Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:04:15.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intergenerational Mobility and Equality of Opportunity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 December 2015

Florencia Torche
Florencia Torche*
Affiliation:
New York University [[email protected]].
Get access

Abstract

Intergenerational mobility—the association between parents’ and adult children’s economic wellbeing—is an important sociological concept because it provides information about inequality of opportunity in society, and it has gained relevance in the recent past due to the increase economic inequality in most of the affluent world. This article provides an overview of the different measures of mobility used by sociologists and economists, as well as main empirical findings about mobility. I then move to topics that push mobility analysis beyond its bivariate focus: The association between intergenerational mobility and economic inequality, the mechanisms for mobility, and the validity of mobility as a measure of inequality of opportunity. I suggest that the association between mobility and inequality is likely spurious, driven by varying institutional arrangements across countries, and that mobility analysis is most useful when focused on describing the bivariate intergenerational association across countries and over time.

Résumé

La mobilité intergénérationnelle – l’association entre le bien-être économique des parents et celui de leurs enfants devenus adultes – est un concept sociologique important dans la mesure où il fournit une information sur l’inégalité des chances en société. Il fait depuis peu l’objet d’une attention croissante en raison de l’augmentation des inégalités économiques dans le monde riche. Cet article présente les différentes mesures de mobilité utilisées par les sociologues et les économistes, ainsi que leurs principaux résultats de recherche. J’en viens ensuite à des sujets qui poussent l’étude de mobilité au delà de son approche bivariée traditionnelle : l’association entre la mobilité intergénérationnelle et l’inégalité économique, les mécanismes de mobilité, et la validité de la mobilité comme mesure de l’inégalité des chances. Je suggère dans cet article que l’association entre mobilité et inégalité est probablement fallacieuse, influencée par des arrangements institutionnels variables d’un pays à un autre, et que l’analyse de mobilité est la plus utile lorsqu’elle se concentre sur la description de l’association intergénérationnelle bivariée entre les pays et dans le temps.

Zusammenfassung

Die Generationenmobilität – eine Verbindung aus wirtschaftlichem Wohlergehen der Eltern und jener der erwachsenen Kinder – ist ein wichtiges soziologisches Konzept, das über die gesellschaftliche Chancenungleichheit informiert. Aufgrund der zunehmenden wirtschaftlichen Ungleichheiten in reichen Ländern steigt das Interesse für dieses Konzept. Dieser Beitrag stellt die verschiedenen Mobilitätsmaßnahmen vor, die von Soziologen und Wirtschaftswissenschaftlern benutzt werden, sowie deren wichtigsten Forschungsergebnisse. In der Folge werde ich Mobilitätsstudien vorstellen, die über ihren ursprünglichen bivariaten Ansatz hinausgehen: die Verbindung aus Generationsmobilität und wirtschaftlicher Ungleichheit, Mobilitätsmechanismen und Bedeutung der Mobilität als Maßeinheit für Chancenungleichheit. Ich behaupte, dass es sich wahrscheinlich um eine Scheinverbindung zwischen Mobilität und Ungleichheit handelt, beeinflusst durch institutionelle Vereinbarungen, die von Land zu Land unterschiedlich sind, und dass die Mobilitätsanalyse am besten greift, wenn sie auf die sowohl länder- als auch zeitübergreifende Beschreibung der intergenerationellen, bivariaten Verbindung ausgerichtet ist.

