Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:30:40.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bilan et perspectives de la sociologie de la science dans les pays occidentaux

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Bernard-Pierre Lécuyer
Get access

Extract

Définir d'emblée la sociologie de la science n'est pas choseaisée. Y parviendrait-on même que l'exploit formel aurait peu d'intérêt, dépourvue que serait la définition des référents empiriques qui lui donneraient un sens. Contentons-nous done d'affirmer ici que la sociologie de la science, si multiples que soient ses acceptions et ses tendances, est une incontestable réalité intellectuelle qui s'efforce souvent avec succès de conquérir une dignité scientifique. Quatre remarques s'imposent d'emblée:

1) Comme la sociologie du travail et plus encore la sociologie militaire, la sociologie de la science s'est développée bien après que les activités sociales qu'elle veut étudier, e'est-à-dire la recherche et l'enseignement scientifiques, fussent devenues (a) des activités numériquement importantes, (b) consommant des ressources considérables, (c) dont les résultats ont une certaine importance pour chacun des États-nations concernés.

Type
Sociologie de la science
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , November 1978 , pp. 257 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliographie

Ayer, A.J. (1959). Logical Positivism (Glencoe, III. The Free Press).Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston (1951). L'activité rationaliste de la physique contemporaine (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
Barber, Bernard (1956). Sociology of Science: A trend report and bibliography, Current Sociology, V, 91–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Bernard (1961). Resistance by Scientists to Scientific Discovery, Science, CXXXIV, 596–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, S.B., Dolby, R.G.A. (1970). The Scientific Ethos: A deviant viewpoint, Archives europiennes de sociologie, XI, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Barry (1974). Scientific Knowlegde and Sociological Theory (London/Boston, Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Ben-David, Joseph (1960). Scientific Productivity and Academic Organization in Nineteenth-Century Medicine, American Sociological Review, XXV, 828–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-David, Joseph (1960). Roles and Innovations in Medicine, American Journal of Sociology, LXV, 557–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-David, Joseph, Zloczower, Abraham (1962). Universities and Academic Systems in Modern Societies, Archives européennes de sociologie, III, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-David, Joseph, Collins, R. (1966). Social Factors in the Origins of a New Science: The case of psychology, American Sociological Review, XXXI, 451–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-David, Joseph (1968). La recherche fondamentale et les universités (Paris, O.C.D.E.).Google Scholar
Ben-David, Joseph (1971). The Scientist's Role in Society (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
Ben-David, Joseph (1976). Organization, Social Control and Cognitive Change in Science, manuscrit inédit: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the University of Chicago, 34 p.Google Scholar
Bennis, Warren G. (1956). Value and Organization in a University Social Research Group, American Sociological Review, XXI, 555–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernal, J.D. (1939). The Social Function of Science (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Blancpain, Frédéric (1974). La création du C.N.R.S.: Histoire d'une décision 1901–1939, Bulletin de I'Institut international d'administration publique, XXXII, 93–143.Google Scholar
Bloor, (1971). Two Paradigms for Science, Science Studies, I, 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonis, Jean (1971). L'organisation et son environnement, Sociologie du travail, XI, 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudon, Raymond (1971). La crise de la sociologie (Genève/Paris, Droz).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudon, Raymond, Cibois, Ph., Lagneau, J. (1975). Enseignement supérieur court et pièges de l'action collective, Revue française de sociologie, XVI, 159–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudon, Raymond (1977). Effets pervers et ordre social (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1976). Le champ scientifique, Actes de la Recherche en Sciences sociales, II, 88–104, paru précédemment sous Ie titre: La spécificité du champ scientifique et les conditions sociales du progrès de la raison, in Sociologie et Sociétés, VII, 1975, 91–118. Traduction anglaise in Social Science Information/Information sur les sciences sociales (1975), XIV, 19–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box, E.S., Cotgrove, S. (1966). Scientific Identity, Occupational Selection and Role Strain, British Journal of Sociology, XVII, 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, S., Postman, Leo (1949). On the Perception of Incongruity: A paradigm, Journal of Personality, XVIII, 206–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukharin, (1931). Science at the Cross Roads (London, Kniga Ltd).Google Scholar
