Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:56:47.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Importance of Protestantism in Max Weber's Theory of Secularisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

Anthony J. Carroll
Anthony J. Carroll*
Affiliation:
Heythrop College, University of London [[email protected]].
Get access

Abstract

In this article, I review my recent book Protestant Modernity. Weber, Secularisation and Protestantism, which reconstructs Weber's theory of secularisation and argues that this is formulated within a liberal Protestant framework. I argue that this theory is a part of his Protestant account of modernity. I also sketch some of the major issues involved in developing a Catholic account of modernity and provide some worked through examples of the sociological implications of this change of confessional presuppositions.

Résumé

En relation avec le livre récent de l'auteur Protestant Modernity. Weber, Secularisation and Protestantism, qui reconstruit la théorie de la sécularisation de Weber, l'article montre que celle-ci est formulée dans le cadre du protestantisme libéral et qu'elle compte dans la contribution protestante à la modernité. L'auteur passe aussi en revue quelques grandes questions concernant la part du catholicisme à la modernité.

Zusammenfassung

Ich beschäftige mich in diesem Beitrag mit meinem neuesten Buch ”Protestant Modernity. Weber, Secularisation and Protestantism“, das Webers Säkularisationstheorie neu aufbaut und zeigt, dass diese dem liberalen Protestantismus angehört. Diese Theorie ist somit Teil seines protestantischen Beitrags zur Modernität. Desweiteren wird der katholische Beitrag zur Modernität beleuchtet.