Keywords

Intergenerational mobilityEconomic inequalityEquality of opportunityMobilité intergénérationnelleInégalité économiqueEgalité des chancesGenerationenmobilitätWirtschaftliche UngleichheitChancengleichheit
Type
State of The Art
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , December 2015 , pp. 343 - 371
Copyright
Copyright © A.E.S. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Angrist, Joshua and Krueger, Alan, 1992. “The effect of age at school entry on educational attainment: An application of instrumental variables with moments from two samples”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87 (418): 328-336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arts, Wil and Gelissen, John, 2002. “Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report”, Journal of European Social Policy, 12 (2): 137-158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry, 2008. Unequal Democracy (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Becker, Gary and Tomes, Nigel, 1979. “An equilibrium theory of the distribution of income and intergenerational mobility”, Journal of Political Economy 87 (6): 1153-1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary and Tomes, Nigel, 1986. “Human capital and the rise and fall of families”, Journal of Labor Economics, 4: 1-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrman, Jere and Taubman, Paul, 1985. “Intergenerational earnings mobility in the United States: Some estimates and a test of Becker’s intergenerational endowments model”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 67: 144-151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrman, Jere, Birdsall, Nancy and Szekely, Miguel, 1999. “Intergenerational mobility in Latin America: deeper markets and better schools make a difference”, in Birdsall, N. and Graham, C., eds., New Markets, New Opportunities? Economic and Social Mobility in a Changing World (Washington Brookings Institution: 135-167).Google Scholar
Beller, Emily and Hout, Michael, 2006. “Intergenerational social mobility: The United States in comparative perspective”, The Future of Children, 16: 19-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belley, Philippe and Lochner, Lance, 2007. “The Changing Role of Family Income and Ability in Determining Educational Achievement”, Journal of Human Capital, 1 (1): 37-89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjorklund, Anders and Jantti, Markus, 2000. “Intergenerational mobility of socio-economic status in comparative perspective”, Nordic Journal of Political Economy, 26 (1): 3-32.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, Anders and Jantti, Markus, 2009. “Intergenerational income mobility and the role of family background”, in Salverda, W., Nolan, B. and Smeeding, T., eds., Handbook of Economic Inequality (Oxford, Oxford University Press: 491-521).Google Scholar
Black, Sandra and Devereux, Paul, 2011. “Recent developments in intergenerational mobility”, in Card, D. and Ashenfelter, O., eds., Handbook of Labor Economics vol. 4, part B (Amsterdam, North Holland: 1487-1541).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanden, Jo, 2013. “Cross-country rankings in intergenerational mobility: A comparison of approaches from economics and sociology”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 27 (1): 38-73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanden, Jo, Gregg, Paul and Macmillan, Lindsey, 2007. “Accounting for intergenerational income persistence: Noncognitive skills, ability and education”, The Economic Journal, 117: 43-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanden, Jo, Gregg, Paul and Macmillan, Lindsey, “Intergenerational persistence in income and social class: The effect of within-group inequality”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 176: 541-563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, Peter M. and Duncan, Otis D., 1967. The American occupational structure (Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons).Google Scholar
Bloome, Deirdre, 2014. “Income Inequality and Intergenerational Mobility in the United States”, Social Forces, 93 (3): 1047-1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudon, Raymond, 1974. Education, opportunity and social inequality (Hoboken, Wiley-Interscience).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, 1977a. “Cultural reproduction and social reproduction”, in Karabel, J. and Halsey, A. H., eds., Power and Ideology in Education (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, 1977b. Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, 1984. Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (Cambridge Mass, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre and Passeron, Jean-Claude, 1977. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture (London, Sage).Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel and Gintis, Herbert, 1976. Schooling in Capitalist America (New York, Basic Books).Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel, Gintis, Herbert and Groves, Melissa Osborne, 2005. Unequal Chances (New York, Russell Sage Foundation).Google Scholar
Breen, Richard, 2010. “Educational Expansion and Social Mobility in the 20th Century”, Social Forces, 89: 365-388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, Richard and Luijkx, Ruud, 2004. “Conclusions”, in Breen, R., ed., Social Mobility in Europe, (Oxford, Oxford University Press: 383-412).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, Richard and Jonsson, Jan, 2007. “Explaining Change in Social Fluidity: Educational Equalization and Educational Expansion in Twentieth-Century Sweden”, American Journal of Sociology, 112: 1775-1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, Richard, Luijkx, Ruud, Müller, Walter and Pollak, Reinhard, 2009. “Nonpersistent Inequality in Educational Attainment. Evidence from Eight European Countries”, American Journal of Sociology, 114: 1475-1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, Richard and Whelan, Christopher, 1996. Social class and social mobility in Ireland (Dublin, Gill and McMillan).Google Scholar
