Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:44:15.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beruf, rationality and emotion in Max Weber's sociology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

J. M. Barbalet
J. M. Barbalet
Affiliation:
University of Leicester, Leicester.
Get access

Abstract

The concept of Beruf, variously translated as ‘calling’ or ‘vocation’, refers to the pracdce of systematic self-control in pursuing constant goals or purposes, which Weber, in The Protestant Etbic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1905), found in both Calvinist religious practice and capitalistic entrepreneurship and labour. But the term is not confined to these applications; it is also central in Science as a Vocation (1917) and Politics as a Vocation (1919). The general significance of the idea of Berufis that it accounts for the mechanisms required to realize in action the quality of rationality, another of Weber's characteristic terms. The connection between rational activity and calling is constant in Weber's discussion. In his early statement of the argument, however, practices of Beruf achieve rationality through the suppression of emotion. In his later discussion, Beruf is achieved through and expresses passion and emotions.

Le terme Beruf, traduit par « appel» ou « vocation », renvoie à une pratique de sévère contrôle de soi dans la poursuite de ses objectifs que Max Weber a trouvé à la fois dans l'exercice de la religion calviniste et dans l'esprit d'entreprise du capitalisme, comme dans son travail [E.P. 1905]. Le terme est également central dans les deux conférences de 1917 et 1919 (Le savant et le politique). Beruf désigne alors les mécanismes requis pour mettre en œuvre le rationalité, autre concept cher à Weber. Le lien entre activité rationelle et vocation est constant, cependant il y a un grand changement. Dans les textes de 1905, Beruf conduit à la rationalité par la suppression de l'émotion alors que dans les textes plus tardifs Beruf s'appuie sur passion et émotions.

Der Begriff »Beruf«, übersetzt mit »calling« oder »vocation«, verweist auf die systematische Selbstbeherrschung bei der Verfolgung von Zielen, die Weber in »Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kaptialismus« (1905) sowohl in der calvinistischen Rellgionsausübung als auch dem kapitalistischen Unternehmertum und Arbeit nachweist. Darüber hinaus ist dieser Begriff aber auch in »Wissenschaft als Beruf« (1917) und »Politik als Beruf« (1919) präsent. »Beruf« deutet hier auf jene Mechanismen hin, die die Rationalität zum Ausdruck bringen, eine andere wichtige Begriffsgattung Webers. Die Verbindung zwischen rationalem Handeln und Berufung ist permanent, in seiner frühen Argumentationsweise bedeutet »Beruf« jedoch Verzicht auf Gefühle. Später dann wird Beruf Ausdruck von Leidenschaft und Gefühlen.