Keywords

WeberLiberalProtestantismSecularisationCatholicModernityWeberLibéralProtestantismeSécularisationCatholiqueModernitéWeberLiberaleProtestantismusSäkularisationKatholischModernität
Type
Research Articles
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , April 2009 , pp. 61 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © A.E.S. 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbot, Walter M., 1967. The Documents of Vatican II (London, Geoffrey Chapman).Google Scholar
Alberigo, Giuseppe, ed., 2006. History of Vatican II, Vol. V, Transition to a New Age (New York, Orbis Books, and Leuven, Peeters, 2006).Google Scholar
Aldenhoff, Rita, 1987. “Max Weber and the Evangelical-Social Congress”, in Mommsen, Wolfgang J. and Osterhammel, Jürgen, eds., Max Weber and His Contempories (London, Allen and Unwin, pp. 193-202).Google Scholar
Bailey, Gauvin Alexander, 1999. “‘Le style jésuite n'existe pas’: Jesuit Corporate Culture and the Visual Arts”, in O'Malley, John W., , S.J., Bailey, Gauvin Alexander, Harris, Steven J. and Kennedy, T. Frank, , S.J., eds., The Jesuits. Cultures, Sciences, and the Arts 1540-1773 (Toronto, Buffalo, London, University of Toronto Press, pp. 38-89).Google Scholar
Benedict, XVI, 2006. Glaube und Vernunft. Die Regensburger Vorlesung. Kommentiert von Gesine Schwan, Adel Theodor Khoury, Karl Kardinal Lehmann (Freiburg, Herder).Google Scholar
Berger, Peter, 1999. “Roman Catholicism in the Age of John Paul II”, in Berger, Peter L., ed., The Desecularization of the World. Resurgent Religion and World Politics (Washington D.C. and Michigan, Ethics and Public Policy Center and William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company).Google Scholar
Borruta, Manuel, 2003. “Enemies at the Gate: the Moabit Klostertum and the Kulturkampf: Germany”, in Clark, Christopher and Kaiser, Wolfram, eds., Culture Wars. Secular-Catholic Conflict in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 227-231).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Anthony J., 2007. Protestant Modernity. Weber, Secularisation and Protestantism (Scranton and London, University of Scranton Press).Google Scholar
Carroll, Anthony J, 2010. A Short History of Secularisation (Scranton and London, University of Scranton Press).Google Scholar
Casanova, José, 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World (Chicago, Chicago University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh, 2007. Provincializing Europe (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Chapple, Christopher, ed., 1993. The Jesuit Tradition in Education and Missions. A 450-Year Perspective (Scranton, University of Scranton Press).Google Scholar
Clark, Christopher, 2003. “The New Catholicism and the European Culture Wars”, in Clark, Christopher and Kaiser, Wolfram, eds., Culture Wars. Secular-Catholic Conflict in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 11-46).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Christopher and Kaiser, Wolfram, eds., 2003. Culture Wars. Secular-Catholic Conflict in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, M. A., 2001. “Anti-Catholicism in Germany, Britain, and the United States: A Review and Critique of Recent Scholarship”, The American Society of Church History, 70 (1), pp. 98-131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, Louis, 1993. Passage to Modernity. An Essay in the Hermeneutics of Nature and Culture (New Haven and London, Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Evennet, H. O., 1951. The Spirit of the Counter Reformation (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Gaillaretz, Richard R., 2005. “The Ecclesiological Foundations of Modern Catholic Social Teaching”, in Himes Kenneth, R. O. F. M., ed., Modern Catholic Social Teaching. Commentaries and Interpretations (Washington D.C., Georgetown University Press, pp. 72-98).Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony, 1993. New Rules of Sociological Method, second edition with a new introduction (Stanford, Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Graf, Friedrich Wilhelm, 1992. “Kulturprotestantismus. Zur Begriffsgeschichte einer theologiepolitischen Chiffre”, in Müller, Hans Martin, ed., Kulturprotestantismus. Beiträge zu einer Gestalt des modernen Christentums (Gütersloh, Gütersloher Verlaghaus Gerd Mohn, pp. 21-77).Google Scholar
Graf, Friedrich Wilhelm, 1995. “The German Theological Sources and Protestant Church Politics”, in Lehmann, Karl and Roth, Guenther, eds., Weber's Protestant Ethic: Origins, Evidence, Contexts (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 34-41).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, 1988. Nachmetaphysisches Denken. Philosophische Aufsätze (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen and Ratzinger, Joseph, 2005. Dialektik der Säkularisierung. Über Vernunft und Religion (Freiburg im Breisgau, Herder).Google Scholar
Hampson, Daphne, 2001. Christian Contradictions. The Structures of Lutheran and Catholic Thought (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heft, James L., ed., 1999. A Catholic Modernity? Charles Taylor's Marianist Award Lecture (New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellyer, Marcus, 2005. Catholic Physics. Jesuit Natural Philosophy in Early Modern Germany (Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Heytropinstituteforreligion, ethics, andpubliclife 2008a. The Institute Series 7, “Charity which makes the Difference” (Leominster, Orphans Press).Google Scholar
Heytropinstituteforreligion, ethics, andpubliclife, 2008b. The Institute Series 11, “Words in Action. Finding the Right Words” (Antwerp, Lithos).Google Scholar