Burtless, Gary and Jencks, Christopher, 2003. “American inequality and its consequences”in Henry, A., Lindsay, J. and Nivola, P., eds., Agenda for the Nation (Washington, Brookings Institution : 61-107).Google Scholar
Carneiro, Pedro, Garcia, Italo, Salvanes, Kjell and Tominey, Emma, 2015 “Intergenerational Mobility and the Timing of Parental Income”, Discussion Papers in Economics, 15/20, University of York.Google Scholar
Chan, Tak Wing and Boliver, Vikki, 2013. “The Grandparents Effect in Social Mobility: Evidence from British Birth Cohort Studies”, American Sociological Review, 78 (4): 662-678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chetty, Raj, Hendren, Nathaniel, Kline, Patrick and Saez, Emmanuel, 2014. “Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129 (4): 1553-1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Gregory, 2014. The Son also Rises. Surnames and the History of Social Mobility (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Clark, Gregory, Cummins, Neil, Hao, Yue and Vidal, Dan Diaz, 2015. “Surnames: A New Source for the History of Social Mobility”, Explorations in Economic History, 55: 3-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conley, Dalton, Strully, Kate and Bennett, Neil, 2003. The Starting Gate. Birth Weight and Life Chances (Berkeley, University of California Press).Google Scholar
Corak, Miles, 2013. “Income Inequality, Equality of Opportunity, and Intergenerational Mobility”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21 (3): 19-102.Google Scholar
Corak, Miles and Heisz, Andrew, 1999. “The intergenerational earnings and income mobility of Canadian men: Evidence from longitudinal income tax data”, Journal of Human Resources, 34 (3): 504-533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couch, Kenneth and Lillard, Dean, 2004. “Non-linear patterns of intergenerational mobility in Germany and the United States”, in Corak, M., ed., Generational Mobility in North America and Europe (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 190-206).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Otis Dudley, 1961. “A socioeconomic index for all occupations”, in Reiss, A. Jr., ed., Occupations and Social Status (New York, Free Press: 109-138).Google Scholar
Eide, Eric and Showalter, Mark, 1999. “Factors affecting the transmission of earnings across generations: A quantile regression approach”, Journal of Human Resources, 34: 253-267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elwert, Felix and Winship, Christopher, 2014. “Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable”, Annual Review of Sociology, 40: 2.1-2.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Equality Trust, 2011. “Income inequality: Trends and Measures”, Equality Trust Research Digest 2: 1-8.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert and Goldthorpe, John, 1992. The constant flux: A study of class mobility in industrial societies (Oxford, Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert, Goldthorpe, John H. and Portocarero, Lucienne, 1979. “Intergenerational class mobility in three Western European societies”, British Journal of Sociology, 30 (4): 415-441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ermisch, John, Jantti, Markus, Smeeding, Timothy and Wilson, James, 2012. “Advantage in Comparative Perspective”, in Ermisch, J., Jäntti, M., and Smeeding, T, eds., From Parents to Children (New York, Russell Sage Foundation: 3-31).Google Scholar
Erola, Jani and Moisio, Pasi, 2007. “Social Mobility over Three Generations in Finland, 1950-2000”, European Sociological Review, 23 (2): 169-183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gosta, 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Fertig, Angela, 2003. “Trends in intergenerational earnings mobility in the U.S.”, Journal of Income Distribution, 12 (3-4): 108-130.Google Scholar
Fox, Liana, Torche, Florencia and Waldfogel, Jane, Forthcoming. “Intergenerational Mobility” in Brady, D. and Burton, L., eds., Oxford Handbook of Poverty and Society (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ganzeboom, Harry, De Graaf, Paul and Treiman, Donald, 1992. “A Standard International Socio-Economic Index of Occupational Status”, Social Science Research, 21: 1-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Theodore and Cheung, Sin Yi, 2008. “Horizontal Stratification in Postsecondary Education: Forms, Explanations, and Implications”, Annual Review of Sociology, 34: 299-318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony, 1973. The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies (New York, Harper and Row).Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin, 2012. Affluence and Influence (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Goldberger, Arthur, 1989. “Economic and mechanical models of intergenerational transmission”, American Economic Review, 79 (3): 504-513.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, John, 1987. Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain, Second Edition (Oxford, Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, John, 2007. On Sociology, Volume 2, Second Edition (Palo Alto, Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Gong, Honge, Leigh, Andrew and Meng, Xin, 2012. “Intergenerational income mobility in urban China”, Review of Income and Wealth, 58 (3): 481-503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grawe, Nathan, 2006. “Lifecycle bias in estimates of intergenerational earnings persistence”, Labour Economics, 13: 551-570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grusky, David and DiPrete, Thomas, 1990. “Recent trends in the process of stratification”, Demography, 27: 617-637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grusky, David and Weeden, Kim, 2006. “Does the sociological approach to studying social mobility have a future?”, in Morgan, S., Grusky, D. and Fields, G. eds., Mobility and inequality, eds. (Palo Alto, Stanford University Press: 85-108).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Steven and Solon, Gary, 2006. “Life-cycle variation in the association between current and lifetime earnings”, American Economic Review, 96 (4): 1308-1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hair, Nicole, Hanson, Jamie, Wolfe, Barbara and Pollak, Seth, 2015. “Association of Child Poverty, Brain Development, and Academic Achievement”, JAMA Pediatrics, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter and Soskice, David, 2001. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (Oxford, Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haller, Archibald and Portes, Alejandro, 1973. “Status attainment processes”, Sociology of Education, 46: 51-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, Robert and Warren, John R., 1997. “Socioeconomic indexes for occupations: A review, update and critique”, Sociological Methodology, 27: 177-298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, Tom. 2007. “Trends in the intergenerational elasticity of family income in the United States”, Industrial Relations, 46 (1): 22-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Heather, Morris, Pamela, Gennetian, Lisa, Wolf, Sharon and Tubbs, Carly, 2013. “The Consequences of Income Instability for Children’s Well-Being”, Child Development Perspectives, 7 (2): 85-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobel, Calvin, 2004. “Stress and preterm birth” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 47: 856-880. Discussion: 881-852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, Robert, 1966. “Occupational mobility as a probability process”, Demography, 3: 19-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hout, Michael, 1988. “More universalism, less structural mobility: The American occupational structure in the 1980s”, American Journal of Sociology, 93 (6): 1358-1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hout, Michael, 2004. “How Inequality Might Affect Intergenerational Mobility”, in Neckerman, K., ed., Social Inequality (New York, Russell Sage Foundation: 967-987).Google Scholar
Hout, Michael and DiPrete, Thomas, 2006. “What have we learned: RC28’s contribution to knowledge about social stratification”, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 24: 1-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hout, Michael and Hauser, Robert, 1992. “Symmetry and hierarchy in social mobility: A methodological analysis of the casmin model of class mobility”, European Sociological Review, 8 (3): 239-265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichino, Andrea, Karabarbounis, Loukas and Moretti, Enrico, 2011. “The political economy of intergenerational income mobility”, Economic Inquiry, 49 (1): 47-69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, Keele, Luke, Tingley, Dustin and Yamamoto, Teppei, 2011. “Unpacking the black box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies”, American Journal of Political Science, 105 (4): 765-789.Google Scholar
Jackson, Michelle and Jonsson, Jan, 2013. “Why does inequality of educational opportunity vary across countries? Primary and secondary effects in comparative context”, in Jackson, M., ed., Determined to Succeed? Performance versus Choice in Educational Attainment (Palo Alto, Stanford University Press: 303-337).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jantti, Markus, Bratsberg, Bernt, Roed, Knut, Raaum, Oddbjorn, Naylor, Robin, Osterbacka, Eva, Bjorklund, Anders and Eriksson, Tor, 2006. “American exceptionalism in a new light: A comparison of intergenerational earnings mobility in the Nordic countries, the United Kingdom and the United States”, Discussion Paper 1938, iza, Bonn, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jantti, Markus and Jenkins, Stephen, 2015. “Income Mobility”in Atkinson, A. and Bourgignon, F., eds., Handbook of Income Distribution, Volume 2 (Philadelphie, Elsevier: 807-935).Google Scholar
Jencks, Christopher, Smith, Marshall, Acland, Henry, Jo Bane, Mary, Cohen, David, Gintis, Herbert, Heyns, Barbara and Michelson, Stephan, 1972. Inequality. A reassessment of the effect of family and in America (New York, Harper & Row).Google Scholar
Jencks, Christopher and Tach, Laura, 2006. “Would equal opportunity mean more mobility?”in Morgan, S., Grusky, D. and Fields, G., eds., Mobility and Inequality: Frontiers of Research in Sociology and Economics (Palo Alto, Stanford University Press: 23-58).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Stephen, 1987. “Snapshots versus movies: ‘Lifecycle biases’ and the estimation of intergenerational earnings inheritance”, European Economic Review, 31: 1149-1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane, 2015. “Is income inequality harmful?” Blogpost, 15 September. http://lanekenworthy.net/is-income-inequality-harmful/).Google Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane and Pontusson, Jonas, 2005. “Rising inequality and the politics of distribution in affluent countries”, Perspectives in Politics 3: 449-471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, Eric, Heckman, James, Cameron, Judy and Shonkoff, Jack, 2006. “Economic, Neurobiological, and Behavioral Perspectives on Building America’s Future Workforce”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103 (27): 10155-10162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, A. B., 2012. The rise and consequences of inequality in the United States,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/krueger_cap_speech_final_remarks.pdf.