Bukharin, (1971). Science at the Cross Roads. Nouvelle édition avec une nouvelle préface de Joseph Needham et une nouvelle introduction de Werskey, P.G. (London, Frank Cass).Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert (1950). The Origins of Modern Science (New York, Macmillan).Google Scholar
Cairns, J., Stent, G.S., Watson, J.D. (sous la dir. de) (1966). Phage and the Origins of Molecular Biology (Cold Spring Arbor, N.Y., Cold Spring Harbour Arbor Laboratory of Quantitative Biology).Google Scholar
Clark, G.N. (1936). Early Capitalism and Innovation, Economic History Review, VI, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G.N., Science and Social Welfare in the Age of Newton (Revised edition: Oxford, the Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Clarke, B.L. (1964). Multiple Authorship Trends in Scientific Papers, Science, CXLIII, 822–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard (1973). Essay Review: Science, technology and society in seventeenth-century England, Scientific American, CCXXVIII, 117–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Stephen (1965). In Defense of the Sociology of Science, The Graduate Sociological Society Journal [Columbia University Graduate Sociological Society], 30–38.Google Scholar
Cole, Stephen, Cole, Jonathan R. (1967). Scientific Output and Recognition: study in the operation of the reward system in science, American Sociological Review, XXXII, 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Stephen, Cole, Jonathan R. (1968). Visibility and the Structural Bases of Awareness of Scientific Research, American Sociological Review, XXXIII, 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Jonathan R. (1970). Patterns of Intellectual Influence in Scientific Research, Sociology of Education, XLIII, 377–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Stephen, Cole, Jonathan R. (1973). Social Stratification in Science (Chicago, III., University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Cotgrove, S., Box, Stephen (1970). Science, Industry and Society: Studies in the sociology of science (London, Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar
Crane, Diana (1965). Scientists at Major and Minor Universities: A study of productivity and recognition, American Sociological Review, XXX, 699–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Diana (1967). The Gatekeepers of Science: some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals, American Sociologist, II, 195–201.Google Scholar
Crane, Diana (1969a). Social Class Origin and Academic Success: The influence of two stratification systems on academic careers, Sociology of Education, XLII, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Diana (1969b). Fashion in Science: Does it exist? Social Problems, XVI, 433–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Diana (1969c). La diffusion des innovations scientifiques, Revue française de sociologie, X, 166–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Diana (1970a). The Nature of Scientific Communication and Influence: A theoretical model, International Social Science Journal, 28–41.Google Scholar
Crane, Diana (1970b). The Academic Marketplace Revisited: A study of faculty mobility in six disciplines, American Journal of Sociology, LXXV, 953–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Diana (1971a). Transnational Networks in Basic Science, International Organization, LXXV, 585–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Diana (1971b). Information Needs and Uses, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, VI, 1–38.Google Scholar
Crane, Diana (1972). Invisible Colleges (Chicago/London, The University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Dolby, R.G.A. (1971). Sociology of Knowledge in Natural Science, Science Studies, I, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duhkheim, Émile (1893). De la division du travail social 8 (Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 1967).Google Scholar
Duekheim, Émile (1911). Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse (Paris, Alcan).Google Scholar
Edge, David (1977). Why I am not a Co-Citationist, Society for Social Studies of Science, II, 13–19.Google Scholar
Edge, David O., Mulkay, Michael J. (1973). Cognitive, Technical and Social Factors in the Growth of Radio Astronomy, Social Science Information, XII, 25–61.Google Scholar
Edge, David O., Mulkay, Michael J. (1974), Case studies of Scientific Specialties, Science Studies Unit, 1–49.Google Scholar
Edge, David O., Mulkay, Michael J. (1976). Astronomy Transformed (New York, John Wiley).Google Scholar
Elkana, Yehuda, Lederberg, Joshua, Merton, Robert K., Thackray, Arnold, Zuckerman, Harriet A. (1977). Toward a Metric of Science. Essays Occasioned by the Advent of Science Indicators (New York, Wiley-Inter Sciences Publications).Google Scholar
