Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:58:59.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Middle-range realism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Ray Pawson
Ray Pawson
Affiliation:
University of Leeds, Leeds.
Get access

Abstract

This paper proposes a liaison —‘middle-range realism’—between two long standing explanatory strategies in sociology— ‘middle-range theory’ and ‘realist social theory’. Each offers what the other lacks. Middle-range theory carries an acute sense of the function of theory within empirical inquiry but has left undeveloped any notion of its appropriate explanatory form. Realist social theory has propositional precision but has been unable, in the most part, to descend from a critical domain to the empirical plane. Middlerange realism thus offers a research strategy of the appropriate form and scope to lead and to federate empirical inquiry. Examples are provided of how middle-range realism can be applied to improve research using two different strategies (survey methods and evaluation research) in two contrasting substantive areas (voting behaviour and offender rehabilitation).

Cet article expose comment ce que nous nommons réalisme de moyennc portée permet d'établir un lien entre deux approches rraditionnelles en sociologie, une théorie dite «de moyenne portee », et une théorie sociale « réaliste ». Chacune de ces deux théories offre ce cjui manque à l'autre. La théorie « de moyenne portée » véhicule un sens aigu du rôle de la théorie dans la démarche empirique mais laisse de côté toute tentative pour élaborer un modèle explicatif approprié. La théorie sociale réaliste, à l'inverse, s'est revelee le plus souvent incapable de passer du niveau critique au niveau empirique. Ainsi, le réalisme de moyenne portée se propose-t-il de développer une stratégic de recherche et une perspective permettant de mobiliser et de fédérer les recherches empiriques. Des exemples d'application possible de cette approche aux fins d'améliorer la qualité des recherches sont fournis, utilisant deux méthodes distinctes (méthodologie d'enquête et modèles d'évaluation) appliquées à deux domaines de recherches bien contrastés (le comportement de vote d'une part, la réinsertion des prisonniers de l'autre).

Dieser Aufsatz zeigt, wie der von uns benannte Realismus mitderer Tragweite einen Bezug zu zwei traditionellen soziologischen Interpretationsansäzen herstellt — die Theorie mittlerer Tragweite und die »realistis« soziale Theorie. Diese Theorien ergänzen sich gegenseitig. Die Theorie mittlerer Tragweite hat einen ausgeprägten Sinn für die Rolle der Theorie bei empirischen Untersuchungen, versäumt jedoch die Ausarbeitung eines passenden Interpretationsansatzes. Die realistische soziale Theorie hat im Gegensatz hierzu häufig den Übergang vom kritischen zum empirischen Niveau vernachlässigt. Der Realismus mittlerer Tragweite entwickelt eine Forschungstrategie und eine Perspektive, die es erlauben, empirische Forschungen zu mobilisieren und zu vereinigen. Mögliche Anwendungsbeispiele dieser Methode, urn die Forschungsqualität zu steigern, werden erlautert, wobei zwei unterschiedliche Methoden (Forschungsmethodik und Bemessungsmodelle) auf zwei verschiedene Forschungsgebiete angewandt werden (das Wahlverhalten einerseits und die Wiedereingliederung von Häftligen andereseits).

