Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:13:45.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring Integration Trajectories for a European Health Union

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2020

Giulia BAZZAN Open the ORCID record for Giulia BAZZAN [Opens in a new window]
Giulia BAZZAN*
Affiliation:
Public Administration and Policy Group, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN, Wageningen, The Netherlands; email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

COVID-19 emerged as a cross-cutting problem across governance sectors and levels, urging the creation of a European Health Union. There are already a number of integrated European governance strategies – such as the European Energy Union (2015) and the European Green Deal (2019) – adopted for overcoming problems of governance fragmentation and inadequacy of fragmented policy responses to cross-cutting policy challenges. Past studies focused on the interaction between crisis and policy change and investigated the activation of different mechanisms to enhance integration. This article contributes to the debate over the creation of a European Health Union by unpacking the acknowledged dimensions of policy integration – policy frame, subsystem involvement, policy goals and policy instruments – in order to assess their manifestations in the new EU4Health policy and to establish what contextual conditions triggered the activation of the integration-enabling mechanisms that led to a more integrated European Health Union. In so doing, it offers an analytical illustration and discusses implications for decision-making.

Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , Volume 11 , Special Issue 4: Beyond COVID-19: Towards a European Health Union , December 2020 , pp. 736 - 746
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Defined by the Wildlife Conservation Society in 2004 as the One World, One Health paradigm, this approach to global health promotes an international, interdisciplinary, intersectoral perspective to disease emergence and control. It can be used to design and implement policies, legislation and research, with the ultimate goal of achieving better public health outcomes. See: WHO, “One Health” (2017) <https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/one-health> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

2 European Commission (EC), “About Energy Union” <https://ec.europa.eu/energy/topics/energy-strategy/energy-union_en> (last accessed 12 October 2020)+(last+accessed+12+October+2020)>Google Scholar.

3 European Commission, The European Green Deal, COM(2019) 640 final <https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/european-green-deal-communication_en.pdf> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, pp 1–77.

5 MS Righettini and G Bazzan, “From Certification to Coordination: Mechanisms for Better Results in European Food Safety Policy” (2017) 12(3) Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche 309–32 <https://doi.org/10.1483/88191> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

6 TG Falleti and JF Lynch, “Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis” (2009) 42(9) Comparative Political Studies 1143–66 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331724> (last accessed 12 October 2020); P Machamer, L Darden and CF Craver, “Thinking about mechanisms” (2000) 67(1) Philosophy of Science 1–25 <https://doi.org/10.1086/392759> (last accessed 12 October 2020); R Mayntz, “Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena” (2004) 34(2) Philosophy of the Social Sciences 237–59 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393103262552> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

7 JJ Candel and R Biesbroek, “Toward a processual understanding of policy integration” (2016) 49(3) Policy Sciences 211–31 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

8 European Commission, “EU4Health 2021-2027 – a vision for a healthier European Union” <https://ec.europa.eu/health/funding/eu4health_en> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

9 Candel and Biesbroek, supra, note 7.

10 JJ Candel and R Biesbroek, “Policy integration in the EU governance of global food security” (2018) 10(1) Food Security 195–209 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0752-5> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

11 Candel and Biesbroek, supra, note 7.

12 European Commission, Proposal for a Regulation of the European parliament and of the Council on the establishment of a Programme for the Union’s action in the field of health for the period 2021-2027 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 282/2014 (“EU4Health Programme”), COM/2020/405 final <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020PC0405> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

13 Candel and Biesbroek, supra, note 7; Candel and Biesbroek, supra, note 10.

14 European Commission, supra, note 12.

15 UN, “Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages” <https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/health/> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

16 Among these: Horizon Europe programme, the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Single Market Programme, the Programme for Environment & Climate Action, the Connecting Europe Facility, the Digital Europe Programme, the Erasmus Programme and the InvestEU Fund. In addition are a number of external action instruments: Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument and Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance. See also: European Commission, supra, note 12.