Feuer, Lewis S. (1962). The Scientific Intellectual (New York, Basic Books).Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul K. (1970). Against Method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge, 17–130, in Radner, M., Winokur, S., Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul K. (1975). Against Method (London, New Left Books).Google Scholar
Gaston, Jerry (1970, 1973). Originality and Competition in Science. A Study of the British High Energy Physics Community (Chicago/London, the University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Gilbert, G.N. (1976). The Transformation of Research Findings into Scientific Knowledge, Social Studies of Science, VI, 281–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Barney G. (1964). Organizational Scientists: Their professional careers (Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill).Google Scholar
Gordon, Gerald and Marquis, Sue (1966). Freedom, Visibility of Consequences and Scientific Innovation, American Journal of Sociology, LXXII, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W. (1970). The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology (New York, Basic Books).Google Scholar
Gran, Thorvald (1974). Elements fromthe Debate on Science in Society: A study of Joseph Ben-David's theory, in Richard, Whitley (ed.), Social Processes of Scientific Development (London/Boston, Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Griffith, B.C., Small, H. (1974). The Structure of Scientific Literatures, Science Studies, IV, Griffith, II: Towards a Macro and Microstructure for Science, 339–365. Small, I: Identifying and Graphing Specialities, 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, B.C., Drott, C.M., Small, H.G. (1977). On the Use of Citations in Studying Scientific Achievements and Communication, Society for Social Studies of Science, II, 9–13.Google Scholar
Guerlac, Henry (1963). Some Historical Assumptions of the History of Science, Scientific Change, edited by Crombie, A.C. (London, Heineman).Google Scholar
Gurvitch, Georges, Moore, Wilbert E. (1945). Sociology of Knowledge, Twentieth Century Sociology (New York, Philosophical Library).Google Scholar
Hagstrom, Warren O. (1965). The Scientific Community (New York, Basic Books).Google Scholar
Hall, Rupert A. (1959). The Scholar and the Craftsman in the Scientific Revolution, in Clagett, Marshall (sous la dir. de), Critical Problems in the History of Science (Madison, Wise., University of Wisconsin Press).Google Scholar
Hall, Rupert A. (1963). Merton Revisited or, Science and Society in the Seventeenth Century, History of Science: an Annual Report, II, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, L.J. (1970). On the Social System. Selected Writings and with an Introduction by Barber, Bernard (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Hessen, B. (1931). The Social and Economic Roots of Newton's ‘Principia’, Science at the Cross Roads (Bukharin, nouvelle édition, 1931, London, Kniga Ltd.).Google Scholar
Holton, G. (1962). Scientific Research and Scholarship. Notes toward the design of proper scales, Daedalus, XCI, 362–399.Google Scholar
Holton, G. (1965). The Thematic Imagination in Science, in Holton, G. (ed.), Science and Culture (Boston, Houghton Mifflin), pp. 88–108.Google Scholar
Holton, G. (1973). Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought. Kepler to Einstein (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Norman (1965). Professional Scientists in Industry: An essay review, Social Problems, XIII, 88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kevles, Daniel J. (1977). Review Symposium on Zuckerman, Harriet A., Scientific Elite…, Society for Social Studies of Science, II, 27–29.Google Scholar
King, M.D. (1971). Reason, Tradition and the Progressiveness of Science, History and Theory, X, 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhauser, William (1963). Scientists in Industry (Berkeley, Los Angeles, University of California Press).Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre (1961). Études philosophiques (Paris, Gallimard, nouvelle édition 1971).Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre (1963). Commentary, in Crombie, A.C., Scientific Change (London, Heineman).Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1957). The Copernican Revolution (Cambridge, Mass.Harvard University Press. 5e édition 1973).Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1959). Energy Conversion as Example of Simultaneous Discovery, in Clagett, Marshall (sous la dir. de), Critical Problems in the History of Science (Madison, Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin Press), pp. 321–356.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962, 1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, Ill., University of Chicago Press), International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, II (2). Traduction françcaise: La structure des révolutions scientifiques (Paris).Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1968). The History of Science, in Shils, David L. (sous la dir. de), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (New York, Macmillan and Free Press, XIV, 74–83.