Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:40:24.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What the United States Can Learn from the European Commission's Better Regulation Initiative

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James Broughel
James Broughel*
Affiliation:
Mercatus Center, George Mason University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In May of 2015, the European Commission released a package outlining the vision for its Better Regulation initiative, a program aimed at improving outcomes of European Union (EU) regulation. The move represents a step forward for regulatory reform in the EU, and signals a potential shift in world leadership roles among countries promoting evidence-based policy. The United States (US), once at the forefront of regulatory science and analysis, may now be lagging behind. If Better Regulation is implemented as its ambitious designers envision, this could signal a new role for the EU in advancing 21st century policymaking.

Better Regulation seeks to improve the EU regulatory process in several ways. The initiative allows for more meaningful citizen and stakeholder participation at all stages of the policymaking process; it seeks to institutionalize the use of economic analysis throughout the lifecycle of a policy; and it sets up a process for reviewing the existing stock of regulations to ensure old rules do not become excessively burdensome or obsolete. All this is done in a manner intended to inform legislators as they periodically review funding levels for new and existing programs.

Type
Special Issue on the Better Regulation Package
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 380 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “Better Regulation,” European Commission website (19 May 2015), accessed on July 1, 2015. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/better_regulation/key_docs_en.htm

2 “Executive Order 12,291” (Washington, DC, February 19, 1981).Google Scholar

3 “RIA Resources and News,” Jacobs, Cordova and Associates webpage, Accessed on July 1, 2015. Available at http://regulatoryreform.com/ria-community/.

4 For example, see Lianos, I., Fazekas, M., and Karliuk, M., “The Diffusion of Impact Assessment Practices across Europe,” in The International Handbook of Regulatory Impact Assessment, ed. Radaelli, C. and Dunlop, C. (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2015)Google Scholar, http://www.e-elgar.co.uk/.

5 Ellig, Jerry and Broughel, James, “How Well Do Federal Agencies Use Regulatory Impact Analysis?” (Arlington, VA: Mercatus Center at George Mason University, 2013)Google Scholar, http://mercatus.org/publication/how-well-do-federal-agencies-use-regulatory-impact-analysis

6 Williams, Richard, “The Influence of Regulatory Economists in Federal Health and Safety Agencies,” Working Paper Series (Arlington, VA: Mercatus Center at George Mason University, 2008)Google Scholar, http://mercatus.org/publication/influence-regulatory-economists-federal-health-and-safety-agencies

7 Aldy, Joseph, “Learning from Experience: An Assessment of the Retrospective Reviews of Agency Rules and the Evidence for Improving the Design and Implementation of Regulatory Policy” (Washington, DC: Administrative Conference of the United States, 2014)Google Scholar, http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/jaldy/img/aldy_retrospective.pdf

8 McLaughlin, Patrick and Williams, Richard, “The Consequences of Regulatory Accumulation and a Proposed Solution” (Arlington, VA: Mercatus Center at George Mason University, 2014)Google Scholar, http://mercatus.org/publication/consequences-regulatory-accumulation-and-proposed-solution