Type
Scale and time in sociological explanation
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , November 2000 , pp. 283 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Archer, M. (1995), Realist Social Theory (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T. and Norrie, A. (eds) (1998), Critical Realism (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
Bhaskar, R. (1978, 2nd ed.), A Realist Theory of Science (Brighton, Harvester Press).Google Scholar
Bhaskar, R. (1979). The Possibility of Naturalism (Brighton, Harvester Press).Google Scholar
Bierstedt, R. (1990), Merton's Systematic Theory, in Clark, J., Modgil, C. and Modgil, S. (eds), Robert K. Merton: Consensus and Controversy (Brighton, The Falmer Press).Google Scholar
Blalock, H. (1990), The interplay of social theory and empirical research, in Clark, J., Modgil, C. and Modgil, S. (eds), Robert K. Merton: Consensus and Controversy (Brighton, The Falmer Press).Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (1974), Education, Opportunity and Social Inequality (New York, Wiley).Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (1991), What middle range theories are, Contemporary Sociology, Vol. 20 (4), 519–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, C. (1995), Practical Sociology (Cambridge, Polity Press).Google Scholar
Bunge, M. (1963), A general black box theory, Philosophy of Science, Vol. 30, 346–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunge, M. (1997), Mechanism and explanation, Philosophy of Social Science, Vol. 27, 410–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H. and Rossi, P. (1983), Evaluating with sense: the theory-driven approach, Evaluation Review, Vol 7, 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, A. (1994), Critical Realism (London, Verso).Google Scholar
Collins, R. (1981), Sociology Since Mid-Century (New York, Academic Press).Google Scholar
Crewe, I. (1984), The electorate: partisan dealignment ten years on, in Berrington, H. (ed), Change in British Politics (London, Frank Cass).Google Scholar
Crewe, I. (1986), On the death and resurrection of class voting, Political Studies, Vol. 34, 620–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duguid, S. and Pawson, R. (1998), Education, change and transformation, Evaluation Review, Vol. 22, 470–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunleavy, P. (1980), Urban Political Analysis (London, Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1951), Suicide (New York, Free Press).Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1989), Nuts and Bolts (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (1999), Alchemies of the Mind (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Felson, M. (1994), Crime and Everyday Life (Thousand Oaks, Pine Forge Press).Google Scholar
Franklin, M. (1985), The Decline of Class Voting in Britain (Oxford, Claredon Press).Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1990), R.K. Merton on Structural Analysis, in Clark, J., Modgil, C. and Modgil, S. (eds), Robert K. Merton: Consensus and Controversy (Brighton, The Falmer Press).Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1963), Stigma (Harmondsworth, Penguin).Google Scholar
Greenwood, J. (1994), Realism, Identity and Emotion (London, Sage).Google Scholar
Harré, R. (1972), The Philosophies of Science (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Harré, R. (1978), Social Being (Oxford, Blackwell).Google Scholar
Harré, R. (1983), Identity projects, in Breakwell, G. (ed.). Threatened Identities (New York, Wiley).Google Scholar
Heath, A. (1985), How Britain Votes (Oxford, Pergamon).Google Scholar
Hedström, P. and Swedberg, R. (eds) (1998), Social Mechanisms (New York, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keat, R. and Urry, J. (1975), Social Theory as Science (London, Routledge and Keegan Paul).Google Scholar
Lawson, T. (1997), Economics and Reality (London, Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layder, D. (1993), New Strategies in Social Research (Cambridge, Polity Press).Google Scholar
Marshall, G. (1997), Repositioning Class (London, Sage).Google Scholar
Marshall, G., Newby, H., Rose, D. and Vogler, C. (1988), Social Class in Modern Britain (London, Hutchinson).Google Scholar
Merton, R. (1968, 3rd ed.), Social Theory and Social Structure (New York, Free Press).Google Scholar
Mills, C.W. (1959), The Sociological Imagination (New York, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Norrie, A. (1993), Crime, Reason and History (London, Butterworths).Google Scholar
Pawson, R. (1989), A Measure for Measures: A Manifesto for Empirical Sociology (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997), Realistic Evaluation (London, Sage).Google Scholar
Rossi, P., Berk, R. and Lenihan, K. (1980), Money, Work and Crime (New York, Academic Press).Google Scholar
Saunders, P. (1990), A Nation of Home Owners (London, Unwin Hyman).Google Scholar
Sayer, A. (1984), Method in Social Science (London, Hutchinson).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayer, A. (2000), Realism and Social Science (London, Sage).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. (1975), Merton's theory of social structure, in Coser, L. (ed,), The Idea of Social Structure (New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanich).Google Scholar
Stones, R. (1996), Sociological Reasoning (London, Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouffer, S., Suchman, E., DeVinney, L., Star, S. and Williams, R. (1949), The American Soldier (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Sztompka, P. (1986), Robert K. Merton: An Intellectual Profile (New York, St. Martins Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Will, D. (1986), Psychoanalysis and the new philosophy of science, International Review of Psychoanalysis, no 13.Google Scholar