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1972). Scientific Growth: Reflection on Ben-David's scientific role, Minerva, X, 166–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1968). Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, [Aristotelian Society] Proceedings, LXIX, 149–186.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs, in Lakatos, Musgrave, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge, G.B., Cambridge University Press, 1970), 91–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Imre, Musgrave, Alan (eds.) (1970). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge, G.B., Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1976). Understanding Toulmin, Minerva, XIV, 126–143.Google Scholar
Law, John (1976a). The Development of Specialties in Science: The case of X-Ray Protein Crystallography, in Lemaine, Gérard et al. , Perspectives on the Emergence of Scientific Disciplines (La Haye/Paris, Mouton, Chicago, Aldine, 1976, pp. 123–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, Law (1976b). Theories and Methods in the Sociology of Science: An interpretative approach, in Lemaine, Gérard, op. cit. 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Paul R., Lorsch, Jay W. (1967). Organizations and Environment: Managing differentiation and integration (Boston, Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University).Google Scholar
Lécuyer, Bernard-Pierre (1967). Régulation sociale, contrainte sociale et ‘Social Control’, Revue française de sociologie, VIII, 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaine, Gérard (1968). Compte rendu de Pelz, Donald C. and Andrews, Frank M., Scientists in Organizations (New York, Wiley), ap. Atomes, XXIII, 437–438.Google Scholar
Lemaine, Gérard, Lécuyer, Bernard-Pierre (1969). Note sur l'action spécifique consacrée a l'organisation de la recherche (Paris [ronéo. 12 p.]).Google Scholar
Lemaine, Gérard, Matalon, Benjamin, Provansal, Bernard (1969). La lutte pour la vie dans la cité scientifique, Revue françcaise de sociologie, X, 139–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaine, Gérard, Lécuyer, Bernard-Pierre et coll. (1972). Les votes du succès. (Paris, CNRS/EPHE (Groupe d'étude et de recherche sur la science), 2 vol.Google Scholar
Lemaine, G., Clemençon, M., Gomis, A., Pollin, B., Salvo, B. (1977). Stratégies et choix dans la recherche. A propos des travaux sur le sommeil (La Haye/Paris, Mouton).Google Scholar
Lodahl, Janice Bayer, Gordon, Gerald (1972). The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments, American Sociological Review, LVII, 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven (1967). Some Problems about Rationality, Archives européennes de sociologie, VIII, 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven (1973). On the Social Determination of Truth, in Horston, R., Finnegan, R. (eds.), Modes of Thought (London, Faber, 1973).Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven (1975). Review on Barnes, Barry, Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory (London/Boston, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974), ap. Social Studies of Science, V, 501–505.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Karl (1936). Ideology and Utopia (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul), traduction française: Idéologie et Utopie (Paris, Riviere, 1956).Google Scholar
Manuel, Frank (1956). The New World of Henri Saint-Simon (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Manuel, Frank (1962). The Prophets of Paris (New York, Harper and Row).Google Scholar
Marcson, Simon (1960). The Scientist in American Industry (Princeton, N.J. [Industrial Relations Section], Princeton University).Google Scholar
Masterman, Margaret (1970). The Nature of a Paradigm, in Lakatos, Imre, Mus-Grave, Alan, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, (vol. IV, Cambridge, G.B., Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Matalon, Benjamin (1972). La structure des révolutions scientifiques, Contrepoint, (7–8), 261–268.Google Scholar
Matalon, Benjamin (1974). Science et critique; à propos de Karl Popper, Contrepoint, (15), 189–202.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Everett, Weingart, Peter, Whitley, Richard D. (1977). Sociology of Science, a Yearbook., vol. I: The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge (Hingham, Mass.D. Reidel Publishing Co.).Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1935). Fluctuations in the Rate of Industrial Invention, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, XLIX, 454–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K., Sorokin, Pitirim A. (1935). The Course of Arabian Intellectual Development, 700–1300 A.D., Isis, XXII, 516–524.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1936). The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action, American Sociological Review, I, 894–904; repr. in Social Theory and Social Structure (1949), nouvelle édition augmentée (1957a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K., Sorokin, Pitirim A. (1937 a). Social Time: A methodological and functional analysis, The American Journal of Sociology, XLII, 615–629.