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michelle, 1992. Money, Morals and Manners. The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Class (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, Michelle, 2002. The Dignity of Working Men (New York, Russell Sage Foundation/Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Layte, Richard and Whelan, Christopher, 2004. “Class Transformation and Trends in Social Fluidity in the Republic of Ireland 1973-1994”in Breen, R., ed., Social Mobility in Europe (Oxford, Oxford University Press: Chapter 7).Google Scholar
Lee, Chul-In and Solon, Gary, 2009. “Trends in intergenerational income mobility”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91 (4): 766-772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindahl, Mikael, Palme, Marten, Massih, Sofia and Sjogren, Anna, 2012. Transmission of Human Capital across Four Generations: Intergenerational Correlations and a Test of the Becker-Tomes Model. Discussion Paper 6463, IZA, Bonn. Online at: http://ftp.iza.org/dp6463.pdf.Google Scholar
Mare, Robert, 2011. “A multigenerational view of inequality”, Demography, 48: 1-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl, 1973. “The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte”, in Fernbach, D., ed., Surveys from Exile (Londres, Penguin Book: 143-249).Google Scholar
Mayer, Susan and Lopoo, Leonard, 2005. “Has the intergenerational transmission of economic status changed”, Journal of Human Resources 40 (1): 169-185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazumder, Bhashkar, 2005. “Fortunate sons: New estimates of intergenerational mobility in the United States using Social Security data”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 87 (2): 235-255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, Leslie and Percheski, Christine, 2010. “Income Inequality: New Trends and Research Directions”, Annual Review of Sociology, 36: 329-347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, Mark, Bisits, Andrew, Davies, Joanne, Woods, Russel, Lowry, Philip and Smith, Roger, 1995. “A placental clock controlling the length of human pregnancy”, Nature Medicine, 1: 460-463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milanovic, Branko, 2000. “The median-voter hypothesis, income inequality, and income redistribution: an empirical test with the required data”, European Journal of Political Economy 16: 367-410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitnik, Pablo, Bryant, Victoria, Weber, Michael and Grusky, David, 2015. “New estimates of intergenerational mobility using administrative data”, Online at https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/15rpintergenmobility.pdfGoogle Scholar
Nakao, Keiko and Treas, Judith, 1994. “Updating Occupational Prestige and Socioeconomic Scores: How the New Measures Measure Up”, Sociological Methodology, 24: 1-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neckerman, Kathryn and Torche, Florencia, 2007. “Inequality: Causes and Consequences”, Annual Review of Sociology, 33: 335-357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, Kimberly, et al., 2015. “Family income, parental education and brain structure in children and adolescents”, Nature Neuroscience, 18: 773-778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunez, Javier and Miranda, Leslie, 2010. “Intergenerational income mobility in a less-developed, high-inequality context: The case of Chile”, B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 10: 1-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD, 2008. Growing Unequal, OECD.Google Scholar
Osberg, Lars, Smeeding, Timothy and Schwabish, Jonathon, 2004. “Income distribution and public social expenditure: theories, effects and evidence”, in Neckerman, K., ed., Social Inequality (New York, Russell Sage Foundation: 821-860).Google Scholar
Palloni, Alberto, 2006. “Reproducing inequalities: Luck, wallets, and the enduring effects of childhood health”, Demography, 43, 587-615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, Judea, 1995. Causal diagrams for empirical research, Biometrika, 82(4): 669-710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekkala, Sari and Lucas, Robert, 2007. “Differences across cohorts in Finnish intergenerational income mobility”, Industrial Relations, 46 (1), 81-111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekkarinen, Tuomas, Uusitalo, Roope and Kerr, Sari, 2009. “School tracking and intergenerational income mobility: evidence from the Finnish comprehensive school reform”, Journal of Public Economics, 93 (7-8), 965-973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perotti, Roberto, 1996. “Growth, income distribution, and democracy: what the data say”, Journal of Economic Growth 1: 149-187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Elizabeth, 1992. “Patterns of intergenerational mobility in income and earnings”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 74: 456-466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, Fabian and Hertel, Florian, 2015. “How Has Educational Expansion Shaped Social Mobility Trends in the United States?”, Social Forces, 94: 143-180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisati, Maurizio and Schizzerotto, Antonio, 2004. “The Italian Mobility Regime: 1985–97”, in Breen, R., ed., Social Mobility in Europe (Oxford, Oxford University Press: Chapter 6).Google Scholar
