), 76–90.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe, Sociology as general economics, Archives européennes de sociologie, XXII (1981), 299–324.Google Scholar