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K., Sorokin, Pitirim A. (1937 b). Sociological Aspects of Invention, Discovery and Scientific Theories, in Sorokin, P. A., Social and Cultural Dynamics (New York, American Book Co).Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1938 a). Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England (Bruges, Sainte-Catherine Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1938 b). Science and the Social Order, Philosophy of Science, V, 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1941). Karl Mannheim and the Sociology of Knowledge, The Journal of Liberal Religion, II, 125–147.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1942). Science and Technology in a Democratic Order, Journal of Legal and Political Science, I, 115–126. Repr. in Merton, Robert K. (1973b), The Normative Structure of Science.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1945). Sociology of Knowledge, in Gurvitch, and Moore, , Twentieth Century Sociology (New York, Philosophical Library).Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1949). Introduction: Sociology of Science, Social Theory and Social Structure (New York, the Free Press. Nouvelle édition 1957).Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1952). Foreword to Barber, Bernard, Science and the Social Order (New York, the Free Press. Repr. in Merton, Robert K., The Sociology of Science (Chicago/London, the University of Chicago Press (1973b), The Neglect of the Sociology of Science, pp. 210–222.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1957 a). Social Theory and Social Structure (New York, the Free Press). Nouvelle édition augmentée.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1957 b). Priorities in Scientific Discovery: a chapter in The Sociology of Science, American Sociological Review, XXII, 635–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1960). Recognition and ‘Excellence’: Instructive Ambiguities, in Yarmolinsky, A. (ed.), Recognition of Excellence (New York, the Free Press).Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1961). Singletons and Multiples in Scientific Discovery: a chapter in The Sociology of Science, [American Philosophical Society] Proceedings, CV, 470–486.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1963 a). Sorokin's Formulations in the Sociology of Science, with Bernard Barber, in P.A. Sorokin in Review, edited by Allen, P. J. (Durham, N.C, Duke University Press).Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1963 b). The Ambivalence of Scientists, Bulletin of Johns Hopkins Hospital, CXII, 77–97.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1963 c). Resistance of Scientists to the Systematic Study of Multiple Discoveries in Science, Archives européennes de sociologie, IV, 237–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science, Science, CXC, 55–63.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1969). Behavior Patterns of Scientists, copublished in American Scientist, LVII, 1–23, and American Scholar, XXXVIII, 197–225.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1970). Science, Technology and Society in SeventeenthCentury England (New York, Howard Fertig, 2nd edition).Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1973 a). Communication orale au Comitè de recherche de sociologie de la science, Association Internationale de Sociologie, avril 1973 (Varsovie).Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1973 b). The Sociology of Science (Chicago/London, the University of Chicago Press). Edited and with an introduction by Storer, Norman W..Google Scholar
Moscovici, Serge (1966). L'histoire des sciences et la science des historiens, Archives européennes de sociologie, VII, 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulkay, Michael (1969). Some Aspects of Cultural Growth in the Natural Sciences, Social Research, XXXVI, 22–53.Google Scholar
Mulkay, Michael J. (1970). Paradigms and Cognitive Norms: A. working paper, unpublished manuscript, Aberdeen University.Google Scholar
Mulkay, Michael J. (1972). The Social Process of Innovation: A study in the sociology of science (London, the MacMillan Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulkay, Michael J., Edge, David O. (1972). A Preliminary Report on the Emergence of Radio Astronomy (Cambridge, G.B., Cambridge University Press), vol. I.Google Scholar
Mulkay, Michael J., Edge, David O. (1973). Cognitive, Technical and Social Factors in the Growth of Radio Astronomy, Social Science Information, 25–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulkay, Michael J. (1974). Methodology in the Sociology of Science: Somereflections on the study of radio astronomy, in Gérard, Lemaine et al. , Perspectives on the Emergence of Scientific Disciplines (La Haye/Paris, Mouton; Chicago, Aldine, 1976).Google Scholar