17 European Commission, “EU Civil Protection Mechanism” <https://ec.europa.eu/echo/what/civil-protection/mechanism_en> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

18 European Commission, “European Regional Development Fund” <https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/funding/erdf/> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

19 European Commission, “Europe investing in digital: the Digital Europe Programme” <https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/europe-investing-digital-digital-europe-programme> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

20 European Commission, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Animal Health, COM(2013) 260 final <https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2013/EN/1-2013-260-EN-F1-1.Pdf> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

21 European Commission, supra, note 3.

22 European Commission, “Farm to Fork Strategy – for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system” <https://ec.europa.eu/food/farm2fork_en> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

23 European Commission, “EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030” <https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/strategy/index_en.htm> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

24 European Commission, “Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe” <https://ec.europa.eu/health/human-use/strategy_en> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

25 European Commission, “About Cancer” <https://ec.europa.eu/health/non_communicable_diseases/cancer_en> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

26 European Commission, “A new, stronger European Social Fund Plus” <https://ec.europa.eu/esf/main.jsp?catId=62&langId=en> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

27 European Commission, supra, note 18.

28 European Commission, “Horizon Europe – the next research and innovation framework programme” <https://ec.europa.eu/info/horizon-europe-next-research-and-innovation-framework-programme_en> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

29 European Commission, “Emergency Support Instrument” <https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-travel-eu/health/coronavirus-response/emergency-support-instrument_en> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

30 European Commission, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument, COM(2018) 460 final <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:d2c24540-6fb9-11e8-9483-01aa75ed71a1.0002.02/DOC_1&format=PDF> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

31 European Commission, “Instrument of Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA)” <https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/funding/ipa/> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

32 D Beach, “It’s all about mechanisms – what process-tracing case studies should be tracing” (2016) 21(5) New Political Economy 463–72 <https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2015.1134466> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

33 Righettini and Bazzan, supra, note 5.

34 G Capano and M Howlett, “Causal logics and mechanisms in policy design: How and why adopting a mechanistic perspective can improve policy design” (2019) Public Policy and Administration 1–22 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076719827068> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

35 R Biesbroek and JJ Candel “Mechanisms for policy (dis) integration: explaining food policy and climate change adaptation policy in the Netherlands” (2019) Policy Sciences, 1–24 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-019-09354-2> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

36 Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety, OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, pp 1–24.

37 E Mossialos, R Baeten, G Permanand and TK Hervey, Health Systems Governance in Europe: The Role of European Union Law and Policy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 2010); Righettini and Bazzan, supra, note 5.

38 F Sager and C Andereggen, “Dealing with complex causality in realist synthesis: The promise of qualitative comparative analysis” (2012) 33(1) American Journal of Evaluation 60–78 <https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1098214011411574> (last accessed 12 October 2020); CQ Schneider and C Wagemann, Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 2012).

39 A Jordan and A Lenschow, “Environmental policy integration: a state-of-the-art review” (2010) 20(3) Environmental Policy and Governance 147–58 <https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.539> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

40 ibid; K Jacob and A Volkery, “Institutions and instruments for government self-regulation: environmental policy integration in a cross-country perspective” (2004) 6(3) Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 291–309 <https://doi.org/10.1080/1387698042000305211> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

41 Capano and Howlett, supra, note 34.

42 M Howlett and K Saguin, “Policy capacity for policy integration: Implications for the Sustainable Development Goals” (2018) Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy Research Paper <https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3157448> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

43 European Central Bank, “Speech by Mario Draghi, President of the European Central Bank at the Global Investment Conference in London 26 July 2012” <https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2012/html/sp120726.en.html> (last accessed 12 October 2020).

44 European Commission, “Speech by President von der Leyen at the European Parliament Plenary on the European coordinated response to the COVID-19 outbreak” <https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_20_532> (last accessed 12 October 2020).