Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:10:24.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Indians' Impossible Civil Code*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2009

Olivier Herrenschmidt
Olivier Herrenschmidt*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'ethnologie et de sociologie comparative, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense [[email protected]].
Get access

Abstract

The Uniform Civil Code which, as written in the 1950 Constitution of the Indian Union, should be enacted, still does not (and will probably never) exist. This paper examines the tactics used by the opponents in the Constituent and Legislative Assembly (1946-1951) who succeeded to wreck a proposed “modernisation” of the Hindu Personnal Law, which could have been a first step towards that Uniform Code. In a very clever way, they never claimed to defend the dharma treatises which had codified and legitimated a Brahmanical Social Order for centuries, but only wanted to maintain the multiplicity and diversity of customs and usages of the Hindu people.

Résumé

La constitution de l'Union indienne (1950) prévoit la rédaction d'un Code civil unique qui n'existe toujours pas et n'existera peut-être jamais. Cet article examine les manœuvres des opposants qui ont fait échec aux tentatives de l'Assemblée constituante et législative (1946-1951) de « moderniser » le droit hindou des personnes et des biens, qui eût pu être un premier pas vers ce Code civil. Leur argument le plus subtil a consisté à se poser en défenseurs des coutumes et traditions diverses de cette nation nouvelle, et non des traités de dharma qui codifiaient et légitimaient depuis des siècles un Brahmanical Social Order.

Zusammenfassung

Die Konstitution der indischen Union (1950) schreibt ein ziviles Gesetzbuch vor, das es bis heute nicht gibt und wahrscheinlich nie geben wird. Dieser Aufsatz schildert, wie die Gegner die Versuche der verfassungsgebenden Versammlung (1946-1951) vereitelt haben, welche eine Modernisierung des hindischen Personen- und Güterrechts, ein erster Schritt in Richtung ziviles Gesetzbuch, vorgesehen hatte. Ihr subtiler Argumentationsstrang bestand nicht in der Verteidigung der dharma, die seit Jahrhunderten das Brahmanical Social Order kodifiziert und gerechtfertigt hat, sondern in der Verteidigung verschiedener Bräuche und Sitten dieser neuen Nation.

Keywords

IndiaConstitutionPersonnal LawCustomsAmbedkarIndeConstitutionDroit personnelCoutumeAmbedkarIndienVerfassungPersonenrechtBräucheAmbedkar
Type
Jewish Institutions and Practices
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , August 2009 , pp. 309 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © A.E.S. 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarwal, Bina, 2005. Landmark Step to Gender Equality, The Hindu, Sunday, 25 September.Google Scholar
DrAmbedkar, B. R., 1979-2003. Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Writings and Speeches, Bombay, Government of Maharashtra (17 volumes to date): 1, Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Writings and Speeches; 2, Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Writings and Speeches; 9, What Congress and Gandhi have done to the Untouchables and Mr Gandhi and the Emancipation of the Untouchables; 13, Dr Ambedkar, The Principal Architect of the Constitution of India; 14 (1-2), Dr Ambedkar and the Hindu Code Bill (the complete debates); 15, Dr Ambedkar as Free India's First Law Minister and Member of Opposition in Indian Parliament (1947 to 1956); 17 (1-3), Dr B. R. Ambedkar and His Egalitarian Revolution.Google Scholar
Basu, Durga Das, 1999. Introduction to the Constitution of India (New Delhi, Prentice Hall of India, 18thed.).Google Scholar
Constituent Assembly Debates (CAD). 12 volumes, fully accessible on the http://parliamentofindia.nic.in.Google Scholar
Doniger, Wendy, 1991. The Laws of Manu, with an Introduction and Notes. Translated by Doniger, Wendy and Smith, Brian K. (London, Penguin Books, Penguin Classics).Google Scholar
Engineer, Ashgar Ali, 1987. The Shah Bano Controversy (Hyderabad, Orient Longman).Google Scholar
First Encyclopaedia of Islam, 1913-1936, 1987 (Leiden, E.J. Brill).Google Scholar
Gaborieau, Marc, 2006. “Les musulmans de l'Inde: une minorité de 140 millions d’âmes”, in Jaffrelot, Christophe, ed., L'Inde contemporaine. De 1950 à nos jours (Paris, Fayard, CERI, 2nded.).Google Scholar
GovernmentofIndia, 1957. Report of the Official Language Commission, 1956 (New Delhi, Government of India Press).Google Scholar
Halpérin, Jean-Louis, 1992. L'Impossible code civil (Paris, PUF).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimsath, Charles H., 1964. Indian Nationalism and Hindu Social Reform (Princeton, Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrenschmidt, Olivier, 1989. Les Meilleurs dieux sont hindous (Lausanne, L’Âge d'homme).Google Scholar
Herrenschmidt, Olivier, 2004. “Ambedkar and the Hindu Social Order”, in Jondhale, Surendra and Beltz, Johannes, eds., Reconstructing the World. B. R. Ambedkar and Buddhism in India (New Delhi, Oxford University Press, pp. 37-48; slightly modified version of “‘L'inégalité graduée’ ou la pire des inégalités. L'analyse de la société hindoue par Ambedkar”, Archives européennes de sociologie, 1996, 37(1), pp. 3-22.Google Scholar
Herrenschmidt, Olivier, 2009. “Trop plein de parents ou aucun parent. L'intégration de l'ethnologue au gré des systèmes de parenté de l'Inde du Nord et de l'Inde du Sud”, La relation ethnographique du terrain au texte. Mélanges offerts à Raymond Jamous, in Ateliers 33, on line journal of the Ethnology and Comparative Sociology Laboratory of Paris University 10 Nanterre-CNRS (http://ateliers.revues.org/document8208.html).Google Scholar
HinduLaw, BareActwithShortComments, 2005. Commercial Law Publishers (India, Delhi).Google Scholar
Jaffrelot, Christophe, ed., 2006. L'Inde contemporaine. De 1950 à nos jours (Paris, Fayard, CERI, 2nded.).Google Scholar
Keer, Dhananjay, 1981. Dr Ambedkar Life and Mission (Bombay, Popular Prakashan) (1sted. 1954).Google Scholar
Lingat, Robert, 1967. Les Sources du droit dans le système traditionnel de l'Inde (Paris, La Haye, Mouton & Co) (The Classical Law of India, 1973, Berkeley, University of California Press).Google Scholar
Menon, Vappala Pangunni, 1956. The Story of the Integration of the Indian States (Bombay, Orient Longmans).Google Scholar
Morris-Jones, Wyndraeth H., 1971. The Government and Politics of India (BombayB.I. Publication) (1sted., 1964, London, Hutchinson & Co).Google Scholar
Pant, Prafulla C., 2005. Law of Marriage, Divorce and Other Matrimonial Disputes, as amended by the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 2003, Fourth Edition (New Delhi, Orient Publishing Company).Google Scholar
Portalis, Jean-Étienne-Marie, 1999. Discours préliminaire au premier projet de Code civil, préface by Massenet, Michel (Bordeaux, Éditions Confluences).Google Scholar
Sarkar, Tanika, 2001. Hindu Wife, Hindu Nation (New Delhi, Permanent Black).Google Scholar
Wolpert, Stanley A., 1982. Tilak and Gokhale. Revolution and Reform in the Making of Modern India (Delhi, Surjeet Publications) (1sted., 1962, Berkeley).Google Scholar