Mulkay, Michael J., Gilbert, G. N., Woolgar, S. (1975). Problem Areas and Research Networks in Science, Sociology, IX, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulkay, Michael J. (1976). The Model of Branching, The Sociological Review, XXXIII, 509–526.Google Scholar
Mulkay, Michael J. (1977). Consensus in Science. Manuscrit non publiè. Pour paraître in Information sur les sciences sociales, 1978.Google Scholar
Mullins, Nicholas C. (1972). The Development of a Scientific Specialty: The Phage Group and the origins of molecular biology, Minerva, X, 51–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullins, (1973). Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology, (New York, Harper and Row).Google Scholar
Mullins, Micholas C. (1977). Review Symposium on Zuckerman, Harriet, A., Scientific Elite…, Society for Social Studies of Science, II, 29–30.Google Scholar
Narin, Francis (1977). Evaluative Bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity (Cherry Hill, N.J., Computer Horizons Inc.).Google Scholar
Ogburn, William F. (1922). Social Change (New York, B. W. Huebsch).Google Scholar
Pagel, Walter (1967). William Harvey's Biological Ideas (New York, Karger).Google Scholar
Pagès, Robert (1967). ‘The Social Control', la régulation sociale et le pouvoir, Revue française de sociologie, VIII, 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1937). The Structure of Social Action (Glencoe, the Free Press, 2nd edition: 1949), p. 58.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1951). The Social System (Glencoe, the Free Press).Google Scholar
Pelz, Donald C. (1952). Influence: A key to effective leadership in thefirst-line supervisor, Personnel, XXIX, 209–217.Google Scholar
Pelz, Donald C, Mellinger, Glen, Davis, Robert (1953). Human Relations in a Research Organization: A study of the national institutes of health (Ann Arbor, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan), Mimeographed, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Pelz, Donald C, Andrews, Frank M. (1966). Scientists in Organizations (New YorkJohn Wiley and Sons).Google Scholar
Phillipps, Derek L. (1977). Hierarchies of Interaction in Sociological Research. Universiteit van Amsterdam. Manuscrit non publié, présenté au Comité de recherche sur la sociologie de la science, Association Internationale de Sociologie, Budapest, septembre 1977.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael (1942). Self-Government of Science, ap. The Logic of Liberty (Chicago, Ill., Chicago University Press).Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael (1958). Personal Knowledge (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul; Chicago, Chicago University Press).Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael (1963). The Potential Theory of Absorption, ap. Knowing and Being (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1935). Logik der Forschung (Vienne, Springer). Traduction anglaise: The Logic of Scientific Discovery (New York/Toronto, Basic Books; London, Hutchinson, 1959). Traduction française: La logique de la découverte scientifique. Préface de Jacques Monod (Paris, Payot, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl (1945). The Open Society and its Enemies (London), 3rd edition: 1951, vol. II, p. 217.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1963). Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul; New York, Basic Books).Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1970). Normal Science and its Dangers, in Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan, op. cil.Google Scholar
Price, D. J. de Solla (1950). Quantitative Measures of the Development of Science, Archives internationales d'histoire des sciences, XIV, 85–93; and Actes du VIe Congrès international d'histoire des sciences, 413–421 (Amsterdam 1950).Google Scholar
Price, D. J. de Solla (1956 a). The Exponential Curve of Science, Discovery, 06 1956, 240–243.Google Scholar
Price, D. J.de Solla (1956 b). The Science of Science, Discovery, 05 1956, 179–180.Google Scholar
Price, D. J. de Solla (1961). Science since Babylone (New Haven, Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Price, D. J. de Solla (1963). Little Science, Big Science (New York, Columbia University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, D. J. de Solla (1970). Citation Measures of Hard Science, Soft Science, Technology and Non science, in Nelson, C. and Pollock, D. (eds.), Communication Among Scientists and Engineeers, pp. 3–22 (Lexington, Mass., Heath).Google Scholar
Raymond, Allen (1933). What is Technocracy? (New York, Whittlesey House).Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans (1959). The Rise of Scientific Philosophy (Berkeley/ Los Angeles, University of California Press).Google Scholar
Rudner, Richard S. (1966). Philosophy of Social Science (Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
Scheffer, I (1967). Science and Subjectivity (New York, Bobbs-Merrill).Google Scholar
Shepard, Herbert A. (1956). Nine Dilemmas in Industrial Research, Administration Science Quarterly, I, 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shils, Edward (1976). A Great Citizen of the Republic of Science: Michael Polanyi 1892–1976, Minerva, XIV, 1–6.Google Scholar