Honigsheim, Paul, 1950. “Max Weber: His Religious and Ethical Background and Development”, Church History, 19 (4), pp. 219-239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honnefelder, Ludger, 1988. “Die ethische Rationalität des mittelalterlichen Naturrechts. Max Webers und Ernst Troeltschs Deutung des Mittelalterlichen Naturrechts und die Bedeutung der Lehre vom natürlichen Gesetz bei Thomas von Aquin”, in Schluchter, Wolfgang, ed., Max Webers Sicht des okzidalen Christentums (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, pp. 254-275).Google Scholar
Höpfl, Harro, 2004. Jesuit Political Thought. The Society of Jesus and the State, c. 1540-1630 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübinger, Gangolf, 1994. Kulturprotestantismus und Politik. Zum Verhältnis von Liberalismus und Protestantismus im wilhelminischen Deutschland (Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr, Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Hughey, Michael W., 1979. “The Idea of Secularisation in the Works of Max Weber: A Theoretical Outline”, Qualitative Sociology, 2 (1), pp. 85-111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Ian, 2001. Rival Enlightenments. Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern Germany (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joas, Hans and Wiegandt, Klaus, eds., 2007. Säkularisierung und die Weltreligionen (Frankfurt am Main, Fischer).Google Scholar
Kalberg, Stephen, 1994. Max Weber's Comparative Historical Sociology (Cambridge, Polity Press).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Benjamin J., 2007. Divided by Faith. Religious Conflict and the Practice of Toleration in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge, Mass., The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kippenberg, Hans G. and Riesbrodt, Martin, eds., 2001. Max Webers Religionssystematik (Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr, Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Komonchak, Joseph A., 2009. “Novelty in Continuity”, The Tablet, 31 January, pp. 5-6.Google Scholar
Krech, Volkhard, 2001. “Mystik”, in Kippenberg, Hans G. and Riesbrodt, Martin, eds., Max Webers Religionssystematik (Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr, Paul Siebeck, pp. 241-262).Google Scholar
Ladrière, Jean, 1990. “Le christianisme dans la théorie wébérienne de la modernité”, in Ducret, Roland, Hervieu-Léger, Danièle and Ladrière, Paul, eds., Christianisme et modernité (Paris, Cerf, pp. 37-73).Google Scholar
Lassman, Peter, ed., 2006. Max Weber (Aldershot, Ashgate).Google Scholar
Lichtblau, Klaus and Weiss, Johannes, eds., [1904-1905] [1920] 2000. Die protestantische Ethik und der “Geist” des Kapitalismus (Weinheim, Beltz Athenäeum).Google Scholar
Lilla, Mark, 2007. The Stillborn God. Religion, Politics, and the Modern West (New York, Knopf).Google Scholar
Louden, Robert B., ed., 2002. Schleiermacher's Lectures on Philosophical Ethics (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lübbe, Hermann, [1965] 2003. Säkularisierung. Geschichte eines ideenpolitischen Begriffs (Freiburg and München, Karl Alber).Google Scholar
Mariña, Jacqueline, ed., 2005. The Cambridge Companion to Friedrich Schleiermacher (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, Robert A., 2006. Christianity and the Secular (Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Masuzawa, Tomoko, 2005. The Invention of World Religions: Or How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvoy, James, 2006. “Church and World at the Second Vatican Council: The Significance of Gaudium et Spes”, Pacifica, 19 (1), pp. 37-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milbank, John, 1990. Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason (Oxford, Blackwell).Google Scholar
Modras, Ronald, 2004. Ignatian Humanism. A Dynamic Spirituality for the 21st Century (Chicago, Loyola Press).Google Scholar
Müller, Hans Martin, ed., 1992. Kulturprotestantismus. Beiträge zu einer Gestalt des modernen Christentums (Gütersloh, Gütersloher Verlaghaus Gerd Mohn).Google Scholar
Münch, Paul, 1995. “The Thesis before Weber: An Archaeology”, in Lehmann, Hartmut and Roth, Guenther, eds., Weber's Protestant Ethic: Origins, Evidence, Contexts (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 51-71).Google Scholar
Naphy, William G., 2007. The Protestant Revolution: From Martin Luther to Martin Luther King Jr. (London, BBC Books).Google Scholar
Nipperdey, Thomas, 1988. Religion im Umbruch. Deutschland 1870-1918 (München, C.H. Beck).Google Scholar
Nirappel, Antony, 1972. “Towards The Definition of the Term ‘World’ in Gaudium et Spes”, Ephemerides Theologicae Louvanienses, 48, pp. 89-126.Google Scholar
O'Malley, John W., 1990. “Renaissance Humanism and the Religious Culture of the First Jesuits”, Heythrop Journal, 31 (4), pp. 471-487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, John W, 1994. The First Jesuits (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
O'Malley, John W, 1999. “The Historiography of the Society of Jesus: Where Does It Stand Today?”, in O’Malley, John W., , S.J., Bailey, Gauvin Alexander, Harris, Steven J. and Kennedy, T. Frank, , S.J., eds., The Jesuits. Cultures, Sciences, and the Arts 1540-1773 (Toronto, Buffalo, London, University of Toronto Press, pp. 3-37).Google Scholar
O'Malley, John W, 2000. Trent And All That. Renaming Catholicism in the Early Modern Era (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
