Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:13:51.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intellectual and Class Alienation: Oxford idealist diagnoses and prescriptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Melvin Richter
Get access

Extract

Few terms have had more complex fortunes than “alienation” and “intellectuals”; few at this time are more modish and less clear. It would be instructive to devote an entire paper to tracing their histories and plotting all their variations in present usage; it would be no less enlightening to determine just why these two concepts are so often coupled. Perhaps the single most important reason is to be found in the numerous attempts to classify and explain the great modern revolutions, particularly those of France and Russia. These have been frequently characterized as qualitatively different from all those that preceded them. Inspired by, or producing in their course, total ideologies, these revolutions have produced a new style of politics. Its origins and patterns of development have received increasingly close scrutiny. Among the most consistently favored hypotheses has been that linking revolution to intellectuals. This theory need not be phrased as did Burke and Taine, who seem to have believed that the world would be spared great political convulsions, if only there were no radical intellectuals, subverting by their impractical speculations, the bases of society and politics. Tocqueville, whose views are occasionally confounded with those of Burke and Taine, did assert that thorough-going revolutions cannot occur without the existence of a general theory about the nature of the good society, a theory that cannot be realized except by changing completely, and possibly violently, the status of persons and property under the existing order (1).

Type
Aliénation et Structure or Conscience and Consciousness
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , May 1966 , pp. 1 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) de Tocqueville, Alexis, Œuvres complètes, édition définitive publiée sous la direction de J.-P. Mayer (Paris 1951), tome I, volume II, 262Google Scholar. Hereafter cited as Tocqueville, , Œuvres (M).Google Scholar

(2) Walzer, Michael, The Revolution of the Saints (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1965), p. 1, p. 19.Google Scholar

(3) Shils, Edward, Ideology and Civility: On the Politics of the Intellectual, Sewanee Review, XLVI (1958), pp. 450–452.Google Scholar

(4) Lipset, Seymour Martin, Political Man (N.Y., Doubleday Anchor Books, 1963), P. 333.Google Scholar

(5) Richter, Melvin, The Politics of Conscience: T. H. Green and His Age (London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1964, and Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1964)Google Scholar. A brief list should include, in addition to T. H. Green, Bernard Bosanquet, A. C. Bradley, E. Caird, Bishop Gore, H. S. Holland, J. MacCunn, J. H. Muirhead, D. G. Ritchie, Arnold Toynbee, and W. Wallace.

(6) Hamburger, Joseph, Intellectuals in Politics: John Stuart Mill and the Philosophical Radicals (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1965).Google Scholar

(7) Gellner, Ernest, “Concepts and Society”, Reprint of Transactions of the Fifth World Congress of Sociology (Washington, D.C., 1962), p. 20.Google Scholar

(8) Plamenatz, John, Man and Society, 2 vols (New York, McGraw-Hill, 1963), II, 40.Google Scholar

(9) Hegel, G. W. F., The Phenomenology of Mind2, trans. Baillie, J. B. (London 1931), p. 251.Google Scholar

(10) Hegel, , op. cit. pp. 752–53.Google Scholar

(11) Cited in Tucker, Robert, Philosophy and Myth in Karl Marx (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1961), p. 83.Google Scholar

(12) Marx, Karl, Early Writings, trans, and ed. Bottomore, T. B. (New York, McGraw-Hill, 1964).Google Scholar

(13) Marx, Karl, “Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right”Google Scholar, in Bottomore, , op. cit. p. 44.Google Scholar

(14) Marx, Karl, Economic and Philosophical ManuscriptsGoogle Scholar, in Bottomore, , op. cit. pp. 124–131, 189–194.Google Scholar

(15) Ibid. p. 155.

(16) Meyer, Alfred G., Marxism (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1963), P. 55.Google Scholar

(17) Ibid. p. 57.

(18) Nisbet, Robert, Community and Power (New York, Oxford University Press, 1962), p. viiiGoogle Scholar. For a more specific application to politics, cf. Levin, Murray B., The Alienated Voter (New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, n.d.).Google Scholar

(19) Bodin, Louis, Les intellectuels (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1962), p. 117.Google Scholar

(20) Touchard, Jean and Bodin, Louis, Définitions, statistiques et problèmes, Revue française ie science politique, IX (1959), p. 840.Google Scholar

(21) Lipset, , op. cit. p. 333.Google Scholar

(22) Aron, Raymond, The Opium of the Intellectuals (New York, Norton Library, 1962), pp. 206–207.Google Scholar

(23) For further detail, cf. Richter, , Politics of Conscience, pp. 97–100.Google Scholar

(24) Shils, Edward, The Intellectuals and the Powers: Some Perspective for Comparative Analysis, Comparative Studies in Society and History, I (1958), p. 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

(25) Ibid. pp. 5–6.

(26) Aron, Raymond, The Opium of the Intellectuals, pp. 210–211.Google Scholar

(27) Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, “The Communist Manifesto”, in Karl Marx: Selected Works, ed. Adoratsky, V., 2 vols (London, Lawrence and Wishart, 1942), I, 236.Google Scholar

(28) Tocqueville, , Œuvres (M), II, I, 199.Google Scholar

(29) Halévy, Elie, England in 1815, trans. Watkin, E. I. and Barker, D. A. (London, Ernest Benn, 1949), p. 387.Google Scholar

(30) Troeltsch, Ernst, The Social Teachings of the Christian Churches, trans. Wyon, Olive, 2 vols, (Glencoe, Ill., Free Press, 1949), I, 44–45.Google Scholar

(31) The Letters of John Stuart Mill, ed. Elliot, Hugh S. R., 2 vols (London 1910), II, 362Google Scholar (extract from his diary, Jan. 23, 1854).

(32) Letter from Green, T. H. to Holland, H. S., 12 29, 1868Google Scholar, Henry Scott Holland, Memoir and Letters, ed. Paget, Stephen (London 1921), pp. 29–30.Google Scholar

(33) Ibid. p. 32.

(34) Ibid. p. 33.

(35) The Works of T. H. Green, ed. Nettleship, R. L., 3 vols (London 1885–1888), III, cxiiGoogle Scholar. Cited hereafter as Green, , Works.Google Scholar

(36) Green, , Works, III, 403.Google Scholar

(37) Toynbee, Arnold, in Lectures on the Industrial Revolution of the Eighteenth Century in England (London 1908), p. 216.Google Scholar

(38) In Paget, (ed.), Holland Memoir and Letters, p. 241.Google Scholar

(39) Richter, , Politics of Conscience, pp. 324–330.Google Scholar

(40) J. S. Mill, cited in Hamburger, , Intellectuals in Politics, p. 281.Google Scholar

(41) Ibid. p. 293.

(42) Ibid. pp. 294–296.

(43) “[…] the intelligent is any able, sensitive, and ambitious individual, from a more or less privileged group, who lives under an inflexible and ‘closed’ old regime which does not offer adequate scope for his energies, and who consequently goes over to integral, as well as highly ideological, opposition to that regime”, Malia, Martin, Alexander Herzen and the Birth of Russian Socialism (New York, Grosset and Dunlap, 1965), P. 5.Google Scholar

* A version of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the American Historical Association in December, 1965.

(44) Young, G. M., Last Essays (London, Rupert-Hart-Davis, 1950), p. 206.Google Scholar