Reardon, Sean and Bischoff, Kendra, 2011. “Income Inequality and Income Segregation”, American Journal of Sociology 116(4): 1092-1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, Carlos C., 2007. Estrutura de classe e mobilidade social no Brasil (Brasil, EDUSC).Google Scholar
Sewell, William, Haller, Archibald and Portes, Alejandro, 1969. “The educational and early occupational attainment process”, American Sociological Review, 34 (1): 82-92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, William, Haller, Archibald and Ohlendorf, George, 1970. “The educational and early occupational status attainment process: replication and revision”, American Sociological Review, 1014-1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, William and Hauser, Robert, 1975. Education, occupation, and earnings: Achievement in the early career (New York, Academic Press).Google Scholar
Shavit, Yossi and Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, 1993. Persistent inequality: Changing educational attainment in thirteen countries (San Diego, Westview).Google Scholar
Shonkoff, Jack and Phillips, Deborah, 2000. From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development (Washington, National Academy Press).Google Scholar
Smeeding, Timothy, Erikson, Robert and Jantti, Markus, eds., 2011. Persistence, privilege and parenting (New York, Russell Sage Foundation).Google Scholar
Solon, Gary, 1999. “Intergenerational mobility in the labor market”, in Ashenfalter, O. and Card, D., eds., Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3A (Amsterdam, North Holland: 1761-1800).Google Scholar
Solon, Gary, 2002. “Cross-country differences in intergenerational earnings mobility”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16 (3): 59-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solon, Gary, 2004. “A model of intergenerational mobility variation over time and place”, in Corak, M., ed., Generational income mobility in North America and Europe (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 38-47).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solon, Gary, 2014. “Theoretical models of inequality transmission across multiple generations”, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 35: 13-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Gillian and Featherman, David, 1981. “A Revised Socioeconomic Index of Occupational Status”, Social Science Research, 10: 264-395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svalastoga, Kaare, 1959. Prestige, Class and Mobility (København, Gyldendal).Google Scholar
Swift, Adam. 2004. “Would perfect mobility be perfect?”, European Sociological Review, 20 (1): 1-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torche, Florencia, 2011. “Is a college degree still the great equalizer? Intergenerational mobility across levels of schooling in the US”, American Journal of Sociology, 117 (3): 763-807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torche, Florencia, 2014. “Intergenerational mobility and inequality: The Latin American case”, Annual Review of Sociology, 40: 30.1-30.24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torche, Florencia, 2015. “Analyses of intergenerational mobility: An interdisciplinary review”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 657: 37-62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torche, Florencia and Corvalan, Alejandro, 2015. “Estimating Intergenerational Mobility with grouped data. A critique of Clark’s ‘The son also rises’”, nyu Population Center Working Paper 2015-2022.Google Scholar
Torche, Florencia and Ribeiro, Carlos C., 2010. “Pathways of Change in Social Mobility: Industrialization, Education and Growing Fluidity in Brazil”, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 28 (3): 291-307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, R. Jay, Wheaton, Blair and Lloyd, Donald, 1995. “The Epidemiology of Social Stress”, American Sociological Review, 60 (1): 104-125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Census Bureau. 2015. “Gini Indexes for Households, by Race and Hispanic Origin of Householder: 1967 to 2014” (https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/inequality/.Google Scholar
Vallet, Louis-André, 2004. “Change in Intergenerational Class Mobility in France from the 1970s to the 1990s and Its Explanation: An Analysis Following the casmin Approach”, in Breen, R., ed., Social Mobility in Europe (Oxford, Oxford University Press: 115-147).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, John Robert and Hauser, Robert, 1997. “Social stratification across three generations: New evidence from the Wisconsin longitudinal study”, American Sociological Review, 62: 561-572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, Paul, 1981. Learning to Labor. How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs (New York, Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Wright, Eric Olin, 1985. Classes (London, New Left Books).Google Scholar
Wright, Eric Olin, 1997. Class Counts (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Wright, Eric Olin, 2002. “The Shadow of Exploitation in Weber’s Class Analysis”, American Sociological Review, 67 (6): 832-853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yehuda, Rachel, Daskalakis, Nikolaos, Bierer, Linda M., Bader, Heather, Klengel, Torsten, Holsboer, Florian and Binder, Elisabeth B., forthcoming. “Holocaust exposure induced intergenerational effects on fkbp5 methylation”, Biological Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Zeng, Zhen and Xie, Yu, 2014. “The Effects of Grandparents on Children’s Schooling: Evidence From Rural China”, Demography, 51: 599-617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, David, 1992. “Regression toward mediocrity in economic stature”, American Economic Review, 82: 409-429.Google Scholar