O'Malley, John W., , S.J., Bailey, Gauvin Alexander, Harris, Steven J. and Kennedy, T. Frank, , S.J., eds., 1999. The Jesuits. Cultures, Sciences, and the Arts 1540-1773 (Toronto, Buffalo, London, University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar
Otto, Eckart, 2002. Max Webers Studien des antiken Judentums. Historische Grundlegung einer Theorie der Moderne (Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr, Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Ratzinger, Joseph, 1988. Church, Ecumenism and Politics. New Essays in Ecclesiology (Slough, St. Paul Publications).Google Scholar
Reardon, Bernard M. G., 1968. Liberal Protestantism (London, Adam and Charles Black).Google Scholar
Reardon, Bernard M. G, ed., 1970. Roman Catholic Modernism (London, Adam and Charles Black).Google Scholar
Reinhard, Wolfgang, 1977. “Gegenreformation als Modernisierung? Prologomena zu einer Theorie des konfessionellen Zeitalters”, Archive for Reformation History, 68, pp. 226-252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhard, Wolfgang, 1989. “Reformation, Counter-Reformation, and the Early Modern State: A Reassessment”, Catholic Historical Review, 75, pp. 383-405.Google Scholar
Reinhard, Wolfgang, 1995. “Was ist katholische Konfessionalisierung?”, in Reinhard, Wolfgang and Schilling, Heinz, eds., Die katholische Konfessionalisierung: Wissenschaftliches Symposium der Gesellschaft zur Herausgabe des Corpus Catholicorum und des Vereins für Reformgeschichte (Gütersloher Verlagshaus and Münster, Aschendorf, pp. 419-452).Google Scholar
Reinhard, Wolfgang, 2002. Religion, Theology and the Human Sciences (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Sachsenmaier, Dominic and Riedel, Jens with Eisenstadt, Schmuel, 2002. Reflections on Multiple Modernities. European, Chinese and Other Interpretations (Leiden, Boston, Köln, Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schluchter, Wolfgang, 1985. Religion und Lebensführung, II (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, 1934. Politische Theologie. Vier Kapitel zur Lehre der Souveränität. Second Edition (Berlin Duncker und Humblot).Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, 1982. “Habermas's Reformation”, The New York Review of Books, 7 October 29, pp. 35-38.Google Scholar
Sorokin, David, 2008. The Religious Enlightenment. Protestants, Jews, and Catholics from London to Vienna (Princeton, Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner, 1968. “The Place of Catholicism in Max Weber's Sociology of Religion”, Sociological Analysis, 29, pp. 202-210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stucki, Pierre-André, 1999. Le Protestantisme et la philosophie. La croisée des chemins (Genève, Labor et Fides).Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles, 1989. Sources of the Self. The Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles, 1999. “A Catholic Modernity?”, in Heft, James L., ed., A Catholic Modernity? Charles Taylor's Marianist Award Lecture (New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 13-37).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles, 2007. A Secular Age (Cambridge, Mass., and London, England, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Tenbruck, Friedrich, 1999. Das Werk Max Webers. Gesammelte Aufsätze zu Max Weber, ed., Harald, Homann (Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr, Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Torró, Lluis Oviedo, 1989. La Secularización Como Problema. Aportaciones al analysis de las relaciones entre fe Cristiana y mundo moderno (Valencia, Siftel).Google Scholar
Treiber, Hubert, 1999. “Zur Genese des Askesekonzepts bei Max Weber”, Saeculum, 50 (2), pp. 245-295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiber, Hubert, 2001. “Askese”, in Kippenberg, Hans G. and Riesbrodt, Martin, eds., Max Webers Religionssytematik (Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr, Paul Siebeck, pp. 262-278).Google Scholar
Tyrell, Hartmann, 1992. “Das Religiöse in Max Webers Religionssoziologie”, Saeculum, 43 (2-3), pp. 172-230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veer, Peter van der, 2001. Imperial Encounters: Religion and Modernity in India and Britain (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voigt, Friedemann, 2002. “Das protestantische Erbe in Max Webers Vorträgen über ‘Wissenschaft als Beruf’ und ‘Politik als Beruf’”, Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologie Geschichte, 9 (2), pp. 245-267.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, [1921] [1922] 1972. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der Verstehende Soziologie, Fünfte Revidierte Auflage, Besorgt von Johannes Winckelmann, Studienaugabe (Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr, Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, [1920] 1988a. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie I (Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr, Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, [1922] 1988b. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, ed., Johannes, Winckelmann, 7. Auflage (Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr, Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Wheeler, Michael, 2006. Old Enemies. Catholics and Protestants in Nineteenth-Century English Culture (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Worcester, Thomas, ed., 2008. The Cambridge Companion to the Jesuits (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yack, Bernard, 1997. The Fetishism of Modernities. Epochal Self-Consciousness in Contemporary Social and Political Thought (Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame).Google Scholar