Singer, Charles (1955). A History of Technology (Oxford, Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stent, G.S. (1968). That was the Molecular Biology That Was, Science, CLX, 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storer, Norman (1966). The Social System of Science (New York, Rinehart and Winston).Google Scholar
Storer, Norman (1973). Introduction, in Merton, Robert K., The Sociology of Science (1973b) (Chicago/London, the University of Chicago Press), XI–XXXI.Google Scholar
Thomas, Jean-Pierre (1974). La fonction militaire, Bulletin de la Société française de sociologie, I, 3–22.Google Scholar
Thuillier, Pierre (1972). Comment est née la biologie moléculaire, Feux et enjeux de la science (Paris, Laffont), pp. 111–141.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen (1953). The Philosophy of Science: An introduction (London, Hutchinson University Library).Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen (1958). The Uses of Argument (London, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen (1961). Foresight and Understanding (London, Hutchinson University Press).Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen (1967). Conceptual Revolutions in Science, in Cohen, R.S., and Wartofsky, M.W. (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht, Holland, RedeilPublishing Co.), pp. 331–347.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen (1972). Human Understanding. Vol. I: The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts (Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Watson, (1968). La double hélice (Paris, Laffont).Google Scholar
Max, Weber (1905). Die protestantische Ethik und der »Geists« des Kapitalismus. Repr. in Max, Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionsoziologie (Tübingen, Mohr, I: 1920). Traduction française: L'éthique protestante et I'esprit du capitalisme (Paris, Plon, 1964).Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1916). Die Wirtschaftsethik der Weltreligionen. Einlatung: 1. Konfuzianismus und Taoismus. Repr. in Weber, Max, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionsoziologie (Tübingen, Mohr, I: 1920).Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1916, 1917). Die Wirtschaftsethik der Weltreligionen. 2. Hinduismus und Buddhismus. Repr. in Max, Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionsoziologie, tome II (Tübingen, Mohr, 1921).Google Scholar
Werskey, , Paul, G. (1971). British Scientist and ‘Outsider’ Politics, 1931–1945, Science Studies, I, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, Richard D. (1972). Black Boxism and the Sociology of Science: Adiscussion of the major developments in the field, The Sociological Review, Monograph no 18, 61–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Thomas P. (1970). Conceptions of Interaction and Forms of Sociological Explanation, American Sociological Review, XXXV, 697–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1977). Remarques sur le rameau d'or de Frazer, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, XVI, 35–42, suivi de Bouvebesse, Jacques, L'animal cèrèmoniel. Wittgenstein et l'anthropologie, Ibid. 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolgar, S. W. (1976). The Identification and Definition of Scientific Collectivities, in Gérard, Lemaine, MacLeod, Roy, Mulkay, Michael, Weingart, Peter (eds.), Perspectives on the Emergence of Scientific Disciplines (La Haye/Paris, Mouton; Chicago, Aldine, 1976).Google Scholar
Woolgar, S. W. (1977). Towards Ethnomethodology? A chronic of research development in the sociology of science. Brunei University, Department of Sociology. Manuscrit non publié.Google Scholar
Wynne, B. (1976). C. G. Barkla and the J. Phenomenon: A case study of the treatment of deviance in physics, Social Studies of Science, VI, 307–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, F. A. (1967). The Hermetic Tradition in Renaissance Science, in Singleton, C. S., Art, Science and History in the Renaissance (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press, 255–274).Google Scholar
Ziman, John (1968). Public Knowledge: The social dimension of science (Cambridge, the University Press).Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Harriet A. (1967 a). Nobel Laureates in Science: Patterns of productivity, collaboration and authorship, American Sociological Review, XXXII, 391–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Harriet A. (1967 b). The Sociology of the Nobel Prize, Scientific American, CCXVII, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Harriet A. (1968). Patterns of Name-Ordering among Authors of Scientific Papers: A study of social symbolism and its ambiguity, American Journal of Sociology, LXXIV, 276–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Harriet A., Merton, Robert K. (1971). Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalization, structure and functions of the referee system, Minerva, IX, 66–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Harriet A. (1977). Scientific Elites. Nobel Laureates in the United States (New York, the Free Press).Google Scholar