Type
Note Critique
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , November 2000 , pp. 329 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, Jeffrey, 1987, The Dialectic of Individuation and Domination: Weber's Rationalization Theory and Beyond, in Whimster, Sam and Lash, Scott (eds), Max Weber, Rationality and Modernity (London: Allen and Unwin), 185–206.Google Scholar
Ay, Karl-Ludwig, 1999, Max Weber: A German Intellectual and the Question of War Guilt after the Great War, in Whimster 1999, 110–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbalet, J.M., 1998, Emotion, Social Theory, and Social Structure: A Macrosociological Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbalet, J.M., 1999, William James' Theory of Emotions: Filling in the Picture, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 29 (3), 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard, 1959 [1966], Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait (London: Methuen).Google Scholar
Bentley, Arthur F., 1908, The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures (Evanston, Ill: The Principia Press).Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah, 1981, Benjamin Disraeli, Karl Marx and the Search for Identity, Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 252–286.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall, 1980, Weber's Last Theory of Capitalism: A Systematization, American Sociological Review 45 (6), 925–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisen, Arnold, 1978, The Meanings and Confusions of Weberian ‘Rationality’, British Journal of Sociology 29 (1), 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, 1899 [1953], The Interpretation of Dreams (London: The Hogarth Press).Google Scholar
Gambetta, Diego, 1987, Were They Pushed or Did They Jump? Individual Decision Mechanisms in Education (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerth, H.H. and Mills, C. Wright, 1970, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony, 1984, The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony, 1991, Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modem Age (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
Goldman, Harvey S., 1988, Max Weber and Thomas Mann: Calling and the Shaping of the Self (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Goldman, Harvey S., 1995. Weber's Ascetic Practices of the Self, in Lehmann, Hartmut and Roth, Guenther (eds), Weber's Protestant Ethic: Origins, Evidence, Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 161–177.Google Scholar
Heller, Agnes, 1979, A Theory of Feelings (Assen: Van Gorcum).Google Scholar
Hennis, Wilhelm, 1998, The Spiritualist Foundation of Max Weber's ‘Interpretive Sociology’: Ernst Troeltsch, Max Weber and William James, Varieties of Religious Experience, History of the Human Sciences 11 (2), 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobsbawm, E.J., 1962, The Age of Revolution: Europe 1789–1848 (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson).Google Scholar
James, William, 1902 [1958], The Varieties of Religious Experience (New York: Mentor).Google Scholar
Kahler, Erich von, 1920, The Vocation of Science, in Lassman, Velody and Martins, 1989, 35–46.Google Scholar
Lassman, Peter, Velody, Irving and Martins, Herminio (eds), 1989, Max Weber's ‘Science as a Vocation’ (London: Unwin Hyman).Google Scholar
SirMaine, Henry Sumner, 1884 [1905], Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas (London: John Murray).Google Scholar
Mannheim, Karl, 1940, Man and Society in an Age of Reconstruction (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World).Google Scholar
Mazlish, Bruce, 1975, James and John Stuart Mill (London: Hutchinson).Google Scholar
Mazlish, Bruce, 1989, A New Science: The Breakdown of Connections and the Birth of Sociology (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Mitzman, Arthur, 1971, The Iron Cage: An Historical Interpretation of Max Weber (New York: Grosset & Dunlap).Google Scholar
Nelson, Benjamin, 1974, Max Weber's ‘Author's Introduction’ (1920): A Master Clue to his Main Aims, Sociological Inquiry 44 (4), 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakes, Guy, 1975, Max Weber, Roscher and Knies: The Logical Problems of Historical Economics (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, 1930, Translator's Preface, in Weber 1905 [1991], 9–11.Google Scholar
Perry, Ralph Barton, 1935, The Thought and Character of William James, Volume 2. Philosophy and Psychology (Boston: Little, Brown, and Company).Google Scholar
Pollard, Sidney, 1968, The Genesis of Modern Management: A Study of the Industrial Revolution in Great Britain (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
Richmond, Charles and Smith, Paul (eds), 1998, The Self-Fashioning of Disraeli 1818–1851 (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Robertson, H.M., 1933, Aspects of the Rise of Economic Individualism: A Criticism of Max Weber and his School (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Schluchter, Wolfgang, 1996, Paradoxes of Modernity: Culture and Conduct in the Theory of Max Weber (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Schroeder, Ralph, 1991, ‘Personality’ and ‘Inner Distance’: The Conception of the Individual in Max Weber's Sociology, History of the Human Sciences 4 (1), 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, Mary, 1999, Max Weber and German Expressionism, in Whimster 1999, 214–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shils, Edward A. and Finch, Henry A., 1949, Max Weber: The Methodology of the Social Sciences (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann, 1973, The Concept of Rationality in the Work of Max Weber, Sociological Inquiry 43 (1), 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenbruck, Friedrich H., 1980, The Problem of Thematic Unity in the Work of Max Weber, British Journal of Sociology 31 (3), 316–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veblen, Thornstein, 1899 [1970], The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions (London: Unwin Books).Google Scholar
Wallace, Graham, 1908, Human Nature in Politics (London: Constable).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1903, Roscher's ‘Historical Method’, in Oakes 1975, 55–91.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1904, ‘Objectivity’ in Social Science and Social Policy, in Shils and Finch 1949, 50–112.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1905 [1991], The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (London: Harper Collins).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1906, Knies and the Problem of Irrationality, in Oakes 1975, 93–207.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1915a, The Social Psychology of the World Religions, in Gerth and Mills 1970, 267–301.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1915b, Religious Rejections of the World and their Directions, in Gerth and Mills 1970, 323–359.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1917a, The Meaning of ‘Ethical Neutrality’ in Sociology and Economics, in Shils and Finch 1949, 1–47.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1917b, Science as a Vocation, in Gerth and Mills 1970, 129–156.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1917–1919 [1967], Ancient Judaism (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1919, Politics as a Vocation, in Gerth and Mills 1970, 77–128.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1920, ‘Author's Introduction’ to Weber 1905 [1991], 13–31.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1921 [1978], Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1927 [1981], General Economic History (New Brunswick: Transaction Books).Google Scholar
Whimster, Sam (ed.), 1999, Max Weber and the Culture of Anarchy (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrong, Dennis, 1970, Max Weber (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar